An open challenge to all E.S.R Members

I am laying down an open challenge to all E.S.R members..to discontinue the use of the term Nubia and Nubian when discussing the people south of the Kemitic boarder and even within kmt it self,
especially going back to pre-Roman times lets identify who the Kemites were fighting or trading and making alliance with by name, I am well aware that most articles and journals that we read from will say Nubians,but this forum is fill with big brains lets dig deeper here is an example I was having a discussion over at E/S and Djehuti had this to say.

The Kushites themselves were allied with a nomad warrior group from the eastern desert known as Antiu. In fact it was the dead body of an Antiu chieftain and NOT a Kushite whom Thutmose I hung from the prow of his boat in victory. Obviously the Antiu were more than just a 'nuisance' to the Egyptians and their national security. Of course throughout the New Kingdom, the Medjay held an honored place in Egyptian society not only as soldiers but as policmen to the point that 'Medjay' became a nickname for police. So obviously the Egyptians did not generalize when it came to 'Nubians' but were very keen to distinguish and differentiate between the various groups. And yes, even some Egyptian royal families were of 'Nubian' ancestry. There is speculation that even the 17th and descendant 18th dynasty was of Nubian ancestry as well due to the features of some 17th dynasty royals. In fact some Egyptologists believe the reason why the Medjay were so closely aligned to the 17th and 18th dynasty was because of familial relations.
www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=003433

Now the highlighted portion how many of us has seen that sentence somewhere and others even used that as proof that the Kemities had to be of a different" race" than the so-called" Nubians"

"Bernal also believes that Egypt was essentially African, and therefore
black. But he does not say what we are to make of the historical accounts of
Egyptian pharaohs campaigning against black neighbors to the south, in the
Land of Kush, as when Tuthmosis I of Egypt, around 1510 B.C., annihilated a
black Kushite army at the Third Cataract and came home with the body of a
black Kushite prince hanging upside down from the prow of his ship. Perhaps
Bernal thinks of this as African tribal warfare?"

Vermeule is clearly arguing that the very savagery of the fighting between
Egyptians and Nubians proves that they must have belonged to different
"races." I can find no other way to interpret Vermeule's argument except as
an expression of the old notion that a "natural antipathy" exists between
people of different races.
www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1992/mar/26/the-world-turned-upside-down/

That's why we have to be better than that^ a trained professional singular laziness to actually identify people will cause all kinds of mis-statements.