|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jan 4, 2012 21:46:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jan 4, 2012 21:49:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 15, 2012 20:50:20 GMT -5
x Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by aniiman on Feb 21, 2012 20:48:56 GMT -5
Why did all discussion on this topic stop?
|
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Feb 21, 2012 21:15:44 GMT -5
Why did all discussion on this topic stop? Do you have a question on the subject. |
|
|
|
Post by aniiman on Mar 15, 2012 16:24:22 GMT -5
Here is a Youtube video just uploaded by phoenician7 : DNATribes The Amarna Mummy Deception www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCULwU4dTmA&feature=uploademail"DNA Tribes debunks their own claims, as well as other geneticists meanwhile the negrocentrics continue to wrap themselves in yet another layer of denial.." |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 15, 2012 18:59:28 GMT -5
This forum is for the more intelligent . . . I am going to respond this once before you are banned.. .. ES may be more suitable to your kind. I am going to play dumb , therefore my response is to the lurkers. You are missing the point. This has nothing to do with DNATribes. There is no DNATribes "deception". That is where the ignorant and stupid are missing the point. DNA tribes took widely published data from a renowned scholarly scientific periodical (JAMA) and showed the public how to calculate population affinity("race"). "How" to do this calculation is no secret. There are widely available free and paid software that perform this calculation. ALL conclude that the AMARNA mummies are "negros"- using your words" . Even the Profiler software used by the racist LAPD conclude that the Amarnas have closest affinity to African Diosparans and NOT "Caucasians". . .using their own words. This is the last time I am going to address you until you can converse or discourse intelligently. Here is a Youtube video just uploaded by phoenician7 : DNATribes The Amarna Mummy Deception www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCULwU4dTmA&feature=uploademail"DNA Tribes debunks their own claims, as well as other geneticists meanwhile the negrocentrics continue to wrap themselves in yet another layer of denial.." |
|
|
|
Post by aniiman on Mar 16, 2012 20:16:24 GMT -5
This forum is for the more intelligent . . . I am going to respond this once before you are banned.. .. ES may be more suitable to your kind. I am going to play dumb , therefore my response is to the lurkers. You are missing the point. This has nothing to do with DNATribes. There is no DNATribes "deception". That is where the ignorant and stupid are missing the point. DNA tribes took widely published data from a renowned scholarly scientific periodical (JAMA) and showed the public how to calculate population affinity("race"). "How" to do this calculation is no secret. There are widely available free and paid software that perform this calculation. ALL conclude that the AMARNA mummies are "negros"- using your words" . Even the Profiler software used by the racist LAPD conclude that the Amarnas have closest affinity to African Diosparans and NOT "Caucasians". . .using their own words. This is the last time I am going to address you until you can converse or discourse intelligently. Here is a Youtube video just uploaded by phoenician7 : DNATribes The Amarna Mummy Deception www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCULwU4dTmA&feature=uploademail"DNA Tribes debunks their own claims, as well as other geneticists meanwhile the negrocentrics continue to wrap themselves in yet another layer of denial.." These are not my words, they are the words of the uploader of this video, I am just forwarding them to this site for discussion, did not mean any offense perhaps I should have made my intentions clearer in my post. I am fully aware that DNATribes does not factor into it. However it appears that phoenician7 is simply parroting what she found on the Hamitic site, word for word: hamiticunion.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=print&thread=38WhiteNord tried to use this at EgyptSearch back in December. www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=005929Since phoenician7 cannot discredit DNATribes she seems to be trying to discredit the study itself or even both. Thanks for the reply |
|
|
|
Post by etheropian9 on Nov 14, 2012 0:38:04 GMT -5
umm,is it just mean or does these amarna results appear to be inconclusive? its almost like these people are reluctant to say these mummies are of african origin. all you keep seeing is, these results does not mean they are exclusively african.....whats that suppose to mean?? seems a lil fishy to me. does anyone here has updates on this,im new to all this by the way.
|
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Nov 14, 2012 10:31:29 GMT -5
According to the data, some of the individuals have small percentages Asiatic and even European genes. This is why they say they are not exclusively African. Meaning, they are Africans, but they also have non African genetic input. You would get the same conclusion if you tested many Afro Americans, many of whom have substantial European and Native genetic input in addition to their African ancestry. umm,is it just mean or does these amarna results appear to be inconclusive? its almost like these people are reluctant to say these mummies are of african origin. all you keep seeing is, these results does not mean they are exclusively african.....whats that suppose to mean?? seems a lil fishy to me. does anyone here has updates on this,im new to all this by the way. |
|
|
|
Post by africurious on Nov 14, 2012 12:24:27 GMT -5
^^And if you tested europeans (current or ancient), the data would show they aren't exclusively "european". Whole lot of african and "asian" dna in europe. I'm sure truthteacher already knew that but i'm stating for the sake of etheropian9.
Also, etheropian9, dnatribes is filled with b.s. interpretation of data so one should be careful when reading their info. Just read some of the threads concerning the dnatribes results on ES or here and you'll get a better understanding.
|
|
