|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 3, 2014 7:15:24 GMT -5
The picture taking shape is the migrations do NOT go as far back as we initially thought. And the replacement and movement was very rapid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2014 16:37:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 4, 2014 19:21:13 GMT -5
Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!
Khoisans are mtDNA H, T, Ub, Ua, X(wink). Evidence of the back-migration of Eurasians that started 3000ya before colonialism. Khoisans are R1b1b2-S116, Evidence of the back-migration of Eurasians that started 3000ya before colonialism.
Only a psychotic delusional lying Euronut will come up with an idiotic illogical premise like that.
You don't understand how these things work hence your idiotic retort.
Just in case you don't get it...these supposedly "Eurasian" lineage are over 20,000ya. None exist in Khoisan. There was no back-migration. Sorry
In fact the data shown by Lazaridis et al shows high frequency of "basal Eurasian" in Hadza and Sandawe. But these click speaker carry the deepest and older African linage and NOT any young/3000ya lineage. That means only ONE thing.
There Was No Back Migration!!!!! "Basal Eurasian" is AFRICAN. Only an idiot can not put the evidence together. But these researchers know this but continue to BS with their mathematical models to fool the Euronuts.
This is not rocket science
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 9, 2014 7:26:04 GMT -5
Mitochondrial DNA genetic relationships at the ancient Neolithic site of Tell Halulamore by Cristina Gamba This work aims to establish the genetic relationship between the different settlers of Eastern Spain and also to determine the conditions of DNA preservation. We studied two overlapping sequences (16,126–16,251 and 16,256–16,369) from mitochondrial HVR-I in 37 bone and teeth samples from 17 archaeological sites of Spanish Levant. Consistence of the results was established by repeated replication of amplifications. Approximately, 50% of the samples yielded reproducible results. The high efficiency in DNA recovery indicates that sample preservation mainly depends on the depositional environment rather than on sample age. Haplogroup V, an alleged marker of Paleolithic newcomers in Europe, has been found in an unusual elevated frequency (1 Calcolithic and 2 Iberian samples). This result could suggest a more southern distribution of Palaeolithic ice refugia. Moreover, we found Haplogroup L in Calcolithic samples. This may suggest the presence of a PREHISTORIC African genetic background in eastern Iberia. More Info: "E. Fernández, J.E. Ortiz, T. Torres, A. Pérez-Pérez, C. Gamba, M. Tirado, C. Baeza, A.M. López-Parra, D. Turbón, J. Anfruns, M. Molist, E. Arroyo-Pardo Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 462-464, August 2008
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 9, 2014 7:59:15 GMT -5
Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! Europeans “back-migrating” to the tropical areas of Africa. No, it is more like Africans entering Europe bring in the supposedly “basal Eurasian”. Africans have been migrating and differentiating in Europe since Paleolthic times.
---- Human Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in an Archaeological Site in al-Andalus: Genetic Impact of Migrations from North Africa in Medieval Spain
Marı´a Jose´ Casas,1*
ABSTRACT Mitochondrial DNA sequences and restriction fragment polymorphisms were retrieved from three Islamic 12th–13th century samples of 71 bones and teeth (with >85% efficiency) from Madinat Baguh (today called Priego de Cordoba, Spain). Compared with 108 saliva samples from the present population of the same area, the medieval samples show a higher proportion of sub-Saharan African lineages that can only “PARTIALLY” be attributed to the historic Muslim occupation. In fact, the unique sharing of transition 16175, in L1b lineages, with Europeans, instead of Africans, suggests a more ancient arrival to Europe FROM Africa. The present day Priego sample is more similar to the current south Iberian population than to the medieval sample from the same area. The increased gene flow in modern times could be the main cause of this difference. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:539–551, 2006. VVC 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. ---- Where is the matching “Eurasian” haplogroups in tropical Africa. THERE IS NONE!!!!
I can go on and on and on.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 12, 2014 5:44:53 GMT -5
Quote
[These guys are making a movie to make money not to try to make an accurate quasi-historic statement.
On the real side you know and I know white people are not going to pay their money to see Egypt 1000 BCE as it was. Also the white idea is to re-invent all 'cradle civs' as their own.
This is evident not only in the movie industry but in all popular renditions of anything they want to claim. Yes, molecular population genetics included.
So why be so surprised or disappointed? I mean really, what else did you expect? A loss leader with African Egyptians and dark south Levantines or background art facsimiled from authentic artifacts? Hah!]
|
|
|
Post by Tukuler al~Takruri on Jul 12, 2014 21:13:00 GMT -5
this is my comment posted on ES behind scott's exodus movie
These guys are making a movie to make money not to try to make an accurate quasi-historic statement.
On the real side you know and I know white people are not going to pay their money to see Egypt 1000 BCE as it was. Also the white idea is to re-invent all 'cradle civs' as their own.
This is evident not only in the movie industry but in all popular renditions of anything they want to claim. Yes, molecular population genetics included.
So why be so surprised or disappointed? I mean really, what else did you expect? A loss leader with African Egyptians and dark south Levantines or background art facsimiled from authentic artifacts? Hah!
|
|
|
Post by Tukuler al~Takruri on Jul 12, 2014 21:18:26 GMT -5
Why do they use this term "back migration?"
Can one go back to where one never was?
To go back one must have been there before.
They are laughing between their lies.
"Back migration" should mean a return from whence originated.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 13, 2014 5:33:11 GMT -5
"Quote"!!!
|
|
|
Post by zarahan on Jul 15, 2014 19:13:55 GMT -5
lol.. for the new readers..
|
|
|
Post by anastasiaescrava on Jul 16, 2014 0:55:38 GMT -5
I know this is off topic, but did anyone read the "Race wars in the Sahara!" article?
|
|
|
Post by azrur on Jul 16, 2014 17:00:35 GMT -5
I know this is off topic, but did anyone read the "Race wars in the Sahara!" article? where is it
|
|
|
Post by anastasiaescrava on Jul 16, 2014 22:36:38 GMT -5
I know this is off topic, but did anyone read the "Race wars in the Sahara!" article? where is it I'm going to post it in another thread.
|
|
|
Post by forty2tribes on Jul 24, 2014 15:47:04 GMT -5
Does this explain the Neanderthal genes and the migration histories of west south and east African tribes?
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Aug 14, 2014 7:58:45 GMT -5
I don’t understand your question. There is no such thing as the Neanderthal gene IN humans. Many researchers(not all) believe these genes pre-existed BEFORE the Human Neanderthal split. This was confirmed by the recent discovery of the so called Neanderthal gene in Sub-Sahran Africans which was NOT disclosed before. Does this explain the Neanderthal genes and the migration histories of west south and east African tribes?
|
|