|
Post by Yarawshalam Yasharahla on Sept 7, 2015 15:03:15 GMT -5
this was discovered in Newark, Ohio at the Indian Mound
Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Yarawshalam Yasharahla on Sept 7, 2015 15:09:13 GMT -5
See that's ignorance in our people we believe in everything science tells and this is why I know your lost! Because you love talking brother I study science and loves science with a passion but I will never make it my belief or whatever your making it! Science changes every year... Just a some years ago we thought the world was flat and some still think the world is flat!
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Sept 7, 2015 18:29:36 GMT -5
Not trying to be funny, but isn't Nimrod the son of an African? Kush was his father right and Mizriam was the brother of Kush if you believe in the religious texts. If you are grounded in the physical world, then there is absolutely no doubt Egypt is the offspring of Africa. And Kush begat Nimrod,not only is Kemet the offspring or at least older brother meaning civilization but he founded the earliest Mesopotamian civ according to biblical lore but as was stated on previous pgs bonafide artifacts put Ta-Seti ahead of Sumerian civ in terms of statehood.
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Sept 7, 2015 19:09:36 GMT -5
this was discovered in Newark, Ohio at the Indian Mound
One word "AUTHENTICATION" it is not enough to come up with artifacts but they have to undergo testing and verification double checked by other experts in various fields Or else one would end up with unbelievable stuff like this ^ There are no shortages of faked or salted sites crafted by men who wanted to make a quick buck or have an agenda, this is not the case with the Qustul finds,we need to know who found it when and which team of specialist signed off on it, or else it is suspect. Brother I have a private library with hundreds of books and journals going back decades, not so long ago I donated some of them to my local library and others to friends so yes I do read but I also know how to separate the wheat from the chaff, yes science especially outside of mathematics works like that change and update is constant,if it's ego driven and a scientist simply refused to change what he/she previously thought was the right answer based off new findings then he or she is behaving in the manner of a priest and is a bad scientist. The term BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD should in no way fill a true scientist with dread or despair his/her findings must be recorded even if it goes against everything he or she was trying to prove the reason for that is for those who came after can look at their findings and follow a different path.
|
|
|
Post by snakepit on Sept 7, 2015 22:14:54 GMT -5
Because books is where the knowledge is actually at! That's what's wrong with our society, we don't read no more. Here I am giving you source to read from and you have a problem with it because its a book!? Like those "artifacts" wasn't creating by another man! How about the fact that the Native American Indians spoke and wrote in Hebrew why would the Native Americans know anything about Moses... and they got artifacts about him written in Hebrew
It's because you didn't post any testable, peer reviewed data. If you don't post that, your arguments are baseless, just pure conjecture, myth, fable & supposition. Let's see some facts being presented, using the scientific method.
|
|
|
Post by Yarawshalam Yasharahla on Sept 11, 2015 21:12:35 GMT -5
LMAO! I give you books and now you say you want artifacts! I give you artifacts and now you say they are not authentic brother I'm trying to be respectful but do you see how ignorant you sound!
|
|
|
Post by Yarawshalam Yasharahla on Sept 11, 2015 21:14:39 GMT -5
well tell me is this a white man or black man and notice this says the 24th president!
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Sept 12, 2015 19:30:30 GMT -5
LMAO! I give you books and now you say you want artifacts! I give you artifacts and now you say they are not authentic brother I'm trying to be respectful but do you see how ignorant you sound! Forget about me just sounding ignorant and recognize how willfully ignorant you actually are,again who found those artifacts, which labs ran test on both the site and the artifacts where is the corresponding paperwork is there a certified linguist preferable in the Hebrew written or spoken at the time, and Glenn Beck??..for real?? okaay!!! Hebrew and Phoenician writing is not the same although both are related but not to split hairs here. Are there cases for pre-Columbian contacts between old and new world i'd say there are circumstantial evidence for that, however note the difference between data mining and research that can be authenticated , egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/1682/study-precolumbian-african-skeletons-virgin This is ^^what I mean when I say authenticated, Pls go to the pdf link for the site and results for testing measuring and dating, all of this is necessary before we can even have a discussion or debate about what those site actually means. And a Black Abe with a questionable caption.. wow!!... not impressed.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Oct 4, 2015 8:55:32 GMT -5
^^ The flaw in your thinking is that you still assume that these Western institutions will willingly verify such arguments when they have knowingly done so much to ensure that they are never put forth. You claim that the only claims that can be believable are those which has the white man's stamp of approval (is that not what "peer reviewed" essentially means?), but you don't acknowledge that the futility in waiting on the "white man's approval" is displayed every month for the past decade and a half on ES and ESR. "Peer reviewed" studies are still tip toeing around who the ancient Khemites were and what they looked like even though we know this. Thus this "peer reviewed" crap is simply the "white man's game" that should not be respected.Now pertaining to this subject, we know that the Hebrews and the early folks of the Middle East and Europe (like in Africa) were and are still black. We know that the Hebrews were simply rebelling Khemites who migrated into neighboring Israel and formed their own identity. We know based on the ancient/prophetic scripture of the Hebrews who exactly the Hebrews of today are (US black-brown people in Ameica today). We know that Khemites and Nubians both had been making voyages to the Americas thousands of years ago and brought back tobacco and cocaine. We know that much of their culture was essentially Kemetic. We find general Kemetic iconography throughout the Americas from Ankhs, to astrological parallels, art style to pyramids. The St. Louis and Mississippi pyramids and civilizations that no one seems to talk about. St. Louis pyramids (oldest city in America) Mississippi MoundsAncient Kemet settlement Interesting how this scene (including the people) above from the Americas looks so similar to this painting from Benin West Africa. Interesting fact is that California was was named after the black Native Queen "Khalifa" The DNA is explained here.
Aboriginal Australians were another black group that had sailed to the Ameica's during ancient times. This accounts for the "mongoloid" features and straight long hair of the Native Americans when mixed with those from Africa with more broad features.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Oct 4, 2015 9:07:29 GMT -5
Another parallel is that the "Negus" (word equivalent to God) or ureaus is also found in Native American cultures. Notice the serpent (kundalini energy coming from the root chakra and up your spine) and bird. In Native American cultures there were " feathered serpents". Ancient Native American culture just like that which is found throughout east, south and southeast Asia (which are also characterized by serpents/NEGUS, pyramids, sickle cell, and people with broad features) are cultural continuations of Kemet. On a side note my former Karate teacher "Baba" just came back from an invitational debate over in China in which he succeeded in proving that the ancient Martial arts of this region came from Africa and in particular one man.
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Oct 4, 2015 18:05:34 GMT -5
Asante said:
And the flaw in your thinking is the belief that science is white and verification can only come from whites, but when verification supports a position you like then it's just verifiable and not necessarily white , look Asante; verification just provide a paper trail and examination of dry bones data the interpretation of said data is taken up by historians and other researchers to draw conclusions, can data be fibbed?? yes there is such a thing a bad science or bad scientist but they are usually exposed by others examining said data for flaws and inconsistencies , much more difficult is guesswork by eyeballing and drawing conclusions based on similarities. Could the Ankh be a diffusion from the old world into the new, perhaps, perhaps not, but until we find a bonafide connection all we have is an interesting similarity, btw by the time Aztecs arise Kemet as an independent civilization was long gone and pyramids turns out to be ubiquitous all over the world, while the shapes are the same the building, uses and concepts behind them may vary greatly,this is where dry bone research and archaeology come into play filling in the gaps by guessing is a crap shoot. Blacks in the Americas is a none issue for me I myself produced multiple thread concerning them, the question for me is are they connected to Africans or Asiatics.
|
|
|
Post by MorolongDithabeng on Oct 9, 2015 3:47:00 GMT -5
I go by dates because things can be dated, how would you know how old you are if you don't use dates, and yes they built nothing that was distinctive from any Kemetian structures not even their religion did they show any distinctiveness for they worshipped one of Kemet's oldest gods to an elevated level, he was called Set. if it weren't for the non Kemetic names for these rulers we might have consider them Kemetians,they were simply a dusty band of Laventine migrants heavily influenced by the Kemites for centuries before they wrestled control from the delta lords setting up a parallel dynasty. I know how old I am because its my birthday and it didn't take place in 2,000BCE and I didn't have to dig up evidence for my birthday, I'm 22 years old I can just count back for mines lol... Hmmm, 22 minus 10 yrs ago, if I understand this correctly, it means while you were still 12yrs of age (not yet a teenager) Anansi and others from ES were already doing research on most of the subjects you touched. So who should I listen to?
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Oct 9, 2015 9:13:30 GMT -5
Asante said: And the flaw in your thinking is the belief that science is white and verification can only come from whites, but when verification supports a position you like then it's just verifiable and not necessarily white , look Asante; verification just provide a paper trail and examination of dry bones data the interpretation of said data is taken up by historians and other researchers to draw conclusions, can data be fibbed?? yes there is such a thing a bad science or bad scientist but they are usually exposed by others examining said data for flaws and inconsistencies , much more difficult is guesswork by eyeballing and drawing conclusions based on similarities. Could the Ankh be a diffusion from the old world into the new, perhaps, perhaps not, but until we find a bonafide connection all we have is an interesting similarity, btw by the time Aztecs arise Kemet as an independent civilization was long gone and pyramids turns out to be ubiquitous all over the world, while the shapes are the same the building, uses and concepts behind them may vary greatly,this is where dry bone research and archaeology come into play filling in the gaps by guessing is a crap shoot. Blacks in the Americas is a none issue for me I myself produced multiple thread concerning them, the question for me is are they connected to Africans or Asiatics. As you stated pyramidal structures are found all over the world. Most people are totally unaware of the fact that by the time these structures were built, Egypt's period of pyramid building had ended thousands of years prior and it's civilization had already been eclipsed by the the invasions we all know so well. There is a perfectly good reason why such structures exist in so many places and it has to do with basic physics, not cultural diffusion. Before the invention of structural steel if you wanted to make a tall structure, the base had to be thicker than the top. That means the base had to be wider and heavier and the top smaller and lighter so that it wouldn't collapse. Europeans invented the buttress to be able to create tall steeples but the principle was the same, you needed to have a strong force at the base to oppose the weight at the top otherwise the structure would cave in on itself. The second point you made was the function of these buildings. If we look at Egypt and Nubia, their functions were more similar to each other, while those of the Americas were more similar to each other. Therefore, they reflect their respective cultures rather than any similarities with the structures found on the African continent. Egypt and Nubian structures were strictly funerary where as those of the Americas could also be funerary, but more often than not were the focal point of sacred activities at the heart of the community and were located in the center of the settlement, a very different sensibility than Egypt where the realm of the living and the dead were kept separate from each other. Different cultures, different world views. One has to take these things into account and not steam roll over them by concluding this looks like that, therefore they must be the same. This goes double when trying to make linguistic connections. Even when working within a language one has to be careful. Perfect example of a mistake I made. I speak a little bit of Egyptian dialect Arabic, but not classical. There is a passage in the Koran which begins Kul huwa, Allah, ho ahad, Allah hu assumed. In Egyptian dialect kul means "everything" or all, so I interpreted it to mean "He is everything". In fact, in classical Arabic, kul means TELL. It is a command. It means TELL him, Allah is one..... Now if you can make a mistake within a language, imagine the mistakes when trying to compare different languages.
|
|
|
Post by samuel on Oct 25, 2015 13:28:59 GMT -5
I don't know if I believe in all those biblical race Ham. Shem and Jacypth. Who were the East Asians descended from?? You know the Chinese??
|
|
|
Post by samuel on Oct 25, 2015 14:56:10 GMT -5
This was written by Hebrew.
There's a reason Hitler did what he did and I don't condone murder against any man, that's man's judgment with the most high... But Hitler wasn't the man the American Jewish media makes him out to be! He just knew who the real
Yo. Are you even aware of how the Jewish people help out and have helped the black community. Stop that anti Semitic rhetoric. Makes you look worse than whites people.
|
|