|
|
Post by anansi on Aug 1, 2015 19:14:06 GMT -5
Okaay your confusion is confusing me, but i'll try an untangle some of that I think you are saying.
first off just because someone on the net says crazysht and may apperentely be black do not mean they are Afrocentric or as I like to put it African Centered, as there are quacks and loons in every discipline, example a person may try and argue using scientific language that the world is flat, but that do not in anyway make them scientist, some folks do not believe in climate change and will tell you differently but in no way one would consider them climatologist, the same is true for those who look at and study life style, history.and politics from an Afri-Centered perspective.
There are many types of African cultures and religions, color symbolism may vary and even so may not be applicable when discussing humans, example white people as we know and used the term today was not always known to many African cultures of the past,although Africans vary in complexion among themselves into Reds and Blacks but belonged to the same African universe.
Well here one have to look at historical facts and figures, for the past 500yrs Europeans did plundered their way across the globe on a massive scale the results and fallout is still present today, yes all humans are capable of extreme violence but only Europeans and their descendants did so on an industrial scale, but that could have been history if the present day descendants came to terms with the sins of their fathers, of course individuals may have come to terms but look how long it took to remove a stupid divisive flag from some southern state, i mean that's such a small step that should have long been a non issue, so yes many people of African or other ancestry maybe angry and used foul language to describe their feelings but trust me white folks in denial or dismissive are not helping.
Well Europeans did not show up in Africa and started snatching Africans that's a myth it was a trade matter of fact when they tried to do just that they were met with massive retaliation other African states simply traded other Africans of another state considered their enemies, they did not have a sense of African unity back then and it's hardly the case today.
|
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Aug 3, 2015 11:51:52 GMT -5
Whoah whoah woah!!! easy-up there padner you are making gross generalizations and expect me to answer back in generalizations, sorry I can't do that, like I said there is a wide variety of African cultures practices some ancient and some modern or near modern,you will have to be specific not only on the culture but the time and place of how Africans view albinos and how they view albinos vs white ppl or self labeled white ppl that would take considerable research on your part and no!! you won't find the answer on Youtube or or some random net chat.
Simple because their version of slavery was way harsher than the eastern or African one where one ceases to be human in that system,the other maybe a reaction to Blackmen having power in some parts of Europe during the so called middle ages with a combination of envy mixed with hatred and grudging respect.
|
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Aug 4, 2015 23:40:39 GMT -5
Why did whites become so racist towards blacks?
I can answer that question. They made it up as they went along. First of all, you have to realize that the notion of identifying as white versus some other color or race is a concept that developed over time. No European ethnic group had a concept of "whiteness" persay until there was a need for it. Europeans for the most part, did not self identify on the basis or concept of color. For the most part, they didn't even have a concept of nationality. They identified primarily based on the geographic region they came from, city town etc. For example, there was no such thing as an Italian identity. you were Tuscan, Roman etc and even more specific, the particular town or city you were born in and more specific than that, your family line. Just consider the story of Romeo and Juliet. These were people who lived in the same city, but were deeply divided along family clan lines. These divisions were deep enough to kill each other over. It was only when they came in contact with someone of a different color that they made descriptions of black or white, but this was just an adjective. Most Europeans had no contact with or real knowledge of other "races" and even when they did, they did not necessarily view it as a problem. Who they had real hatred towards were other people who looked like them who were of different ethnic groups, family lines or classes. European identity was never based primarily on color.
The deepest divisions in European society were along lines of class. Society was strictly divided according to a person's rank. Even within the aristocracy, a person's rank determined who they could and could not marry. Even in England, to this day, there is something called the book of peeridge, (spelling?) in which all the nobility of England is recorded along with the stipulations as to who they can or cannot marry within the nobility. Therefore, a marriage between an aristocrat and a commoner, was considered detestable and a marriage between an aristocrat and a person of the serving class unheard of. This is what you have to keep in mind when considering the question of where and how Africans would fit into a European social structor.
European societies were deeply divided along lines of class. At the top was the land owning aristocracy, everyone else lived on the land they owned and worked for them. The exception to this was a very small merchant class who made up "the middling class", or middle class. Nevertheless, they were still subject to the rule of the lord, whose land they also lived on and had to pay taxes. This is where the term "land lord" comes from. The lord owned everyone and everything on their land. The only thing they could not do was sell their subjects, but in all other ways, they owned the people who lived on their land. If the lord wanted access to any of the women on his land or servant in his household, he had the right to take what he wanted. This was called "the lord's right". The servile class was not even considered the same "race" as the aristocracy. They were scarcely human, or not human in the same way as the ruling class was.
When the British decided to expand their empire, they first started by annexing Wales, Ireland and Scotland. They didn't consider these people fully human. They would talk about the "Irish race" etc. They described them as being animalistic, brutish, ugly, unintelligent, mentally inferior. In their minds, the stability of society was based on maintaining the class system. Everybody had to know their place and respect their "betters".
Therefore, when you consider these facts, it becomes obvious that the roots of racism are based in the European class system. When European economies became dependent of the agriculture of their American colonies, it was obvious that there weren't enough people in Europe to supply their labor needs. Yes, they did try. It was only because of its sheer size that it was obvious that Africa would be the logical source to supply their labor needs. So given the social culture of Europe, where would Africans fit in? In the servant class of course. It is important to realize that at this early stage they were on the same level of the servile Europeans. So what changed?
With the founding of the colonies it became obvious that the servile classes vastly outnumbered the ruling class and the distance from the Mother Country made it especially hard to enforce military control. Because of this, it became necessary to create systems of social control. It is at this time that the concepts of blackness and whiteness start to be created. They begin to create policies to create divisions amongst the servile class. Marriages between blacks and whites start becoming illegal and poor Europeans begin to gain something they never had before, status. Servitude for life becomes reserved for Africans and other non Europeans. Interesting to note that at this time, people like the Irish were not considered white. Thus the concepts of who is white and who is black shifts over time as they figure out how to maintain control.
The reason why those considered to be black are treated so harshly is because it is in keeping with the European custom of maintaining social control. It had nothing to do with skin color persay, but the fear that equality would lead to the collapse of the social order. And for poor Europeans, who never had status before, the notion of having it was deeply intoxicating. Therefore, to have equality would mean the loss of status and for people who had no real political or economic power, the idea of superiority was all they had. All they had was a concept of pride and they would never let it go. Therefore, the ruling class tried to create proof of racial superiority to justify slavery and colonialism, and poor people of European descent were only too willing to buy into the deception to protect their diminished sense of self.
|
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Aug 6, 2015 12:23:56 GMT -5
Why did whites become so racist towards blacks? I can answer that question. They made it up as they went along. First of all, you have to realize that the notion of identifying as white versus some other color or race is a concept that developed over time. No European ethnic group had a concept of "whiteness" persay until there was a need for it. Europeans for the most part, did not self identify on the basis or concept of color. For the most part, they didn't even have a concept of nationality. They identified primarily based on the geographic region they came from, city town etc. For example, there was no such thing as an Italian identity. you were Tuscan, Roman etc and even more specific, the particular town or city you were born in and more specific than that, your family line. Just consider the story of Romeo and Juliet. These were people who lived in the same city, but were deeply divided along family clan lines. These divisions were deep enough to kill each other over. It was only when they came in contact with someone of a different color that they made descriptions of black or white, but this was just an adjective. Most Europeans had no contact with or real knowledge of other "races" and even when they did, they did not necessarily view it as a problem. Who they had real hatred towards were other people who looked like them who were of different ethnic groups, family lines or classes. European identity was never based primarily on color. The deepest divisions in European society were along lines of class. Society was strictly divided according to a person's rank. Even within the aristocracy, a person's rank determined who they could and could not marry. Even in England, to this day, there is something called the book of peeridge, (spelling?) in which all the nobility of England is recorded along with the stipulations as to who they can or cannot marry within the nobility. Therefore, a marriage between an aristocrat and a commoner, was considered detestable and a marriage between an aristocrat and a person of the serving class unheard of. This is what you have to keep in mind when considering the question of where and how Africans would fit into a European social structor. European societies were deeply divided along lines of class. At the top was the land owning aristocracy, everyone else lived on the land they owned and worked for them. The exception to this was a very small merchant class who made up "the middling class", or middle class. Nevertheless, they were still subject to the rule of the lord, whose land they also lived on and had to pay taxes. This is where the term "land lord" comes from. The lord owned everyone and everything on their land. The only thing they could not do was sell their subjects, but in all other ways, they owned the people who lived on their land. If the lord wanted access to any of the women on his land or servant in his household, he had the right to take what he wanted. This was called "the lord's right". The servile class was not even considered the same "race" as the aristocracy. They were scarcely human, or not human in the same way as the ruling class was. When the British decided to expand their empire, they first started by annexing Wales, Ireland and Scotland. They didn't consider these people fully human. They would talk about the "Irish race" etc. They described them as being animalistic, brutish, ugly, unintelligent, mentally inferior. In their minds, the stability of society was based on maintaining the class system. Everybody had to know their place and respect their "betters". Therefore, when you consider these facts, it becomes obvious that the roots of racism are based in the European class system. When European economies became dependent of the agriculture of their American colonies, it was obvious that there weren't enough people in Europe to supply their labor needs. Yes, they did try. It was only because of its sheer size that it was obvious that Africa would be the logical source to supply their labor needs. So given the social culture of Europe, where would Africans fit in? In the servant class of course. It is important to realize that at this early stage they were on the same level of the servile Europeans. So what changed? With the founding of the colonies it became obvious that the servile classes vastly outnumbered the ruling class and the distance from the Mother Country made it especially hard to enforce military control. Because of this, it became necessary to create systems of social control. It is at this time that the concepts of blackness and whiteness start to be created. They begin to create policies to create divisions amongst the servile class. Marriages between blacks and whites start becoming illegal and poor Europeans begin to gain something they never had before, status. Servitude for life becomes reserved for Africans and other non Europeans. Interesting to note that at this time, people like the Irish were not considered white. Thus the concepts of who is white and who is black shifts over time as they figure out how to maintain control. The reason why those considered to be black are treated so harshly is because it is in keeping with the European custom of maintaining social control. It had nothing to do with skin color persay, but the fear that equality would lead to the collapse of the social order. And for poor Europeans, who never had status before, the notion of having it was deeply intoxicating. Therefore, to have equality would mean the loss of status and for people who had no real political or economic power, the idea of superiority was all they had. All they had was a concept of pride and they would never let it go. Therefore, the ruling class tried to create proof of racial superiority to justify slavery and colonialism, and poor people of European descent were only too willing to buy into the deception to protect their diminished sense of self. An 11 minute video that pretty much sums up everything I said before. |
|
|
|
Post by A Boy Named KING on Aug 6, 2015 18:06:02 GMT -5
Why did whites become so racist towards blacks? I can answer that question. They made it up as they went along. First of all, you have to realize that the notion of identifying as white versus some other color or race is a concept that developed over time. No European ethnic group had a concept of "whiteness" persay until there was a need for it. Europeans for the most part, did not self identify on the basis or concept of color. For the most part, they didn't even have a concept of nationality. They identified primarily based on the geographic region they came from, city town etc. For example, there was no such thing as an Italian identity. you were Tuscan, Roman etc and even more specific, the particular town or city you were born in and more specific than that, your family line. Just consider the story of Romeo and Juliet. These were people who lived in the same city, but were deeply divided along family clan lines. These divisions were deep enough to kill each other over. It was only when they came in contact with someone of a different color that they made descriptions of black or white, but this was just an adjective. Most Europeans had no contact with or real knowledge of other "races" and even when they did, they did not necessarily view it as a problem. Who they had real hatred towards were other people who looked like them who were of different ethnic groups, family lines or classes. European identity was never based primarily on color. The deepest divisions in European society were along lines of class. Society was strictly divided according to a person's rank. Even within the aristocracy, a person's rank determined who they could and could not marry. Even in England, to this day, there is something called the book of peeridge, (spelling?) in which all the nobility of England is recorded along with the stipulations as to who they can or cannot marry within the nobility. Therefore, a marriage between an aristocrat and a commoner, was considered detestable and a marriage between an aristocrat and a person of the serving class unheard of. This is what you have to keep in mind when considering the question of where and how Africans would fit into a European social structor. European societies were deeply divided along lines of class. At the top was the land owning aristocracy, everyone else lived on the land they owned and worked for them. The exception to this was a very small merchant class who made up "the middling class", or middle class. Nevertheless, they were still subject to the rule of the lord, whose land they also lived on and had to pay taxes. This is where the term "land lord" comes from. The lord owned everyone and everything on their land. The only thing they could not do was sell their subjects, but in all other ways, they owned the people who lived on their land. If the lord wanted access to any of the women on his land or servant in his household, he had the right to take what he wanted. This was called "the lord's right". The servile class was not even considered the same "race" as the aristocracy. They were scarcely human, or not human in the same way as the ruling class was. When the British decided to expand their empire, they first started by annexing Wales, Ireland and Scotland. They didn't consider these people fully human. They would talk about the "Irish race" etc. They described them as being animalistic, brutish, ugly, unintelligent, mentally inferior. In their minds, the stability of society was based on maintaining the class system. Everybody had to know their place and respect their "betters". Therefore, when you consider these facts, it becomes obvious that the roots of racism are based in the European class system. When European economies became dependent of the agriculture of their American colonies, it was obvious that there weren't enough people in Europe to supply their labor needs. Yes, they did try. It was only because of its sheer size that it was obvious that Africa would be the logical source to supply their labor needs. So given the social culture of Europe, where would Africans fit in? In the servant class of course. It is important to realize that at this early stage they were on the same level of the servile Europeans. So what changed? With the founding of the colonies it became obvious that the servile classes vastly outnumbered the ruling class and the distance from the Mother Country made it especially hard to enforce military control. Because of this, it became necessary to create systems of social control. It is at this time that the concepts of blackness and whiteness start to be created. They begin to create policies to create divisions amongst the servile class. Marriages between blacks and whites start becoming illegal and poor Europeans begin to gain something they never had before, status. Servitude for life becomes reserved for Africans and other non Europeans. Interesting to note that at this time, people like the Irish were not considered white. Thus the concepts of who is white and who is black shifts over time as they figure out how to maintain control. The reason why those considered to be black are treated so harshly is because it is in keeping with the European custom of maintaining social control. It had nothing to do with skin color persay, but the fear that equality would lead to the collapse of the social order. And for poor Europeans, who never had status before, the notion of having it was deeply intoxicating. Therefore, to have equality would mean the loss of status and for people who had no real political or economic power, the idea of superiority was all they had. All they had was a concept of pride and they would never let it go. Therefore, the ruling class tried to create proof of racial superiority to justify slavery and colonialism, and poor people of European descent were only too willing to buy into the deception to protect their diminished sense of self. Truthteacher education on Point as Usual. The 2 main Regulators doing there thang thang with respect and Patience. The Best posters of ESR. Let me just say that, Not a surprise Truthteacher, that certain English treated the Scotish, Wales, Irish People like that. The gehazis WAS(They are being exposed) huge inside of England the same country that was eating Blood, like Blood pudding, Blood sausage etc. Wonder if You heard about: John Brown  The Servant of the Queen of England Queen Victoria, Seems that she may of Possibly fell inside Love with John Brown and the English Vilified John Brown and attacked him for that rumour. Proves again like You stated.....Hate is Hate, no matter Black, White, Red, Yellow and Brown. Peoples get treated like ish when surrounded by gehazis Influenced peoples and Gehazis dominated countries. Color is an Excuse to keeps us preoccupied so they can ROB US BLIND and Have us Hurt each other and the gehazis, Pharasees, Principalities etc Laugh. To these scum look at us as just fodder, to be used, abused and thrown aside when they get Bored. Don't matter the color. Blacks, Whites, Reds, Yellow and Brown get treated Evil by these scum. Example? England and European obsession with eating mummies. To think that People were CONvinced that eating Human Parts was some kind of medicine??? REALLY??? So the most "developed" whatev that means English were eating Blood pudding, blood sausages and eating mummies??? Thats how the Gehazis had these People hating themselves, AND DEM A NAW EVEN KNOW  We Need eachother regardless where we are from, Finding these scum Gehazis and principalites is one of the Main things that will free the People. Look at the English Now, After Realizing that they have to war against the SCUM INSIDE THERE COUNTRY. A Prime Minsiter Got caught for Child Abuse...Think...A Leader of the country was a child molestor whos idenity was hidden Now We KNOW!!!  edward heath, british prime minister, Child abuse cases since 1961!!! http//news.newsdirectory1.com/abuse-proceedings-against-the-british-ex-prime-minister-heath-2edward heath, child molestor, just like jimmy saville www.dw.com/en/british-police-investigate-ex-pm-child-abuse-claims/a-18626421The People Putting Work Inside of united kingdom. White,Black,Brown,Yellow and Red British Brothers and Sisters, do dat dere Family EDIT |
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Aug 7, 2015 16:22:47 GMT -5
Why did whites become so racist towards blacks? I can answer that question. They made it up as they went along. First of all, you have to realize that the notion of identifying as white versus some other color or race is a concept that developed over time. No European ethnic group had a concept of "whiteness" persay until there was a need for it. Europeans for the most part, did not self identify on the basis or concept of color. For the most part, they didn't even have a concept of nationality. They identified primarily based on the geographic region they came from, city town etc. For example, there was no such thing as an Italian identity. you were Tuscan, Roman etc and even more specific, the particular town or city you were born in and more specific than that, your family line. Just consider the story of Romeo and Juliet. These were people who lived in the same city, but were deeply divided along family clan lines. These divisions were deep enough to kill each other over. It was only when they came in contact with someone of a different color that they made descriptions of black or white, but this was just an adjective. Most Europeans had no contact with or real knowledge of other "races" and even when they did, they did not necessarily view it as a problem. Who they had real hatred towards were other people who looked like them who were of different ethnic groups, family lines or classes. European identity was never based primarily on color. The deepest divisions in European society were along lines of class. Society was strictly divided according to a person's rank. Even within the aristocracy, a person's rank determined who they could and could not marry. Even in England, to this day, there is something called the book of peeridge, (spelling?) in which all the nobility of England is recorded along with the stipulations as to who they can or cannot marry within the nobility. Therefore, a marriage between an aristocrat and a commoner, was considered detestable and a marriage between an aristocrat and a person of the serving class unheard of. This is what you have to keep in mind when considering the question of where and how Africans would fit into a European social structor. European societies were deeply divided along lines of class. At the top was the land owning aristocracy, everyone else lived on the land they owned and worked for them. The exception to this was a very small merchant class who made up "the middling class", or middle class. Nevertheless, they were still subject to the rule of the lord, whose land they also lived on and had to pay taxes. This is where the term "land lord" comes from. The lord owned everyone and everything on their land. The only thing they could not do was sell their subjects, but in all other ways, they owned the people who lived on their land. If the lord wanted access to any of the women on his land or servant in his household, he had the right to take what he wanted. This was called "the lord's right". The servile class was not even considered the same "race" as the aristocracy. They were scarcely human, or not human in the same way as the ruling class was. When the British decided to expand their empire, they first started by annexing Wales, Ireland and Scotland. They didn't consider these people fully human. They would talk about the "Irish race" etc. They described them as being animalistic, brutish, ugly, unintelligent, mentally inferior. In their minds, the stability of society was based on maintaining the class system. Everybody had to know their place and respect their "betters". Therefore, when you consider these facts, it becomes obvious that the roots of racism are based in the European class system. When European economies became dependent of the agriculture of their American colonies, it was obvious that there weren't enough people in Europe to supply their labor needs. Yes, they did try. It was only because of its sheer size that it was obvious that Africa would be the logical source to supply their labor needs. So given the social culture of Europe, where would Africans fit in? In the servant class of course. It is important to realize that at this early stage they were on the same level of the servile Europeans. So what changed? With the founding of the colonies it became obvious that the servile classes vastly outnumbered the ruling class and the distance from the Mother Country made it especially hard to enforce military control. Because of this, it became necessary to create systems of social control. It is at this time that the concepts of blackness and whiteness start to be created. They begin to create policies to create divisions amongst the servile class. Marriages between blacks and whites start becoming illegal and poor Europeans begin to gain something they never had before, status. Servitude for life becomes reserved for Africans and other non Europeans. Interesting to note that at this time, people like the Irish were not considered white. Thus the concepts of who is white and who is black shifts over time as they figure out how to maintain control. The reason why those considered to be black are treated so harshly is because it is in keeping with the European custom of maintaining social control. It had nothing to do with skin color persay, but the fear that equality would lead to the collapse of the social order. And for poor Europeans, who never had status before, the notion of having it was deeply intoxicating. Therefore, to have equality would mean the loss of status and for people who had no real political or economic power, the idea of superiority was all they had. All they had was a concept of pride and they would never let it go. Therefore, the ruling class tried to create proof of racial superiority to justify slavery and colonialism, and poor people of European descent were only too willing to buy into the deception to protect their diminished sense of self. Truthteacher education on Point as Usual. The 2 main Regulators doing there thang thang with respect and Patience. The Best posters of ESR. Let me just say that, Not a surprise Truthteacher, that certain English treated the Scotish, Wales, Irish People like that. The gehazis WAS(They are being exposed) huge inside of England the same country that was eating Blood, like Blood pudding, Blood sausage etc. Wonder if You heard about: John Brown The Servant of the Queen of England Queen Victoria, Seems that she may of Possibly fell inside Love with John Brown and the English Vilified John Brown and attacked him for that rumour. Proves again like You stated.....Hate is Hate, no matter Black, White, Red, Yellow and Brown. Peoples get treated like ish when surrounded by gehazis Influenced peoples and Gehazis dominated countries. Color is an Excuse to keeps us preoccupied so they can ROB US BLIND and Have us Hurt each other and the gehazis, Pharasees, Principalities etc Laugh. To these scum look at us as just fodder, to be used, abused and thrown aside when they get Bored. Don't matter the color. Blacks, Whites, Reds, Yellow and Brown get treated Evil by these scum. Example? England and European obsession with eating mummies. To think that People were CONvinced that eating Human Parts was some kind of medicine??? REALLY??? So the most "developed" whatev that means English were eating Blood pudding, blood sausages and eating mummies??? Thats how the Gehazis had these People hating themselves, AND DEM A NAW EVEN KNOW We Need eachother regardless where we are from, Finding these scum Gehazis and principalites is one of the Main things that will free the People. Look at the English Now, After Realizing that they have to war against the SCUM INSIDE THERE COUNTRY. A Prime Minsiter Got caught for Child Abuse...Think...A Leader of the country was a child molestor whos idenity was hidden Now We KNOW!!! edward heath, british prime minister, Child abuse cases since 1961!!! http//news.newsdirectory1.com/abuse-proceedings-against-the-british-ex-prime-minister-heath-2edward heath, child molestor, just like jimmy saville www.dw.com/en/british-police-investigate-ex-pm-child-abuse-claims/a-18626421The People Putting Work Inside of united kingdom. White,Black,Brown,Yellow and Red British Brothers and Sisters, do dat dere Family EDIT You're right on point. Jim Brown is a perfect example. That's why it's so necessary to maintain divisions. Because if you allow the other to be a real person, if you allow yourself to know them, you see their humanity and the system crumbles. Thing is every society has these classes of people. You call them gehazi, I call them blood suckers amongst other things. The ancient Egyptian aristocracy was about the same thing. A small group of elites grinding the people into dust for their benefit. Mesopotamians, same thing, Aztecs, same thing, Chinese, same thing, Japanese shoguns, same thing. Within every society there is a small class of sociopaths who have no conscience and will do whatever to whomever to get whatever they want. These are the same types of people who sold their neighbors as slaves to the Europeans for the sake of material gain. They justified it by telling themselves these weren't their own people, yadda, yadda, yadda. These are the same kind of people in the ghettos selling drugs to the people in their own communities, why? Because they could give a $hit as long as they get their money etc. Sociopaths have no capacity for regret or remorse, which is why they tend to be able to amass great wealth. Not saying all wealthy people as sociopaths, but a sociopath has no boundaries or limitations and so they are free to do anything to get what they want, where as normal people do have limits. They don't care if they have to kill their mothers, sisters, brothers or even children to get what they want. Just read the histories of the elite class in any society and you will see the exact same patterns of behavior, or better yet, compare and contrast and you'll see what I mean. So racism is only one of many tools that a group of sociopaths, who happened to come from Europe, devised to get what they wanted. The reason they were able to spread around the globe the way they did was because everywhere else had resources in abundance. The Chinese weren't motivated to go anywhere else because they had everything they needed right there. Europe on the other hand was assed out and so, like a pack of wolves, they had to go elsewhere to feed their bellies once they had sucked the life out of the people around them. A rabid pack of hyaenas, but make no mistake, in every country they went, there were people just as sick as they were. It's just that the dog whose starving the most is usually the most vicious. The whole world needs to band together and realize that we are all at their mercy. Only when we come together will we keep them in check. |
|
|
|
Post by zarahan on Aug 23, 2015 21:58:12 GMT -5
To so-called "confused white guy" seems like a troll on that site, asking
"mere" or "innocent" questions, while making or insinuating a number of bogus racial
strawmen such as the allegedly "rude"black people accusing white people
of bad things- saying: "you white peoples have murdered every culture
and you should be ashamed for your white skin"." The setup is of "innocent"
white people "unfairly accused" by rude or "militant" blacks.. Its a standard
white right wing trope- virtuous white people being beat up by "political
correctness" and so on. The game is used to avoid or dismiss debate,
So police misconduct against blacks can be dismissed by saying "oh that's just
political correctness by the liberals.." Meanwhile the same dismissive people are
justifying such misconduct by implying or insinuation most black people are criminals..
Abuse of women online in terms of vicious personal attacks and digging up
personal private info to make such attacks can be waved away by saying "oh that's
just political correctness by the feminists" and so on..
Its like an allegedly "Chinese girl" I ran into on Yahoo questions running
the same game- with the "Chinese girl" persona supposed to divert attention
from the game, cuz no one can possibly accuse a "fellow minority" of being racist
when they make racist statements, or pump up assorted racial strawmen. But these
people don't realize that we are on to them.
Truthteacher says:
They made it up as they went along. First of all, you have to realize that the notion of identifying as white versus some other color or race is a concept that developed over time. No European ethnic group had a concept of "whiteness" persay until there was a need for it. Europeans for the most part, did not self identify on the basis or concept of color.
^^True enough. There wasn't a master plan from Day One. Bu they became
more sophisticated and organized as time went on and blacks appeared in
large numbers under slavery.
|
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Aug 24, 2015 14:21:56 GMT -5
To so-called "confused white guy" seems like a troll on that site, asking "mere" or "innocent" questions, while making or insinuating a number of bogus racial strawmen such as the allegedly "rude"black people accusing white people of bad things- saying: "you white peoples have murdered every culture and you should be ashamed for your white skin"." The setup is of "innocent" white people "unfairly accused" by rude or "militant" blacks.. Its a standard white right wing trope- virtuous white people being beat up by "political correctness" and so on. The game is used to avoid or dismiss debate, So police misconduct against blacks can be dismissed by saying "oh that's just political correctness by the liberals.." Meanwhile the same dismissive people are justifying such misconduct by implying or insinuation most black people are criminals.. Abuse of women online in terms of vicious personal attacks and digging up personal private info to make such attacks can be waved away by saying "oh that's just political correctness by the feminists" and so on.. Its like an allegedly "Chinese girl" I ran into on Yahoo questions running the same game- with the "Chinese girl" persona supposed to divert attention from the game, cuz no one can possibly accuse a "fellow minority" of being racist when they make racist statements, or pump up assorted racial strawmen. But these people don't realize that we are on to them. Truthteacher says: They made it up as they went along. First of all, you have to realize that the notion of identifying as white versus some other color or race is a concept that developed over time. No European ethnic group had a concept of "whiteness" persay until there was a need for it. Europeans for the most part, did not self identify on the basis or concept of color. ^^True enough. There wasn't a master plan from Day One. Bu they became more sophisticated and organized as time went on and blacks appeared in large numbers under slavery. Well..... first of all, people of color can be incredibly racist and secondly,  ? Don't these people have lives? Honestly, what a waste of time. |
|
? Don't these people have lives? Honestly, what a waste of time.