|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 22, 2015 18:05:28 GMT -5
It is shocking that this was actually presented by a popular scientist. They really live in a fantasy world. As I said before. They have conceded Neolithic women as hg-H. Unto rape and pilfering. FROM: Dr M Hammers presentation to the 11th FTDNA Conference (13-15 Nov 2015)
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 22, 2015 18:06:02 GMT -5
Ha! Ha! Ha! Direct from Hollywood. This is picture of "some" of the women who accompanied the men. Note they have conceded MtDNA H as Neoltihic. H1 and H3 The battle is to put R1b in the Russian Steppes.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 22, 2015 18:06:35 GMT -5
Haak and Hammer....really lol!
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 22, 2015 18:07:44 GMT -5
They have also conceded. The modern European male line is "new" to Europe and does NOT have a Paleolithic nor Neolithic presence IN Europe. The Fantasy continues in the Russian Steppes. Lol!
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 22, 2015 18:12:19 GMT -5
keep in mind this is not a Hollywood script but from an actual "scientific" presentation. Are they interested in the truth or European propaganda and false dominance.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 22, 2015 18:19:58 GMT -5
The fact is La Brana is black like Melanesians, His hair texture is not know but this is what they portray. Otzi is also is dark skin and has black hair and eyes...ditto Not to mention Yamanya were dark skin also based upon genetics Neanderthals were also black skinned...yet What is their end game? Are they really interested in educating the public or continue the delusion?
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 21, 2019 18:06:56 GMT -5
Methodological issues in the Indo-European debate - Michel Danino July2019
Abstract The Indo-European debate has been going on for a century and a half. Initially confined to linguistics, race-based anthropology and comparative mythology, it soon extended to archaeology, especially with the discovery of the Harappan civilization, and peripheral disciplines such as agriculture, archaeometallurgy or archaeoastronomy. The latest entrant in the field, archaeogenetics, is currently all but claiming that it has finally laid to rest the whole issue of a hypothetical migration of Indo-Aryan speakers to the Indian subcontinent in the second millennium BCE. This paper questions the finality of this claim by pointing to inherent limitations, methodological issues and occasional biases in current studies as well as in the interpretation of archaeological evidence.
|
|