Finally!! origin of the Neolithics through DNA

[djoser-xyyman]

What does the chart show?

The LBK migrated FROM the Sahara through the Levant but never really reached Western Europe
The Anatolian Neolithic FROM the Sahara migrating to primarily Anatolia
The Greek Neolithic FROM the Sahara migrating to primarily North and Western Europe
All Neolithic has an African origin.
Notice Yoruba is found as far as Asian Europe
Notice Loschbour is found in The Island of the coast of Africa.
LBK is found further south in Africa
Notice Persians carry Yoruban component also.

That is what DNATribes and Lazaridis suggested LD or you can NOT disassociate the Neolithics and Yorubans. I will speculate this association will be found in the Harrapan Valley people also if they were included in the study.

This chart is a bombshell.

[djoser-xyyman]

Here is what the authors stated


Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans - by
Zuzana Hofmanová1 NOV2015

Quote
Over the last 6 years ancient DNA studies have transformed our understanding of the European Neolithic transition (1-6, 24, 29), demonstrating a crucial role for migration in central and southwestern Europe. Our results bookend this transformative understanding by extending the unbroken trail of ancestry and migration all the way back to southwestern Asia. The lack of shared drift among central and southwestern Early Neolithic farmers to the exclusion of the genomes presented here suggests that Aegean Neolithic populations CAN BE considered the root for all early European farmers and their colonization routes. A key remaining question is whether this unbroken trail of ancestry and migration extends all the way back to southeastern Anatolia and the Fertile Crescent, where the earliest Neolithic sites in the world are found. . Regardless of whether the Aegean early farmers were ultimately descended from western or central Anatolian, or even Levantine hunter-gatherer, the differences between the ancient genomes presented here and those from the Caucasus (23) indicates that there was considerable structuring of forager populations in southwest Asia prior to the transition to farming. The DISSIMILARITY AND LACK OF CONTINUITY of the Early Neolithic Aegean genomes to modern Turkish and Levantine populations, in contrast to those of early central and southwestern European farmer and modern Mediterraneans, is best explained by SUBSEQUENT gene-flow into Anatolia from yet unknown sources.

[djoser-xyyman]

So DNATribes (and I)was right!!!. RIP Lucas Martin. Chicken is coming home to roost

--------------
Quote:
Modern Anatolian and Aegean populations do not appear to be the direct descendents of Neolithic peoples from the same region. Indeed, our mixture model comparison of the Aegean genomes to >200 modern groups2 indicates low affinity between the two Anatolian Neolithic genomes and seven of eight modern Turkish samples (the eighth is from Trabzon on the Black Sea coast, a long-standing area of Pontic Greek settlement). Furthermore, when we form each Anatolian Neolithic genome as a mixture of all modern groups, we infer ****no**** contributions from groups in southeastern Anatolia and the Levant where the earliest Neolithic sites are found. . Similarly, comparison of allele sharing between ancient and modern genomes to those expected under population continuity indicates Neolithic to modern discontinuity in Greece and western Anatolia, unless ancestral populations were unrealistically small. Instead, our mixing analysis shows that each Aegean Neolithic genome closely corresponds genetically to modern Mediterraneans, and in particular Sardinians (as also seen in the PCA and outgroup f3 statistics), with few *********substantial contributions from elsewhere*********{/b].
------------------------
Do you want to know where the “elsewhere” is? Lol!

[djoser-xyyman]

Quote:

The first two dimensions of variation from principal components analysis (PCA) reveal a tight clustering of all five Aegean Neolithic genomes with Early Neolithic genomes from central and southern Europe (2, 3, 24) (Fig. 2).


Quote:
Early Neolithic genomes from Germany and Hungary. However, while these results conform to a Neolithic dispersal from Anatolia to Greece, and then to the rest of Europe, it is not possible to infer a direction for dispersal within the Aegean with statistical confidence since both the Greek and Anatolian genomes copy from each other to a similar extent. We therefore see the origins of European farmers EQUALLY well represented by Early Neolithic Greek and northwestern Anatolian genomes (29). It is widely believed that farming spread into Europe along both Mediterranean and central European routes, but the extent to which this process involved demic dispersals from the Aegean has long been a matter of debate (30). We applied f4 statistics to examine whether the Spanish Neolithic farmers shared MORE drift with the Early Neolithic genome from Germany than with the Aegeans, which would be expected if Neolithic populations first reached southwestern Europe via central Europe. We found no support for this hypothesis: none of the early farmers in Europe shared significantly more drift with one another than with Aegean farmers. This result is consistent with early farmers migrating from the Aegean via at least ***TWO** independent routes into central and southwestern Europe, and with inferences made on the BASIS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE (31, 32).

[djoser-xyyman]

I can’t wait to get my hands on the Supplemental. Yummy!

This is the first I have seen Loshcbour having a significant African presence. See Fig3. I always suspected the “metapopulation” of which Loshcbour was, entered through Iberia from Africa. Notice also the LBK genetic component has a strong African presence to the further south.

This is an example of how conflicted Europeans are. They are at war within themselves. Conflicted, delusional and mental anguish. Why? They are admitting the Neolithics came from “elsewhere” , show charts including Africans but infer “Greece was the first where they landed. Again trying to upplay the contribution of the modern “geopolitical Europe”. Europe had nothing to do with the turn to Neolithic system.

They are admitting it was NOT from the Levant and the modern population of Greece and the Levant have essentially replaced the original inhabitants of these areas.

[djoser-xyyman]

There you have it. The origin of Neolithic from the Levant is “inferred” from archeology. Now genetics have smashed that fantasy to a thousand pieces. Infact the Neolithics having first appeared(archeology) in the Levant is a lie. These people never island hopped to Iberia. The drying of the Sahra what trgger the entire transformation. These dispersed Sahara Africans went on to transform the world wherever they went. Per DNATribes. From the Sahara, Europe, Persia and the Harrapan Valley. The chicken is coming home to roost.

[djoser-xyyman]

Everyone has a Genetic Lab now…….they will have to eventually stop lying or run the risk of being exposed and be embarrassed for what they are. It is only matter of time. Lol!

This is essentially a group of unknowns genetic scientist. Of course being Europeans they are afflicted, conflicted, self absorbed and delusional. Yeah, Greece!! Riiiight. Although THEIR charts show Africans carry Loschbour, LBK and other Neolithic material even points further South. They even concluded “elsewhere” but was afraid to name that region but ruled OUT the Levant.

[djoser-xyyman]

Interestingly, in Africa, the Loschbour component is found in Morocco, Canary Islands, Tunisia, Libya, into the Levant. The pattern is consistent with Neolithics replacing HG Loschbour starting in the Sahara Africa continuing into Europe and Asia. Loschbour has high frequency in Central Asia and points further from Africa.

Canary seem to have high frequency also due to isolation.

It would be nice to see Loschbour component in San and Hadza and Sandewe. I speculate it would very high. At least higher than Yorubans.

[djoser-xyyman]

Bump