Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 10:50:34 GMT -5
The mutation for blue eyes was in Europe. All people who carry the derived allele share a common ancestor from Europe about 10,000 years ago. "The mutations responsible for blue eye colour most likely originate from the north-west part of the Black Sea region, where the great agricultural migration of the northern part of Europe took place in the Neolithic periods about 6,000 to 10,000 years ago," the researchers report in the journal Human Genetics. Professor Eiberg said that brown is the "default" colour for human eyes which results from a build-up of the dark skin pigment, melanin. However, in northern Europe a mutation arose in a gene known as OCA2 that disrupted melanin." www.independent.co.uk/news/science/how-one-ancestor-helped-turn-our-brown-eyes-blue-776170.htmlIt is only black racists like xyyman who are denying this. Its too much for him to admit a mutation arose in Europe. lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 10:55:46 GMT -5
@ xyyman, you also need to explain why the same PCA (Fig. S23) shows Mesolithic/Neolithic European specimens cluster with modern Europeans.
Its looks like any data that doesn't fit your dogma you just ignore.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 11:01:58 GMT -5
here's what Sindhis look like, they aren't black-
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 11:48:27 GMT -5
Yeah. Continue selective picture spamming......SMH These are South ....Africans.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 12:03:34 GMT -5
I am still at a lost what your are arguing. My argument is labeling KOS14 as "European" is delusional and a lie. I Also said he clusters closest with Makrani and Sindhi and Dravidian people of India. I posted data.
What is YOUR argument?
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 12:23:52 GMT -5
do you know why KOS14 has so much African AIM and Europeans do not @ K3? also @k2 KOS14 is essentially a Papaun and Melenesian. In other words KOS14 has absolute no relation to modern European. Nein!!!
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 12:32:44 GMT -5
I thought you were onto something. Wasting my time.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 15:04:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 15:18:19 GMT -5
and as far as blue eyes is concerned.....
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 15:21:25 GMT -5
Blue eyes do NOT have an European origin and is NOT unique to Europe!!! Only delusional racialist with no clue repeat that nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Apr 2, 2016 16:01:35 GMT -5
I am glad you broached the subject. This led me to revisit the studies on blue eyes and KOS14. Mike111 always posted that pic and I never realized it was KOS14? In addition I knew the blue eye haplotype existed in Africa as the chart shows but I never knew who the Zaramo people were. I now know they are a Bantu ethnic group that exist in Tanzania. It would be nice to see the BEH2 haplotype break down in Sandewe and Hadza of Tanzania. These are two of the oldest populations in Africa yet carry more "Eurasian" genes than African-Americans. Are the Zaramo, Sandewe and HAdza related?
See, we can always learn something from a discussion no matter how idiotic it is.
I am out.
|
|
|
Post by Ish Gebor on May 21, 2017 7:40:18 GMT -5
lol @ black supremacist buffoon. You're totally clueless. Can you even read basic population genetics? The PCA you post is closest to Central Asian populations. Look at the population centroids, not (outlier) individuals. "K14 was also found to fall outside the range of contemporary European variation, but was distinct from MA1, clustering most closely with Central Asian populations. (Fig. S21-S23)" (Seguin-Orlando et al. 2014) Are you sure that passage is from (Fig. S21-S23, Seguin-Orlando et al. 2014)?
|
|