No doubt Lee had a sense honor, in the sense of fighting to uphold what he believed to be
right, and I have no doubt he considered himself a patriot of Virginia and the South.
And yes, he was dedicated, hard-working and skilled in carrying out the mission he believed in.
In a GENERIC sense, generic I said, all these things are perfectly understandable, even commendable.
And no, stating the generic case above does not constitute any "endorsement" of slavery or
the Confederate cause. Far from it
As for his portrayal as a white nationalist- if some folk are trying to make him out as a
19th century southern version of fanatical Adolf Hitler, I believe that this is too extreme.
Its not that dramatic, and there is no need for such distortion of Lee.
But some points to consider:
1) Since when is any history being "taken away" from white people? This is rather dubious.
There are tens of millions of white people who passionately believe in Robert E. Lee.
No one has "taken away" anything from them. In fact well into the 1980s school textbooks
handled slavery and the confederacy with kid gloves, and white right wing groups like
the United Daughters of the Confederacy had huge influence on educating about slavery
and the Civil War, some of that influence is dubious or even bogus.In short, white right
wingers have had a pretty good run as far as history, and as far as being gingerly handled
even by some textbook publishers today. Yet even with this, one key change SOMETIMES seen today
is that Lee and the COnfederacy get searching scrutiny, not the hero worship of old.
This is what white right wingers are really lamenting about- the easy, simplistic propaganda
narratives of the as are no longer automatically accepted by many folk.
www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/07/01/why-do-people-believe-myths-about-the-confederacy-because-our-textbooks-and-monuments-are-wrong/?utm_term=.dbe27b580c3c2) Lee believed in the southern slave system and fighting to preserve it. This is why he went to war.
In fact numerous southern states said they were going to war because of slavery- call it states rights
or whatever-
the bottom line 'states right' was slavery.3) Lee believed slavery, in a disciplinary sense, was necessary for
black people. Quote:
The painful discipline they [the blacks] are undergoing is
necessary for their further instruction as a race, and will prepare
them, I hope, for better things. How long their servitude may be
necessary is known and ordered by a merciful Providence.”--FROM: Robert E. Lee letter dated December 27, 1856 to US President Franklin PIERCE
4) As well respected and inspirational leader of the fight to preserve slavery, Lee
is often invoked by white nationalists, who cite points 2 and 3 above in his defense,
and in defense of slavery and the Confederacy.