>>>What you say above is rather vague.
You should provide more specifics as to what you had problems with.
1. What languages in question are being spoken at the same time, in what time frames?
2. What cognates?
3. What artifacts and why?
4. What other items?
5. How does what he is saying compare to what various other mainstream linguists
are saying and where do they clash, or agree?
6. What sources are in use and are they strong or weak in relation to arguments being made?
Throw down a detailed list of specifics.<<<<<<
1. He thinks Old, Middle, Late, Coptic were spoken at the same time in the early history of egypt
2. Mistakenly comparing modern pidgin words from Yoruba and Swahili (sebi and sasa respectfully) asserting that they came from or directly connected to ancient egypt
3. He tried to compare the Ile Ife bronze head to an Egyptian crown saying that they both have serpents on them, the white crown is inspired by a birds nest
4. He compares Napoleon's robe to the leopard skin robes of Kemet, when Napoleon's robe was actually inspired by Bee's
5. damn near every expert he used doesn't agree with his stances and he also cut off certain parts when quoting them, Like he completely misunderstood paul newman apparently when he quoted paul newman treating every language as unrelated when doing the comparative method. but when you look at what paul newman said, actually that method was completely unscientific
6. he uses outdated George M james/Helen Blavatsky to say the egyptians actually had a secret language, Africans that wrote the bible was another bad source.. a number of them..
All of those questions and more are answered in the video... i never had a problem with his work until i saw this
