Had I known this guys history --
he debuted w/t same line of shit --
I wouldn't a wasted my precious time.
I see clearly now. He wasn't asking
questions but making what he imagines
to be unassailable points.
We busted those piñatas frickin 12
years gone now. We shook up Nat'l
Geo who put out a special AE issue
that included a pop quiz in vain
effort to counter the results of
our research.
Not later ES was flooded with 'black'
reactionary fantasies in an attempt
to besmirch the forum along with the
foolish line of 'innocent questioning'
presented by the OP.
These clowns never present a shred of
evidence to support their taurusscat
and reject out of hand the mountain
of well researched information with
a stupid line or two, if they even
bother to read any of it (nope,
obviously didn't read), declaring it
doesn't answer their 'question(s)
with asinine responses like
child and mother relationship does
not show where the child came from
Please if anybody sees me trying to
'help' a rhetorical questioner again.
quick rush in and shut me down.