The thread is over 120 pages size. That's a lot to scroll through.
How are they begging the racists/racialists therein? And exactly
who is doing the begging? Can you post some specific examples?
You must not have read the first post!
HE IS POSING A FACT AS A QUESTION! Oh white people and wanna be white people, why won't you accept this evidence of black Egypt. If it needs to be explained to
YOU why this is unacceptable then that is a reflection of the fact that your values in these discussions are laced with some form of approval from pale skin Devils. If a new study came out, and it furthers the truth (like the one from Keita that I posted), then post it there, and then tell them to eat a d***.
You missed the point Enrique! .
There is NO DEBATE with those denizens! Those same individuals have been mollywopped dozens upon dozens of times on various forums. They wholly rely on the administration there blocking those posters who intellectually whoop their azzes. On the Anthrogenecia forum where I posted the Keita study from last year, Archades wouldn't dare step in the line of my fire, because he did not have the overt white supremacist backing of site owner Ellias as he does on Ellias's platform Forum Biodiversity. You know that you're dealing with intellectual cowards, so at this point they would never treated with respect in these discussions. By respect I mean asking them "why won't you accept this or that". That's time wasting bullshit that is designed to give those intellectual cowards some sort of clout. I'm not playing that game.
So the f^^^ what Enrique, AND IS A HOME RUN THAT THEY CANNOT STOP.
Archades says; "The Egyptians were Caucasoids who may have resembled Horners who have "caucasoid ancestry and blah blah blah who steadily imported Negroe slaves and blah blah blah"
ME; Post picture of the first Dynastic King of Kemet -
And BOOM he looks like jackazz! Then I further provide supplementary bio-cultural evidence validating the relationship between the Bantu-NigerCongo speakers and the ancient Kemites. He has no direct response. That's just it Zaharan. I have plenty examples of this in my many post over the years on that platform.
Zaharan the issue with YOUR style of debating is that YOU seem to purposely allow them to SET THE NARRATIVE.
Them telling a lie - "Egyptians were Near Easterners with some remnants of Hamitic blood that is really Caucasoid"
YOU; "Well the Hamites are really AFRICAN, and they were really Hamitic"
Common sense ME: They were
NOT HAMITIC though populations deemed Hamitic (Somalis and Omoro) had involvement as an
element in the civilization along with the so called "NEGROID" "Niger-Congo-Bantu" and Nilotic populations.
Their entire MO is to try to eliminate that latter two (sometimes they'll acknowledge a minor Nilotic element) elements, and you seem (from what I've seen you do in early discussions) to go right along with that bullsh*t Hamitic nonsense. I can truly say that I with my thread have changed the narrative throughout the internet. Now you have people Khamitics on youtube building on the Niger-Congo involement in ancient Kemet. Do you know how f*cking hard it was prior to 2014 (when I made my thread) to find
ANYTHING relating the Niger-Congo speakers as a whole to ancient Kemet, and with the narrative of a mass migration from the region?!?! I had to scour to the internet for YEARS for off beat African scholars (the only ones who had individual knowledge) to throw into that gumbo of a thread to comprise a narrative that is the home run in my thread? People from
KRSONE TO TARIQ NASHEED (IN HIDDEN COLORS), TO RIZZA ISLAM (THE NEXT LEADER OF THE NOI) HAVE UTILIZED AND BROADCASTED MY OWN CONTEXTUALIZATION OF THIS EVIDENCE. Now you sites like Lisapo Ya Kama breaking this shit down intricately, but they
WERE NO WHERE TO BE FOUND PRIOR TO MY THREAD (that is not a diss as spreading this information through whatever means possible to make it common knowledge is the entire point of my thread) Me
ASSERTING that evidence
NOT BEGGING FOR IT'S APPROVAL which was brought home with that pictorial evidence is what gave confidence to those blacks online to take the research further.
For you to even say that the relatively few depictions of pale skinned Kemites matches that of the enumerable melaninated - clearly Africoid Kemites makes you sound retarded, as you're going along with their lying narrative. They can never win picture spam war. They can NEVER post a sequence of pharaohs prove that point Zaharan. For you to say that they can means you're full of it too or you don't know what tf you're talking about. Show me where they can counter each pharaoh Zaharan or their offspring depicted here...
realhistoryww.com/index.htm