|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 4, 2020 20:05:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 4, 2020 20:09:03 GMT -5
Seems like Professor Luisa Pereira likes this thread. So Sage. We do attract "Academics".
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 4, 2020 20:22:25 GMT -5
What is my post about?
Well, I have new research papers delivered to my inbox automatically if it is given a nod my certain scientist I follow. One of these is Luisa Pereira a world renowned geneticist. (I am partial to some Iberian geneticist, they seem to embrace their African admixture). Dr Eva Fernandez come to mind, She and Luisa are ones I have some affinity for along with Helena Malstrohm, Sarah Tishkoff, Brenna Henn and MArk Shriver Guido Barbujani etc. Anyways it look like she reads or someone put her on to ES. I am not sure why she provided citation to this specific thread on North Africans that was posted on ES. The subject was broached by Lioness with input from myself and Dr Winters . My Guess is at least she read what we said on the topic. I assume she thought it important enough to reference the thread. Click the link.
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 4, 2020 20:40:43 GMT -5
To those who haven't grasped the significance. She is telling her followers to take a look/read the thread on Egyptsearch. She is directing them to ES or at least what was posted on the subject on ES,
|
|
|
|
Post by Tukuler al~Takruri on Feb 5, 2020 10:47:30 GMT -5
I think that's just a google scholar algorithm hit.
Nonetheless it is vital.
Maybe not so much as in the days skepticism and thorough investigation characterised ES, but yeah I'm sure there's still a set of population genomicists referencing ES and ESR for commentary critique and leads they can find nowhere else.
Any of them following you from 2008 to today are surely going back to see what other unique hypotheses of yours might also be vindicated by current pop gen sci.
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 5, 2020 12:20:51 GMT -5
The way it works I believe is I follow certain Researchers through Google scholar. Like Instagram. They give the thumbs up to research papers or links periodically. When that happens it hits my inbox. Got to admit. I have about 1000 papers within the last 2 years. I Still have about 200 to look at. Information overload I think that's just a google scholar algorithm )hit. Nonetheless it is vital. Maybe not so much as in the days skepticism and thorough investigation characterised ES, but yeah I'm sure there's still a set of population genomicists referencing ES and ESR for commentary critique and leads they can find nowhere else. Any of them following you from 2008 to today are surely going back to see what other unique hypotheses of yours might also be vindicated by current pop gen sci. |
|
|
|
Post by Tukuler al~Takruri on Feb 5, 2020 16:54:26 GMT -5
Humble apologies MensaOh Tukuler, you fudged up agaaiin!The way it works I believe is I follow certain Researchers through Google scholar. Like Instagram. They give the thumbs up to research papers or links periodically. When that happens it hits my inbox. Got to admit. I have about 1000 papers within the last 2 years. I Still have about 200 to look at. Information overload I think that's just a google scholar algorithm )hit. Nonetheless it is vital. Maybe not so much as in the days skepticism and thorough investigation characterised ES, but yeah I'm sure there's still a set of population genomicists referencing ES and ESR for commentary critique and leads they can find nowhere else. Any of them following you from 2008 to today are surely going back to see what other unique hypotheses of yours might also be vindicated by current pop gen sci.
|
|
