probably gonna reserve a second one for this...hoo boy.
-----------------
I am going repost this here since it has to do with the ancient Egyptian race discussion. Most specifically it discusses race in response to whats provided on wikipedia
sources:
[30]Manni F, Leonardi P, Barakat A, Rouba H, Heyer E, Klintschar M, McElreavey K, Quintana-Murci L (2002). "Y-chromosome analysis in Egypt suggests a genetic regional continuity in Northeastern Africa.". Hum Biol 74 (5): 645–58. doi:10.1353/hub.2002.0054. PMID 12495079.
source:
www.comp-archaeology.org/WendorfSAA98.html Source:Bogucki, Peter I. (1999). The origins of human society. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 355. ISBN 1-57718-112-3.
Current ES responses accounted for
Subject: DNA of Modern Egyptians
[27]Source: Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., P. Menozzi, and A. Piazza. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Response:
egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=bag&action=display&thread=662
[28]Bosch, E. et al. (1997). "Population history of north Africa: evidence from classical genetic markers". Human Biology 69 (3): 295–311.
[29] Arredi B, Poloni E, Paracchini S, Zerjal T, Fathallah D, Makrelouf M, Pascali V, Novelletto A, Tyler-Smith C (2004). "A predominantly neolithic origin for Y-chromosomal DNA variation in North Africa.". Am J Hum Genet 75 (2): 338–45. doi:10.1086/423147. PMC 1216069. PMID 15202071.You can read it here:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1216069/Tunis, Mansoura, Tizi Ouzu and Algiers are all coastal North African cities, the only exception being Luxor which was among the least sampled of the populations and represents only ten percent of the sampled populations. Many other north African populations are ignored.
[30]^ Cavalli-Sforza. "Synthetic maps of Africa". The History and Geography of Human Genes. ISBN 0-691-08750-4.The present population of the Sahara is Caucasoid in the extreme north, with a fairly gradual increase of Negroid component as one goes south
He's saying that a "Caucasoid" component is present in the EXTREME north. This may also debunk his previous studies in 1994 because he selected his samples from the extreme north and didn't represent more inland populations. Also worth noting that the Egyptian dynasties came from
Southern/Upper Egypt.
source: Frank Yurco, "An Egyptological Review" in Mary R. Lefkowitz and Guy MacLean Rogers, eds. Black Athena Revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996. pp. 62–100
According to ES, Yurco says no such thing
www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=006903
books.google.com/books?id=97jwg1Xwpj0C&pg=PA65&lpg=PA65&dq=%22Certainly+there+was+some+foreign+admixture%22&source=bl&ots=
pg 65, Frank Yurco,
Black Athena Revisited
Edited by Mary R. Lefkowitz, Guy MacLean Rogers What wikipedia says..
images taken from Lionese from ES.
source: Kings, T; Salem, AE; Bauer, K; Geisert, H; Malek, AK; Chaix, L; Simon, C; Welsby, D et al (1992). "mtDNA Analysis of Nile River Valley Populations: Genetic Corridor or a Barrier to Migration?". Am J Hum Genet. 64 (5): 1116–76. doi:10.1086/302314. PMC 1377841. PMID 10090902
Potential ES response(s):
www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=005743source:Stevanovitch, A.; Gilles, A.; Bouzaid, E.; Kefi, R.; Paris, F.; Gayraud, R. P.; Spadoni, J. L.; El-Chenawi, F. et al (2004). "Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Diversity in a Sedentary Population from Egypt". Annals of Human Genetics 68 (Pt 1): 23–39.
ES Responses
www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=006902www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=006907ES mention of Stevanovitch (dunno if it's a refutation or anything but I'll keep it here for the moment).
DNA of some modern Egyptians found a genetic
ancestral heritage to East Africa:
"The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity of 58
individuals from Upper Egypt, more than half (34
individuals) from Gurna, whose population has an
ancient cultural history, were studied by sequencing
the control-region and screening diagnostic RFLP
markers. This sedentary population presented
similarities to the Ethiopian population by the L1 and
L2 macrohaplogroup frequency (20.6%), by the
West Eurasian component (defined by haplogroups H
to K and T to X) and particularly by a high frequency
(17.6%) of haplogroup M1. We statistically and
phylogenetically analysed and compared the Gurna
population with other Egyptian, Near East and
sub-Saharan Africa populations; AMOVA and
Minimum Spanning Network analysis showed that
the Gurna population was not isolated from
neighbouring populations. Our results suggest that
the Gurna population has conserved the trace of an
ancestral genetic structure from an ancestral East
African population, characterized by a high M1
haplogroup frequency. The current structure of the
Egyptian population may be the result of further
influence of neighboring populations on this
ancestral population."
(Stevanovitch A, Gilles A, Bouzaid E, et al. (2004)
Mitochondrial DNA sequence diversity in a sedentary
population from Egypt.Ann Hum Genet. 68(Pt
1):23-39.)
www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=006851Got other fun facts too I'll need to return to that.
Source(s):
ngm.nationalgeographic.com/geopedia/Ancient_Egypt <-- Skimmed it. The same source SEEMS to suggest against a mass migration and influence.
Ahhyep! This is what Keita says.
"Linguistics and writing can give some clues to migration or major cultural interactions. Semitic and perhaps Sumerian speakers in the Near East developed agriculture some 2,000 years before it emerged in the Nile Valley. If Egypt had been peopled by a mass migration of farmers from the Near East, ancient Egyptians would have spoken either a Semitic language or Sumerian (considered a language isolate, meaning that it has no obvious close relatives). Although certain major domesticated species used in Egypt came from the Near East, it is interesting to note that the words for these in Egyptian were not borrowed from any members of the Semitic family whose common ancestor had terms for them. They are all Egyptian."
So basically they are through choice of word choice over-exaggerating the level of influence from the Near East.
UNESCO convened the "Symposium on the Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script" in Cairo in 1974. At that forum the "Black Egyptian" theory was rejected by 90% of delegates
unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0003/000328/032875eo.pdf ES Response:^^The only thing wrong with this "fact" is that it
is completely bogus. There is no "90 percent" "rejection"
anywhere in the report. In fact, most participants, using
classic "racial" categories hold that "Negroes" (in
the stereotypical 'true negro' sense) made up a
substantial proportion of the population. QUOTE:
There is a contradiction here: all the anthropologists agree in stressing the
sizable proportions of the Negroid element—almost a third and sometimes
more—in the ethnic mixture of the ancient Egyptian population; but nobody
has yet defined what is meant by the term 'Negroid', nor has any explanation
been proferred as to how this Negroid element, by mingling with a 'Mediterranean'
component often present in smaller proportions, could be assimilated
into a purely Caucasoid race."
-- UNESCO 1981. The Peopling ancient Egypt..
The claimed "90% rejection" is sheer Wikipedia bullshiit,
protected from correction by dishonest administrators.
But that ain't nothing new... Hence the importance of
ES and Reloaded to give people the actual facts and let
them verify for themselves.