I hope the following helps in the research as to who first colonized ancient Africa. We know there are TWO views: "The Out of Africa" and "the out of Near East" theories. I hope we can all share what we have and use it to all our benefit. The following is extracted from my professor's (Dr. John D Pilkey) works on the Ancient Near East, Mesopotamia. Footnotes ( ? ) are by me.
Black Africa
A missing element so far is an explanation of the non-Kushitic, non-Semitic blacks of Africa. There is reason to believe that they played a role in the battle of Metelis on the Akkadian side. This mystery is clarified by a set of three tribe names: Sagara of Tanzania, Mandja of Zaire and Kamba of Kenya. Not particularly noteworthy in themselves, these tribe names tell a remarkable story. The names Sagara and Mandja are identical to the two rulers of the East Indian solar line of the city of Ayodhya (A.) singled out by L. A. Waddell as the Aryan names of Sargon and Manishtushu, founders of the Akkadian Empire. He treats East Indian Ayodhya as an anachronistic rendering of the Akkadian capital of Agade from Indian records originally compiled from Mesopotamia long before the Satem Aryans came to Gangetic India from Anatolia. Also identifying Asa-Manja of Ayodhya with Manasyu of the lunar Puru line, he identifies Emperor Naram Sin with the lunar king Karamba of the Yadu line. The Indian cult center of lunar worship was Mathura. The lunar identity given to the Aryan name of Naram Sin is appropriate because he was an intense devotee of the cult of the moon god Nanna-Suen at Sumerian Ur. The Yadu name Karamba accounts for the correlative Kamba tribe of Kenya. Thus three African tribes parallel the Aryan names of the three chief emperors of Agade, all of them incorporated into the Egyptian establishment of Hamitic northwestern Africa: Sargon-Sagara as the sun god Amun Re of Thebes; Manishtushu-Manja, as the first dynastic Pharaoh Menes; and Naram Sin-Karamba, as the conquering Pharoah Narmer, Menes’ successor.
(A.) [In further studies, Eber is identified with King Dasaratha, ruler of Ayodhya; father of Rama-Chandra (Joktan), whom was the 7th incarnation of Vishnu (Indra Noah). Rama is 7th from Vishnu-Narayana, the Mesopotamian fish god Dagon, the Babylonian Apzu described in the mythological text Enuma elish. Notice the blackness of these patriarchs, Eber a son of Kali (Bast) the Hindu (black) goddess. Kali, (Sanskrit: “She Who Is Black” or “She Who Is Death”) in Hinduism, is goddess of time, doomsday, and death; she is the black goddess (the feminine form of Sanskrit kala, “time-doomsday-death” or “black”). Krishna is also in this line as the 9th incarnation of the above Vushnu. He is described as “black” or “blue-necked.” The name "Krishna" originates from the Sanskrit word Kṛṣṇa, which is primarily an adjective meaning "black", "dark", or "dark blue".[22] As a name of Vishnu,… Krishna is often depicted in idols as black- or blue-skinned. Notice the brothers Joktan & Peleg, and Rama & Bharata, sons of Dasaratha. Bharata was the name given to ancient India. Notice the “blackness” of ancient India within the Dravidian colonization to the Indus, the Decan, then Tamil-Nadar, Dwarka, the city of Krishna, then Australia.]
Sargon himself was a “man of color,” identified in Genesis 11 as Peleg’s son Reu but in Genesis 10:8 as the Cushite Nimrod. He was a son of the mulatto Cush by Peleg’s sister Pele-Bilika, a daughter of the mulatto Eber. For perspective Nimrod was Kali-Bast’s grandson through Cush and her great-grandson through Eber and Pele. Some African blacks, therefore, figure as the race of Nimrod-Sargon. The Sagara, Mandja and Kamba represent the core of “Akkadian Africa” or “Nimrod’s Africa.” As we have seen, a pair of east African tribes, the Afar and Isa, tell a different, complementary story. Also known as Afir, the Afars gave their name to the African continent as a label alternative to “Libya” used by the Greeks and Romans. The name Afir suggests a variant of the Colchian and Egyptian names of Cush’s first vassal Seba, Absyrtus and Asir, the great god Osiris (Indian Shiva) of the Ennead. This suggestion is reinforced by the Isa, a form we would expect for Osiris’ sister-wife Isis. The “is” at the end of the names Osiris and Isis is a suffix added by the ancient Greeks. The Afars are Kushitics and Isa regionally associated Nilotics. Because there was no rebellion against the Akkadian Empire involved in the migration of the Kushitics to the Gulf of Aden and Ethiopia, the Afar and Isa presumably lived in harmony with the Akkadian establishment of Egyptian Dynasty I.
Clusters of isolated tribe names, however, do not convey the sort of definition established by the large linguistic stocks. Despite a vast array of languages in black Africa, these people are classifiable into three groups: the Sudanic West Africans, the Bantu of Central and South Africa and the Khoisans of South and Southwest Africa (Bushmen and Hottentots). This big-picture triad suggests that the Akkadians brought into Africa three groups of blacks as replacements for the three stocks which rebelled against the Arabian scheme, including the Canaanites who were supposed to have colonized Africa along with the Kushitics. The Bushmen claim descent from an ancestor named Cagn, possibly derived from the Lagashite priest Urukagina, a version of Ham’s son Coeus outraged by Shem’s destruction of the Lagashite cult of Ningirsu (Nimrod) in the years immediately prior to the rise of Sargon. If the identification of Cagn with Urukagina holds true, the Khoisans are replacements for the Canaanites.
An article on the Bantu languages in Wilfred Funk’s Universal Standard Encyclopedia associates Bantu with Indo-European:
This classification is similar to the gender concord of most Indo-European languages (other than English). Many philologists believe that gender concord is a remnant of the classification system of suffixes in the original language from which the Indo-European family is derived.
Thus the Bantus figure as substitutes for the rebel Centum Aryans. There is an apparent emphasis on black Eber among the West African Sudanics such as the Ebira of southern Nigeria and the Ebrie of the west Guinea coast as well as Ebore, a sky god of the Nigerian Yoruba. The implication is that Sudanics were added by the Akkadian rulers to replace the Amerindians who had abandoned both Arabia and eventually Libya for the Americas. The position of the Sudanics in West Africa may reflect the knowledge that the race, which they replaced lived far to the west across the Atlantic. In Chapter Three we will see that black Africans reached the mouths of the Volta and Niger in the same voyage or series of voyages that then sent the Amerindians across the Atlantic.
Although the association of Sudanics with Eber is clearly indicated, the Yoruba pantheon suggests, even there, the centrality of Nimrod’s Akkadian Empire in general black African origins. The chief Yoruba sky god Olorun supplies a name from which the Greeks may well have derived one of their three versions of Nimrod: Orion the Mighty Hunter. If so one of Olorun’s two sons Oduduwa hints at the name of Akkadian Emperor Dudu. The other, Obatala, can be matched with any of the other emperors, including either Manishtushu or Narmer; but there is no resemblance of name. One clue is that Obatala is a god of the north and Oduduwa of the south. My source for the Yoruba pantheon does not indicate a family relationship for Ebore. That silence is appropriate because Eber-Gilgamesh was an independent Sumerian, not an Akkadian.
The association is that Eber and Nimrod were half-brothers by the same mother Kali-Bast. The Yoruba god Esu(*) suggests the Gallic version of Joktan, Esus, and fits the Sudanic context as Eber’s son even though my source does not state that Esu is Ebore’s son. Among the North American Muskhogeans proper to Joktan-Meshech, Esu appears under the name Esaugetah. The identities of Ebore and Esu equate these African deities with the two horsemen leading the attack in the Teutates panel (Gundrestrup Caldron). The Yoruba pantheon is probably the most significant such grouping among the black African traditions.
(*) Esu, Eshu - alternate name for Eleggua, the messenger for all Orishas; father of Ogboni
Three more probable identifications in the Yoruba pantheon fill out its relationship to events in Africa in the early 22nd century. The Yoruba god of fate, Fa, figures as a third West African version of Eber after Ebore and Mbori. As for Obatala and Oduduwa, Olorun commissioned the first to create the earth. When Obatala failed, the commission went to Oduduwa, who succeeded. When we add the northern and southern polarity of these two deities, a clear explanation emerges.
In Akkadian tradition Sargon-Nimrod-Olorun is succeeded by two sons, Rimush and Manishtushu. The later of these succeeded in conquering Egypt from southern Upper Egypt as Menes. The implication is that Rimush had failed to conquer Egypt by means of the Upper Sea fleet or by land from the north. The conquest of Egypt was conceived as creation of the earth for the same reason that Marduk’s conquest of Aratta was conceived as creation of the human race. In the case of the Yoruba tradition, the Akkadian conquest of Egypt placed the entire African continent in the power of the Empire and its black colonists. That conquest served to replace with the three African stocks the lost rebel Canaanites, Centum Aryans and Amerindians.
By means of these replacements, the Akkadians sought to patch up the effects of the three-nation rebellion by means of placing matching families in Africa, which they controlled from Egypt. Palestine and Europe were lost to them and, therefore to the Mesopotamian establishment representing the last form of Noahic world unity. Among the Hamites of Egypt, princes such as Japheth and his primary vassals attempted to create an ideal order in Dynasty IV as though Egypt were the whole world. They sought to achieve that goal through Sidon-Ptah’s penchant for propagandistic mythology based on a sincere, if misguided, mysticism. The doubtful results of this initiative can be observed by comparing the subsequent history of Egypt and Mesopotamia with the rest of the world.
Polygenetic confusion had come to stay. Powerfully civilized people such as the Greeks of the 5th century BC could only refer to the rest of the world as “barbarians.” Eventually the image of these “barbarians” would give Charles Darwin the false but immensely influential notion of the subhuman origin of the human race.
Another evidence that ancestors of the Yorubas memorialized events and personalities from the Akkadian Empire lies in Olorun’s followers the Orishas (known as Orichas among the transplanted West Africans of the Caribbean). This group rebelled against Olorun by asking him to abdicate for sixteen years. That term accords with the fifteen year reign of Manishtushu, whom Waddell interprets as a rebel son (from an East Indian narrative about Asa-Manja and Sagara). As I interpret the Akkadian chronology of the Sumerian King List, Manishtushu’s fifteen-year reign was grafted into the 56 years shared by Sargon and Naram Sin.
The Orishas include Obatala and a moon goddess Yemaya, whose name recalls the Hellenic name of Mahadevi as mother of Ham-Hermes— Maia. Because the Amerindians are Mahadevi’s offspring, it is safe to assume that the famous Mayas of Meso-America derive their name from Maia-Yemaya. The popularity of the Orichas of the Caribbean confirms our premise that the Sudanics settled in West Africa as deliberate replacements from the Amerindians. According to Yoruba myth, Olorun granted the Orishas sixteen days after which they were subdued and loyal to him from then on. The colonization of black Africa will be described more fully in Chapter Three. The purpose of stressing colonization processes in these early chapters is to establish a framework of ethonological reality to remove the standard, polygenetic premise that foreign nations beyond the scope of one’s cultural topic are always “out there” waiting to discredit monogenesis by swamping it with “mankind in general,” the idol of the masses in the form of the masses.
Fa, Ebore, Mbori - Eber -Gilgamesh
(m. blk Kali-Bast)
Eshu, Esu - Joktan-Meshech -Gallic Esus,
(s. of Ebore) Muskhogeans Esaugetah
Olorun - Nimrod (m. blk Kali-Bast) -Orion, Sargon, Ningursu
Oduduwa - s.1 Rimush -Akkadian Emperor Dudu,
Obatala - s.2 Manishtushu, Asa-Manja, - Menes
Sagara
or Narmer
Yemaya - Maia, Mahadevi,
mother of Hermes-Ham
NOTES: Deirk Lange: CHAPTER SIXTHE BAYAJIDDA LEGEND AND HAUSA HISTORY.
The Hausa palace version of the Bayajidda legend refers to two different migrations from the Near East. The first was a movement en masse from Canaan and Palestine headed in the beginning by Najib/Nimrod, then by Abdul-Dar and finally by several successive
queens. This first migration found its way―via Egypt and North Africa―through the Sahara to the Central Sudan, where under the guidance of Magajiya Daurama the newcomers established the city of Daura.
[14 Ref. In the available palace versions of the legend, a migration from Canaan and Palestine preceded the migration from Baghdad (Palmer,
Memoirs, III, 132; Smith, Daura, 53; Lange, Kingdoms, 289). They indicate the ancestral name of Najib which the court historian Alhasan identifies with Nimrod (FN 1997:3), an identification confirmed by other Hausa traditions (see notably Coutumiers juridiques de l’Afrique Occidentale Française, vol. III (Paris : Larose, 1939), 268, and Lange, Kingdoms, 209).]
HAUSA-BAYAJIDDA PALACE VERSION Colonization of C. Sudan.
CANAAN & Palestine to C Sudan
1st bt Najib=NIMROD [Lamarudu, son of Kan’an], NIMROD
[of Akkad and Assyria] |
and Magajiya Daurama, s. Abdul-Dar
(established the city of Daura)
[In the king list of Daura the names of the 45 kings before the Fulani Jihad are preceded by the names of seventeen queens, of which the first eight are supposed to designate the female successors of Abdul-Dar, the son of Najib/Nimrod, established in Tsofon Birni near Daura and the next nine the first Magajiyas of Daura.120]
| ?? years ?? Gap of successive 17 Queen Mothers, and 45 Kings.
The 17 Queens:
1st 8 Queens, successors of Abdul-Dar at Tsofon Birni
Next 9 Queens, first is Magajiyas
Next
1 Bayajidda (Assyrian, Assur-uballit-II, 612-609)
2 Bawo
NOTES FROM LANGE: (Shows later intrusion of Israelite invader/migrants out of Assyria.]
Very ancient Hausa version of the Bayajidda (Abuyazidu) legend vs Azna
|
Bayjidda (Abraham)
Daura \ PHARAO
wf1 --------------------wf2
(Hausa Invaders) (Azna Natives)
DYNASTIC AGRARIAN tradition (later white Israelite
Queen Magajiya, Bagwariya, slave maid of Queen Magajiya
of Hausaland [Larabawa/Arabs]
(Sarah) (Hagar)
| |
Son-1 (Jacob) Son-2 (Isaac)
(Israelites) (Ishmaelites)
BAWO > vs < Karba-gari – ancestor of Azna
(Issac) (Karap-da-Gari) Azna versions =
| | (Azna versions ignor the following 7 States)
s.1 KALKALU [6+6 12Tribes]
6 sons + Biram Seven Sons (Azna tradition)
7 Hausa Legitimate States (7 Banza illigetamate States)
Daura Zamfara
Katsina Kebbi
Gobir Nupe
Kano Gwari
Zaria Yauri
Biram Yoruba
Rano Kwararrafa (Jukun)
[Has the Bayajidda Legend
= principle Hausa Versions]
[Hausa “Palace” Version
= most valid version]
LEGEND has two Migrations:
1st bt Najib=NIMROD,
And Magajiya Daurama,
(established the city of Daura)
Colony from Canaan, to C. Sudan,
Via Egypt, N. Afr., Sahara.
Legend:
7 Hills/Heaps formed from/after
Killing “snake” by well at Daura.
KILLER of the SNAKE of DAURA.
“Kalkalu” (Zamfara version)
Cuts snake into 12 pc
= Babylonian Myth of Creation &
=Ugaritic Baal Cycle
=Biblical Creation Account
Snake = TIAMAT
Pieces = new parts of the World
And = 7 or 12 tribes/people
KILLER of the SNAKE:
Most versions = Bayajidda (Abuyazida)
Hause Legend = Bawa Jidda
Hausa Kings of Kano say = Bawo
Poss. Comp. “BAWA/BAAL and Ar”
[Bayajidda’s heroic dragon-killing and his marriage with the queen are best understood as mythological feats formerly re-enacted by the Assyrian king, which were transposed to Africa in an attempt to bestow historical legitimacy on the state founding which was in fact realized by former subject groups of Assyria.94]
-------------------------------------------------------------
[NOTES FROM JOHN PILKEY: Notice here the degraded tradition of Tiamot and Kingu, Havilah (Red Matriarch) and Peleg, the overthrow of Tiamot and the shedding of blod of Jingu (the blood spawning the colonial disperions of peoples); Nimrod is (Hamitic) son of Ham, Cush (Kushites) also a son of Ham. Cush and Nimrod fit the E1 and E2 Haps out of the Ham “E” Haplogroup (Haplogroup E-V38?).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_E-V38Also,
Haplogroup E-M96 is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is one of the two main branches of the older haplogroup DE, the other main branch being haplogroup D. The E-M96 clade is divided into two main subclades: the more common E-P147, and the less common E-M75.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_E-M96The Bantu as a whole are in this hap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BORI Pantheon, in W. Hausaland:
Invaders Natives
Israelite Babylonian
Royal Hausa Kings Slave Azna Kings
Magajiya & Bagwariya;/Bagulma
| | (Gulma/Gurma)
Hausa Tradition
s.1 HAUSAWA vs. s.2 GWARAWA / Karap da Gari
[lg. Afroasiatic] Gwari
[lg. Benue-Congo]
DYNASTIC Version of Katsina accounts:
Namoudou/Nimrod came from Birnin Kissera near Mecca
and settled Daura, C Sudan.
NOTES: The 2 Migrations from A. Near East.
The downfall of Assyria and the subsequent dispersal of Assyrian deportee communities appear to have been more faithfully reflected in the Bayajidda legend. 90
The early emigration from Canaan and Palestine, said to have been led first by Nimrod and finally by Magajiya Daurama, seems to correspond to a mass movement of deportees from Syria-Palestine of which the antecedents can be traced to Mesopotamia and other eastern provinces of the Assyrian empire. The later emigration from Mesopotamia led by Bayajidda, the son of the defeated king of Baghdad, can be likened to the retreat of the remnants of the Assyrian army from Nineveh to Harran under the last scion of the ruling family, Assur-uballit II.91
PRE-ISLAMIC section of KING LIST of KATSINA
Eight kings
1 Zaria –Zegzeg = Gunguma, Gungunum (1932-1909) 5th Babylonian ruler of Larsa.
2 KUMAYO (Kemuel, Abraham’s nephew, by Nahor, father of Aram.
3 RAMBA (Eber
4 TERYAU (Terah)
5 Jamanata (unknown)
6 Yanka Dari - (Ibrahim), Abraham
7 Jida Yaki - Sanau)(Ishmael-ites)
8 Korau - (Isaac) ancestor of the Azna, the Durbawa of Katsina (Ishmaelites)
Zamfara King List: (Some early Babylonian Kings)
1 Bakurukuru = Kurigalzu (1332-1308) late Kassite King.
2 Bakara?
3 Gimshiki = Gilgamesh, Sumerian King of Uruk.
Kebbi King List: First 14 Kings = Near Eastern
1 Burunburun / Burnaburiash-I (1510) 1st Kassite King
2 Arguji / Argisti-I (785-760) 4th King of Urartu
3 Tabari / Tabrimmon (890) 2d ruler Damascus
4 Zartai / Sarduri-I (840-830) 1st Kg of Urartu
Founders of the Banza State of Kebbi = Babylonian Kassites, and Urartians, Elamites.
NOTES:
The bulk of the Hausa immigrants came originally from Syria-Palestine, and that their
political leadership originated from the Assyrian capital of Nineveh but was devoid of all power. Moreover, from the Mesopotamian ancestral The Bayajidda Legend and Hausa History 16 figure Nimrod, son of Canaan, of the Hausa immigrants it can be inferred that the Near Eastern invaders actually included great numbers of people from the central and south-eastern parts of the Assyrian Empire where Nimrod, i.e. Sargon of Akkad, was a celebrated figure. In view of the policy of mass deportations practised by the Assyrians, it is in fact quite plausible that people of Mesopotamian origin were also among the immigrants whom the legend traces back to a region corresponding to the Western provinces of Assyria.
NOTES FROAM PILKEY: “Origin of Nations.”
In the Ubangi-Chari region of central Africa are a wholesale series of matches between tribes of the Nilotic stock and the consecutive series of kings from the legendary solar line of East Indian Ayodhya. The matches are in two clusters based on kings 36-45 and 48-52. These matches of the solar line lie to the Nilotic west in Central Africican Repiblic, Chad, and other lands. Kings of the parallel lunar line enter the picture five times, each time matching a tribe from the eastern Nilotic zone of Uganda, Kenya, and southern Sudan:
East Indian King List African Tribes
36 Bahuka Bwaka
37 Sagara Nzakara
Kara
Sokoro
38 Asa-Manja Manja
39 Karam-bha Karamojong
40 Dili-pa Sila
41 Bhagi-catha Bagirmi
Shamighu Samburu
42 Suhotra Suk
43 Habhaya Baya
44 Ambarisha Mbere
45 Madhu Madi
48 Sarva-Kama Sara
Kum
49 Su-Dasa Daza
50 Kal-masha-pada Musa
51 Ashmaka Maka
Kukura Kuku
52 Mulaka Laka
NOTES FROM PILKEY: “Kingship At Its Source”.
But notice, before the Assyrian exodus, we had the Akkadian under Nimrod.
Pilkey says:
“Colonization of Africa
Any account of the colonization of Africa must begin with the perspective created by Ham’s first two sons Cush and Mizraim. Cush’s identification with Kushitic-Semitic East Africa is a matter of firm tradition. Like his father Ham-Havilah II, Cush derived his name from an antediluvian land named in Genesis 2:10:14. The second son Mizraim’s name signifies Egypt as inhabited by Hamitic-speaking Caucasoids. He himself was Ham’s son by yellow Durga. Yet analysis of West Africa identifies his name with the black inhabitants of that part of the earth— fathers and mothers of our Afro-Americans. As Aka king of Kish, Mizraim gave his name to the Akans, not a tribe but a substantial fraction of the entire West African population including many tribes. As Mandaru of the Amorites he did likewise for the major Mende linguistic stock; and the same applies to the root of his Hebrew name, Musri, and the Mossi group. Mizraim is to West Africa what Cush is to East Africa.
The management of the African colonization process fell accordingly to the eight members of the Mizraim clan along with six sons of Noah, the three antediluvians and three vassals of Gomer. Loosely the three Gomerites can be pieced together from such West African regional names as the Kingdom of Ashanti, the important culturally important Yoruba tribe, the kingdom of Gober and even the Tuaregs of the western desert region to the north. This loose construction lacks conclusiveness and is only suggestive. The actual colonization process began in Yemen and can be treated with some precision. The Mizraim clan includes five males and three females. It overlaps the Egyptian Ennead but is not identical to it. The members common to both traditions are Lehab-Geb-Noah, Pathrus-Riphath-Osiris, Masluh-Atum Re-Japheth, Naphtuh-Nephthys-Hamath and Caphtor-Isis-Dôn. Three other members of the clan— Zud-, Anam- and Philist— are not members of the Ennead. The last two of these were immediate children of Mizraim.
The Mizraim clan furnished the leadership of the expedition. The genetics of black Africa is another matter. This issue is best settled by enumerating the Noahic elite identified as sons or grandsons of Kali. The sons are Riphath-Seba by Noah, Cush by Ham, Hul by Shem and Eber by Shelah. Another son was the non-Genesis 10 figure Coeus, father of South African Khoisans or Khoikhoi. A full set of eight emerges from adding three grandsons: Peleg and Joktan through Eber and Serug-Manishtushu through through Reu-Nimrod. To identify these eight as genetic sources of eight divisions of the African process requires an analysis of how the eight aligned themselves to the eight universal protoplasts and their respective languages. This genetic issue leads to a remarkable result. One of the eight black patriarchs occurs in the context of each of the eight linguistic-theocratic protoplasts. Because Negroid Adam was known to be the father of all humanity, this distribution of Kali’s sons and grandsons was for the purpose of universalizing the eight protoplasts as truly Adamic. Accordingly the belt of nations spread westward from Yemen to Mexico were intended to symbolize the world as a whole, precisely the “blood of Kingu,” the quadroon Peleg known in Bantu as Congo, nominal source of the Bukongo tribe.
Both chronologically and spatially the African expedition filled the interval between the close of the Arabian system in 2208 and the start of the American expedition before 2162. The appropriate isochronic explanation is the forty years from 2208 to 2168 with a module of five years for each step given to one of the eight members of the Mizraim clan. It begins in southern Arabia with Pathrus-Asir-Riphath as reflected in the Asir mountains extending northward from Yemen and running parallel to the Red Sea. In Ptolemy’s chart of Arabia, these mountains separate the Sabaeans toward the sea from the Achchitae, representative of the overlord Aka-Mizraim. The name Asir is duplicated in the Asaritae shown southeast of the Achchitae at the eastern slope of Jabal Balak in Yemen near the modern capital of Sana. Because of Asir-Seba-Adamu’s status as founder of the Semitic Amorites, this division of the process speaks Semitic as does the Kushitic. I am unacquainted with how closely Arabic resembles ancient Amorite.
The historic Red Sea continuum of the Kingdom of Axum associates Yemen directly with Ethiopia, land of the other Semitic people of the process, the Kushitics. In Ethiopia the Afars are still another tribal version of Pathrus-Riphath-Seba. Riphath’s Austronesian and African expeditions began almost simultaneously in 2209 and 2208. Obviously Riphath could not be in both regions at the same time. His reinforced presence in Yemen and Ethiopia indicates that he left the Austronesians in the hands of the sons of Ham just as the Maori pantheon of Raki suggests. Thus Riphath and the Hamite Ocean Dragon Kings exchanged places in Arabia-Ethiopia and the Indus around the year 2209. The Sumerian names of these two lands, Meluhha and Dilmun, indicate that they were an established part of the Sumerian scheme of things as was Magan-Egypt.
The isochronic African process brought the Africans and Amerindians to Ethiopia by 2203. After that moment the process became entangled in the three-protoplast rebellion, the Battle of Metelis and the colonization of Crete (Caphtor) along with North Africa. In order to analyze the political situation in these years, close attention must be paid to which member of the Mizraim clan took charge at each new step in space and time. The first three settlements on the African continent were assigned to the three female members of the clan— first Anam-Amaterasu in Ethiopia, then Dôn-Caphtor on the Nilotic Upper Nile and finally Nephthys-Naphtuh-Hamath on the Hamite Lower
Nile. The Japanese name of Sidon’s granddaughter Amaterasu is probably cognate with the dominant Kushitic people the Amhara. On the Upper Nile the Isa of Isis are themselves Nilotes; and in Egypt Nephthys-Naphtuh is the only member of the clan to bear a Hamitic name in the text of Genesis 10. The Ethiopian settlement took place between 2203 and 2198; the Nilotic between 2198 and 2193; and the Egyptian between between 2193 and 2188, ending in the same year that the 56 years of Sargon and Naram Sin ended in Mesopotamia, triggering the Akkadian intervention in Egypt.
The spotlight now falls on Lehab-Geb-Noah in the next settlement in Libya. In 2188 twenty years remained to this postdiluvian father of mankind. In the previous century he had been among the thirty-two “Arabian kings,” whom Manishtushu claims to have conquered in an inscription. These thirty-two were probably the balance of the fifty Noahic elite exclusive of the ones who appear as kings of the Guti in Iran. Together the thirty-two and the Gutian rulers are the entire Genesis 10 community leagued against the Akkadians. It was in Noah’s settlement in Libya that the war against the Akkadians broke out again as it had when Manistushu raided the coasts of Arabia. The original plan was to settle the Khoisans in Libya; but owing to the disaster at Metelis, Narmer forced Noah’s son Japheth as Masluh- to carry them off to their traditional homeland on the Cubango and Orange Rivers in the deep southwest of the continent. This development freed Noah to return to Sumer where he reigned under the name Kudda shortly before his death.
Beyond Egypt the four remaining divisions of the African expedition were Noah’s Khoisans, the Bantus under Japheth-Masluh, West Africans under Mizraim’s son Beli-Philist- and Amerindians under Zud-, Sidon-Izanagi’s son Susanowo, the god Sosondowah of the Iroquois. After 2188 this second half of the African group attempted to challenge Akkadian authority in Egypt. They may have intended to terminate the process and remain where they were in North Africa; whereas the Akkadian motive was always to banish as much of the world as they could to distant shores in order to secure themselves from threats against Mesopotamia. One development of the Mizraim challenge involved Crete where two of the Mizraim tribes settled as the Caphtorim and Philistim. Beli-Philist’s turn to govern the African expedition extended from 2183 to 2178, the five years encompassing the battle in the Nile Delta in 2181. We can speculate on the likely scenario that governed his behavior in this period. Leaving the bulk of the expedition in Libya, he likely voyaged to Crete in order to establish a base from which to check the westward advance of the Akkadians from the point of Sargon’s conquest in Ionia. Crete was the logical place to hold off the Akkadians both from the Ionian east and Egyptian south.
When the Amerindians met defeat in 2181, Narmer took the ten victims at Metelis hostage at first to demand that Beli capitulate, return to North Africa and submit to the plan to settle the rest of the African group in the distant West. When Beli refused the demand by Narmer, the Akkadian Pharaoh executed the ten hostages. The Amerindians were so shocked at this development that they lost some of their respect for the Noahic elite as fellow mortals analogously to the Hawaiian attitude toward Captain James Cook in the 18th century. Impressed with the pragmatic reality of Akkadian power, they agreed to submit to a continuation of the process guiding them to the western end of the earth. They sent messengers to Beli at Crete, reporting that his father had been murdered and demanding that he return to North Africa and spend the rest of his five years executing the Akkadian demand that he leave Libya with the rest of the expedition. The result was one of the most distant voyages of early postdiluvian times. It extended from Libya westward through the Strait of Gibralter, down the coast of Mauritania and eastward along the Guinea Coast to the mouth of the Volta.
The three antediluvian sons of Noah accompanied Beli to West Africa and were prepared to undertake the American expedition at the close of the allotted forty years. In 2178, Japheth-Masluh took command of the Bantus and Noah’s Khoisans and planted the Bantus at the Congo and the Khoisans farther south at the Cunene and Orange Rivers. The presence of Noah and his sons Shem, Ham and Japheth in the African expedition arose from their vassalage to Cush as Dedan, Raamah, Havilah II and Sheba II.
The Congo is one of those rivers that are narrower at the mouth than upstream. Neverthless it served as orientation for the Bantus, the quasi-Indo-European part of the black African stock. Farther south the Khoisan Bushmen are shown along the south bank of the Cubango, a landlocked river but with a source near that of the Cunene, which forms the border of Angola and Namibia. The name “Hottentots” was applied by the Dutch and English to the Nama Khoikhoi, who were living on the Orange in 1815. Seven clans of the Nama are known by themselves as the “Red Nation” because of the tint of their skin. The Dama Khoikhoi are known as the “Black Nation.” This color consciousness is consistent with Noah’s influence over the stock in Libya in view of his antediluvian efforts to supply the Ark with four women of all four Adamic colors. The entire remnant of the African expedition that reached the Niger by 2178 were red Amerindians and black Africans; so the Khoikhoi memorialized the group from which they came by distinguishing red and black nations.
The final step of the African expedition became the first stage of the Amerindian expedition under Zud-Sosondowah between 2173 and 2168. The expedition memorialized Sidon’s slain Javanites as the Caddoan linguistic stock. Tarshish-Enkidu was Sidon’s grandson through Elishah-Agenor, patriarch of the Caddoan Eyeish of Louisiana. Sidon’s Akkadian title Karibu, the “Enthroned One,” is embodied in the Caribs of Guiana and the Caribbean. Over the five years ending in 2168, the African expedition ended as the Amerindians crossed the Atlantic from the Guinea Coast to Guiana more or less along the fifth parallel of north latitude which strikes the South American coast near Cayenne. The expedition then worked its way up the coast into the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and Gulf of Campeche to the Olmec homeland between the Yucatan Peninsula and Veracruz, namely the Coatzacoalcos River in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.
Physically the West Africans descended from Kali’s son Eber-Tubal; but they were led to the Niger by Beli-Philist in the name of his father Mizraim and adopted three names of Mizraim as their own. This relationship between Beli and Eber, probably established by the time the Philistines arrived in Crete, explains why that nation felt authorized to conquer Eber’s imperial-line people the Hebrews in the time of King David. The Bantus owed their origin to Sabtah and his son fellow Cushite Nimrod. The imperial line of Nimrod-Sargon-Reu is represented in the Central African Republic by tribes such as the Banda (Lugalbanda-Shelah), Lega (Peleg) and Mandja (Asa-Manja-Serug) as well as the West African Kurumba (Karamba-Naram Sin-Nahor). The assignments of the Khoisan “Black Nation” and “Red Nation” to Japheth and Ham, respectively, derive from Japheth’s black wife Kali and Ham’s red mother Mahadevi.
Dates Location Leader Alternative Names Nation
2208-2203 Yemen Pathrus- Osiris, Riphath, Seba Arabs
2203-2198 Ethiopia Anam- Amaterasu Kushitics
2198-2193 Upper Nile Caphtor- Dôn Nilotes
2193-2188 Lower Nile Naphtuh- Nephthys, Hamath Hamites
2188-2183 Libya Lehab- Geb, Noah [Khoisans]
2183-2178 Niger River Philist- Beli Akans
Mende
Mossi