|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 25, 2014 7:21:00 GMT -5
On the other hand. Here we have physical evidence, real evidence of an African IN the Americas. Dating is speculated to be about 1100AD, ie pre-Columbian!! No information was disclosed on the true dating I assumed performed by the Smithsonian Instituite and the infamous Larry Angel. I am the one that doubted African presence in the Americas. Contrary to Van Sertima. Now I am beginning to believe but information is hidden.
Remember he, Angel, is the one that played games with the “Negroid” Greek Skeleton. See People of Lerna thread here.
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 26, 2014 8:13:01 GMT -5
More lies. Arabian.  Arabian mtDNA Hg-I has highest frequency where? ----------- www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080609172919.htm1.0 NEW RESEARCH REFUTES MYTH OF PURE SCANDINAVIAN(VIKING) RACE Date: June 10, 2008 Source: University of Copenhagen Summary: A team of forensic scientists at the University of Copenhagen has studied human remains found in two ancient Danish burial grounds dating back to the iron age, and discovered a man who appears to be of Arabian?? origin. The findings suggest that human beings were as genetically diverse 2,000 years ago as they are today and indicate greater mobility among the Danish iron age populations than was previously though On the southern part of the island of Zealand in Denmark, lie two burial grounds known as Bøgebjerggård and Skovgaarde, which date back to the Danish iron age (c. 0-400 BC). Linea Melchior and forensic scientists from the University of Copenhagen analysed the mitocondrial DNA of 18 individuals buried on the sites and found that there was as much genetic variation in their remains as one would expect to find in individuals of the present day. The research team also found DNA from a man, whose genetic characteristics indicate a man of Arabian origin. The ancestors of the Danes were in contact with the wider world Archeologists and anthropologists know today that the concept of a single scandinavian genetic type, a scandinavian race that wandered to Denmark, settled there, and otherwise lived in complete isolation from the rest of the world, is a fallacy.The iron age peoples moved away from their place of birth "All of our ancestors, no matter when they arrived have contributed to our history and the development of our lifestyle," explains Linea Melchior. "Indeed, Danish identity is more a definition of where one is physically located and lives today than a question of our past history - since we're all originally african in origin. That we ended up in Europe was accidental, which is in itself remarkable". says scientist, Linea Melchior. "We know from other archeological excavations that there was a good deal of trade and exchange of goods between Denmark and other parts of Scandinavia and Europe. These lines of communication must have extended further south as one of the Danish burial grounds, which dates back to the iron age also contained the remains of a man, who appears to have been of arabian origin. |
|
|
|
Post by forty2tribes on Aug 21, 2014 15:53:25 GMT -5
djoser-xyyman you should publish something on this before the next season of Vikings.
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Aug 21, 2014 22:07:41 GMT -5
Europeans enjoy lying to themselves. What they show on TV is not intended to educate and inform but to perpetuate the myth of European achievements. They believe and repeatedly spread their lies. The genetic data shows that the Vikings were NOT as what you see in Hollywood movies. another eg genetic analysis shows that the Neanderthals were black skinned yet they continue showing images of a red haired pale skin Neanderthal. They enjoy lying to themselves. Fortunately some of us can understand this stuff and expose the lies. This is what a world renowned geneticist says. This not MY quote! =============
Quote: 1.0 NEW RESEARCH REFUTES MYTH OF PURE SCANDINAVIAN(VIKING) RACE
Date:June 10, 2008
Source:
University of Copenhagen
Summary:
A team of forensic scientists at the University of Copenhagen has studied human remains found in two ancient Danish burial grounds dating back to the iron age, and discovered a man who appears to be of Arabian?? origin. Linea Melchior and forensic scientists from the University of Copenhagen analysed the mitocondrial DNA of 18 individuals buried on the sites and found that there was as much genetic variation in their remains as one would expect to find in individuals of the present day. The research team also found DNA from a man, whose genetic characteristics indicate a man of Arabian origin.
Archeologists and anthropologists know today that the concept of a single scandinavian genetic type, a scandinavian race that wandered to Denmark, settled there, and otherwise lived in complete isolation from the rest of the world, is a fallacy.
]=========
[/div] [/i] djoser-xyyman you should publish something on this before the next season of Vikings. |
|
|
|
Post by forty2tribes on Aug 28, 2014 16:00:56 GMT -5
Europeans enjoy lying to themselves. What they show on TV is not intended to educate and inform but to perpetuate the myth of European achievements. They believe and repeatedly spread their lies. The genetic data shows that the Vikings were NOT as what you see in Hollywood movies. another eg genetic analysis shows that the Neanderthals were black skinned yet they continue showing images of a red haired pale skin Neanderthal. They enjoy lying to themselves. Fortunately some of us can understand this stuff and expose the lies. This is what a world renowned geneticist says. This not MY quote! =============
Quote: 1.0 NEW RESEARCH REFUTES MYTH OF PURE SCANDINAVIAN(VIKING) RACE
Date:June 10, 2008
Source:
University of Copenhagen
Summary:
A team of forensic scientists at the University of Copenhagen has studied human remains found in two ancient Danish burial grounds dating back to the iron age, and discovered a man who appears to be of Arabian?? origin. Linea Melchior and forensic scientists from the University of Copenhagen analysed the mitocondrial DNA of 18 individuals buried on the sites and found that there was as much genetic variation in their remains as one would expect to find in individuals of the present day. The research team also found DNA from a man, whose genetic characteristics indicate a man of Arabian origin.
Archeologists and anthropologists know today that the concept of a single scandinavian genetic type, a scandinavian race that wandered to Denmark, settled there, and otherwise lived in complete isolation from the rest of the world, is a fallacy.
]=========
Unlike the history of the Nile Valley Europeans are not bathing in the Nile they are truly ignorant. I guess what I’m saying is that the first person who links the histories and myths with DNA evidence will have a story to tell. |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Dec 21, 2014 22:08:52 GMT -5
Here is the latest on the Vikings. Not even the Vikings were white.   |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jan 5, 2015 14:04:08 GMT -5
Again – here is further proof that the Vikings as described in “history books” never existed. It is all lies!!!!
In fact it is becoming evidently more clear that one cannot tell truth from the lies in “documented” European history books.
The authors also conclude that there was only ONE migration event by Inuit-like people to Greenland. Goes to show the amount of BS is written/documented in “history ‘or archeological books. Here are the main points.
-------
Uncovering the Genetic History of the Present-Day Greenlandic Population - Ida Moltke,JAN2015
Quote ---
through Canada in the 12th century, and archaeology has provided evidence of the coexistence of the two groups in this area.2,3 In 985, the Norse Vikings settled in the southern part of West Greenland, where they remained until about 1450 AD. Archaeology has provided substantial evidence of contact between Norse, Late Dorset, and Inuit pioneers.2,3
xyyman comment: Really??? Read on
Quote ---
For example, it is still unknown whether the Norse Vikings are among the ancestors of the Greenlanders. No physical or dental anthropological evidence has been found in support of admixture between the Inuit and the Norse,11 but the two populations were in Greenland at the same time, and sagas, Papal briefs,12 and archeological findings suggest that contact took place.2 A few attempts were made to answer this question with genetics, but all were unsuccessful; part of the reason is that the Norse Vikings came from the same or similar geographical regions as the later European colonizers, making it difficult to answer this question by inferring the source country of the European ancestors of the Greenlanders.6Moreover
Xyyman comment: So the Pope is in on the lies?
Quote ----
Third, we found no support for previous hypotheses suggesting multiple migration events.
Xyyman coment: they are speaking about Inuit-like people.
Quote----
Likewise, we did not find evidence of interbreeding between Inuit and Norse Vikings. Because the largest Viking settlement was located in Southwest Greenland, we would expect such interbreeding to have left a genetic signature in the individuals in the South villages, and we would not expect it to be present in Qaanaaq. However, we observed no more European ancestry in the South villages than in Qaanaaq. On the contrary, more than half of the individual Individuals were inferred to have ***no**** European ancestry at this location, unlike at most of the other locations, including Qaanaaq. Additionally, all individuals with more than 5% European admixture harbored long (>39 cM) ancestral European tracts, which we would expect from very recent admixture. Thus, the most parsimonious explanation is that the admixture in these individuals was caused by very recent admixture and not Norse Viking gene flow. Other results, such as the lack of Norse Viking admixture, are well in line with previous studies that have found no genetic evidence of such admixture10 and thus provide further support for their conclusions. In conclusion, we have presented the largest genetic data set to date for an Arctic population. Our findings complement the recent ancient-DNA-based study by Raghavan et al.10 and provide knowledge about the history of the present- day Greenlandic population
Xyyman comment: so, other studies also concluded the Norse Viking occupation is also fantasy. Ie lies!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Aug 28, 2018 10:44:51 GMT -5
Genomic and Strontium Isotope Variation Reveal Immigration Patterns in a Viking Age Town - Maja Krzewinska 2018  |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Aug 29, 2018 7:52:56 GMT -5
So I decided to do a deep dive into the paper. The author stated in the main body that derived SLC24A5 was observed and to my surprise that is a lie!!!! SLC24A5 was NOT observed or at least the data was not shown. SLc45A2 was shown but as we all know Papuans and some Central Africans like pygmies carry the derived SLC45A2. So...WT....I can't believe what I am seeing. Maybe it is an error on their part. rs1426654 is the SLC24A5 and it was mislabeled. Also they chose to show data for seven (7) out of the 23 samples they obtained. Hmmmm! White people can't help themselves with that VMAt1 gene  |
|
|
|
Post by kel on Aug 29, 2018 18:28:53 GMT -5
If the Vikings werent white then Where does or did the idea that they were white come from |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 6, 2019 19:51:39 GMT -5
There is no data showing Vikings were white. None! It is all made up by modern Europeans. The latest study 2019. Modern European Haplogroups is at very low frequency. Why? The genetic makeup of modern Europeans are very very very new. Iron age or much later. Title: Mitochondrial DNA analysis of a Viking Age mass grave in Sweden Authors: Magdalena M. Bus, Maria Lembring, Anna ´ Kjellstr¨om, Christina Strobl, Bettina Zimmermann, Walther Parson, Marie Allen  |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jul 19, 2019 22:34:46 GMT -5
As I said several years ago ...not even the Vikings were white. European "history" is filed with lies.
Oh! No SLC24A5 results disclosed...why? He! HE! HE!....SMH.
-------
Population genomics of the Viking world - July 2019
Ashot Margaryan, Daniel Lawson, Martin Sikora,
Abstract
The Viking maritime expansion from Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) marks one of the swiftest and most far-flung cultural transformations in global history. During this time (c. 750 to 1050 CE), the Vikings reached most of western Eurasia, Greenland, and North America, and left a cultural legacy that persists till today. To understand the genetic structure and influence of the Viking expansion, we sequenced the genomes of 442 ancient humans from across Europe and Greenland ranging from the Bronze Age (c. 2400 BC) to the early Modern period (c. 1600 CE), with particular emphasis on the Viking Age. We find that the period preceding the Viking Age was accompanied by foreign gene flow into Scandinavia from the south and east: spreading from Denmark and eastern Sweden to the rest of Scandinavia. Despite the close linguistic similarities of modern Scandinavian languages, we observe genetic structure within Scandinavia, suggesting that regional population differences were already present 1,000 years ago. We find evidence for a majority of Danish Viking presence in England, Swedish Viking presence in the Baltic, and Norwegian Viking presence in Ireland, Iceland, and Greenland. Additionally, we see substantial foreign European ancestry entering Scandinavia during the Viking Age. We also find that several of the members of the only archaeologically well-attested Viking expedition were close family members. By comparing Viking Scandinavian genomes with present-day Scandinavian genomes, we find that pigmentation-associated loci have undergone strong population differentiation during the last millennia. Finally, we are able to trace the allele frequency dynamics of positively selected loci with unprecedented detail, including the lactase persistence allele and various alleles associated with the immune response. We conclude that the Viking diaspora was characterized by substantial foreign engagement: distinct Viking populations influenced the genomic makeup of different regions of Europe, while Scandinavia also experienced increased contact with the rest of the continent.
=====
We conclude that the Viking diaspora was characterized by substantial foreign engagement: distinct Viking populations influenced the genomic makeup of different regions of Europe, while Scandinavia also experienced increased contact with the rest of the continent.
in other words blonde, white mean with blue eyes and white skin as Vikings are ALL LIES. Just as white skin, red-head Neanderthals. All lies Tsk! Tsk! Europeans!!
|
|
|
|
Post by kel on Aug 13, 2019 17:50:49 GMT -5
Crazy......so who and what were the Vikings/Norse What and who were they originally ? ....from the "South" ?? Arabian Penninsula originally ?? Who made them white ? This is Totally insane. If they werent white, where are their decendants ? At what point did they become white ? |
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Aug 13, 2019 18:15:03 GMT -5
The FACTS are: The genetic make up the Vikings are NOT consistent of modern Europeans. Pigmentation genetic profile is not consistent with blood hair with blue eyes...."norse" Now make up ANY story you want. My point? Not everything you read is the truth. You should know that by now. eg The famous Alexandria the Great portrait. The FACT is this was created 400years AFTER his supposed death. Yet 99% of people believe this is a true likeness of him  |
|
|
|
Post by kel on Aug 14, 2019 20:07:16 GMT -5
That "Alexander" mural is clearly of a 'Roman'......due to the armor....
|
|
Arabian mtDNA Hg-I has highest frequency where?
