Post by asante on May 21, 2019 2:57:41 GMT -5
No this thread was posed as a "question" and theory, not a definite statement... The specific question that garnered the theory has yet to answered.
So damn me. Sure looks rhetorical. If not please accept my sincere apologies. Nonetheless the cited map answers such question with a resounding NO!
HEY a theory is a definite statement.
You tripping yourself up.
You tripping yourself up.
Saying that something is a "theory" as opposed to "this is how it is" are two totaling different things. Why tf are you acting remedial to that fact?
But you don't present a coherent hypothesis less lone
a full blown operative theory.
a full blown operative theory.
To the real "black" folk reading this look at how rigid these mf's are acting towards this theory. Rather than simply disproving what I'm saying (if they disagree) by answering the question they come at me as though I'm doing a write up in a peer reviewed journal. Well you need "this this this and that in order to be", when I stated in the first post that this theory is based almost entirely on a riveting finding in regards to a genetic trait that is inconsistent with a common narrative.
Evolution
is a theory. Relativity is a theory. This
thread is just egotism against all odds.
is a theory. Relativity is a theory. This
thread is just egotism against all odds.
Dude answer my question or stfu...
"Why African Americans who are supposedly of West African ancestry have an almost zero tolerance for lactate?"
The same Aframericans who, Yvette Carnell
of #ADOS constantly reminds us, are also
of NW Euro ancestry too.
of #ADOS constantly reminds us, are also
of NW Euro ancestry too.
Simply explain that. You all's reaction to a simple question (and posed as such via the question mark in the title of the thread...) wreaks of the common notion that "some of you" are some type of guardians to a silly Western paradigm.
I ain't "you all". I YYT Tukuler al~Takruri
and I ain't got no qualms disagreeing
and I ain't got no qualms disagreeing
Yes you do, and your post throughout this thread proves that. You are standing guard to an old Western paradigm under the guise of a new face along with several other members.
What in the Hell are you talking about?
You do realize you just said you can't read
the map you yourself posted. How silly referencing a map you don't even understand
the map you yourself posted. How silly referencing a map you don't even understand
I'm not talking about subjective "rock art". I'm referring specifically to data on the actual...
Who you? The last person never read the
Lactose thread 8 years ago and all its
data data data? Gramps says watch Sonny
go CouCou for Cocoa Puffs!!!
Lactose thread 8 years ago and all its
data data data? Gramps says watch Sonny
go CouCou for Cocoa Puffs!!!
Stfu with you whack azz fake Ebonics weird mf. Like I said what I am using to base this theory on is actual "data" from living populations. You are referencing ancient rock paintings in a silly attempt to repudiate what the data presented indicates.
With all the pic spam
The only pics that have been posted in the main are various maps showing the distribution of lactate digestion for the purpose of proving their consistency. Zaharan actually made a claim that I did not have an adequate (quantitative) amount of evidence in the form of correlating maps, and me "spamming" maps is you being on code and taking the obvious out of context.
you post how you
got nerve to say a painting of a cow
being milked is subjective?
got nerve to say a painting of a cow
being milked is subjective?
Face facts. This not no debate.
If you just wanna lay down the law then
why claim the thread title is an innocent
question when you not trying to hear the static.
why claim the thread title is an innocent
question when you not trying to hear the static.
ANSWER THE QUESTION OR LEAVE IT ALONE!