|
Post by anansi on Jun 23, 2014 4:58:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 23, 2014 9:35:29 GMT -5
Great Find Bro!!. They irritate me when they write "personal communication" in these reports. It makes it look "hush hush".
DNA testing is needed for confirmation. This reminds of the recent 14,000ya teenager found in the cave. She had "Negroid" features but DNA was Native American. SHe also had "partial" shovelled teeth. These two did not. They also had definite tropical body porportions. Indicate definite tropical African.
I wonder what else is "hush hush"
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Jun 23, 2014 9:55:47 GMT -5
Great Find Bro!!. They irritate me when they write "personal communication" in these reports. It makes it look "hush hush". DNA testing is needed for confirmation. This reminds of the recent 14,000ya teenager found in the cave. She had "Negroid" features but DNA was Native American. SHe also had "partial" shovelled teeth. These two did not. They also had definite tropical body porportions. Indicate definite tropical African. I wonder what else is "hush hush" Actually it seemed to have been news back in the day but just like the Qustol grave goods it shined for a brief moment then everyone went to sleep not talked again till resurrected by Van Sertima, then not talked about or improved upon,this in my view is the best case for an African pre-Colombian contact apart from Black Asians this matches up with the first European contacts of seeing black folks of African origins doing business with whom ever was here first.
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Jun 23, 2014 11:18:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 23, 2014 18:22:33 GMT -5
Indeed. This is a fascinating revelation. I had doubts of Van Sertima's assertation, primarily because in his books the statues are more Polenesians type rather than Africans. Now I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 23, 2014 18:27:34 GMT -5
It pisses me off how these Europeans twist the truth, hide information to maintian their false and delusional belief of European dominance of history. Their history is filled with lies and delusion. It would really be informative for all population to know the truth without the sleight of hand and lies these Europeans tell.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 23, 2014 18:41:19 GMT -5
From the Observer in 1975
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Jun 23, 2014 22:15:45 GMT -5
This is were we are at for the last 40yrs what we have is a grave site dating 1250 A.D with two apparently non native Americans of African origins one wearing a Pre-Colombian clay vessel around his wrist dating 950-1250 A.D no colonial objects were found at the site. and as said earlier this is no stand alone although I know of no new studies done on the others,I hope the Virgin Island's government refocus on this. Incidentally one of the figures appeared to been a sacrifice news.google.com/newspapers?nid=757&dat=19741021&id=kw9OAAAAIBAJ&sjid=BK4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6610
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2014 14:53:26 GMT -5
You're talking about controversial/anomalous findings. There's a whole list of artifacts alleged to provide evidence for pre-columbian trans-atlantic ocean contact including a Sumerian bowl, a Roman head figurine etcetc. They don't appear in mainstream works as they are not confirmed. Anyway, Vikings were in the Americas as early a the 10th century. This is not controversial and is accepted by all scholars,so there were white folk there hundreds of years before Columbus. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_colonization_of_the_Americas
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2014 14:56:22 GMT -5
If i'm not mistaken one of the Norse texts describes a 'swarthy' Viking in the Americas (Greenland?). However there no reason to suppose he was an African.
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Jun 24, 2014 15:26:56 GMT -5
If i'm not mistaken one of the Norse texts describes a 'swarthy' Viking in the Americas (Greenland?). However there no reason to suppose he was an African. It's not outside of the realm of possability that from time to time people were blown out to sea. There is the story of the expedition that was sent out and never returned after getting caught in a "river in the middle of the sea". This sounds like an ocean current. Since we know that there are curents off the coast of West Africa that run into the Caribbean. If there are African remains, they could be of people who were ship wrecked. Don't forget that once upon a time the notion of Norse contact in the Americas was considered a wild myth. Let's wait and see what future research finds before we dismiss it completely.
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Jun 24, 2014 15:33:26 GMT -5
You're talking about controversial/anomalous findings. There's a whole list of artifacts alleged to provide evidence for pre-columbian trans-atlantic ocean contact including a Sumerian bowl, a Roman head figurine etcetc. They don't appear in mainstream works as they are not confirmed. Anyway, Vikings were in the Americas as early a the 10th century. This is not controversial and is accepted by all scholars,so there were white folk there hundreds of years before Columbus. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_colonization_of_the_AmericasThis is not a pissing contest between Vikings Vs African for race to the so-called New world but unlike many of those other supposed finds this was looked at in earnest by experts in the field ie mainstream work, A swarthy Viking is a swarthy Viking who cares??
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 24, 2014 16:27:19 GMT -5
What human anthropological evidence that Vikings entered the America's pre-Columbian. Or what genetic evidence? Is this like the fallacious Neanderthal admixture? That Wiki Link reads like Alice in Wonder Land. No hard evidence. BTW - you do know that some Vikings carried E1b1b? Another Hollywood illusion about blond roving Vikings. So. What authentic evidence of Viking presence in the America?. No Fairy-tale BS. Anthropological evidence or genetic. No BS. But start a new thread, Anyone.
|
|
|
Post by azrur on Jun 24, 2014 17:23:07 GMT -5
What human anthropological evidence that Vikings entered the America's pre-Columbian. Or what genetic evidence? Is this like the fallacious Neanderthal admixture? That Wiki Link reads like Alice in Wonder Land. No hard evidence. BTW - you do know that some Vikings carried E1b1b? Another Hollywood illusion about blond roving Vikings. So. What authentic evidence of Viking presence in the America?. No Fairy-tale BS. Anthropological evidence or genetic. No BS. But start a new thread, Anyone. news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/10/121019-viking-outpost-second-new-canada-science-sutherland/There is archaeological evidences apparently
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Jun 24, 2014 19:20:00 GMT -5
Archeological is somewhat "subjective". That is why I said hard evidence. Genetics or Anthropological. Anyone!?
Is there real evidence that the Vikings were present in the Americas or is this another internet folklore spread by delusional Eurocentrics.
I have never seen ANY hard evidence of Vikings being present in the Americas...NONE!
|
|