|
Post by anansi on Oct 11, 2014 12:16:22 GMT -5
A mother and son team have some pretty interesting take on Africans the word Negro and dark or Black Indians who were present before Europeans came. these dark Indians were mixed with the Africans who came as slaves thus confusing the two populations,good watch check out some of their other vids.
|
|
|
Post by nebsen on Oct 11, 2014 17:43:49 GMT -5
In the 1st video they talk about Dr. Louis Henry Gates saying only 5% of African Americans have native blood in an Ebony article . They say they don't know where he gets this information from. Well he gets his information from Ancestry .com which he is part owner i believe. Dr. Gates has been saying this for a while now based on his DNA samples from African Americans. They should know this, for he has been on PBS with a program that is on now, about DNA & ancestry with famous people of all races. Now maybe they still need larger samples of African American to reach the percents that they say on this video is more accurate. I personally feel it is much higher than 5%.
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Oct 11, 2014 19:37:35 GMT -5
In the 1st video they talk about Dr. Louis Henry Gates saying only 5% of African Americans have native blood in an Ebony article . They say they don't know where he gets this information from. Well he gets his information from Ancestry .com which he is part owner i believe. Dr. Gates has been saying this for a while now based on his DNA samples from African Americans. They should know this, for he has been on PBS with a program that is on now, about DNA & ancestry with famous people of all races. Now maybe they still need larger samples of African American to reach the percents that they say on this video is more accurate. I personally feel it is much higher than 5%. I personally don't agree with Gates. I know far too many people who DO have native ancestry. My god mother does and I do not appreciate anyone trying to tell her she doesn't know who her family is. I know many people who are classified as black in our society who are card carrying members of native groups. How can he make such a sweeping claim based on a few DNA samples. Afro Americans are an extreemly diverse group. So when I see studies that say Afro this or that are this percentage this, that percentage that, I'm like, well how do they know? Did they test everybody? Can they test everybody? We are not all identical in color or racial composition. This idea that we are all the same in itself is a myth that needs to be exposed. Some of us are genetically pure, some of use are extreemly mixed, multi racial and thatis the reality of who we are. I would also say it would depend greatly on what part of the country the people are located.
|
|
|
Post by truthteacher2007 on Oct 11, 2014 20:09:04 GMT -5
I haven't finished watching the videos, but I will say this regarding the use of terms like negro. I think it is important to realize that terms of racial classification were created for the benifit of the ruling class and so definitions shift as suits their needs. Also, there were differences between the way the English classified people and the way that the Spanish did. The South East changed hands between the Spanish and English. In the regions that were controled by the English, there was a great deal of incentive to classify natives as negros. If the people there were "negros", then they had no legal claim to the land and it could be taken from them. The same tactic of blood quantum is still being used against native people and Hawaiians to steal their land from them. In areas of New England where there were high rates of mixing between Africans and Natives, the govt has used the one drop rule to claim that those people are black and not native and have no claim to ancestral lands etc. In Hawaii, where there is a movement by natives to reclaim family land, they have used the same tactic. If you have more than a certain percentage of Native ancestry, (of course they determine what the acceptable percentage is), you are not a native and have no claim to anything. They totally disregard the identity of the individuals, their cultural upbringing and impose their world view on these people and subject them to laws that disenfranchise them. This is why I so detest this idea of racial classifying people. It was not designed for our benefit, but as a tool to be used against us.
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Oct 11, 2014 22:48:43 GMT -5
Add to the fact that Blacks the earliest man in the America's may not show African genetic stuff because they may well came from Asia/Pacific and may have survived to this day. Man as 'black’for 50 years finds out he's probably notlinkklik^ for more. How many like this man exist.
|
|