This proves indigenous people of North Africa were white.

[zarahan]

Numerous claims about "North Africa" mostly are referring only to coastal
samples. But there is more to "North Africa" than the coast. It is like
talking about the "Wes"t in the US and only sampling the California, Oregon
and Washington coasts, leaving out the inland areas, plus such "Western" states
as Montana, Dakotas. Idaho Utah, Colorado etc. Anyone doing that would be laughed
away in the US, but in when it comes to Africa, a different, double standard arises.

[Tukuler al~Takruri]

Hahah. Leftover Tamazghacentrics probably fuming over the EPIX series Britannia,
wherein is the Roman multi-ethnic army as below with said AD 43 "black African presence",
recognizing one as Numidian hence a black North African (foreshadowing the North African
skulled and British strontium toothed Ivory Bangle Lady, also a black).

Aug 4, 2016 11:24:37 GMT -5 Ish Gebor said:

A common misconception is that the Romans in Britain were all born in Italy, had white skin, and spoke Latin. Not so: ever since

the Emperor Claudius' multi-ethnic Roman army landed at Richborough in Kent in ad 43, there has been a black African presence in Britain (Britannia).

Two types of Africans came to Britain:
those who were Roman citizens, from African families of the ruling classes who had embraced Romanization (the acceptance of Latin and Roman culture),
and those who did not necessarily have a choice, such as slaves and soldiers mustered in one of the Roman provinces in Africa.

1. Evidence [...]

2. High ranking officials [...]

3. Soldiers [...]

--The Oxford Companion to Black British History
Edited by David Dabydeen, John Gilmore, and Cecily Jones

www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780192804396.001.0001/acref-9780192804396-e-356