Destroying the ALT-RIGHT'S "WE WUZ KANGZ" Article
Jan 28, 2018 16:37:04 GMT -5
whosdatgal and google like this
Post by asante on Jan 28, 2018 16:37:04 GMT -5
Caucasians over the last decade have changed their strategy in how they cope with the glorious history of our people. About a decade or so ago there were "serious" debates about the race of the ancient Kemites in situations where they controlled the narrative. Within the last 8-10 years however with several genetic test of ancient Kemetic remains it has become virtually impossible for them to make any serious argument against the ancient Kemites originally being a hub of various melaninated Africoid populations. With this overbearing and "harsh" truth that they are now glaring at they have created the "We Wuz Kangz" retort as their way to shamelessly mock the truth about our glorious history that they were recently making "serious" attempts to "legitimately" steal. Understand that for over 2 centuries Caucasians have been obsessed with trying to be the "Kangz" of ancient Kemet. The proof in the fact that they still secretly obsess over trying to steal our African history is in the whole King Tut being "99% Western European". Despite the crap eventually being debunked look at how far they took that lie. To the contrary look at how hush hush people are about the legitimate reports of the Ramses III's Y-DNA matching that of most Niger-Congo speakers.
The Alt-Right (the new face of casual racism) has attempted to chime in on the subject with a little article in which they try to actually debunk the fact that the ancient Kemites were Africoid, and they even go as far as citing blatant white supremacist bs sources such as "March of the Titans". On a popular white supremacist website called "Theapricity" they posted the article "We wuz Kangz" in a thread with the same title. Here is what I used to dismantle the BS and send them running.
www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?230732-WE-WUZ-KANGS-N-SHID/page6
We Wuz Kangz! It is a meme that we have all used 100’s of times. It comes from the Black Egyptian hypothesis, which was based on a bunch pseudo-intellectual leftist people claiming that Ancient Egypt, without any real proof, was founded and cultivated by Black Africans.
They must not be aware of the fact that the "Afrocentric" movement of the 70's-90's did in fact have a profound affect on how Egyptologist regarded the origin and lineage of ancient Kemet. The intellectual ass whooping handed out by Diop, Dr. JHC, Ivan Van Sertima, Dr. Ben, Dr. Francais Cress Wellsing etc etc made the Eurocentrics act right. In the 1970's the Caucasian Egyptologist were not prepared for the can of whoop ass that CA Diop and Theophile Obenga were going to let lose on them. Rather than conceding to the intellectual beating delivered to them by the "65 IQ Sub Saharans" they opted for an extremely rash 20 year comprise with the truth. That compromise of course being to deny indigenous African genetic and physical variability, and to call those Africans who were not the "true Negroid" Niger-Congo speakers (who comprised over 1/3 of the overall population and the single largest component) "mixed race", just so that Caucasoids would not feel completely thrashed by Diop and Obega at UNESCO. CA Diop was only the beginning though. There was a sled of Afrocentric scholars calling whites out on their revisionist BS, and Caucasians "authorities" had to yield to overwhelming evidence by the late 90's.
"There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa.. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas.....must be placed in the context of hypotheses informed by archaeological, linguistic, geographic and other data. In such contexts, the physical anthropological evidence indicates that early Nile Valley populations can be identified as part of an African lineage, but exhibiting local variation. This variation represents the short and long term effects of evolutionary forces, such as gene flow, genetic drift, and natural selection, influenced by culture and geography." ("Nancy C. Lovell, " Egyptians, physical anthropology of," in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt, ed. Kathryn A. Bard and Steven Blake Shubert, ( London and New York: Routledge, 1999). pp 328-332)
You see as you can read the "Afrocentrics" won the debate. We proved our case about ancient Egypt. This hurt the Caucasians feelings and ego. The real phenomenon then becomes the Caucasian feverish obsession and inference and denial of African history. The Caucasian wanted badly to be the descendants of the ancient Egyptians. The proof that was when the whole Tut was R1b craze was plastered throughout the internet. That lie that Caucasians were descended from an ancient African civilization that they had obsessed about for over 200 years pumped you all's nuts until real DNA results deflated them.
We are supposed to believe that a group of people that did not have a written language, no building over two stories high, or how to harness the power of the wheel, suddenly overcame some of the lowest average IQ’s ever recorded, and built one of the greatest and most complex civilizations in human history.
1. Language - Sir Caucasians did not even have a spoken language until they came out of the Caucus. They were literally grunting and groaning at each other. The mother's didn't say "baby" or "husband". There was no communication between the recessive inhabitants of those caverns. For that very basic reason there is no sign of any sort of intelligence during the 2,000 years that you mutants existed in that desperate mountain range. Let's skip the fact that Medu Neter which is the ancient Nile Valley form of writing is the oldest in the World, and that NUBIANS created it, and spread it north into Kemet and points onward to form the basis of the very English language that we are communicating with today.
This is from Dhar Tichitt which was an early West African civilization created by Mande speakers who migrated directly from Nubia in what was the fertile Sahara, and pushed Westward into modern day Mauritania after the desertification process.
Debunked
2. no building over two stories high - The same West African civilization known as Dhar Tichit which was ancestral to ancient Wagadou" (incorrectly called ancient Ghana by Caucasians) disproves your caveman lunacy. Look at the timeline, and keep in mind where Caucasians were at during this same time.
This is older than anything that Caucasians had ever done. Reason being Caucasians did not leave the Caucus until 2,000 BCE. This West African civilization, and those structures were old by then.
Debunked!
3. The Wheel - With the same ancient Mande speaking West African civilization Dhar Tichitt we debunk another prominent Caucasoid fallacy.
Not only is the artwork showing domestication of cattle being Africans, but also it depicts the ox drawn plow was used a measurement tool in writing. That right there is literature and mathematics all in one.
Debunked
suddenly overcame some of the lowest average IQ’s ever recorded,
Is it true that China less than 50 years ago had an IQ lower than "Sub Saharan" Africans? If that's true then doesn't throw the entire argument IQ (Nazi brand Eugenics) being genetic completely away? Let here your logic on this one.
and built one of the greatest and most complex civilizations in human history. Seem plausible? I did not think so.
Any evidence that contradicts this hard evidence in favor of the Black Egyptian hypothesis is usually from the later dynastical periods when the Black Nubians started to invade, or from anecdotal stories from historians describing what the “Egyptians” looked like at that time in the last centuries of Ancient Egyptian history, well after documented race mixing had already begun.
That is so crazy...
"On this basis, many have postulated that the Badarians are relatives to South African populations (Morant, 1935 G. Morant, A study of predynastic Egyptian skulls from Badari based on measurements taken by Miss BN Stoessiger and Professor DE Derry, Biometrika 27 (1935), pp. 293–309.Morant, 1935; Mukherjee et al., 1955; Irish and Konigsberg, 2007). The archaeological evidence points to this relationship as well. (Hassan, 1986) and (Hassan, 1988) noted similarities between Badarian pottery and the Neolithic Khartoum type, indicating an archaeological affinity among Badarians and Africans from more southern regions. Furthermore, like the Badarians, Naqada has also been classified with other African groups, namely the Teita (Crichton, 1996; Keita, 1990).
Nutter (1958) noted affinities between the Badarian and Naqada samples, a feature that Strouhal (1971) attributed to their skulls possessing “Negroid” traits. Keita (1992), using craniometrics, discovered that the Badarian series is distinctly different from the later Egyptian series, a conclusion that is mostly confirmed here. In the current analysis, the Badari sample more closely clusters with the Naqada sample and the Kerma sample. However, it also groups with the later pooled sample from Dynasties XVIII–XXV."
-- Godde K. (2009) An Examination of Nubian and Egyptian biological distances: Support for biological diffusion or in situ development? Homo. 2009;60(5):389-404.
and
Previous analyses of cranial variation found the Badari and Early Predynastic Egyptians to be more similar to other African groups than to Mediterranean or European populations (Keita, 1990; Zakrzewski, 2002). In addition, the Badarians have been described as near the centroid of cranial and dental variation among Predynastic and Dynastic populations studied (Irish, 2006; Zakrzewski, 2007). This suggests that, at least through the Early Dynastic period, the inhabitants of the Nile valley were a continuous population of local origin, and no major migration or replacement events occurred during this time.
Studies of cranial morphology also support the use of a Nubian (Kerma) population for a comparison of the Dynastic period, as this group is likely to be more closely genetically related to the early Nile valley inhabitants than would be the Late Dynastic Egyptians, who likely experienced significant mixing with other Mediterranean populations (Zakrzewski, 2002). A craniometric study found the Naqada and Kerma populations to be morphologically similar (Keita, 1990). Given these and other prior studies suggesting continuity (Berry et al., 1967; Berry and Berry, 1972), and the lack of archaeological evidence of major migration or population replacement during the Neolithic transition in the Nile valley, we may cautiously interpret the dental health changes over time as primarily due to ecological, subsistence, and demographic changes experienced throughout the Nile valley region."
-- AP Starling, JT Stock. (2007). Dental Indicators of Health and Stress in Early Egyptian and Nubian Agriculturalists: A Difficult Transition and Gradual Recovery. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 134:520–528
Notice how these White supremacist are very aware of the truth of this matter, but they to rush to control the narrative that they can flip the situation and present it first. That way when the truth is revealed, some peoples are so entangled in their lunacy that they display cognitive dissonance. The Caucasians and mulattoes overran the original Africoid civilizations of Europe Asia and Africa. Kemet was the last stronghold of Africoid populations. These Caucasians were a plague from the Caucus mountains who usurped civilization after they would trickle in little by little for centuries. They tried to take over Kemet for over 1,000 years. Meaning for 1,000 years those persist cavemen got their asses beat, and in epic fashion (let Ramses II and III tell it).
The story basically breaks down as such: Blacks invented Western Civilization and then those evil Whites came swooping in as per usual and stole it all and then took all the credit. In other words, Whites have always been the amoral bad guys in history. This has been a vicious methodology that has been used as a tool to dehumanize and justify committing acts of violence on us. I have heard this insane propaganda in one form or another all my life.
Here is Elijah Muhammad's and Malcolm X's breakdown of the evil of the whiteman.
"Interestingly, the ancient Egyptians recorded the Tamahu, which means created white people. Egyptian writings also refer to whites as Typhonians or People of Seth, both meaning “the devils.”. The Seth worshiper designation is also reference to the lower chakras, which they only have access too (in which set rules), because they lack a functioning third eye or pineal gland unlike melaninated people. After these “white devils” were first released into the Black community of the Near East 6000 years ago, they caused severe strife, thus the Africans rounded them up, stripped them of everything and exiled them to the caves and hills of the Caucasus Mountains. This explains the sudden appearance of white people in this region. To prevent their escaping Africans installed a series of guarded walls blocking all exits along that area from one sea to the other!
Thus “roping” them off (hence the word Europe). These walls have been witnessed and recorded by many European writers, including Pliny. Thus, totally cut off from civilization, the whites degenerated into uncivilized, nomadic savages. They remained this way for 2000 years until ‘Allah mercifully sent an Egyptian priest named Musa or Moses to civilize them.’
This explains the otherwise unknown reason why suddenly about 2000 B.C.E, vast hordes of these white barbarians left the Caucasus region and stormed all the (Black) centers of civilizations throughout Mesopotamia, the Near East, Africa and India, destroying and usurping them.
Thus, the Whiteman’s arrival signaled destruction for all these civilizations and the beginning of the Whiteman’s rise to power and the subsequent plague of the Earth for 4,000 years. 6,000 years total. They were told that they will all be destroyed at the end of the 6,000 years. The 6,000 years dating of the Abrahmic religious World's is chronicling Caucasian existence in a realm called "time". The raising of melaninated consciousness signifies the end of their "time", and the return to eternity for melaninated people."
In fact, they are not even closely related to the so-called “Modern Egyptians”. It is astounding, to say the least. And after reading the prologue above, we now know what their fate really was, and why it is a fate that we must absolutely avoid.
Geographical analysis of the Amarna mummies was performed using their autosomal STR profiles based on 8 tested loci.Results are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Maps for individual Amarna mummies are included in Figures 2-8 in the Appendix.
Discussion: Average MLI scores in Table 1 indicate the STR profiles of the Amarna mummies would be most frequent in present day populations of several African regions: including the Southern African (average MLI 326.94), African Great Lakes (average MLI 323.76), and Tropical West African (average MLI 83.74) regions. These regional matches do not necessarily indicate an exclusively African ancestry for the Amarna pharaonic family. However, results indicate these ancient individuals inherited some alleles that today are more frequent in populations of Africa than in other parts of the world (such as D18S51=19 and D21S11=34).
and again.
Ramses III and his son
We amplified 16 Y chromosomal, short tandem repeats (AmpF\STR Yfiler PCR amplification kit; Applied Biosystems).........Genetic kinship analyses revealed identical haplotypes in both mummies (table 1⇓); using the Whit Athey’s haplogroup predictor, we determined the Y chromosomal haplogroup E1b1a
link
E1b1a
It is obvious to anyone who is objective that Whites are the Alpha and Omega of civilization;
It's obvious to folks who are brainwashed by Caucasian media platforms, but to people who actually know history...YOU CAME OUT OF THE CAUCUS AFTER 2,000 BCE...ANCIENT NUBIA GOES BACK TO AT LEAST 3,600 BCE AND KEMET IS AT 3,200 BCE. The bigger question is where is the civilization in the Caucus mountains, WHEN YOU ALL WERE ON YOUR OWN? You were lost until your African parents came and civilized you. If we didn't civilize you through integration essentially...You would have all died in the Caucus from own filth and disease that ran rampant through those caves. Now, you lived like the depiction below until 2,000 BCE, and yet you want to believe that you civilized the World when you came out;
White people EXPLAIN!
[/quote]