|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 26, 2018 15:52:27 GMT -5
The peopling of the Canaries: new data and new hypotheses Roger Blench
ABSTRACT Although the Canary Archipelago was known to classical authors, the date and manner of its peopling remains highly controversial. Remarkably, when the first maritime explorations from the Mediterranean reach the islands, they were still in the Neolithic. Despite extensive evidence for contact, metal technology was never transferred. Even more remarkably, the inhabitants, the Guanche, had no seagoing tradition, despite the evidence for inter-island cultural transfers. A lack of radiocarbon dates has meant that the chronology of the settlement of the Canaries has remained controversial, with wild guesses circulating in the literature. The genocide of the Guanche in the eighteenth century remains an unacknowledged moral stain on European colonial traditions. The paper reviews the classical accounts, and the records of first contact from 1312 onwards. Linguistics points strongly to a connection with the Berbers of the Maghreb, although the extermination of the inhabitants before their language was properly recorded, makes this uncertain. Some types of cultural evidence, such as the granaries with door locks on Gran Canaria, point to Berber contact. However, other practices, such as mummification, log-coffins, body stamps and terracotta images of deities seem highly idiosyncratic. Although the Guanche practised minimalist agriculture from ca. 300 AD onwards, with barley, wheat, goats, sheep and pigs, some islands had reverted to foraging by the medieval era. Recent aDNA work has confirmed the North African connection but the results remain frustratingly unspecific.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 26, 2018 16:25:14 GMT -5
I have always wondering what is the difference between the Berbers and North Africans. Now I know
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 26, 2018 16:28:43 GMT -5
7.2 Epigraphy and rock inscriptions One of the most surprising aspects of the Canaries archaeology is the presence of rock inscriptions in five of the seven islands (Vycichl 2003). Only Gomera and Tenerife lack engraved epigraphy. The basic alphabet is the Libyco-Berber or Numidian script which occurs across the Maghreb. Although the first inscriptions occur in the 3rd century BC and continue through to the 3rd century AD, almost all texts are disappointingly short, hence the limited contribution of epigraphy to Berber history (Le Quellec 2011). Vycichl points out that the epigraphy of the Canaries can be divided into two phases, an early style which is hard to decipher but which shows parallels with the inscriptions in Morocco, and a later phase, which shows familiarity with Latin script.
7.3 Berber relexification of Old North African? Whether there was another language used at first in the Canaries, many Guanche words can be compared to Berber, including the numerals and most of those related to subsistence (§7). Similarly, agriculture appears to be introduced later than first settlement (§4.1). Could it be that the first population transported to the Canaries were non-Berbers, and that a second wave brought new script practices, agriculture and overwrote or relexified much of the original language with Berber?
quote: "An intriguing piece of confirmation is that of the names for individual fish species in Guanche recorded in Wölfel (1965) turn out to be borrowings from Spanish or Portuguese."...hmmmmm. Ancient connection
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 26, 2018 16:46:21 GMT -5
10.5 Mummification Mummification was famously practised in Ancient Egypt and in scattered locations across the world. However, it was not known in any of the source areas where the Guanche presumably originated. Nonetheless Guanche mummies were found on Gran Canaria, Hierro, Tenerife and La Palma (Photo 12). This indicates it was introduced early, when inter-island contact was still vibrant. The internal organs of the corpses were not removed, unlike Egypt, hence it is not thought to be a direct borrowing. Regrettably, the discovery of mummies stimulated a ‘gold rush’ in the 19th century and many tumuli were dismantled in the search for mummies which were carried off to institutes around Europe.
|
|