What you post shows need for police reform, including changes in use of deadly force.
Also changes in handling routine interactions. Some of these incidents over the years
need not have happened but for unnecessary police escalation- the Sandra Bland case
comes to mind. Just write the damn traffic ticket and be done with it.
But aside from work methods there are the needed policy level reforms. Most street cops
I would say are not bad people but they have to toe the line and follow the policies demanded
by the system, and the politicians who greenlight it. Exhibit A is the so-called "broken Windows"
approach with its "stop and frisk" quotas that basically provoke confrontations with all their
risks of escalation over minor matters. Many White Americans basically approve of this
state of affairs because it is not happening to them to the extent of minority groups.
So even liberals may pay lip service to "reform", but since they are not under the harassment
they are willing to let it continue. Things will change substantially when (among other things)
more white people start getting killed or injured, or substantially jacked with fines and fees.
However the current game is rigged to ensure that the most abusive practices go easy in white areas,
so a critical tipping point has not been reached yet.
A Youtube video on stop and frisk quotas- broken windows ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNoHcUnJ2aURelated to policy is the pernicious "Black Shakedown" approach that encourages bogus or
pretexted fines, fees and citations as a revenue gouging machine against poor minorities.
This is what was happening in Ferguson Missouri. The Michael Brown shooting exposed the
corrupt system.
www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/03/04/the-12-key-highlights-from-the-dojs-scathing-ferguson-report/?utm_term=.ad87b4525a83Also sinister is the well documented "policing for profit" practices in operation via the
many corrupt and well documented "civil forfeiture" tactics where they take any money
you have on you and you have to spend thousands to go to court to get it back, or you
can take an "Easy" settlement where they will deduct various "administrative costs" and
promise not to sue, after which you can get your money back without a long, draining
court battle. The game is rigged against poorer people, again, mostly minorities get the hit.
The corrupt "motoring while black" seizures of the Sheriff VOgel regime in Florida off
Interstate 95 in the 1990s:
www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-1992-08-23-9208230488-story.htmldown to the "motoring while black" shakedowns against minority drivers in Texas, circa 2008.
www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-texas-profiling_wittmar10-story.htmlIn the Vogel case, in the 1990s, the CLinton Administration actually had adopted his methods
and trained hundreds of policemen on how to similar pretextual "interdiction" stops. It was all
part of CLinton's "triangulation" strategy to out-conservative the conservatives. Hilary's
"super predators" spiel is drawn from right wing claims of some sort of "looming wave" of
negro "super-predators", starting in elementary school, about to "swamp" society.
The only thing wrong with this claim is that it was/is all bogus.
Again many white Americans silent approve of such things- because its the black "Other" taking the hit,
and constant propaganda campaigns demonizing that "Other" provides nice cover to do so. The case is
is not helped by those blacks embracing "thug" styles which help along the demonization and propaganda
and play into white racialist hands. The enemy provides the rope and how oft victims do the work themselves.