Confirmation of the "White" Jedi Mind Tricks

[asante]

I asked a simple question on a white supremacist forum regarding the first "all white" civilization. The Devils have yet to bring themselves to answer this basic question, but rather resort to juvenile trolling. At this moment our people need to understand who and what we are in relation to them. They had to lock the thread . This is why I side-eye melaninated peoples who look to them for confirmation of the obvious facts regarding who we are, and what we've done. If this is what they resort to when pressed on the truth, then why are there "black people" on places like forum biodiversity begging these b*tches to recognize our truth. They are going so far and wide to find irrelevant studies to prove that "Egypt was black", when there is an unfathomable amount of evidence proving the truth. These people I notice also don't post the pictures from Kemet, the so obviously black pictures that would make anybody arguing otherwise (even with "counter studies") look like complete a$$es. Are they trying to condition other melaninated people reading their discussions to see their wicked opinions based on lies as authorities? These stupid azz debates have been going on with these same people begging the same "white" and "off white" people for the same sh*t. It's like a time wasting puppet show, and all of the black people with common sense see through that sh*t. 

www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=121928

[zarahan]

The thread is over 120 pages size. That's a lot to scroll through.
How are they begging the racists/racialists therein? And exactly
who is doing the begging? Can you post some specific examples?

Also when you mention the "unfathomable amount of evidence proving the truth"
that would include the many studies of hard data that make the case. SO how can
you say such studies are irrelevant, when you yourself use them in various debates?
Your complaint is not really clear.

I am not going to troll through all those pages, but some initial setups seem weak.
Example- within the first 3, one of the forum denizens is allowed to get away with the
bilac argument, when in fact expanded body mass does not necessarily indicate any
significant "settlers" influx in Kemet, but is also a product of better nutrition.
In addition, cooler climates WITHIN Africa itself, (like some coastal or high altitude
zones) not to mention climate change over millennia can influence enough native diversity
to affect body mass without the need for any mass influx of "Settlers." Such factors debunk
his argument right off the bat, but it goes unchallenged. Maybe the matter is addressed within
the 120 pages, but this is precisely why you need hard evidence from studies. Mere pictures
don't address this point, nor do they address things like pottery, or climate. Its simplistic
to rely on pictures which can be easily countered by alternative pictures of pale looking
people. Pictures are part of a legit data package, but they are not the main guns to bring
to a heavy duty fight.

Some advocate not giving away too much to start, but to roll out various points in small bits and
pieces, capitalizing on mistakes of opponents. Is that what the strategy of these blacks is? WHo are
these blacks?

Also did you take on the various denizens in the thread? If so, what arguments did you make to the
various points and how effective were they? Did you use mostly pictures? Can you post some actual
specific examples of where you produced better alternatives?

[asante]

Jun 17, 2019 0:32:47 GMT -5 zarahan said:

The thread is over 120 pages size. That's a lot to scroll through.
How are they begging the racists/racialists therein? And exactly
who is doing the begging? Can you post some specific examples?

You must not have read the first post! HE IS POSING A FACT AS A QUESTION! Oh white people and wanna be white people, why won't you accept this evidence of black Egypt. If it needs to be explained to YOU why this is unacceptable then that is a reflection of the fact that your values in these discussions are laced with some form of approval from pale skin Devils. If a new study came out, and it furthers the truth (like the one from Keita that I posted), then post it there, and then tell them to eat a d***. 

Also when you mention the "unfathomable amount of evidence proving the truth"
that would include the many studies of hard data

You missed the point Enrique! .

I am not going to troll through all those pages, but some initial setups seem weak.
Example- within the first 3, one of the forum denizens is allowed to get away with the
bilac argument, when in fact expanded body mass does not necessarily indicate any
significant "settlers" influx in Kemet, but is also a product of better nutrition.

There is NO DEBATE with those denizens! Those same individuals have been mollywopped dozens upon dozens of times on various forums. They wholly rely on the administration there blocking those posters who intellectually whoop their azzes. On the Anthrogenecia forum where I posted the Keita study from last year, Archades wouldn't dare step in the line of my fire, because he did not have the overt white supremacist backing of site owner Ellias as he does on Ellias's platform Forum Biodiversity. You know that you're dealing with intellectual cowards, so at this point they would never treated with respect in these discussions. By respect I mean asking them "why won't you accept this or that". That's time wasting bullshit that is designed to give those intellectual cowards some sort of clout. I'm not playing that game. 

Its simplistic to rely on pictures

So the f^^^ what Enrique, AND IS A HOME RUN THAT THEY CANNOT STOP. 

Archades says; "The Egyptians were Caucasoids who may have resembled Horners who have "caucasoid ancestry and blah blah blah who steadily imported Negroe slaves and blah blah blah"

ME; Post picture of the first Dynastic King of Kemet - 

And BOOM he looks like jackazz! Then I further provide supplementary bio-cultural evidence validating the relationship between the Bantu-NigerCongo speakers and the ancient Kemites. He has no direct response. That's just it Zaharan. I have plenty examples of this in my many post over the years on that platform. 

Zaharan the issue with YOUR style of debating is that YOU seem to purposely allow them to SET THE NARRATIVE. 

Them telling a lie - "Egyptians were Near Easterners with some remnants of Hamitic blood that is really Caucasoid" 

YOU; "Well the Hamites are really AFRICAN, and they were really Hamitic" 

Common sense ME: They were NOT HAMITIC though populations deemed Hamitic (Somalis and Omoro) had involvement as an element in the civilization along with the so called "NEGROID" "Niger-Congo-Bantu" and Nilotic populations. 

Their entire MO is to try to eliminate that latter two (sometimes they'll acknowledge a minor Nilotic element) elements, and you seem (from what I've seen you do in early discussions) to go right along with that bullsh*t Hamitic nonsense. I can truly say that I with my thread have changed the narrative throughout the internet. Now you have people Khamitics on youtube building on the Niger-Congo involement in ancient Kemet. Do you know how f*cking hard it was prior to 2014 (when I made my thread) to find ANYTHING relating the Niger-Congo speakers as a whole to ancient Kemet, and with the narrative of a mass migration from the region?!?! I had to scour to the internet for YEARS for off beat African scholars (the only ones who had individual knowledge) to throw into that gumbo of a thread to comprise a narrative that is the home run in my thread? People from KRSONE TO TARIQ NASHEED (IN HIDDEN COLORS), TO RIZZA ISLAM (THE NEXT LEADER OF THE NOI) HAVE UTILIZED AND BROADCASTED MY OWN CONTEXTUALIZATION OF THIS EVIDENCE. Now you sites like Lisapo Ya Kama breaking this shit down intricately, but they WERE NO WHERE TO BE FOUND PRIOR TO MY THREAD (that is not a diss as spreading this information through whatever means possible to make it common knowledge is the entire point of my thread) Me ASSERTING that evidence NOT BEGGING FOR IT'S APPROVAL which was brought home with that pictorial evidence is what gave confidence to those blacks online to take the research further. 

which can be easily countered by alternative pictures of pale looking

For you to even say that the relatively few depictions of pale skinned Kemites matches that of the enumerable melaninated - clearly Africoid Kemites makes you sound retarded, as you're going along with their lying narrative. They can never win picture spam war. They can NEVER post a sequence of pharaohs prove that point Zaharan. For you to say that they can means you're full of it too or you don't know what tf you're talking about. Show me where they can counter each pharaoh Zaharan or their offspring depicted here...

realhistoryww.com/index.htm 

[ycoamigofull]

As Beyoku and the rest show you were schooled on the thread, and another of the things you keep failing on is your super Niger-Congo migration thing out of Egypt to populate Africa, like Straight outta Compton on the Nile, lol.