Spread of Neolithics from the south- Isolation by Distance Jan 6, 2020 11:45:30 GMT -5
Post by zarahan on Jan 6, 2020 11:45:30 GMT -5
Fair enough. In the same way we have discovered modern (last century) distortions, lies, omissions, etc....the same probably has been done over and over again in the past to craft whatever agendas needed or desired. Its just hard to swallow that all that 'history'is bunk.
Why lie about all those tribal migrations and lies ?? Doesn't add up to me.
And again, if u can, please answer this question.
If modern Euros according to u are not Central Asian migrants this means that they are in situ indigenes ?? Correct ?
What is the political value if u will of claiming migrations if it isnt true ?
Also, How then do u explain the extreme whiteness as opposed to general 'lighter skin'one sees in North Africa or Medit for example ?
I did not say they are not Central Asian migrants. I said- if you or others are claiming that they
"came from Africa", then in what specific sense? Central Asia ain't Africa. Hence the need for more
precision to tighten up the formula. Re the politics yes some Euros want a pristine picture for
themselves as far back as possible- the right wingers especially so they can claim all "pure" advances
back even into the Paleolithic for themselves- etc etc.- like Brace said- the oft repeated European
feeling that "Cro-Magnon's are us" is the product of folklore. ANother thing many don;t like is the
appearanceof that extreme whiteness only relatively recently, though some are trying hard to push that
back as far as possible into the past- a "pure" line you see... lmao. But anyway, how do the basal Eurasians
figure into your model?