The End of White Supremacy, Done In By "One Drop R

[globalafrikanpower]

It appears that the single central claim of all "Aryan" haters, be they "feel good" white nationalists, or militant hopefuls for the day of the rope, that they are the purest form of humanity, died this week.

Hamburg - New findings by a team of German researchers appear to have settled a long-standing academic debate about whether there was interbreeding between separate branches of the human family tree tens of thousands of years ago.

Scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, say they have proof that some of our ancestors did indeed mate with Neanderthals - at least those Homo sapiens who left Africa.

Those who stayed in Africa do not appear to have come into contact with Neanderthals.
What this means is, the humans who left Africa 50,000 years ago and entered central Asia and Europe, were given to slumming it with their evolutionary cousins, separated by 300,000 years of evolution. Neanderthals were never human. Period. Whites, Asians and Native Americans mongrel-ized themselves by evidence of between 1 and 4 percent Neanderthal DNA present in all populations... but African blood lines.

Put plainly, the presence of this NON HUMAN DNA is ONE DROP RULE evidence that NON-AFRICANS are SUBhuman.

I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that... just that the claim that Blacks are less human... will become the biggest joke of century amongst the enlightened masses... as the evidence clearly shows otherwise, and anyone that remains clinging to it, will be known to be ignorant and irrelevant... kind of like... a Neandethal.....

[zarahan]

^^Do you have the title and a link to this news story?

[anansi]

Jun 20, 2010 17:56:02 GMT -5 zarahan said:

^^Do you have the title and a link to this news story?

It's same Neanderthal story I posted about a month back
egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=bag&action=display&thread=221

[djoser-xyyman]

Think we are missing the point of this new “discovery”.

This is all political PR. Read some of the spin coming from this piece of news.

1. Everyone outside of south Sahara have this gene. Interpretation: South Saharan’s is different from other humans.
2. Some studies are claiming that Neanderthals inhabited North Africa. Again. Excluding South Saharans. But including the “Caucasoids” coastal Africans
3. They are claiming that this genetic material may have led to cognitively ie intelligence. Interpretation: Only the south Saharans are not intelleigent.


Same ole same ole.

[anansi]

Jun 21, 2010 14:24:21 GMT -5 djoser-xyyman said:

Think we are missing the point of this new “discovery”.

This is all political PR. Read some of the spin coming from this piece of news.

1. Everyone outside of south Sahara have this gene. Interpretation: South Saharan’s is different from other humans.
2. Some studies are claiming that Neanderthals inhabited North Africa. Again. Excluding South Saharans. But including the “Caucasoids” coastal Africans
3. They are claiming that this genetic material may have led to cognitively ie intelligence. Interpretation: Only the south Saharans are not intelleigent.


Same ole same ole.

Xyyman if that's what they are going for it still wouldn't add up see Thruthcentric map
egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=egyto&action=display&thread=65
Africans rule all three stages of the stone age they went from stone straight to iron mining,arts and so on was developed by Africans south of the desert even mathematics the Ishongo bone??

The Ishango bone, dating to perhaps 18000 to 20000 B.C.
Long before the earliest written records, there are drawings that do indicate a knowledge of mathematics and of measurement of time based on the stars. For example, paleontologists have discovered ochre rocks in a cave in South Africa adorned with scratched geometric patterns dating back to c. 70,000 BC.

Shell Beads From South African Cave Show Modern Human Behavior 75,000 Years Ago
ScienceDaily (Apr. 19, 2004) — ARLINGTON, Va.- Perforated shells found at South Africa's Blombos Cave appear to have been strung as beads about 75,000 years ago-making them 30,000 years older than any previously identified personal ornaments. Archaeologists excavating the site on the on the coast of the Indian Ocean discovered 41 shells, all with holes and wear marks in similar positions, in a layer of sediment deposited during the Middle Stone Age (MSA).
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/04/040416014444.htm

[truthteacher2007]

Jun 21, 2010 14:24:21 GMT -5 djoser-xyyman said:

Think we are missing the point of this new “discovery”.

This is all political PR. Read some of the spin coming from this piece of news.

1. Everyone outside of south Sahara have this gene. Interpretation: South Saharan’s is different from other humans.
2. Some studies are claiming that Neanderthals inhabited North Africa. Again. Excluding South Saharans. But including the “Caucasoids” coastal Africans
3. They are claiming that this genetic material may have led to cognitively ie intelligence. Interpretation: Only the south Saharans are not intelleigent.


Same ole same ole.

I don't think so. If I tremember correctly, the article said that only 1 to 4% of non Africans have those genes. That's far too few people to suggest superior anything.

[sundiata]

Jun 21, 2010 14:24:21 GMT -5 djoser-xyyman said:

Think we are missing the point of this new “discovery”.

This is all political PR. Read some of the spin coming from this piece of news.

1. Everyone outside of south Sahara have this gene. Interpretation: South Saharan’s is different from other humans.
2. Some studies are claiming that Neanderthals inhabited North Africa. Again. Excluding South Saharans. But including the “Caucasoids” coastal Africans
3. They are claiming that this genetic material may have led to cognitively ie intelligence. Interpretation: Only the south Saharans are not intelleigent.


Same ole same ole.

You guys! See, this is why it is more responsible to check sources than assume that what a member is reporting is actually accurate. The above are blatant misinterpretations.

Concerning point #3, they clearly did not imply this in the paper or news article and directly refuted such a notion, writing that:

"The Neanderthal DNA appears in the modern human genomes randomly, suggesting it offers no evolutionary benefit and is merely a genetic relic."

and

"Green said there is no evidence that anything genetically important came over from Neanderthals. "The signal is sparsely distributed across the genome, just a 'bread crumbs' clue of what happened in the past," he said. "If there was something that conferred a fitness advantage, we probably would have found it already by comparing human genomes."

www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1987568,00.html

^Not to mention that the "news" story, which is written by journalists, has noting to do with anything, read the study. If the masses are too dumb to tell the difference in authority between a journalist and a scientist, then maybe they aren't worth catering to.

Trikanus actually defended against negative implications, saying we shouldn't think non-Africans are the only ones with "cave-man biology in them". The study shows that non-Africans are closer to Neanderthals than Africans are while other genome studies show Neanderthals as being closer to Chimpanzees than humans are. The implications or deductions that can be made are severe and don't at all point to the sub-humanity of Africans, so why entertain any spin?

Some studies are claiming that Neanderthals inhabited North Africa

Where are these studies? What do these studies say about them "mixing" with people already there? The only thing I saw was brief speculation from a journalist in the Time magazine report (not a scientific source) and this is 50,000 years ago before the advent of any south/north African so tying geography to modern people wouldn't help your paranoia.

1. Everyone outside of south Sahara have this gene. Interpretation: South Saharan’s is different from other humans.

Yes, different to the effect that they have no Neanderthal blood. I mean, lol, what is your point here? Do you actually want neanderthal blood (or as Trikanus says: "cave-man biology") in you? Do you want to join the crowd now? I don't get it.

[egyptianplanet]

I don't get it back in my day calling someone a neanderthal or cave man was an insult. Now some prefer to be called such? Damn, people these days are messed up.

[Dawn2Earth]

Dude,

Jun 21, 2010 14:24:21 GMT -5 djoser-xyyman said:

Everyone outside of south Sahara have this gene. Interpretation: South Saharan’s is different from other humans.

Some studies are claiming that Neanderthals inhabited North Africa. Again. Excluding South Saharans. But including the “Caucasoids” coastal Africans

The thing about that is we have to consider how long ago Neanderthal lived and when the peopling of Nile Valley Africa that led to "Dynastic Egypt" and it's exalted intellectaul progress began.

Also

* where that peopling came from

* that both the Nile and Sahara were uninhabited at a point between the existance of Neanderthal and "ancient egypt"

* the fact that during and after Km.t Nw.t or "ancient egypt" a number of possibly Neanderthal mixed non Africans moved into the Nile Valley, Sahara and South thereof