|
|
Post by thamm1 on Apr 11, 2016 22:35:39 GMT -5
Was have a discussion with a Arab guy and he was telling me the old Kingdom of Egypt started by Arabs.
|
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Apr 11, 2016 23:25:54 GMT -5
Was have a discussion with a Arab guy and he was telling me the old Kingdom of Egypt started by Arabs. Pls tell the Arab guy that when the old Kingdom came about there were no such thing as an Arab. |
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Apr 12, 2016 4:19:23 GMT -5
What do you mean? How is that possible?
|
|
|
|
Post by anansi on Apr 12, 2016 8:25:38 GMT -5
What do you mean? How is that possible? Simple Arabic did not became a language until 6 cent C.E so there were no Arabs in existence to have been a remote possible candidate for a seed population that would usher in the old kingdom dynasties, then again the point is mute as we know where the old kingdom arose from, matter of fact Arabic is the youngest child of the Semitic branch of the Afrasian language phylum,which in turn is the youngest of that language family.   |
|
|
|
Post by anonymous on Apr 12, 2016 10:05:52 GMT -5
Was have a discussion with a Arab guy and he was telling me the old Kingdom of Egypt started by Arabs. No, there were no Arabs during this time in KMT. KMT was about 3,000 years old before any foreign contact and early dynastic KMT was started by Nubians. |
|
|
|
Post by forty2tribes on Apr 13, 2016 17:06:58 GMT -5
Was have a discussion with a Arab guy and he was telling me the old Kingdom of Egypt started by Arabs. Pls tell the Arab guy that when the old Kingdom came about there were no such thing as an Arab. Pretty much this. Show me some Arabian history before Rome |
|
|
|
Post by zarahan on Apr 13, 2016 17:50:13 GMT -5
 ^^Bear in mind that Nubian influence in pharaohs, did not suddenly appear only in the 25th Dynasty.. Here is text from SOY Keita's 2008 National Geographic article. He notes that the weight of evidence points to a dominant African population profile- as proved by skeletal, dental, cranial and DNA evidence, and that LATER elements to Egypt from the Near East and Europe would join this African foundation. Arabs would be among those later elements. QUOTE: Overall, these studies can be interpreted as suggesting that the Egyptian Nile Valley's indigenous population had a craniofacial pattern that evolved and emerged in northeastern Africa, whose geography in relationship to climate largely explains the variation. Dental affinity studies generally agree with the craniofacial results, though they differ in the details. The body proportions of ancient Egyptians generally are similar to those of tropical (more southern) Africans.. Very little DNA has been retrieved from ancient Egyptian remains, and there are not many studies on the modern population. However, the results of analyses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the Y chromosome in the living Egyptian population show the existence of very old African lineages that are consistent with the fossil remains and of younger lineages of more recent evolution, along with evidence of the assimilation of later migrants from the Near East and Europe.." --SOY Keita. Ancient Egyptian Origins- Human Biology. 2008. National Geographic And much data shows how Egypt changed with the migration of latecomers like Arabs. Today;s Egyptians re not the same as the ancients due to this incoming admixture from Europe and the Near East, particularly the Arabs who still have not gone.  |
|
