|
Post by marcwashington on Feb 5, 2012 0:01:08 GMT -5
. . The web page below is a draft of a subject. That subject tries to establish the fact that though Haplogroup 173 does not appear to have been found in Old Stone age Africa that the marker, from the statues of steatophygous Upper Aurignacian Paleolithic women, indicates that it is a San / Bushman marker as evidenced in the same population preserved for us in the illustrious drawing of none other than the Queen of Punt (Pharonic headdress and all) from the Temple of Hatshepsut. Furthermore, as she and her entourage are thin-lipped and aquiline nosed that should their Old Stone Age ancestors who journeyed to and populated Aurignacian Europe that those features we associate with whites are historically black making whites with the aquiline nose and thin lips depigmented blacks /Africans / Negroes. However, blacks /Africans / the Nego have a range of features – the more typical ones with full facial features, shown in pictures 4 and 5 whose inclusion I thank Mike for pointing out the need for. Finally, as the Bushman was the ancestor to Egyptians (note again the Queen of Punt's pharonic headdress) that the sharp features we sometimes see in the Somali, Nubian, Ethiopian, and ancient Egyptian, are Bushmen descendents. The above being true: 1) Sharp features of East Africans did NOT come with whites but was always there from prehistrory, 2) Those slick whites whose ancestors laughed about ole black Sambo and the ugliness of blackness but today are trying to claim that black and brown people with sharp features are white are full of it. www.beforebc.de/all_africa/02-16-000-24-10.html. .
|
|