The Iceman Inheritance - from the ES archives

[zarahan]

Summary by G. Howe, 1999

AMAZON REVIEW:

Revised 2001 edition of the original text.
New Foreword, Notes and Appendices.
Includes relevant anthropological and DNA research since 1978.

Michael Bradley delves back into our glacial past during the last Ice Age in order to find the prehistoric sources of the white race's aggression, racism and sexism. Relying on the researches of Alexander Marshack, Carleton Coon, Konrad Lorenz, S.L. Washburn, Ralph Solecki and others, Bradley offers a persuasive argument that the white race, the Neanderthal-Caucasoids, are more aggressive than others because of ancient sexual maladaptation. And, in tracing the effects of Caucasian aggression, Bradley offers an uncomfortable and all-too-plausible explanation for the pattern of human history.

[zarahan]

The "racial reality" work below cited by race
proponents seems strangely obsessed with black
penis size. This may be part of the inferiority complex seen in white racists.

Racial Reality authors Sarich and Miele, cite a number
of Greek depictions of Africans that show black penis sizes
as larger than that of nearby whites. QUOTE:

"The genitalia of black Africans were also
deemed noteworthy to the Greek and Roman artists.
Within the same art piece, black males are
depicted with penises larger than those of white
figures, and in others are shown as being erect."
--Vincent Sarich, Frank Miele. 2005. Race: The
Reality of Human Differences. pg 41


Obsession with black penis size also enters into
the work of other racist authors, like JP Rushton,
who conducted detailed "self-assessment" in penis
size compared to the potency exhibited by Negroid
[sic] data..

QUOTE:
"Then there is the issue of Rushton's data and
disparate sources one of the most heavily cited
in his earlier workd is an 1898 book, by an
anonymous French army surgeon, a repository of
anecdotal information about the penis, breast,
and buttock size of different native populations.
His reliance on these kinds of data led to some
strong criticism. More recently Rushton has used
a wider variety of sources, including census
data, studies of military recruits, and brain
scanning techniques. He argues that such data
reinforce his original conclusion that human
populations can be ordered in a scale of
evolutionary advance from blacks, to whites, to
Orientals."
--Stringer and McKee, African Exodus 1996


and -- more obsession with Negro indexes on penis size.
Note trembling "self-assessment"
by white "biodiversity" author Rushton..
QUOTE:

"No criteria are ever set up to decide how
these groups are established or what traits
should be used in determin- ing membership. This
means that his acceptance of "race" is ultimately
arbitrary and subjective. When "the races" are
compared in terms of appearance and performance
in the quantities of uncritically collected data
assembled in his book, "racial" identity is
determined by "self-assessment." Rushton's basic
units, then, are rooted in folk belief and not in
biology.

The possibility that the vast majority
of the human biological traits that have been
shaped by evolution are clinally and independently
distributed in association with the relevant
selective forces is never once considered, and
the word cline is simply missing. One running
concern is how these folk categories compare on
such matters as intelligence and reproductive
behavior. Sex rears its head again and again in
the discussion, with much of the information on
comparative sexual performance based on "self-
assessment." Rushton is obviously much taken with
the "salience of... buttocks and breasts" (pp.
167, 231) as measures of sexuality, although
there is a dearth of objectively collected data.

More telling is his evident fascination with the
"Negroid" penis as an index of "potency" and
libido. In his earlier publications on these
matters, his information came from "self-assessment."
--FROM:
Review: Racialism and Racist Agendas
Author(s): C. Loring Brace
Reviewed work(s):Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective by J. Philippe Rushton
Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.
98, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 176-177


WHite "biodiversity" scholars protected by
university tenure, even as they solicit students to
engage in penis size studies of negroid indexes..
Rushton was a tenured professor at UWO in the 1990s.

QUOTE:
"In other words, Rushton took advantage of
students who didn’t know that in the case of his
study they had the option not to participate
without incurring additional work. As punishment,
the psychology department barred him from using
students as research subjects for two years.

The second instance also occurred in 1988.
Rushton conducted a survey at the Eaton Centre
mall in Toronto, paying 50 whites, 50 blacks, and
50 Asians $5.00 each to answer questions about
their sexual habits. For this, he was again
formally reprimanded, this time by the University
of Western Ontario administration itself, because
he had failed to submit the project for approval
by the university’s ethics committee, as required
for research projects off campus. This was “a
serious breach of scholarly procedure,” according
to the university’s president, George Pederson. "
NY review of Books. 1994 "Pioneer"
www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1995/mar/23/pioneer/


----------------------------------------------------

It should be noted that the above racial theories are
being advanced by white racial writers who demonize
blacks as lesser examples of humanity. Could the
obsession with black penis size be related to this
savage disparagement of blacks? White writer Michael
Bradley suggests that penis envy could be a relevant
factor is the hate of white racists for blacks.
-------------------------------------------------------

Yet another white writer, M. Bradley, in "The Iceman
Inheritance", holds that white evolution in cold
climates generated smaller penis sizes, compared
to Negroes. This smaller penis size generates intense
envy, resentment and rage in some white lineages,
leading to murderous violence. Some lynchings in
the US South may be related to this white penis envy
re Negroid [sic] data..



-------------------------

White racist jealously of black potency has long
historical roots scholars suggest, with white obsession
so intense that black African penises where sometimes
preserved and shipped to Europe as curiosities in colonial times.

QUOTE:

"Some histories suggest that European explorers and
slave traders sometines even perserved and pickled
the penises of some African males, shipping the back
to Europe as curiosities. Typically, the size of the African
penis was held up as evidence of the "animalistic" and
"subhuman" nature of the black race.

In 1954, in his analysis of the underpinnings of bias and racism,
Gordon Allport referenced the preoccupation with sex and the
black man's penis, suggesting that it was not the physical size
of the penis, but the "psychological" size of the penis that was
the fascination and preoccupation. In Calvin Hernton's work
Sex and Race in America, Hernton describes the history of
Southern white women's preoccupation with black men,
suggesting that black males took on an iconic sexual persona."
--David J. Ley. 2009. Insatiable wives


E------- longated African at work 1..


Feelings of inadequacy haunt white racists, directly
and indirectly, among all white social classes,
some white writers suggest..

"There is in the psyche of the racist an inordinate disposition for
sexual atrocity. He sees in the Negro the essence of his own
sexuality, that is. those qualities that he wishes for but fears he does not possess."
--Hernton, Calvin 1965. Sex and Racism in America. Grove Press

"This was particularly salient to me when I gave a lecture on
environmental racism before an audience of over 400 of North
Carolina's "most gifted" high school seniors.. [who thought blacks
lagged in some school academic areas] (except for athletic ability
and — as many of my white students routinely point out — penis size)..
--White college professor in American Philosophical
Association newsletter, Spring 2004, vol 103, no 2


WHite racist envy and resentment re black potency
is reflected subtly in several Hollywood horror films
quote:
"the question of penis size is also part and parcel of racist
fears: Kong as black rapist, which tells us far more about the
castration fears of white racists than about the real endowments
of black males."
--Reynold Humphries - 2006 - The Hollywood horror film, 1931-1941: madness in a social landscape





Racist architect of the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler's writings reveal an
obsessive fear of negro sexual potency even when railing against Jews.. Quote:

"The myth of the over-sized black penis may be contrasted with
the turn-of-the-century antisemitic beeif that the large Jewish nose
signified a small penis, further truncated by circumcision. Such
images raised questions about Jewish masculinity and virility.
But.. [the] notion of the Jew as cunning seducer, and occasionally
a violent rapist, was a staple of Nazi propaganda. In his passage
warning against 'the black-haired Jewish youth' Hitler also manages
to arouse fears of lack sexuality when he blames Jews for the introduction
into the Rhineland of soldiers from the French African colonies,
some of who had affairs with German women that resulted in children
of mixed ancestry.

Hitler even claimed that the French toleration of black-white intermarriage
and its seeming color blind conception of assimilation was turning France
into' an extension of Africa into the heartland of Europe'.. As for hundreds
of mixed offspring sired on German women by French African colonial
soldiers in the Rhineland during the early postwar years, they were rounded
up and sterilized in 1937.." Had there been a significant black population in
Germany, they might have conceivably have been sent to gas chambers
along with all the Jews who could be apprehended and some of the Gypsies.
Nevertheless, the German fixation on Jews clearly did not depend on large
numbers: there were only about 1 percent of the population when Hitler came
to power."
---George M. Fredrickson. 2003. Racism: A Short History. Princeton University Press. 120-121


White hereditarian scholars show obsession with
black sexual endowment in their research
QUOTE:
"Another god in the racist pantheon Herrnstein and
Murray employ as a source is Philippe Rushton, a
Canadian psychologist who has received worldwide
attention for his racial theories. Rushton is known particularly
for his argument that brain size and penis size are inversely
proportional.. To prove his contentions about the races,
Rushton has conducted research at shopping malls, where
he asks men from different racial groups to specify the distance
their semen travels during ejaculation. ."
--Joe L. Kincheloe 2009. Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined

[zarahan]

"Pure white evolution led to Neanderthals both
in terms of paler skin and cold-adaptive limb proportions.
African evolution led to anatomically modern
humans.


QUOTE:
"What was different about the Neanderthals?
What did the Cro- Magnons think when they saw
them for the first time? To begin with, the
Neanderthals were very light-skinned and the Cro-
Magnons were less so. "
--Juan Luis Arsuaga, Andy Klatt. 2004. The Neanderthal's
Necklace: In Search of the First Thinkers

"This finding suggests that Neanderthals evolved
a functional variant of the MC1R gene independently
from modern humans as they dispersed into northerly
latitudes, and thus supports the inference for the
convergent evolution of depigmented skin in the
Neanderthals lineage.."
--Michael P. Muehlenbein. 2010. Human Evolutionary Biology

"Regarding environmental buffering, Trinkaus
(1986 and this volume) reiterates that while
Neanderthal limb proportions are suggestive of
cold adaptation, no such indications are shown by
Eurasian early modern humans. Their distinct
limb proportions are instead indicative of an
equatorial ancestry and better culturally based
thermal protection.. the limb proportions of the
Eurasian early modern samples are retentions of
the African ancestral morphology of long limbs
with long distal segments.."
-- Erik Trinkaus (ed), 'The Emergence of Modern Humans", (C. Stringer p. 88).
School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1989.




Modern scholarship shows a great 3-way evolutionary
split in hominid lineages s several hundred thousand years ago.
European hominids evolved into Neanderthals. Asians into Homo Erectus.
Africans went on to evolve into today's advanced anatomically modern humans.

QUOTE:
"Following the initial Out-of-Africa event, natural selection and
random genetic drift began to drive populations in Africa,
Europe, and eastern Asia in different morphological directions.
Morphological differentiation was particularly clear by 500,000–400,000
years ago, and from this time onwards, there were at least three
evolving human lineages. These may always have been able to
exchange genes, but distance and small population size probably
limited gene flow, and the composite fossil and archeological
records indicate that the African lineage spread to replace or
swamp the others beginning roughly 50,000 years ago. It is thus r
easonable to supply the lineages with biological species labels:
Homo sapiens in Africa, Homo neanderthalensis in Europe, and
Homo erectus in the eastern Asia.

.. Many details of Out-of-Africa remain to be worked out, and
disagreement persists, for example, on the extent to which
dispersing modern Africans and archaic Eurasians may have
interbred and especially on what promoted the relatively sudden
Out-of-Africa expansion. Most authorities attribute the expansion to
behavioral changes that conferred a substantial Darwinian fitness
advantage, that is, that allowed modern humans of African descent t
o survive and reproduce at a significantly higher rate than the archaic
humans they encountered in Eurasia. "

-- Richard G. Klein. 2009. Darwin and the recent African origin of modern humas
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 September 22; 106(38): 16007–16009.


Some white "Racial Reality" or "biodiversity" proponents
argue for European descent from NEanderthals "untainted"
by Africa- a lily white "pure" line of white evolution.

Fine. Lets go with their approach for a moment.
----------------------------------------------------

Using it, we see then that the first whites were cold-adapted
Neanderthals that failed to progress beyond the Stone Age
despite a sometimes favorable environment with
rich resources available (Lewin 1994). Ice Age Europe was not
a cold hell but had variable climate and rich forest,
woodland and aquatic resources, including ancient
variants of wheat-like spelt and chick peas in place
that could have been domesticated, along with ancestors
of sheep, cattle and pigs, and a favorable East-West
climatic axis that could have aided domestication.
Despite tens of thousands of years with these advantages
and resources however, white lineages failed to move
beyond the Stone Age.

Thus, using the "biodiversity" approach, the first
great "racial" split in the humanoid line involved
white Neanderthals who colonized Europe, and Africans,
who colonized Africa and went on to become anatomically
modern humans.

The first “pure” white genetic output was thus
brutish, primitive, dead end Neanderthals. By
contrast, it was Africa that produced the future
of humanity- anatomically modern humans, not
cold-climate Europe. White NEanderthals survived,
until they were supplanted by more advanced, modern
tropically adapted humans from Africa that mingled
with and replaced them. This would be the first instance
of the hybridization that produced today's white Europeans.
It was the coming of tropically adapted African variants into
Europe that caused Europe to progress beyond the brutish
“pure” white Neanderthal lineages. Continuing migrations
from Africa and a mixture of African and Asian
OOA migrants- all anatomically modern humans- caused
a second round of mixed breeding in EUrope, and was
to eventually replace the pure white Neanderthal
lineages to yield today's European hybrid population.
QUOTE:

^^"There is wide agreement on a speciation event in Africa at around 0.8 or 0.9 mya when
Homo erectus (or Homo ergaster) gave rise to a species named Homo heidelbergensis,
or Homo rhodesiensis, or Homo sapiens. The new species expanded into Europe leading
to the Neanderthal lineage, whereas in Africa it evolved into anatomically modern
humans. The lineage of anatomical modernization can be subdivided into three groups,
morphs, or grades: an early one including Bodo, Saldanha, Kabwe, Salé, a subsequent
one including Florisbad, Laetoli H 18, Ileret (ER 3884), Jebel Irhoud, and early
anatomically moderns with Omo Kibish, Herto and others."
--Günter Bräuer, "Middle Pleistocene
Diversity in Africa and the Origin of Modern
Humans". IN:
Modern Origins: A North African Perspective. 2012.
Series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
Hublin, Jean-Jacques; McPherron, Shannon P. (Eds.)

And

” Holliday (2000) examined postcranial morphology
of the varied Levantine hominids from Qafzeh and
Skhul(anatomically modern) and from Amud, Kebara
and Tabun (Neanderthal). He determined that they
were morphologically distinct; the anatomically
moderns had tropically adapted body proportions,
suggesting African origins, while the Neanderthals
had cold adapted body proportions, suggesting European origins.”
--Holliday 2000

This then could be another source of the Eurocentric
inferiority complex. Pure white genetics produced only
the savage Neanderthals. Africa by contrast, produced
a better, more advanced human than white lineages.
Today's whites still show some traces of Neanderthal
genes, a throwback to their savage evolution. Some
white writers argue that this Neanderthal remnant,
could account for the white penchant for violence
and murder. R. Bradley, advances this this theory
in "The Iceman Inheritance."

So under this biodiversity approach, why then
didn't pure white Europeans stay as NEanderthals?
According to Bradley, they were replaced with the more
advanced Africans and Asians. This diluted the savage
white NEanderthal lineages, producing a better level
of humanity. However the violent, savage nature of
whites still remains, due to remnants of Neanderthal genes.
Recent scientific findings showing European whites
have traces of Neanderthal genes have been used by
some claimants to support the Iceman theory. Some
disagree with Bradley. Others argue that his theory of white
ice age adaptation is true. Racial "biodiversity"
proponents share general agreement along a spectrum
with its central holding of pure white evolutionary
lineages, "untainted" by "negro blood."


White European lineages [Neanderthals] were the first humans to engage in cannibalism

"Cannibalism is a good example. Several Mousterian sites,
along which Moula-Guercy (France) stands out, have provided
reasonably firm evidence of anthropic action on Neanderthal
bones.. Defleur and colleagues (1999) compared the patters of
ungulate and Neanderthal bones, the skeletal parts that were
found and the tool marks on the bone fragments. They concluded
that all the fragments with marks indicate prey that had been subject
to butchery. This suggests that cannibalistic oractices existed among
the Neanderthals.. But the question of cannibalism can be understood
in another way. When Wolpoff was asked about the meaning of the
evidence found at Moula-Guercy, he replied with a question: why
should modern humans be the only violent ones? Arsuaga went even
further in believing that Neanderthal cannibalistic behavior actually
constituted a very human behavior, which revealed a human mind
(Both cited by Culotta, 1999). "
--Camilo J. Cela-Conde, Francisco José Ayala, 2007. Human evolution: trails from the past.


"But recent excavation by Alban Delfeur and Tim White at the
100,000 year old French cave of Moula-Guercy has demonstrated
cannibalism beyond any reasonable doubt. The site contains butchered
animal remains, predominantly red deer. Among the bones are the skulls
of two young Neanderthals, their masseter muscles filleted and the tongue
removed from at least one of them; the cut marks on the inner face of the
mandible are virtually identical with those mode on the inside of the
12,5000-year-old modern human mandible from Gough's (New) Cave,
[England] described in Chapter 3 (see p. 80). Crania of both deer and
Neanderthals were broken open to get at the marrow.."
--Timothy Taylor. 2005. The Buried Soul: How Humans Invented Death

[zarahan]

Not pushing a particular theory.. Just messin' with some racist minds..

Again and again, white writers note the greater length
of the negro, and warn that white women would find sex painful,
due to more powerful negro equipment. Such warnings
also helped discourage white women from unmentionable
activity with the negroes. QUOTE:




"One of the distinctive traits of the Ethiopians [negroes],
according to Serres, is the length of his penis,
compared to that of the White man's organ. Its
dimension is presumably commensurate with the
excessive length of the vaginal canal of the
Ethiopian [negro] woman. Both phenomena apparently
have to do with the peculiar configuration of the
pelvis of Black people. "From this particular
physical make-up", Serres continues, "it ensues
that the union of a Caucasian man and an Ethiopians
woman is easy, without discomfort to the woman. Such
is not the case with the union of an Ethiopian man
and a Caucasian woman. The act is painful to the woman;"
--Joseph-Anténor Firmin, Asselin Charles. 1897.
The equality of the human races


One experienced European physician with extensive
travel abroad, notes the negro lengths, and correlates
size with buttock width- a marker noted in modern
studies
QUOTE:
It is known however that the negro's member is
much greater than that of other races. During the
years that I practised as a doctor in South
America I have verified this completely. This
greater volume of the member of the man,
corresponds with a greater width of the parts of
the negroes.
--Paolo Mantegazza. 2001. (re-issue) The Sexual Relations of Mankind


More powerful and developed Negro gluteus correlates
with penis size one current study claims. Flat buttocks
of Caucasians may lack this correlation

The supposed relationship between penile length and gluteal size
may have a scientific basis, but contrary to belief, large buttocks is
more predictive of longer penile length than small buttocks."
-- Orakwe JC, et al. Show all. Can physique and gluteal size predict
penile length in adult Nigerian men?. West Afr J Med. 2006 Jul-Sep;25(3):223-5.


Measurements and observations of a French surgeon in the
colonial era testify of superior Negro endowment, compared to whites.

"Even when flabby, the Negro's yard still retains a size and
consistence that are greater than that of the European, whose
organ shrivels up and becomes soft and limp. The average
size of the penis generally appeared to me to be about 7 3/4 to 8 inches
in length, by two inches in diameter. Except with young lads, just arrived
at the age of puberty, the penis is rarely less than 6 1/2 inches in length..
I took these measurements from the Sharpshooters, amongst whom
I met specimens of the most of the races of Senegal and the Upper
Niger. I often came across a penis of 9 3/4 to 10 inches by 2 1/4 inches,
and once, in a young Bambara, barely twenty years of age, found a
monstrous organ 11 3/4 inches long by 2.6 inches in diameter at the
circular circumcision mark... I find in Mantegazza and exact confirmation
of what I have just said."
--Jacobus, X. Untrodden fields of anthropology: Observations on the
esoteric Manners and Customs of Semi-civilized peoples, Being a
record fo thirty Years Experience in Asia, Africa, America and Oceania,
By a French Army Surgeon. Vol II, Paris 1898




The Italian surgeon, neurologist, physiologist and anthropologist,
Paolo Mantegazza, also found a pattern of more potent negroes,
specifically contradicting Tropinard who found negro advantage
when flaccid. Mantegazza also references the work of another
German scholar, who too, found negro length to be superior in any state.

"Observations as to the shape and dimensions of the genital organs,
in the various races, are not as yet very numerous; it is proved, however,
that the Negroes generally have the virile member more voluminous than
other people, and I myself verified this statement, during the years I practiced
medicine n South America.. Falkenstein remarked that the Negroes of Loango
had huge members and that their wives reproached our men with having such
small yards. He rejects the singular idea of Topinard, who states that it is only
when flabby that this enormous size is noticed.."
--Gli Amori degli Uomini di Paolo Mantegazza, Senatore del Regno (Milan, 1892




White racist jealously of black potency has long
historical roots scholars suggest, with white obsession
so intense that black African penises where sometimes
preserved and shipped to Europe as curiosities in colonial times.

QUOTE:

"Some histories suggest that European explorers and
slave traders sometines even perserved and pickled
the penises of some African males, shipping the back
to Europe as curiosities. Typically, the size of the African
penis was held up as evidence of the "animalistic" and
"subhuman" nature of the black race.

In 1954, in his analysis of the underpinnings of bias and racism,
Gordon Allport referenced the preoccupation with sex and the
black man's penis, suggesting that it was not the physical size
of the penis, but the "psychological" size of the penis that was
the fascination and preoccupation. In Calvin Hernton's work
Sex and Race in America, Hernton describes the history of
Southern white women's preoccupation with black men,
suggesting that black males took on an iconic sexual persona."
--David J. Ley. 2009. Insatiable wives


White envy and jealously may be related to cold
climate evolution that led to smaller penises, some
white writers argue

Summary by G. Howe, 1999


WHite biodiversity or heriditarian authors are
much concerned about negro size, and conduct
obsessive "self-assessment" to compare themselves
with the more powerful blacks..
QUOTE:

"No criteria are ever set up to decide how
these groups are established or what traits
should be used in determin- ing membership. This
means that his acceptance of "race" is ultimately
arbitrary and subjective. When "the races" are
compared in terms of appearance and performance
in the quantities of uncritically collected data
assembled in his book, "racial" identity is
determined by "self-assessment." Rushton's basic
units, then, are rooted in folk belief and not in
biology.

The possibility that the vast majority
of the human biological traits that have been
shaped by evolution are clinally and independently
distributed in association with the relevant
selective forces is never once considered, and
the word cline is simply missing. One running
concern is how these folk categories compare on
such matters as intelligence and reproductive
behavior. Sex rears its head again and again in
the discussion, with much of the information on
comparative sexual performance based on "self-
assessment." Rushton is obviously much taken with
the "salience of... buttocks and breasts" (pp.
167, 231) as measures of sexuality, although
there is a dearth of objectively collected data.

More telling is his evident fascination with the
"Negroid" penis as an index of "potency" and
libido. In his earlier publications on these
matters, his information came from "self-assessment."
--FROM:
Review: Racialism and Racist Agendas
Author(s): C. Loring Brace
Reviewed work(s):Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A
Life History Perspective by J. Philippe Rushton
Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.
98, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 176-177


On numerous white racist websites, denizens of "the faithful" obsessively
catalog interracial celebrity couples, with harsh
racist rhetoric concealing hidden fears and
jealously of black potency, as suggested by some
white authors..


Feelings of inadequacy haunt white racists, directly
and indirectly, among all white social classes,
some white academic writers suggest..

"There is in the psyche of the racist an inordinate disposition for
sexual atrocity. He sees in the Negro the essence of his own
sexuality, that is. those qualities that he wishes for but fears he does not possess."
--Hernton, Calvin 1965. Sex and Racism in America. Grove Press

"This was particularly salient to me when I gave a lecture on
environmental racism before an audience of over 400 of North
Carolina's "most gifted" high school seniors.. [who thought blacks
lagged in some school academic areas] (except for athletic ability
and — as many of my white students routinely point out — penis size)..
--White college professor in American Philosophical
Association newsletter, Spring 2004, vol 103, no 2


Envious southern whites also noted Negro potency, compared to whites, and in
some incidents where blacks faced death for alleged crimes, the whites still noted
the superior potency and continued virility of the doomed Negro.
Dollard relates and incident where a negro sentenced to hang, requested
a woman to spend with him, his last night on earth. "Hitting it" hard all night long,
the negro duly "swung praying" in the morning. Unable to charge the official
accounts to pay for the colored prostitute, the white lawmen could have simply
dismissed her, but instead took up a collection to cover her costs, a sporting
gesture in recognition of the vigorous negro's last ride.
QUOTE:

"Seventeenth-century accounts of travel to West Africa included
references to the "extraordinary greatness" of the "members" of
the native males or of their large propagators..." Certainly [Mississippi]
Delta white men discussed the matter of the length of the black man's
penis with both anxiety and envy. One planter told Dollard of entering
a sharecropper cabin unannounced and discovering a black man
preparing for intercourse. Dollard's informant was shocked by the
size of the man's penis 'and gave indication by his arm and
clenched fist of its great length and diameter.' Local legend also
had it that the belief in the greatness of the black mans penis
was confirmed by those who conducted pre-induction physical
examinations in the county in 1917"
--James CObb. 1994. The Most Southern Place on Earth: The Mississippi Delta

and from Dollard 1998:

"This virility-in-the-face-of-death is a good
symbol of the potency of the Negro as it seems
to the white man, and as it may indeed be in fact."
--John Dollard, 1998. Caste and class in a southern town






Ancient Greeks and Romans noted black potency in their art

"The genitalia of black Africans were also
deemed noteworthy to the Greek and Roman artists.
Within the same art piece, black males are
depicted with penises larger than those of white
figures, and in others are shown as being erect."
--Vincent Sarich, Frank Miele. 2005. Race: The
Reality of Human Differences. pg 41


European explorers noted larger penises of Africans compared to whites
"whereof these people are witnesse, who are furnis't with such
members as are after a sort burthensome unto them.."
European explorer Richard Jobson, 1632, observing the large
penises of Mandingo tribesmen, in "The golden trade; or, A discovery of the river Gambra"

Likewise Muslim historian, al-Mas'udi, note of black Sudanese that they possessed:
"elongated penises and excessive merriment".
-- (see Akbar Muhammad, Slaves and Slavery
in Muslim Africa, vol. I, p 68).



Racist architect of the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler's writings reveal an
obsessive fear of negro sexual potency even when railing against Jews..
Quote:

"The myth of the over-sized black penis may be contrasted with
the turn-of-the-century antisemitic belief that the large Jewish nose
signified a small penis, further truncated by circumcision. Such
images raised questions about Jewish masculinity and virility.
But.. [the] notion of the Jew as cunning seducer, and occasionally
a violent rapist, was a staple of Nazi propaganda. In his passage
warning against 'the black-haired Jewish youth' Hitler also manages
to arouse fears of lack sexuality when he blames Jews for the introduction
into the Rhineland of soldiers from the French African colonies,
some of who had affairs with German women that resulted in children
of mixed ancestry.

Hitler even claimed that the French toleration of black-white intermarriage
and its seeming color blind conception of assimilation was turning France
into' an extension of Africa into the heartland of Europe'.. As for hundreds
of mixed offspring sired on German women by French African colonial
soldiers in the Rhineland during the early postwar years, they were rounded
up and sterilized in 1937.." Had there been a significant black population in
Germany, they might have conceivably have been sent to gas chambers
along with all the Jews who could be apprehended and some of the Gypsies."
---George M. Fredrickson. 2003. Racism: A Short History. Princeton University Press. 120-121


Kinsey data confirmed by Kim...


Extensive Kinsey surveys report black dominance as well
The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews
Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research -- the 1979 follow-up to Alfred
Kinsey's famous 1948 survey of male sexual practices in the United States -
reported black advantage. From self-administered measurements given by
roughly ten thousand whites and four hundred blacks, Kinsey Data
authors Paul H. Gebhard and Alab B. Johnson found the average erect
black penis to be longer in length (6.44 inches) and larger in circumference
(4.96 inches) than corresponding white erections (6.15 and 4.83 respectively).
Even larger differences occurred in the flaccid state. Blacks: 4.34 inches long,
3.78 around; whites 3.86 and 3.16)..

--Data from: Paul H. Gebhard and Alan B. Johnson, The Kinsey Data
(Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1979), tables 69-73, pp 116-20)


Modern surveys confirm older data re NEgro length



Data from: British Medical Journal- "Penis Size By Ethnicity." -
BMJ: British medical journal: Volume 324, Issues 7336-7344, 2002
and BMJ: British medical journal: Volume 330, Issues 7484-7489, 2005
Published by BMJ.

[jari]

To be honest I don't want to paint all European/White people with a broad brush. For example Neadertal seems to not be as savage as once thought, sure they did not produce any high forms of exporession such as Art and Shelter but they were around for a long time, and there is no evidence of Neadandertal being anymore savage than AMH.

And lets be honest AMH's have our own share of Savagery, from Human sacrifice, War, Slavery, Caste systems, etc have all been practiced by AMH's and still exist in this day an age. Also Modern Europeans are more similar to Africans than Asians.

Good info for debunking white supremacy though, fight fire with fire..

[jari]

Also Modern Europeans are not descended from Neandertal but AMH tropical Africans, scary part is their behavior probably reflects on us Africans and Asians, They took advantage of the advancements brought to them by Africans and Asians, and they took Divide and Conquer to a whole new level. In a way it was a smart strategy.

[sundiata]

^Indeed. This is no better than Rushton's climate theory of racial intelligence. At the end of the day, Euros are not Neanderthals, they are Africans so I think it would be hard to attribute something to them that doesn't also apply to us. Culture wars shouldn't seep into the realm of science as that's how it turns into pseudoscience.

We should also be sensitive to other forum board members such as Truthcentric et al. as this type of Black supremacy stuff can easily be seen as inflammatory.

[zarahan]

Fair enough. As I say above, I don't post it to push a particular theory,
and reject supremacist theories also, but something to keep on hand
in case hard-edged "fire with fire" action, as Jari says, is needed. The
danger is that one can become a mirror image of the enemy being
confronted, or that weapons will be taken up and used indiscriminately.
That is a valid point and a valid warning. I also figure the ES board will
be spammed out of existence sooner of later, so just transferring the
info over as well.

[jari]

Yeah, the thing about Fighting with Fire is that it can be effective but at the same time you end up getting burned yourself. For example when we post that stuff we pretty much endorse the idea that Europeans are descended from Neadertal and therefore are of a different race than other Humans. Just a small example but fighting fire with fire will end up burning you after a while.

[sundiata]

^Why "keep it in hand" if you don't even believe in what you're posting? I hate to be overly critical, especially since you're otherwise an excellent researcher, but this kind of stuff is just tasteless and offensive. I'd be wrong and a hypocrite to criticize the Cassies of the world and not this, even though I ignore ignorant white supremacists more than I criticize, probably because I know how self-defeating it is so I just let them sink and drown. I guess I speak out against this because I don't want fellow Blacks to sink and drown with them.

Your history obviously suggests that you really don't hold any animosity against White people but I just want that to be clear to the guests who may be visiting this forum. I chalk it up to a misguided method of attack.

[jari]

Honestly, I did not even resort to that type of attack until Cassite started posting, even with folks like Rahotep it was alway a tongue in cheek type thing, for example Rahtep would talk about how Africans were primitive and I would point out that Europeans were "Primitive" as well. I never resorted to those type of attacks until recently because like you said I don't really believe in its foundation(that Modern Europeans are descendants of Neandertal), Also I don't think majority of white people should be blamed for the actions of a few bad apples.

[Tukuler al~Takruri]

Some guys love you some racist trolls don't you.
They aren't even here (yet) but here you are
in essence laying out a welcome mat for them
and it is you not white racists introducing racist
content to this board where it did not exist and
supposedly is not allowed.

Oh OK I see. It's alright to be racialist towards
whites. It's just racialism toward blacks that's
intolerable. Right?

[sundiata]

Jari, that last comment of mine was meant for Zarahan. Sorry for the confusion.