Rise Of The Black Pharaohs- On Most Local PBS Stations
Oct 15, 2014 14:58:09 GMT -5
nebsen likes this
Post by zarahan on Oct 15, 2014 14:58:09 GMT -5
What things do you feel would make it more possible to create an inclusive, fair and balanced approach to Egyptology?
Things like continual pressure, based on credible information, on the academic establishment
and the media whether on websites, blogs, letters to media editors etc, but most
importantly, building up alternative networks (again with credible information, not
easily debunked claims like levitating pyramids etc). These alternatives include places
like the Reloaded forum, ES forum, personal blogs and sites, commentary on other blogs
and forums using that credible data, Youtube videos etc. that help set the record straight.
Part of that also means individuals working independently, harvesting data and info
for the genera data pool. Info can be harvested by providing good links, typing info
out of books and posting it, harvesting screenshots from books, transferring text
etc etc. Not everyone will agree with everything, but the key is building up that data pool
or "base" to put people on sure ground, as well as providing the base to pressure the media
and academia as shown above. Simply complaining is not enough. Exactly HOW are the Natl Geo
depictions wrong? We know from several lines of evidence such as tropical body plans that
they are not telling the while truth. These are the kinds of specifics needed to hammer them
hard, not merely complaints about racism.
That will do the most good in the long run- strong, alternative networks filled with credible information.
Again, everyone may not agree on everything, but if there is solid information so at least arguments
are on reasonable ground, this will prevail against distorters and detractors. Too often
though the zone is flooded with shaky claims (some of which may be by fake agents and provocateurs).
Just because somebody black (or claiming so) shows up, that doesn't give them instant
credibility. They have to make their case, based on the evidence, like everybody else.
A balanced approach is needed, fending off BOTH Eurocentrics AND extreme Afro "enthusiasts", who
while well meaning, sometimes overplay their claims, setting up easy victories for opponents
of Africa and African history. Strong, balanced networks will help avoid these twin dangers.
Things like continual pressure, based on credible information, on the academic establishment
and the media whether on websites, blogs, letters to media editors etc, but most
importantly, building up alternative networks (again with credible information, not
easily debunked claims like levitating pyramids etc). These alternatives include places
like the Reloaded forum, ES forum, personal blogs and sites, commentary on other blogs
and forums using that credible data, Youtube videos etc. that help set the record straight.
Part of that also means individuals working independently, harvesting data and info
for the genera data pool. Info can be harvested by providing good links, typing info
out of books and posting it, harvesting screenshots from books, transferring text
etc etc. Not everyone will agree with everything, but the key is building up that data pool
or "base" to put people on sure ground, as well as providing the base to pressure the media
and academia as shown above. Simply complaining is not enough. Exactly HOW are the Natl Geo
depictions wrong? We know from several lines of evidence such as tropical body plans that
they are not telling the while truth. These are the kinds of specifics needed to hammer them
hard, not merely complaints about racism.
That will do the most good in the long run- strong, alternative networks filled with credible information.
Again, everyone may not agree on everything, but if there is solid information so at least arguments
are on reasonable ground, this will prevail against distorters and detractors. Too often
though the zone is flooded with shaky claims (some of which may be by fake agents and provocateurs).
Just because somebody black (or claiming so) shows up, that doesn't give them instant
credibility. They have to make their case, based on the evidence, like everybody else.
A balanced approach is needed, fending off BOTH Eurocentrics AND extreme Afro "enthusiasts", who
while well meaning, sometimes overplay their claims, setting up easy victories for opponents
of Africa and African history. Strong, balanced networks will help avoid these twin dangers.