Post by clydewin98 on Jan 12, 2015 8:13:11 GMT -5
al~Takruri in a recent post noted that:
White it is true white academicians
and educators no longer use negro
they hold on to Caucasian even
though they now posit their
kind originated in Africa
(not the Caucasus) before
the negroes BaNtus etc.
A search of PLOS' peer reviewed
scientific anthro-genetic articles
site:plos.org caucasian
yields over 5000 instances of the
white/Euro scientific community's
embrace of Caucasian as racial
label for Euro-Levant-Arab-Arabian
-IndoPak and other non Far East Asian
Eurasians.
Read more: egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/1850/painting?page=1#ixzz3ObpoTVeN
I have returned to the use of the term Negro to identify the Black race because it is an inclusive term , used over time by anthropologists and laymen since the 15th Century to identify the Black nationalities and ethnic groups Europeans discovered while they explored the world. When I began research into the history of ancient Blacks I found information based on the identifier “Negro”. Diop never stopped using the term Negro to identify Black people.
As noted by al~Takruri European researchers continue to refer to themselves as Caucasian. European researchers refer to Blacks as Sub-Saharan Africans, in their research. Use of Sub-Saharan African , appears to be a neutral term. But in reality its use is to diminish the reality of the Black nationality in ancient history.
At the same time this is being done, Europeans have begun to claim there is no relationship between the ancient Blacks, formerly called Negroes, that live or lived in the Americas and Eurasia. A good example, is the people in Oceania. Today researchers claim these Blacks lack any relationship to Africans, even though people in Fiji claim they came from Africa, and the place names in the region are of West African origin, like the languages.
As a result, if you use Sub-Saharan African to identify Blacks you fail to account for the other Blacks who live in Eurasia and the Americas. You lose these Blacks because the term Sub-Saharan African to identify Blacks, implies that the Blacks outside Africa, exist today as remnants of the Europeans Slave Trade, when Blacks had been Eurasia and the Americas thousands of years before the Atlantic Slave trade.
The use of the term Sub-Saharan African for the Black nationality, is meant to limit the history of Blacks in World History. Using the term Negro to describe Blacks, is a scientific term that describe and unifies Black people within and throughout World History. I use the term Negro, to make sure we know and can research the long and great history of Black People.
White it is true white academicians
and educators no longer use negro
they hold on to Caucasian even
though they now posit their
kind originated in Africa
(not the Caucasus) before
the negroes BaNtus etc.
A search of PLOS' peer reviewed
scientific anthro-genetic articles
site:plos.org caucasian
yields over 5000 instances of the
white/Euro scientific community's
embrace of Caucasian as racial
label for Euro-Levant-Arab-Arabian
-IndoPak and other non Far East Asian
Eurasians.
Read more: egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/1850/painting?page=1#ixzz3ObpoTVeN
I have returned to the use of the term Negro to identify the Black race because it is an inclusive term , used over time by anthropologists and laymen since the 15th Century to identify the Black nationalities and ethnic groups Europeans discovered while they explored the world. When I began research into the history of ancient Blacks I found information based on the identifier “Negro”. Diop never stopped using the term Negro to identify Black people.
As noted by al~Takruri European researchers continue to refer to themselves as Caucasian. European researchers refer to Blacks as Sub-Saharan Africans, in their research. Use of Sub-Saharan African , appears to be a neutral term. But in reality its use is to diminish the reality of the Black nationality in ancient history.
At the same time this is being done, Europeans have begun to claim there is no relationship between the ancient Blacks, formerly called Negroes, that live or lived in the Americas and Eurasia. A good example, is the people in Oceania. Today researchers claim these Blacks lack any relationship to Africans, even though people in Fiji claim they came from Africa, and the place names in the region are of West African origin, like the languages.
As a result, if you use Sub-Saharan African to identify Blacks you fail to account for the other Blacks who live in Eurasia and the Americas. You lose these Blacks because the term Sub-Saharan African to identify Blacks, implies that the Blacks outside Africa, exist today as remnants of the Europeans Slave Trade, when Blacks had been Eurasia and the Americas thousands of years before the Atlantic Slave trade.
The use of the term Sub-Saharan African for the Black nationality, is meant to limit the history of Blacks in World History. Using the term Negro to describe Blacks, is a scientific term that describe and unifies Black people within and throughout World History. I use the term Negro, to make sure we know and can research the long and great history of Black People.