jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158 
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:23:10 GMT -5
@ Jetro since you are a "race" man and like to typecaste here is some raw but dated news about skulls and bones. Klik the link for more, now understand we usually do not go into "oid" terms but since that is the term you understand then read the above and klik the link. |
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:35:40 GMT -5
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:37:03 GMT -5
Jethro's consolidated: I ONLY BELIEVE GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SITES AND WIKI!
WIKI STATES THE NATUFIANS CARRIED E-Z830 and the VERY EURASIAN MTDNA N
E-Z830 ORIGINATED IN NORTH AFRICA AMONGST THE VERY INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS!
EINSTEIN CARRIED E-Z830 as HIS MAIN Y-DNA! Does he resemble a SSA??? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
------------------------------
ANY BLACK AFRICANS CARRYING E-Z830 would have got it from a back migration of NORTH AFRICANS!
FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!
37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN as was 36 000 year old South African HOFMEYR MAN!
ANCIENT 13 000 RACE WAR BETWEEN NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS and black Africans in Northern Sudan:
www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/saharan-remains-may-be-evidence-of-first-race-war-13000-years-ago-9603632.html
Afronazis just cannot accept reality! NORTH AFRICA HAS ALWAYS BEEN CAUCASIAN GOING BACK TO THE VERY FIRST MODERN MAN the very CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON!!!!
LOL SO WIKI IS DOCTORED! SO TYPICAL OF DUMBAZZ AFRONAZIS that cant face reality! Facts are, YOUR LINKS ARE OUT OF DATE and the other LINKS ARE NOT GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESPECTED LINKS!
THERE WERE NEVER EVER ANY BLACK AFRICANS IN EURASIAN EVER!!!
N*GR***DS ARE ONLY 8000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asselar_man
CAUCASIANS are 45 000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurignacian
FIRST EUROPEANS WERE HEAVILY MIXED WITH NEANDERTHALS and looked FCK ALL like N*GR***DS that didnt even exist at the time! [/b] ------------------=============================================--------- LOL at "Jethro"'s nonsense. Let's debunk it again: Debunk 4- Wiki- You or your buddies no doubt have gone into Wikipedia and doctored pages, and then you come back to talk about "information you found on WIki" as if its such a great "treasure trove." How laughable. But let's take what you say at face value and look at your own "supporting Wiki reference." Wiki says that Haplogroup E-z830 forms a subclade of z827, which in turn is a sub-clade of M35. Whatever the naming, the major ancestral cluster originated in Africa. There goes your "Eurasian" blather up in smoke based on your own "supporting reference." Debunk 5- You say the Natufians carry ez380 a "very Eurasian" DNA. But your own Wikipedia set of articles cites Lizardis who specifically notes the African DNA elements among Natufians. XYZ has highlighted THE SAME article above in detail and when you look at the actual scholar's article rather than doctored Wiki write-ups, your "white Natufian" claim becomes nonsense.  ^^Whoops- there you go again, debunked by your own "supporting" reference. Debunk 6- you say "FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!" Actually as Brada so succintly points out there were no "Caucasians" around at the time. And one of the earliest modern humans actually clusters with tropical or "sub-Saharan" Africans. You fail again, and by the way- we know the name of the early modern from your own place- Wikipedia, which points us to an actual credible scientist's source. Thanks for the pointer, which by the way, - has caused you to lose again.  Debunk 7 You said: "37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN" So let's get this straight. Said European migrated into ancient Egypt some tens of thousands of years ago- right?  As for the hoped for "negro free Cro-magnons" alack and alas, you fail there too..  Debunk 8 WHITE SKIN ORIGINATED IN CENTRAL ASIA about 9000 years ago and was taken into EUROPE BY THE VERY WHITE MIDDLE EASTERN FARMERS
READ SUPER SLOWLY:
www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin LOL do you realize hat yet again you debunk yourself with your own "supporting" reference? It says: "Most modern Europeans don’t look much like those of 8000 years ago."
This confirms BRada's point, whereas you are still contradicting yourself with your white Cro-magnons
circa 45,000 years ago.
It also says:
[o]"The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today." LOL you have destroyed your "ancient Caucasoids" claim with your own reference.  So let's see. Your very own "supporting references" debunk every point you are trying to make. But don't tell us. You will now go back to Wiki to doctor and "massage" the text to "spin" additional distortion eh? Then you will report back on what you "found." LOL. GO ahead, and also hunker down to "guard" your changes. Unfortunately for you, people already have more accurate data based on the actual scholars. All your effort fails- an exercise in irrelevance. But carry on! [/quote] |
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:39:05 GMT -5
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:40:00 GMT -5
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:42:16 GMT -5
Jethro's consolidated: I ONLY BELIEVE GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SITES AND WIKI!
WIKI STATES THE NATUFIANS CARRIED E-Z830 and the VERY EURASIAN MTDNA N
E-Z830 ORIGINATED IN NORTH AFRICA AMONGST THE VERY INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS!
EINSTEIN CARRIED E-Z830 as HIS MAIN Y-DNA! Does he resemble a SSA??? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
------------------------------
ANY BLACK AFRICANS CARRYING E-Z830 would have got it from a back migration of NORTH AFRICANS!
FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!
37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN as was 36 000 year old South African HOFMEYR MAN!
ANCIENT 13 000 RACE WAR BETWEEN NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS and black Africans in Northern Sudan:
www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/saharan-remains-may-be-evidence-of-first-race-war-13000-years-ago-9603632.html
Afronazis just cannot accept reality! NORTH AFRICA HAS ALWAYS BEEN CAUCASIAN GOING BACK TO THE VERY FIRST MODERN MAN the very CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON!!!!
LOL SO WIKI IS DOCTORED! SO TYPICAL OF DUMBAZZ AFRONAZIS that cant face reality! Facts are, YOUR LINKS ARE OUT OF DATE and the other LINKS ARE NOT GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESPECTED LINKS!
THERE WERE NEVER EVER ANY BLACK AFRICANS IN EURASIAN EVER!!!
N*GR***DS ARE ONLY 8000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asselar_man
CAUCASIANS are 45 000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurignacian
FIRST EUROPEANS WERE HEAVILY MIXED WITH NEANDERTHALS and looked FCK ALL like N*GR***DS that didnt even exist at the time! [/b] ------------------=============================================--------- LOL at "Jethro"'s nonsense. Let's debunk it again: Debunk 4- Wiki- You or your buddies no doubt have gone into Wikipedia and doctored pages, and then you come back to talk about "information you found on WIki" as if its such a great "treasure trove." How laughable. But let's take what you say at face value and look at your own "supporting Wiki reference." Wiki says that Haplogroup E-z830 forms a subclade of z827, which in turn is a sub-clade of M35. Whatever the naming, the major ancestral cluster originated in Africa. There goes your "Eurasian" blather up in smoke based on your own "supporting reference." Debunk 5- You say the Natufians carry ez380 a "very Eurasian" DNA. But your own Wikipedia set of articles cites Lizardis who specifically notes the African DNA elements among Natufians. XYZ has highlighted THE SAME article above in detail and when you look at the actual scholar's article rather than doctored Wiki write-ups, your "white Natufian" claim becomes nonsense. ^^Whoops- there you go again, debunked by your own "supporting" reference. Debunk 6- you say "FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!" Actually as Brada so succintly points out there were no "Caucasians" around at the time. And one of the earliest modern humans actually clusters with tropical or "sub-Saharan" Africans. You fail again, and by the way- we know the name of the early modern from your own place- Wikipedia, which points us to an actual credible scientist's source. Thanks for the pointer, which by the way, - has caused you to lose again. Debunk 7 You said: "37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN" So let's get this straight. Said European migrated into ancient Egypt some tens of thousands of years ago- right? As for the hoped for "negro free Cro-magnons" alack and alas, you fail there too.. Debunk 8 WHITE SKIN ORIGINATED IN CENTRAL ASIA about 9000 years ago and was taken into EUROPE BY THE VERY WHITE MIDDLE EASTERN FARMERS
READ SUPER SLOWLY:
www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin LOL do you realize hat yet again you debunk yourself with your own "supporting" reference? It says: "Most modern Europeans don’t look much like those of 8000 years ago."
This confirms BRada's point, whereas you are still contradicting yourself with your white Cro-magnons
circa 45,000 years ago.
It also says:
[o]"The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today." LOL you have destroyed your "ancient Caucasoids" claim with your own reference. So let's see. Your very own "supporting references" debunk every point you are trying to make. But don't tell us. You will now go back to Wiki to doctor and "massage" the text to "spin" additional distortion eh? Then you will report back on what you "found." LOL. GO ahead, and also hunker down to "guard" your changes. Unfortunately for you, people already have more accurate data based on the actual scholars. All your effort fails- an exercise in irrelevance. But carry on! [/quote] [/quote] |
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:42:50 GMT -5
WHAT A LOAD OF OUTDATED CR*P!!!!
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:45:07 GMT -5
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:48:20 GMT -5
WHAT A LOAD OF OUTDATED CR*P!!!! FIRST MODERN MAN EVERYWHERE!!!! AND EVERYONE CARRIES HIS DNA including black Africans and Afronazi racists! EUROPEANS 8000 YEARS AGO WITH BLUE EYES, STRAIGHT HAIR AND CAUCASIAN FEATURES! No woolly hair and flat noses |
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:54:07 GMT -5
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 5:57:19 GMT -5
|
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 16, 2016 6:00:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by zarahan on Sept 16, 2016 20:38:01 GMT -5
Says Jethro- THE ONLY PEOPLE LIVING 5000 YEARS AGO IN PALESTINE WERE WHITE CAUCASIANS! WHY???
BECAUSE EUROPEANS ANCESTORS ORIGINATED FROM THE WHITE MIDDLE EAST 8000 years ago! Actually your magical EUrope has seen several migrations of Africans, directly from Africa or via the Middle East. On top of that are the ancient migrations even earlier. Sorry. You lose again.  EUROPEANS 8000 YEARS AGO HAD CAUCASIAN FEATURES, STRAIGHT HAIR AND BLUE, GREEN EYES:Ironically, your ancient white European "savior" even the recent one some 8kya shared several features with Africans. And on top of that are the earlier African links 45-50kya. You fail again.  OUTDATED CR*APBut we are using YOUR same Wikipedia references, and actually several are quite recent and it debunks your laughable claims in detail. ANd your habit of updating a Wikipage a few days ago and calling it a "recent" source is one of the most idiotic things of all time. What nonsense. But let's look at one of those pages.. see.. OH! Lookie below! An "outdated" 2016 reference.. LMAO..  EARLY NATUFIANS were CAUCASIAN and later MEDITERRANEAN CAUCASIANSLOL- hopeless.. debunked again.. ========== FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON LOL- this asinine claim speaks for itself- but troll on nevertheless...  Oh dear, would it spoil the party to mention that Europeans are no "pure" race but are "mixed race" hybrids, using common European race models and modern DNA?  ^^ whoops.. so much for Caucasian "purity"... FIRST REAL EUROPEAN not the outdated NEGROID recreation of Richard Neave!
That dumbazz recreation was done before it was found, MODERN HUMANS INTERBRED WITH NEANDERTHALS! Your nonsensical "new" dodge is that Neanderthal introgression in EUropeans somehow "cancels" the fact of African migration to and admixture in EUrope. But it doesn't in any way. Neanderthal introgression would be of very ancient origin, and in any event is of trivial proportion in Europeans, a mere 1-4%. There could be Neanderthal mix, but the people doing the mixing, would be- wait for it hapless- MIGRANTS FROM AFRICA. Your LOL- your "Neanderthal cancellation" dodge is a complete bust, for the people doing the mixing would be anatomically modern humans from Africa. You have just shot yourself in the foot- again.  Let's Recap your failures: 1) "Assured" Wikipedia references? - Debunked 2) "Supporting" Wikipedia references? - Debunked. 3) Pure "negro free" white Natufians? - Debunked 4) Pure "negro free" ancient Europeans- Debunked. 5) Cro-magnon as the ancestors of humanity? - Debunked. 6) Wandering white skin Caucasoids 8000 years ago? - Debunked 7) Nazlet Khater man in Egypt was an ancient wandering Caucasoid from EUrope? - Debunked. 8) Use of Neaderthal introgression to "cancel" the fact of ancient African migration to and admixture in EUrope? - Debunked. But carry on adding nonsensical "new" spin.. It will still Pitifully be...  |
|
jethro
Scribe
Site guidelines violation- off-topic spamming across multiple threads w/o even addressing issues.
Posts: 158
|
Post by jethro on Sept 17, 2016 1:58:28 GMT -5
EUROPEANS ORIGINATED FROM 3 SOURCES
FIRST the very CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON hunter gatherer
SECOND, the very CAUCASIAN WHITE MIDDLE EASTERN FARMERS about 8000 years ago
THIRD, from the YAMNAYA Culture of Eastern Europe
|
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Sept 17, 2016 5:52:36 GMT -5
Lol! you are funny dude. Can take the horse to the river but can't make it drink. In your delusional mind you believe what you want to believe. But here are the facts. Ignoring the labels Caucasoid, negroids etc. I will it keep scientific. Caucasoid is a label used to steal African history. That said. "Negroids" are found all over Eurasia. so the label makes no sense. same as Caucasoid. North AFRICAN are genetically African just as people south of the Sahara based upon STR. Based upon Haplogroups indigenous North Africans are also Africans carrying PN2 which also includes many Southern Europeans. I don't use WIki or bloggers. Sorry. lol! But here are the facts. take it or leave it. Delude yourself if you want to. 1. Western Europeans did not come from the Steppes of Asia. Western Europeans are Basal Eurasian - Lazaridis et al. With recent African origin. The R lineage on Western Europeans are on a different branch of R1b compared to the Bronze age Steppes males. 2. Prior to 6000 years ago ALL Europeans were black skinned and NOT related to modern European - La Brana eg To tell the truth I don't "debate" with people who rant and they have no idea what they are talking about and who are not well read. I assume you are in your 20-something and think your are the shyt and have a handle on what you are talking about. But you don't, seriously. Here is a few links to start you off. Not from bloggers. Read the authentic studies and then come back and lets talk. I will drop in occasionally yes. Negros are 'new' lol! insert sarcasm onge     egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/2313/neanderthal-man-african-tskegyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/2083/rosenberg-et-2002-cluster-chart |
|
? 
