Myth of a Mongoloid race and how it's a made up idea...

[mindovermatter]

So I was reading a recent thread on the Chinese in Africa here and I became frustrated at the sheer ignorance and naivety regarding the Mongoloid peoples of Eastern Asia and South East Asia (whom are Eastern Asian Mongoloid imposters themselves too). That it became too much for me to handle after that, that I knew that I had to create this thread to spread awareness and save this online movement from any further dangerous amounts of gullibility and possible future stupidity regarding these people. One of these dumb statements involved the fact that people THINK THAT THESE MONGOLOIDS ARE NOT AS MUCH OF A DANGER, AN ABHORRENCE, OR A THREAT OR DO NOT BEHAVE AS WORSE IF NOT MORE WORSE, THEN THE EUROPEAN albinosOPE TODAY AND IN AMERICA! THIS IS A CLEAR AND UTTER FOOLISH IDEA THAT WILL JEOPARDIZE BLACK/COLORED PEOPLES WORLDWIDE DUE TO THESE MONGOLOIDS TARGETING THEIR LANDS FOR THE FUTURE FOR COLONIZATION AND INVASIONS BY THESE MONGOLOIDS (CHINESE IN AFRICA ETC)!

YES THE CHINESE AND THE MONGOLOIDS ARE WORSE AND FAR MORE RACIST AND XENOPHOBIC THEN EUROPEANS THIS IS A REALITY SINCE I HAVE BEEN TO THEIR COUNTRIES AND HAVE DEALT WITH THEM FIRST HAND! The reason THEY DID NOT COLONIZE AFRICA, EVEN THOUGH THESE MONGOLOIDS HAVE A HISTORY OF IMPERIALISM IN THEIR PART OF THE WORLD BEFORE EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM, THAT WAS AS WORSE IF NOT MUCH WORSE THEN GLOBAL EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM, IS BECAUSE OF THEIR OWN INHERENT FLAWS AND SETBACKS RELATED TO THEIR FRAIL DYSGENIC BACKWARDS INBRED MONGOLOID GENES! THESE PEOPLE ARE JUST WORSE AS THE EUROPEAN ALBINOS IN THEIR TREATMENT OF ANIMALS AND BLACK/COLORED PEOPLE, IF NOT WORSE! INFACT EAST ASIAN MONGOLOIDS CANNOT FEEL ANY SYMPATHY OR HIGHER TIER EMOTIONS OR ABSTRACT NOTIONS OF THOUGHT, WHICH EVEN THE EUROPEAN CAN DO! THIS MAKES THEM LITERAL HUMAN INSECTS THAT SWARM AND EAT EVERYTHING UP LIKE LOCUSTS WITHOUT A SINGLE AFTERTHOUGHT! THIS IS WHAT THEY PLAN TO DO TO AFRICANS AND THE AFRICAN CONTINENTS AND EVEN PERHAPS SOUTH AMERICA AND OTHER PARTS OF ASIA!

IN ADDITION MONGOLOID EASTERN ASIAN SOCIETY IS HIGHLY RACIALIST AND COLOR BASED AND RIGIDLY HIERARCHY BASED, TO THE POINT THAT IT WOULD DRIVE ANY FREEDOM LOVING COLORED NON-WHITE PERSON AND EVEN A WHITE PERSON INSANE! THERE IS A REASON WHY EVEN THEIR OWN PEOPLE HAVE HIGH SUICIDE RATES TO THIS DAY! THERE IS A REASON WHY ALL NON-WHITE PEOPLE THAT VISIT THEIR COUNTRIES SAY THAT THEY ARE WORSE THEN WHITES WHEN IT COMES TO RACIST THINKING AND SEEING EVERYTHING THROUGH A COLOR BASED WHITE SUPREMACIST LENS! THESE MONGOLOID PEOPLE LIVE AND BREATH WHITE SUPREMACY IN EVERYTHING! THEY CANNOT THINK INDEPENDENTLY ON THEIR OWN WITHOUT SOMEONE DIRECTING THEM OR BRAINWASHING THEM OR CONTROLLING THEM! THEY HAVE NO SENSE OF COMPASSION OR EMPATHY THEY ARE LITERAL HUMANS ANTS AND INSECTS IN HOW THEY OPERATE AND LIVE! I AM TELLING YOU THIS BASED ON FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE! IT IS THE TRUTH!

EVEN A WHITE PERSON WHO TAUGHT THEM AND LIVED IN THEIR COUNTRIES, ON A ALT-RIGHT FORUM ADMITTED WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT MONGOLOID ASIATICS AS CAN BE SEEN HERE!

I taught Asians for nearly a decade. They have...no capacity for abstract thought. They rely exclusively on external stimuli, without it, they fall asleep. Go to Asia and observe the constant noise and blinking lights everywhere. Limited ability to generate internal stimuli means no imagination.

This also surfaces in lack of empathy, where I was, they often hung dogs by trees and beat them to death to tenderize the meat. Having limited imagination, they could not put themselves in the position of the dog, and beat them to death without concern, ignoring the hideous cries of pain.

This also ties into to Confucian culture. People (all animals are considered so low that they can be thoughtlessly exterminated, see whales) seen as 'lower' can be bossed around. Asians can not be friends with people of a different age, the younger one must be the . This is built directly into their language, whenever you meet anybody you must immediately asses whether they are 'higher' or 'lower 'than you and use the appropriate language, in many cases obsequious fawning. All Asian endeavour is to climb the social ladder through the vehicle of money. They read, but not for interest or curiosity, just to climb the ladder through study to pass tests, which are all rote memorization.

Shameless bragging is very common among men there. Dishonesty is the norm. All of my students cheated endlessly, when I asked them about it they said it was 'smart'. They assume we are the same, and did not believe me when I tried to explain our ways. What's more,  there are laws against causing someone to lose 'face', which means pointing out he's lying braggart. Even if you are telling the truth and can prove that he is lying, you can get in trouble with the police, especially if they are high on the social ladder. In Asian society people are appointed into positions often simply because they are family or have connections, ability is not considered, the Korean ferry disaster did not surprise me in the least. When something like this happens the buck will be passed until somebody suitable (low) is found to take the heat. Everything is a facade, it is looks like it can do the job, it's good, if you can act haughty enough to be a doctor, feel free and amputate limbs all you want. The trouble is is that they will believe it themselves, and long as they have accreditation, even if they cheated.

This lack of inner life and curiosity manifests in other ways as well. Simple lack of awareness and the need to be led everywhere. The water at the beach is all cordoned off least they wander lemming like into deep water and drown. They never look where they are going and do not self correct their trajectory to smoothly navigate through crowds. When I had heard that recently, somebody fell into Niagara falls and died, I immediate knew it was an Asian. It was a Japanese girl. In their society there are always people to guide you, like sheep.

Much more to say about Asian society, not all bad, but different...They seem to be more geared toward the average, you rarely meet a dumb one, but I never saw any creative genius there.

^^^Doesn't this sound like these Mongoloid people have some sort of mental genetic disorder and disease that makes them the way that they are, given all the other evidence I have given in my previous reply? It seems that Mongoloids/Asians are NOT A SEPARATE RACE OF PEOPLE, but DIFFERENT GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH SOME SORT OF A GENETIC INBRED DISEASE AKIN TO RETARDATION OR DOWN SYNDROME HENCE THEIR APPEARANCES WITH ALL THEM LOOKING THE SAME AND HAVING EYES!JUST LIKE WHITES ARE NOT A SEPARATE OF PEOPLE BUT ARE SIMPLY ALBINOS OF DIFFERENT COLORED PEOPLES! Mongoloid Asians seem to fullfill all the criteria of qualified for having a genetic disorders like down syndrome characterize their entire group!


So people have exposed the fact that Whites are albinos and not an actual race of people and we have figured out how so many of them came into being (supernova/inbreeding); now I am going to do an expose and research on the origin of the Mongoloid race and what they are. Like Whites being albinos, the people with mongoloid traits like Chinese, Korean etc people are deformed freaks and have FIXED genetic ailments/diseases/disorders that give them their ethnic or racial appearance, just like White people are falsely characterized as a racial group when they are simply just FIXED albinos of different black/brown people coalescing together in a certain region of the world (Europe etc) and becoming a distinct ethno-genetic group through isolated inbreeding.

There are so many of these Mongoloids on this planet, despite their projected birth rates said to decrease in the future, and their countries are being hailed as future powers by the Khazar Jews and the mainstream media that I think it's time we expose these people for what they are, just like we did with White Europeans.

I was researching this, and I came across this online thread  on a now defunct forum and these videos, it's very informative:

sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?t=63035

Videos:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6RX_OweEp0

www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHV9XR1-8M8&spfreload=10&bpctr=1508105907

www.youtube.com/watch?v=khak8GYdfIU


Now check this out:

english.stackexchange.com/questions/67258/mongoloid-with-reference-to-downs-syndrome

"Where did “mong” come from?

The word “mong” derives from the word “mongol” and “mongoloid”. Dr. John Langdon Down, who discovered Down’s syndrome in the 1860s, used “mongolism” and “mongoloid” to describe the syndrome as he stated that there were similar physical characteristics of people with Down’s syndrome to people from Mongolia and Mongoloid race (those of Asian ethnicity). This phrase was used until the 1960s, when scientists petitioned to use “Down’s syndrome” instead of “Mongolism” or “Mongoloid” as they were embarrassing terms for Chinese and Japanese scientists and academics to use this word to refer to the syndrome.

Mongolia delegates from the World Health Organisation later requested that the use of “mongolism” and “mongol” be dropped from WHO publications.

Why is “mong” such an issue?

Today, the word “mong” is used quite frequently. However, have you ever heard it used in a positive way? Have you used it to mean “idiot”, “slow” or “stupid”? These words have been used throughout history and today to refer to people with learning disabilities and people with Down’s syndrome. Has the word really changed?"

And this:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans

"In humans, neotenic traits include several features of the head, including the globular skull[3] thinness of skull bones;[4] the reduction of the brow ridge;[5] the large brain;[5] the flattened [5] and broadened face;[4] the hairless face;[6] hair on (top of) the head;[3] larger eyes;[7] ear shape;[3] small nose;[6] small teeth;[5] and the small maxilla (upper jaw) and mandible (lower jaw)"

Trying to rescue Louis Bolk's theory, Stephen Jay Gould objected to the ranking of races as more or less neotenous, but Gould argued that if one used the terms set forth by 1920s proponents of racial neoteny, "Asians" are "clearly" the most neotenized human "race".[14]

"Ashley Montagu said that the "Mongoloid skull, whether Chinese or Japanese" is the most neotenized human skull,[5] and Montagu added that "Chinese peoples" are "perhaps" the best representatives of neoteny out of the Mongoloids.[40] Montagu further said that the "European" skull was less neotenized than the Mongoloid, with the "Australian Aborigine" skull less neotenized than the European and the Neanderthal skull even less neotenized than the Australian Aborigine skull.[5] Montagu said that humans have more neotenized skulls than Australopithecus[17] and gorillas.[40]"

Montagu said that "The Mongoloid skull has proceeded further than in any other people."[5] "The Mongoloid skull, whether Chinese or Japanese, has been rather more neotenized than the Caucasoid or European."[5] "The female skull, it will be noted, is more pedomorphic in all human populations than the male skull."[5]

"Montagu further observed that "the skeleton of the classic Mongoloid type is very delicately made, even down to the character of the sutures of the skull which, like those of the infant skull, are relatively smooth and untortuous. In fact the Mongoloid presents so many physical traits which are associated with the late fetus or young infant that he has been called a fetalized, infantilized or pedomorphic type. Those who have carefully observed young babies may recall that the root of the nose is frequently flat or low as in Mongoloids, and that an internal epicanthic fold in such instances is usually present. The smaller number of individual head hairs and the marked hairlessness of the remainder of the body are infantile traits, as are likewise the small mastoid processes, the shallow fossa into which the jawbone fits (the mandibular fossa), the rather stocky build, the large brain-pan and brain, lack of brow ridges, and quite a number of other characters."[53]"

"Gould suggested a mild intensification of neoteny in Mongoloids, in whom it has been given the name pedomorphy. Such a mechanism is likely to involve only a few controller genes and could therefore happen over a relatively short evolutionary period. It would also explain how the counterintuitive retroussé [turned up at the end] nose and relative loss of facial hair got into the package."[55] "[D]ecrease unnecessary muscle bulk, less tooth mass, thinner bones and smaller physical size; ...this follows the selective adaptive model of Mongoloid evolution."[55]"

"Down syndrome neotenizes the brain and body.[63] The syndrome is characterized by decelerated maturation (neoteny), incomplete morphogenesis (vestigia) and atavisms."

www.self.gutenberg.org/articles/Paedomorphic

Neoteny (/niːˈɒtɨni/ /niːˈɒtni/,[1][2][3] or /niːˈɒtəni/[4]) also called juvenilization,[5] is one of the three ways by which paedomorphism can arise. Paedomorphism or paedomorphosis is the retention by adults of traits previously seen only in juveniles, and is a subject studied in the field of developmental biology. In neoteny, the physiological (or somatic) development of an organism (typically an animal) is slowed or delayed. In contrast, in progenesis, sexual development occurs faster. Both processes result in paedomorphism.[6] Ultimately this process results in the retention, in the adults of a species, of juvenile physical characteristics well into maturity and pedogenesis (paedogenesis), the reproduction in a neotenized state.[7]
Neoteny is one of three dimensions of heterochrony, or the change in timing of developmental events: acceleration (faster) vs. neoteny (slower), hypermorphosis (further) vs. progenesis (not as far), and predisplacement (begins earlier) vs. postdisplacement (begins later)."


DOWN SYNDROME
Down syndrome neotenizes the brain and body.[40] Down syndrome is characterized by decelerated maturation (neoteny), incomplete morphogenesis (vestigia) and atavisms.[41] Dr. Weihs considers Down syndrome to be a condition of "neoteny" that makes people "like a baby."[42]
He notes both the physical neoteny of people with Down syndrome: "round in shape," "bowed legs which tend to be short," "slanty eyes," a "long tongue" and "short fingers," and their mental neoteny: "unsexual," "playful," "affectionate," "mischievous" and "imitative".[42]

Now let's take a look at this, we know that epicanthal folds or chinky eyes are known as a "mongoloid" racial phenotype characteristic right? And nearly all of East Asia has these weird freakish eye shape. Now let's look at what mainstream sources have to say about epicanthal fold eye shape:


www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjMmr_f1PPWAhXFwiYKHUfrAFcQFggxMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FEpicanthic_fold&usg=AOvVaw0z3pB3mGaQaTi5VX5kW06h

"Epicanthic fold is sometimes found as a congenital abnormality. Medical conditions that cause the nasal bridge not to mature and project are associated with epicanthic folds. About 60% of individuals with Down syndrome (also called as trisomy 21) have prominent epicanthic folds."

ic.steadyhealth.com/understanding-epicanthal-folds

Understanding Epicanthal Folds

Epicanthal fold is normally seen in people of East Asian origin. However, in others it may indicate some other birth defects.

What is Epicanthal Fold?

Epicanthal fold or epicanthus, represent a fold of the skin that comes down across of the eye’s inner angle, which is known as canthus of the eye. Epicanthal folds give the eyes appearance of almond-shaped or boat-shaped eye. Although, this is normal in people of Asciatic descent, children with inherited genetic disorders also have it. Epicanthal folds may develop in fetuses or infants of non-Asian descent before the bridge of the nose starts elevating. With age, epicanthal fold can change in shape and size.

Causes of Epicanthal Folds

As already mentioned, epicanthal folds are related to different genetic disease.

Down Syndrome

Down syndrome is a genetic disorder that causes developmental problems and mental retardation for life. This disorder occurs due to extra copy of chromosome 21. Down syndrome can be identified during prenatal testing. At birth, the condition is diagnosed by physical features of an infant. Children with Down syndrome have flat face, short neck, abnormally shaped ears and short stature. Due to flat face and epicanthal folds, these children appear like Mongolians.

Turner Syndrome

Turner syndrome is genetic disorder that occurs due to abnormality of one X chromosome. It affects only women, and they have only 45 chromosomes. It is a rare condition that affects about 1 in every 2,500 girls. Patients with Turners syndrome are recognized by webbed neck, short stature, a hollow appearance to the chest, lack of secondary sex characteristic, lymphedema and skeletal, autoimmune, dermatological and renal problems.

Fetal Alcohol Syndrome

This genetic disorder occurs when the mother drinks too much alcohol during pregnancy. This can lead to low birth weight, delayed growth, abnormal facial features, vision and hearing problems and problems with central nervous system. Children with fetal alcohol syndrome have epicanthal folds.

William Syndrome

William syndrome is characterized by different medical problems, including cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, kidney problems, developmental delays, and learning disabilities. Physical appearance of children with William syndrome is distinguished by small stature, small upturned nose, long upper lip, wide mouth, puffiness around the eyes and epicanthal folds.

Noonan Syndrome

Noonan syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that prevents normal development of different parts of the body. This may result in chest deformity, undescended testicles and heart defects. Children with Noonan syndrome generally have short stature, unusual facial characteristics with widely spaced and down-slanting eyes with epicanthal folds, and other physical problems. Noonan syndrome is also sometimes accompanied with mental retardation.

Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome

This condition results from genetic error on chromosome 4. It is a rare condition that affects more frequently females than males. Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome is followed by mental retardation, short stature, heart defects and distinctive facial features such as prominent forehead, small head and wide set eyes with epicanthal folds.

Is this a coincidence? Here mainstream sources are admitting directly and indirectly, that Mongoloid people, like Chinese, Korean etc people fit all the criteria of being characterized by a genetic disorder or abnormality like down syndrome. Just like these mainstream websites and research journals admit that Whites are albinos indirectly through data, they are admitting that "Mongoloid" peoples might not actually be a distinct racial group of people, but the result of a down syndrome like condition or a genetic disorder that gives them this down syndrome like appearance of them. I suspect that the euro albino mainstream science journals and academia are hiding and concealing the fact of the reality and down syndrome genetic like roots of "mongoloid peoples" and just like how there is no singular "white race", since whites are albinos, that there isn't really a singular "mongoloid" race either.

Now look at these pictures. here are people other then Asian mongoloids with down syndrome:











Now here are REGULAR MONGOLOID CHINESE/JAPANESE/KOREAN ETC PEOPLE:













^^^Looking at the pictures above, it seems as though the Mongoloid peoples LOOK EXACTLY LIKE PEOPLE WITH DOWN SYNDROME OR PEOPLE WITH RELATED DISEASES! The epicanthic folds of the so called Mongoloid peoples characterize people with down syndrome, noonan syndrome etc etc and all the other genetic disorders listed in my epicanthal fold link! Is it surprising that noonan syndrome like down syndrome, is characterized by epicanthal or chinky eyes, flat face and nose, and a small penis? Aren't mongoloid Chinese like people known to have the smallest dicks in the world?

It looks like Whites are trying to conceal not just the fact that they are actually albinos, but that we have entire groups of people in Eastern Asia characterized by a genetic disorder like down syndrome etc and then falsely identified as a separate race (Mongoloid); just like Whites are also falsely identified as a unique racial group of their own when they are actually just albinos and they are not even from Europe.

And I know for a fact that the whole Asian high IQ thing, being smart thing is largely a myth because of selective immigration, and false reporting of IQ scores from China by frauds and pseudo-intellectual racists like Richard Lynn. This explains the slave like ant like insect existence of Asian people, where they aren't capable of having original thoughts or generating stimuli on their own, have to always be ruled or guided by strong authoritarian figures, and always behave in a herd like manner like a bunch of animals or an insect hive colony as I have said multiple times before.

Asian mongoloid peoples seem to have no feelings of empathy or having an ability to generate abstract thoughts on their own, are largely unemotional and cannot feel the pain or joy of other people including their own. Historically they have treated their own kind extremely poorly and as if they didn't have any real human connection to them, and the stuff that Japanese people did in WWII in terms of barbarity and savagery made the Nazi's look like good guys in comparison. They show this in their treatment of animals, like Whites, where they eat dogs and cats and anything that slithers on the ground, and sometimes even torture or put animals in pain without a second thought and without feeling anything about it and have a tendency to take over areas like a swarm of locusts and spread pollution everywhere, have no real regard for their surroundings or their environment etc etc etc.

They behave and function like a bunch of autistic robotic insects, and they always have been like cold emotionless machines without a purpose or any sense of higher direction; for a mongoloid, their entire life is soulless and dedicated to the collective hive colony they call their nation or province or people and they have no independent say or thoughts or rights except what their leaders or authority figures tell them. Mongoloid Asian cultures have always been characterized by strong collectivism, with the individual being stamped down and out.


Asians seem to fullfill all the characteristics of a group of people, like Whites, with a genetic disease and disorder like down syndrome or noonan syndrome, in their appearance and behavior and culture, wouldn't you agree?


Here are pictures of people with Noonan Syndrome, which is a condition similar to down syndrome:








Now here are more pictures of so called "normal" "Asian" people:













^^^^Do you see the resemblance between Noonan syndrome "retarded" people and these "normal" Asian mongoloid peoples? They seem to look as if they HAVE THE EXACT SAME CONDITION, JUST LIKE WHITE PEOPLE WITH ALBINOS OF OTHER RACES! And Noonan syndrome, like down syndrome, is characterized by epicanthal folds or chinky eyes, flattened face, flat nose, small mouth, short stature etc and SMALL DICKS! Is this all a coincidence? Probably not! And like Whites with albinism, there is no real "mongoloid" Asian race, but rather a large group of people characterized by a genetic disorder due to incessant multi-generational inbreeding in isolated regions of the world and closed small genetic pools just like Whites with albinism in Europe and Asia.


I very disappointed that Mike and Clyde haven't figured this out or made an effort to look more into this, or at least suspected something about mongoloid peoples; but we have to expose these Mongoloid peoples for being genetic abnormalities like Whites being albinos, like we did with White Europeans.

[mindovermatter]

Here is something related to this subject of Mongoloid Asiatics being a FIXED GENETICALLY DEFECTIVE RACE, JUST LIKE WHITE EUROPEANS BEING ALBINOS AND NOT AN ACTUAL RACE OF PEOPLE, AND THIS THREAD WHICH IS VERY IMPORTANT IN REGARDS TO UNDERSTANDING WHO THESE MONGOLOID ASIATIC PEOPLE ARE, THEIR ORIGINS AND WHAT AFRICANS ARE DEALING WITH IN REGARDS TO THEM!

www.amren.com/news/2013/02/east-asian-physical-traits-linked-to-35000-year-old-mutation/

East Asian Physical Traits Linked to 35,000-Year-Old Mutation

Gaining a deep insight into human evolution, researchers have identified a mutation in a critical human gene as the source of several distinctive traits that make East Asians different from other races.

The traits — thicker hair shafts, more sweat glands, characteristically identified teeth and smaller breasts — are the result of a gene mutation that occurred about 35,000 years ago, the researchers have concluded.

The discovery explains a crucial juncture in the evolution of East Asians. But the method can also be applied to some 400 other sites on the human genome. The DNA changes at these sites, researchers believe, mark the turning points in recent human evolution as the populations on each continent diverged from one another.

The first of those sites to be studied contains the gene known as EDAR. Africans and Europeans carry the standard version of the gene, but in most East Asians, one of the DNA units has mutated.

Seeking to understand if the gene was the cause of thicker hair in East Asians with the variant gene, a team of researchers led by Yana G. Kamberov and Pardis C. Sabeti at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mass., decided to test the gene in mice, where its effects could be more easily explored.

Mice already have EDAR, an ancient mammalian gene that plays a leading role in the embryo in shaping hair, skin and teeth. The Broad team engineered a strain of mice whose EDAR gene had the same DNA change as the East Asian version of EDAR.

When the mice grew up, the researchers found they did indeed have thicker hair shafts, confirming that the changed gene was the cause of East Asians’ thicker hair. But the gene had several other effects, they report in Thursday’s issue of the journal Cell.

One was that the mice, to the researchers’ surprise, had extra sweat glands. A Chinese member of the team, Sijia Wang, then tested people in China and discovered that they, too, had more numerous sweat glands, evidently another effect of the gene.

Another surprise was that the engineered mice had less breast tissue, meaning that EDAR could be the reason that East Asian women have generally smaller breasts.

East Asians have distinctively shaped teeth for which their version of EDAR is probably responsible. But the mice were less helpful on this point; their teeth are so different from humans’ that the researchers could not see any specific change.

The finding that the gene has so many effects raises the question of which one was the dominant trigger for natural selection.

Dr. Sabeti said the extra sweat glands could have been the feature favored by natural selection, with all the other effects being dragged along in its train.

“We’re the only mammals to have changed their entire hair pattern. So the changes in teeth, hair and breasts — it’s very possible they are the passengers and thermoregulation is the key,” she said, referring to the role of sweat glands in cooling the body.

East Asians are sometimes assumed to have evolved in a cold environment because of their narrow nostrils, which conserve heat, and the extra eyelid fat that insulates the eye. But the Broad team calculates that the EDAR variant arose about 35,000 years ago in central China and that the region was then quite warm and humid. Extra sweat glands would have been advantageous to the hunter-gatherers who lived at that time.

But Joshua Akey, a geneticist at the University of Washington in Seattle, said he thought the more likely cause of the gene’s spread among East Asians was sexual selection. Thick hair and small breasts are visible sexual signals which, if preferred by men, could quickly become more common as the carriers had more children. The genes underlying conspicuous traits, like blue eyes and blond hair in Europeans, have very strong signals of selection, Dr. Akey said, and the sexually visible effects of EDAR are likely to have been stronger drivers of natural selection than sweat glands.

Yet a third view is held by Dr. Kamberov, who believes that each of the effects of the EDAR variant may have been favored by natural selection at a different time. A series of selections on different traits thus made the variant version so common among East Asians. About 93 percent of Han Chinese carry the variant, as do about 70 percent of people in Japan and Thailand, and 60 to 90 percent of American Indians, a population descended from East Asians.

The Broad team is studying EDAR as part of a larger plan to identify all the genetic variants responsible for recent human evolution. Many researchers, including Dr. Sabeti, have devised ways of scanning the human genome to detect the fingerprints of natural selection. But these scans have typically identified large chunks of the genome that contain many genes. There is often no way to tell which gene was the target of natural selection.

A team led by Dr. Sabeti and Sharon R. Grossman of the Broad Institute has now refined the usual scanning methods and identified 412 sites on the genome that have been under selection. Each site is small enough that it contains at most a single gene.

LOOKING AND DIGESTING THE INFORMATION ABOVE, now take a look at this:

bmcmedgenet.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12881-015-0227-5

Background

Mutations in the EDAR-gene cause hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with defects in ectodermal appendage development including teeth, skin, exocrine glands and hair. Hair defects are sparsely described in genetically defined samples. The aim of this study was to investigate hair structures in three families with a heterozygous c.1072C > T mutation in the EDAR gene using scanning electron microscopy.

Ectodermal dysplasias (EDs) are genetic disorders with lack or dysgenesis of at least two of the ectodermal derivatives; hair, nails, teeth or sweat glands [1]. Yavuz et al [2] reported that the most frequent abnormality in ectodermal dysplasia is skin disorders (93 %), followed by hair and nail disorders (86 %). Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) which is the most common form of ectodermal dysplasia is characterized by severe defects in ectodermal appendage development, including hairs, teeth, and exocrine glands. Common symptoms in individuals with HED are reduced number of teeth, reduced saliva secretion, dry skin and sparse and thin hair

This study describes the effect on hair structure of a heterozygous c.1072C > T mutation (p.ARG358X) in the EDAR gene which has previously not been described in a genetically defined human clinical material. Deep hair deformations were more common in the mutation group and the null-hypothesis could therefore be rejected for deformation of hairs. The mutation which changes a CGA arginine codon to a TGA stop codon has earlier been described

and this:

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022202X15320042

A Rare Case of Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia Caused by Compound Heterozygous Mutations in the EDAR Gene

Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is a genetic disease characterized by abnormal hair, teeth, and sweat gland development. Although most cases of HED display X-linked recessive inheritance, autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms also exist. X-linked HED is caused by mutations in the EDA gene, and the autosomal forms result from mutations in either the EDAR gene or the EDARADD gene. In this study, we identified compound heterozygous mutations in the EDAR gene in a Japanese female patient with HED.

AND THIS!


www.genedx.com/test-catalog/disorders/ectodermal-dysplasia/

Ectodermal Dysplasia

The clinical features of the X-linked and autosomal forms of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia can be indistinguishable. EDA1 gene mutations have been found in 75%-95% of familial hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and about 50% of sporadic cases. Sequencing can detect approximately 95% of EDA1 mutations in affected males. In approximately 10% of patients, large deletions of one or more exons or a deletion of the entire EDA1 gene have been reported. In females, targeted array CGH analysis with exon-level resolution (ExonArrayDx) is performed concurrently with sequencing to evaluate for such intragenic deletions/duplications. Mutations in the WNT10A gene have been reported in up to 9% of individuals with ectodermal dysplasia and in 25% of individuals with HED who do not have a mutation in the EDA1 gene. A broad spectrum of clinical features has been found in ectodermal dysplasia patients who are compound heterozygous or homozygous for mutations in the WNT10A gene, with the most consistent clinical feature being severe oligodontia of permanent teeth. Other common features include: dry skin, nail dystrophy, abnormal teeth, sparse hair, and hypohidrosis or hyperhidrosis. Approximately 50% of heterozygotes carrying a WNT10A mutation have mild clinical symptoms of ectodermal dysplasia, including abnormal teeth and nails. Mutations in the EDAR gene are responsible for both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms of HED. Mutations in this gene have been reported in about 7% of individuals with HED and in up to 25% of individuals with HED who do not have a EDA1 gene mutation. The clinical features are clinically indistinguishable from the X-linked form (EDA1) and include fine, sparse and light-colored scalp and body hair (hypotrichosis), decreased ability to sweat leading to heat intolerance, and missing, conical or peg shaped teeth. The facial features are characterized by dark pigmented skin surrounding the eyes, saddle nose and full lips. Males and females are equally affected.

Now here is something very interesting I found, this is a graph data chart of rates of down syndrome by ethnicity in the Michigan area, notice how it's mostly the "mongoloids" with the highest rate of down syndrome:

www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/ViewSubtopic.aspx?reg=26&top=16&stop=561&lev=1&slev=4&obj=1

^^^^^^
Asians and Pacific Islanders have the highest rate of down syndrome occurring among them then any other group in this data set at 14.3; and a down syndrome person looks just like a mongoloid Asian person!

Is this a big coincidence? The people with the highest rate of epicanthal folds just happen to be groups that are relatively isolated geographically or inbred at several levels.


Now again speaking about Mongoloids being a group WITH SEVERAL FIXED GENETIC DEFECTS THAT GIVES THEM OUTWARD TRAITS WHICH THE REST OF THE WORLD HAS MISIDENTIFIED AS BEING FALSE EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION TRAITS RELATED TO THEIR SUPPOSED ANCESTRAL ENVIRONMENTS, here are some pictures of regular Chinese people:

Now here are some pictures of NON-MONGOLOID PEOPLE with the condition ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA, the condition which the EDAR gene in the article can cause by mutations in it, just like whites with the OCA2 albino gene:








See the resemblance between these two groups? It seems AGAIN THAT Mongoloid East Asians are some genetically defective group of people like WHITE EUROPEANS WITH ALBINISM, that inherited and mass bred a large population of themselves through a genetic bottle neck effect IN HIGHLY BARRED AND ISOLATED LOCALES OF THE GLOBE, THROUGH MULTI-GENERATIONAL INBREEDING THAT EVENTUALLY RESULTED IN THE CREATION OF A DISTINCT GROUP OF PEOPLE WITH THE DYSGENIC GENETIC DISEASES MENTIONED IN THIS THREAD AKA THE MONGOLOID RACE OF THE WORLD! It's interesting to consider how this genetic defective state might have influenced their culture and civilization, mongoloid East Asian cultures AGAIN have been known to be highly collectivist and authoritarian and hive like, it's clear their genetic defect plays a role in this, along with their albinism admixture and ancestry....


Now here is another insightful video on ectodermal dysplasia, the genetic condition that characterizes East Asians/Mongoloid Asiatics:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3m6jMXxOw

It's very similar to albinism in many ways, lack of sweat glands and inability to tolerate sunlight and high temperatures. Combine that with albinism and you have an entire demographic/massive population of people with severe genetic hindrances in modern north-east Asia. East Asian mongoloids like to lie that their peasant lower classes were dark skinned while their upper classes were white and light skinned and whites say something similar, well look at these children in the video with ectodermal Dysplasia, the genetic disease and mutation that mongoloid East Asians carry; like Whites/Mongoloids these children lack and cannot produce enough sweat due to this disease condition and are sensitive to light! And East Asians are KNOWN FOR LACKING SWEAT GLANDS AND SWEATING LESS THEN OTHER RACES which means they can't live in hot high sunlight environments; and even these children's heads and faces LOOK LIKE THAT OF MODERN MONGOLOID ASIATICS!

[mindovermatter]

HERE IS MORE EVIDENCE THAT THERE IS NO MONGOLOID RACIAL OR ETHNIC GROUP, AS FALSELY MISCHARACTERIZED TODAY, AND MONGOLOIDS IN EASTERN ASIA AND IN SOUTH EAST ASIA AND ELSEWHERE ARE THE FIXED GENETIC DEFECTIVE RESULT OF DOWN SYNDROME AND OTHER AILMENTS THAT HAS RESULTED IN THEIR MODERN RACIAL APPEARANCE TODAY!:

www.newscientist.com/article/dn25848-oldest-case-of-downs-syndrome-from-medieval-france/

Oldest case of Down’s syndrome from medieval France

The oldest confirmed case of Down’s syndrome has been found: the skeleton of a child who died 1500 years ago in early medieval France. According to the archaeologists, the way the child was buried hints that Down’s syndrome was not necessarily stigmatised in the Middle Ages.

Down’s syndrome is a genetic disorder that delays a person’s growth and causes intellectual disability. People with Down’s syndrome have three copies of chromosome 21, rather than the usual two. It was described in the 19th century, but has probably existed throughout human history. However there are few cases of Down’s syndrome in the archaeological record.

The new example comes from a 5th- and 6th-century necropolis near a church in Chalon-sur-Saône in eastern France. Excavations there have uncovered the remains of 94 people, including the skeleton of a young child with a short and broad skull, a flattened skull base and thin cranial bones. These features are common in people with Down’s syndrome, says Maïté Rivollat at the University of Bordeaux in France, who has studied the skeleton with her colleagues.

“I think the paper makes a convincing case for a diagnosis of Down’s syndrome,” says John Starbuck at Indiana University in Indianapolis. He has just analysed a 1500-year-old figurine from the Mexican Tolteca culture that he says depicts someone with Down’s syndrome.
Treated well?

Rivollat’s team has studied the way the child with Down’s syndrome was buried, which hasn’t been possible with other ancient cases of the condition. The child was placed on its back in the tomb, in an east-west orientation with the head at the westward end – in common with all of the dead at the necropolis.

According to Rivollat, this suggests the child was treated no differently in death from other members of the community. That in turn hints that they were not stigmatised while alive.

A similar argument was put forward in a 2011 study that described the 1500-year-old burial in Israel of a man with dwarfism (International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, DOI: 10.1002/oa.1285). The body was buried in a similar manner to others at the site, and archaeologists took that as indicating that the man was treated as a normal member of society.

Starbuck is not convinced by this argument. “It can be very difficult to extrapolate cultural values and behaviour from burials or skeletal remains,” he says.

and this, this is very important, VERY IMPORTANT!

news.psu.edu/story/322149/2014/08/04/research/flores-bones-show-features-down-syndrome-not-new-hobbit-human

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. -- In October 2004, excavation of fragmentary skeletal remains from the island of Flores in Indonesia yielded what was called "the most important find in human evolution for 100 years." Its discoverers dubbed the find Homo floresiensis, a name suggesting a previously unknown species of human.

Now detailed reanalysis by an international team of researchers including Robert B. Eckhardt, professor of developmental genetics and evolution at Penn State, Maciej Henneberg, professor of anatomy and pathology at the University of Adelaide, and Kenneth Hsü, a Chinese geologist and paleoclimatologist, suggests that the single specimen on which the new designation depends, known as LB1, does not represent a new species. Instead, it is the skeleton of a developmentally abnormal human and, according to the researchers, contains important features most consistent with a diagnosis of Down syndrome.

"The skeletal sample from Liang Bua cave contains fragmentary remains of several individuals," Eckhardt said. "LB1 has the only skull and thighbones in the entire sample."

No substantial new bone discoveries have been made in the cave since the finding of LB1.

Initial descriptions of Homo floresiensis focused on LB1's unusual anatomical characteristics: a cranial volume reported as only 380 milliliters (23.2 cubic inches), suggesting a brain less than one third the size of an average modern human's and short thighbones, which were used to reconstruct a creature standing 1.06 meters (about 3.5 feet tall). Although LB1 lived only 15,000 years ago, comparisons were made to earlier hominins, including Homo erectus and Australopithecus. Other traits were characterized as unique and therefore indicative of a new species.

A thorough reexamination of the available evidence in the context of clinical studies, the researchers said, suggests a different explanation.

The researchers report their findings in two papers published Monday (Aug. 4) in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In the first place, they write, the original figures for cranial volume and stature are underestimates, "markedly lower than any later attempts to confirm them." Eckhardt, Henneberg, and other researchers have consistently found a cranial volume of about 430 milliliters (26.2 cubic inches).

"The difference is significant, and the revised figure falls in the range predicted for a modern human with Down syndrome from the same geographic region," Eckhardt said.

The original estimate of 3.5 feet for the creature's height was based on extrapolation combining the short thighbone with a formula derived from an African pygmy population. But humans with Down syndrome also have diagnostically short thighbones, Eckhardt said.

Though these and other features are unusual, he acknowledged, "unusual does not equal unique. The originally reported traits are not so rare as to have required the invention of a new hominin species."

Instead, the researchers build the case for an alternative diagnosis: that of Down syndrome, one of the most commonly occurring developmental disorders in modern humans.

"When we first saw these bones, several of us immediately spotted a developmental disturbance," said Eckhardt, "but we did not assign a specific diagnosis because the bones were so fragmentary. Over the years, several lines of evidence have converged on Down syndrome."

The first indicator is craniofacial asymmetry, a left-right mismatch of the skull that is characteristic of this and other disorders. Eckhardt and colleagues noted this asymmetry in LB1 as early as 2006, but it had not been reported by the excavating team and was later dismissed as a result of the skull's being long buried, he said.

A previously unpublished measurement of LB1's occipital-frontal circumference -- the circumference of the skull taken roughly above the tops of the ears -- allowed the researchers to compare LB1 to clinical data routinely collected on patients with developmental disorders. Here too, the brain size they estimate is within the range expected for an Australomelanesian human with Down syndrome.

LB1's short thighbones not only match the height reduction seen in Down syndrome, Eckhardt said, but when corrected statistically for normal growth, they would yield a stature of about 1.26 meters, or just over four feet, a figure matched by some humans now living on Flores and in surrounding regions.

These and other Down-like characteristics, the researchers state, are present only in LB1, and not in the other Liang Bua skeletal remains, further evidence of LB1's abnormality.

"This work is not presented in the form of a fanciful story, but to test a hypothesis: Are the skeletons from Liang Bua cave sufficiently unusual to require invention of a new human species?" Eckhardt said.

"Our reanalysis shows that they are not. The less strained explanation is a developmental disorder. Here the signs point rather clearly to Down syndrome, which occurs in more than one per thousand human births around the world."

^^^^
As you can see from the two reports and articles, in both instances the albino euro researchers and the mongoloid researchers BOTH came to the erroneous conclusions about down syndrome affecting those subjects entirely by analyzing their skeletons and not necessarily their genetic structures. Since they determined that these remains illustrated down syndrome based on skeleton physical analysis, then we can safely conclude that Mongoloids are not a race, and mongoloidism is a fixed genetic disorder like albinism in whites, because of the irregular and odd features involved in the Mongoloid skull and skeleton. Mongoloids have more neoteny and a more paedomorphic skeleton/skull type of any other "racial group" with a high percentage of simian creases in the hands, moreso then other racial groups. Down syndrome sufferers and victims also have a high amount of simian creases in the hands, with mongoloid like epicanthal folds, and high amount of neoteny and paedomorphisim in the skull and skeleton. And this is not counting the OTHER SYNDROMES I LISTED THAT ALSO RESULTS IN SOME OF THOSE THINGS!

So we can safely conclude that Mongoloidism IS A FIXED IN GENETIC DEFECT INSTEAD OF A ADAPTATIONAL RACIAL/ETHNIC CHARACTERISTIC TO ANY SORT OF ENVIRONMENT PERTAINING TO A SINGULAR RACIAL OR ETHNIC GROUP! Because based on the skeletons and skulls of Mongoloid people, as well as their characteristic epicanthal folds, their lack of tolerance to high sunlight and high temperatures (in the case of North-East Asians like Chinese, Koreans etc), and their behavior and other such traits; Mongoloidism has to be the result of the multitudes of syndromes that result in epicanthal folds found in medical databases, as well as a genetic defect resulting from ectodermal dysplasia from a mutated EDAR gene, and in the case of North-East Asians, ALSO ALBINISM OF VARIOUS TYPES (due to distant Indo-European/Turkic ancestry)!

Now notice how the second article about the Hobbit species, indicated that the down syndrome condition affecting them arose as a result of isolated ISLAND DWARFISM AND INBREEDING DUE TO THEIR GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION! As I said before, the vast majority of Mongoloid populations on Earth, are ALMOST ALWAYS in places that are RELATIVELY ISOLATED, PROTECTED, BARRED AND DIFFICULT TO REACH GEOGRAPHICALLY, or among communities that HAVE PRACTICED CENTURIES OF MULTI-GENERATIONAL INBREEDING AMONGST THEMSELVES (in the case of African tribes like the Khoison etc). So it's likely that like the dwarf down syndrome species of hominids in the second article, Mongoloidism arose due to the geographical and physical isolation of populations in the general East Asia and South East Asia areas and in the South America and even North America regions due to the combined factors of BOTH INBREEDING PLUS SHALLOW NARROW GENETIC POOLS AMONG ETHNIC GROUPS THAT GAVE BIRTH TO MONGOLOID TYPE PEOPLES AND GEOGRAPHICAL ISOLATION AND PROTECTION OF THESE SAID GROUPS!


Based on this, it's important that we look at cryptic indirect admissions by the European albinos about what epicanthal folds and Mongoloids actually can indicate and mean:

ic.steadyhealth.com/understanding-epicanthal-folds

Epicanthal fold is normally seen in people of East Asian origin. However, in others it may indicate some other birth defects.

What is Epicanthal Fold?

Epicanthal fold or epicanthus, represent a fold of the skin that comes down across of the eye’s inner angle, which is known as canthus of the eye. Epicanthal folds give the eyes appearance of almond-shaped or boat-shaped eye. Although, this is normal in people of Asciatic descent, children with inherited genetic disorders also have it. Epicanthal folds may develop in fetuses or infants of non-Asian descent before the bridge of the nose starts elevating. With age, epicanthal fold can change in shape and size.


Causes of Epicanthal Folds

As already mentioned, epicanthal folds are related to different genetic disease.

So here, we have European albinos admitting that epicanthal folds and mongoloid like appearances in OTHER RACIAL ETHNIC GROUPS BESIDES EAST ASIAN MONGOLOIDS, ARE SIGNS OF GENETIC DISEASES OR DISORDERS OR ARE NOT NORMAL! Which is an indirect admission that MONGOLOID PEOPLE ARE NOT NORMAL COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT DO NOT RESEMBLE THEM, AND THEY ARE LIKELY THE RESULT OF GENETIC DISEASES AND/OR DISORDERS!


Now here is something important that I also found, list of quotes about the origins of the Chinese/Asian mongoloid peoples and civilization:


Chinese scientists admit MODERN mongoloids are more by genetics and blood, closer to Negro's from Africa then previously thought:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQJzhFGuoHg

articles.latimes.com/1998/sep/29/news/mn-27603

"Most of the population of modern China--one-fifth of all the people living today--owes its genetic origins to Africa, an international scientific team said today in research that undercuts any claim that modern humans may have originated independently in China...Populations from East Asia always derived from a single lineage, indicating the single origins of those populations," the researchers said. "It is now probably safe to conclude that modern humans originating in Africa constitute the majority of the current gene pool in East Asia," they said.

Researchers admit that MODERN Mongoloid are derived from "Negroids" of various stripes: H. Imbert, a French scholar in 1928 in Les Negritos de Chine, observed that "*In the first epochs of Chinese history, the Negrito type peopled are the south of this country and even the island of Hainan, as we have attempted to prove in our study on the Negritos, or black men of the land*

*According to T. DeLacoperie, the Chinese first met these tribes in 2116 BC, when they advanced eastwards of the great southern bend of the Yellow River. They are spoken of in the Zhou Li, composed under the Zhou dynasty (1122-249 BC), as "black and oily skinned."

Tribes of the same race are also spoken of in the fabulous geography of the Shan hai king, written a few centuries before the Christian era. Many of these tribes were called Diaoyao or 'Dark pygmies'.* In 122 BC, Prince Liu-Nan, who died in 122 BC, speaks of references of Negritos in China as late as the Tang dynasty. In the Lin-yi Kuo Chuan, contained in Book 197 of the Chu Tang Shu it is written that "the people living to the south of Lin-yi have wooly hair and black skin".

In addition to the above, Chinese folk-lore mentions an empress of China, named Li (373-397 AD) who was the consort of the Emperor Xiao Wu Wen, was a Black. According too Prof. Shun-sheng Ling, the earliest documented rulership of China known as the Xia and Shang dynasties, were ruled by emperors called XuanDi, Black Emperors who introduced farming and writing to China, and under their leadership, trade cities and travel developed. Blacks in China were raising silkworms to make silk not later than 3500 BC.

The fundamental structures of a stylish calligraphy which is still present today was perfected by the Chinese under this Black dynasty, but in addition to writing, the Blacks of the Xia and Shang dynasties introduced bronze working to China and also invented the pounded earth architecture associated with early Chinese city-states. Furthermore, archaeology and forensic tests confirm that China’s first two important dynasties, the Xia and the Shang/ Chang, were Black African, with an Australoid known as Madras Indian or Chamar in Trinidad present in small percentages.

"One of the most eminent anthropologists K C Chang said that the Dawenkou culture,considered to be a precursor culture was largely African:K.C. Chang, The archaeology of ancient China, (Yale University Press:New Haven,1977) p.76: ""Negroid skeletons dating to the early periods of Southern Chinese history have been found in Shangdong, Jiantung, Sichuan, Yunnan, Pearl River delta and Jiangxi especially at the initial sites of Chingliengang (Ch’ing-lien-kang) and Mazhiabang (Ma chia-pang) phases"", "He goes on to state that the Shang ruled S. China before the mongoloid Han. The presence of Negroid skeletal remains at Dawenkou sites make it clear that Negroes spread out from the North to South China.


The Dawenkou culture predates the Lung-shan culture which is associated with the Xia civilization." Many researchers believe that the Yi of Southern China were the ancestors of the Austronesian, Polynesian and Melanesian people. "In the Chinese literature the Blacks were called li-min, Kunlung, Ch’iang (Qiang), Yi and Yueh. The founders of the Xia Dynasty and the Shang Dynasties were blacks.These blacks were called Yueh and Qiang. The modern Chinese are descendants of the Zhou. The second Shang Dynasty (situated at Anyang) was founded by the Yin.

As a result this dynasty is called Shang-Yin. The Yin or Classical/Oceanic Mongoloid type is associated with the Austronesian speakers ( Kwang-chih Chang, “Prehistoric and early historic culture horizons and traditions in South China”, Current Anthropology, 5 (1964) pp.359-375 :375)." "The fur-ther comparison of Neolithic Man with Modern Man in China (including inhabitants of Northern China, Fujian province and Hainan island) is made, also based on the main index values and total prognathism of skull, showing that the development of the physi-cal characteristics of Chinese is a genetic and successive course from Later Paleolithic Man to Modern Man via Neolithic Man. Thus, so-called Negro-Australoid racial traits, such as the narrow and long cranial pattern, height vaulted crania, lower orbit, wide nose and some projective prognathism (from the morphological observations), themsel-vesare intrinsic characteristics of Neolithic Man in China, only there is a little diffe-rentia in the degrees of display of these traits among groups."

"The populations of the early and late Neolithic in South China are closer to Southern Mo- ngoloids,and even display certain clear racial characters of the Negro-Australoid race.......The human bones of the Neolithic of South China,according to our study clearly display both Mongoloid and Pacific Negroid characters.This situation already existed,in the skull of the late Paleolithic Liujiang Man.Thus,we think that it is the continuation of polymo- rphism of physical evolution which existed in Paleolithic **Mongoloids.It* canot be concluded that the populations with Negro-Australoid elements had been distributed in South China before the Neolithic or was the result of a mixture of two principal races.:"*

*"Society for the Study of Early China,1989. Among Europoid and Eskimoid skulls in a Hua-chia-chiang cemetary are unmistakable Oceanic Negroid crania (the Shang period)."*Page 31 *"The Magic Square cities in ancient China By Alfred Schinz.1996 makes plain that in sacrificial pits were recovered Mongoloid skulls from the N.West and from the Southern populations, Oceanic Negroid types. Page 54I forgot the KC Chang you specifically requested. The archaeology of ancient China ; "the liu chang skull has some morphological features comparable with Oceanic NEGROID CHARACTERISTICS"* Page 33 Page 43, *"the population in N.China and that in the South West and INDOCHINA had become sufficiently differentiated to be designated by the names Mongoloid and Oceanic Negroid respectively, even though both may have evolved out pf a common Upper Pleistocene substratum"*.......

^^^^ Now this stuff written above is very important, I have told and PROVED BY EVIDENCE BEFORE, that the China and East Asia area was invaded and colonized and taken over by Indo-European/Turkic ALBINOS from the South Asia/India area in accordance to Mike's theory/idea, in remote antiquity FROM THE SIBERIAN STEPPES REGION. Infact FOUR of the defining ancient Chinese dynasties (the Shang,Zhou, Qin, Tang) were ALL SET UP BY BARBARIAN FOREIGNERS FROM THE SIBERIAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN STEPPES! Who was in Central Asia and Siberia in very ancient times during the time period of these dynasties? Why it's none other then our favorite friends, THE INDO-EUROPEAN AKA INDIAN/SOUTH ASIAN ALBINOS THAT CARRIED THE INDO-EUROPEAN AND TURKIC LANGUAGES TO EUROPE AND NORTH AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST LATER ON, AND WHOM ARE FOUND IN THE MAJORITY IN THAT PART OF THE WORLD TODAY! So the people that set up the FIRST CHINESE DYNASTIES WERE THE BLACK/BROWN PEOPLE OF THE INDIA/SOUTH AREA WITH SOME OCEANIC/MELANESIAN NEGROID TYPES MIXED IN FOLLOWED BY INDIAN/SOUTH ASIAN AKA INDO-EUROPEAN/TURKIC ALBINOS that we find in VARIOUS PARTS OF EUROPE TODAY! There is even evidence that the INDO-EUROPEAN/TURKIC ALBINOS MAY HAVE REACHED JAPAN IN ANCIENT TIMES BASED ON WRITTEN HISTORY IN ANCIENT JAPAN, FROM THEIR SIBERIAN HOMELAND, AND WHOM MAY HAVE SET THEMSELVES UP AS A FOREIGN CLASS OF SORTS IN THAT PART OF THE WORLD! I provided evidence for that in past threads on Egyptsearch.

Now bear in mind that these skeletons and skulls described in the quotes above, ARE FOUND IN THE CHINA/EAST ASIA AREA AFTER THE 35,000 YEAR OLD MUTATION APPEARED IN THE EDAR GENE THAT SUPPOSEDLY RESULTED IN THE MONGOLOID EAST ASIAN PHENOTYPE ACCORDING TO LYING EUROPEAN ALBINO RESEARCHERS, AS A RESULT OF THE CYGNUS SUPERNOVA SHOWERING EARTH WITH COSMIC RAYS! Which means that the EDAR gene mutation, which is responsible for the ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA GROUP OF SYNDROMES AND GENETIC DISEASES THAT CHARACTERIZE MODERN MONGOLOID EAST ASIAN POPULATIONS AS ADMITTED BY THE EUROPEAN ALBINOS, IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETE MONGOLOID PHENOTYPE AND RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS FOUND IN MODERN MONGOLOID POPULATIONS TODAY! This is also along with the lie, that Mongoloids have extra sweat glands WHEN THEY ARE KNOWN FOR PRODUCING LESS SWEAT AND THE ABILITY TO PRODUCE LESS SWEAT COMPARED TO OTHER RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUPS (which is actually a trait of down syndrome sufferers or other types of genetic syndromes etc).


So in summation, the East Asia/China area, WAS A MINI-LATIN AMERICA/BRAZIL-MEXICO LIKE MELTING POT OF DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS IN ANCIENT TIMES, LIKE WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE SPANIARDS/PORTUGUESE/EUROPEANS IN THE NEW WORLD, PARTICULARLY IN THE LATIN AMERICA/SOUTH AMERICA REGION! This is proved by the fact of ancient Chinese and eastern civilization accounts as to the origins and roots of their civilization (racially/ethnically/tribally), by archeological work/research in that part of the world, and by the fact that statues/pictures/murals of ancient China DEPICT FIGURES WITH A DIFFERENT APPEARANCE TO THAT FOUND IN THE MAJORITY MONGOLOID ASIATIC POPULATIONS OF THE WORLD TODAY! Therefore due to the relative geographical isolation and difficult to reach characteristic of the Siberia/East Asia area, along with OTHER SUCH AREAS OF THE WORLD LIKE SOUTH AMERICA AND NORTH AMERICA WITH KNOWN MONGOLOID POPULATIONS, we can safely conclude that there is no singular Mongoloid race, but really the Mongoloid populations of Eastern Asia are a large population with the fixed in genetic defects of:

1) the ectodermal dysplasia group of diseases and syndromes

2) Down syndrome and all other syndromes LIKE IT that result in epicanthal folds, and mongoloid type phenotypes in peoples that ARE NOT MONGOLOID

3) Albinism of varying degrees and types, due to recent admixture with Central Asian and Siberian Indo-European/Turkic albinos along with their OWN PROBABLY ALBINO POPULATIONS!

Is it all starting to make sense now, and can you connect all the dots?

[kel]

interesting........

seeing as how Euros and Asians suffer these genetic defects, one can only speculate as to not only the physical differences from Africans/Blacks, but also the psychological differences.....(and there are fairly obvious differences) - such as the tendency towards extreme xenophobia, reactionary fear and hostility to "other". China, Japan, Korea, ....

Another point to consider is that the anti-black animus of these populations is as Mike has pointed out a symptom of psychological projection, jealousy, fear. Once near contact with Blacks, it is apparent that they are genetically weaker (more defects, less diverse, lower mutational load, fertility, virility, robust skeletal and musculature). Furthermore, given an unrestricted choice, it is likely that their women would choose to procreate with Black men exclusively - (females animals seek out to mate with the healthiest males and the cues to genetic health are not just visual, but olfactory as well...perhaps women pick up on this subconsciously). 

Naturally, this would cause hostility from Mongol and Euro men...........if nature is allowed to take its course, they dont get to procreate. (natural selection)

qz.com/945053/china-has-an-irrational-fear-of-a-black-invasion-bringing-drugs-crime-and-interracial-marriage/

owning-my-truth.com/post/136229285792/the-history-of-anti-african-riots-in-chinese

[anansi]

Locked for staff review, decision will be made to reopen or delete.

Warning we are not trying to recreate the worst part of old ES, with bait threads, rank racism against any group, online spats and trolling.

[zarahan]

Agreed. Don't think we can use a lot of these "albino mutate" or "Mongoloid mutate" threads over here at Reloaded for a couple of reasons:

1) A ton of them going on for years are already archived over as ES. Reposting the same info doesn't really add anything


2) Rather disturbing, it uses some of the same racist approaches used against by white racists against black people, such as when they "rank" races by degree of neoteny or so-called juvenile looking characteristics in skull, etc. For example racists have used the same neoteny argument to "rank" various Africans "intermediate" between apes and humans, as can be seen in the reference below. Quote:

"Given the major role attributed to neoteny in human evolution, this rationalization soon became an effort to see which races were more neotenic (i.e., "evolved"). Thus, Kollman (1905) saw African pygmies as intermediate to apes and humans. Bolk (1929) wrote a major article which specifically considered the role of neoteny in racial development of hairlessness, brain size, prognathism, pigmentation, and other “fetal primate” traits supposedly derived from "retardation" of ape ontogeny. The basic idea was that modern human groups could be ranked along this traajectory of fetalization."

--Michael L. McKinney, ?K.J. McNamara - 2013 - Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny - Page 319
Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny - Page 319


"The idea that neoteny is the primary process for humanization was first formalized scientifically by Louis Bolk in 1926 (see Montagu, 1989 for a concise review of historical sources). Gould acknowledges that much of Bolk's neoteny is really an argument for scientific racism and sexism."
--Barry Bogin - 1999 - Patterns of Human Growth - Page 158
-----------------------------------------------------------


3) In addition, the argument lacks credibility in that few credible modern scientists support albinism or "Mongoloidism" as any significant factor making up ethnicity or races. For example, so-called "Mongoloidism" (Down's Syndrome) is not an indication of any Asian race mutation but a genetic disorder that hits black people as well. THe above arguments make use of too many distortions of credible scientific research to make up its "race mutate" theories


4) Even more disturbing, the OPosts make a number of racist statements against Asians that certainly are not a true characterization of over 1 billion people. FOr example it says Asians lack empathy, are not creative, can;t think for themselves etc etc. The historical record and actual experience makes all this dubious. It's just like white racists disrespecting black people with bogus claims. Some of these statements are- QUOTE:

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Orignailly posted by mindovermatter
Jan 31, 2018 at 8:57pm

--I became frustrated at the sheer ignorance and naivety regarding the Mongoloid peoples of Eastern Asia and South East Asia (whom are Eastern Asian Mongoloid imposters themselves too). THEY CANNOT THINK INDEPENDENTLY ON THEIR OWN WITHOUT SOMEONE DIRECTING THEM OR BRAINWASHING THEM OR CONTROLLING THEM! THEY HAVE NO SENSE OF COMPASSION OR EMPATHY THEY ARE LITERAL HUMANS ANTS AND INSECTS IN HOW THEY OPERATE AND LIVE! I AM TELLING YOU THIS BASED ON FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE! IT IS THE TRUTH!

--Like Whites being albinos, the people with mongoloid traits like Chinese, Korean etc people are deformed freaks and have FIXED genetic ailments/diseases/disorders that give them their ethnic or racial appearance,



--I taught Asians for nearly a decade. They have...no capacity for abstract thought. They rely exclusively on external stimuli, without it, they fall asleep. Go to Asia and observe the constant noise and blinking lights everywhere. Limited ability to generate internal stimuli means no imagination.


--This also surfaces in lack of empathy, where I was, they often hung dogs by trees and beat them to death to tenderize the meat. Having limited imagination, they could not put themselves in the position of the dog, and beat them to death without concern, ignoring the hideous cries of pain.

--This lack of inner life and curiosity manifests in other ways as well. Simple lack of awareness and the need to be led everywhere. The water at the beach is all cordoned off least they wander lemming like into deep water and drown.


\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\


Basically Reloaded can't really use this sort of stuff. It is already archived over at ES so no point repeating years worth over here. People can Google it if they want to. Also much of it is already duplicated over at Realhistoryww. It uses an assorted of pseudo-scientific racist approaches- same as those used against "intermediate" black people, and distorted arguments about things like DOwn's Syndrome that are not supported by credible science. And it makes unqualified blanket stereotypical racial claims about Asians, like calling them deformed freaks.

Reloaded is more based on collecting a slice of valid, credible research on the Nile Valley, Egypt, Africa anthropology, history plus some current event, art etc. etc, and archiving a slice of valuable info from ES. No attempt is being made to compete with ES or become a big web presence. But at the same time credible, non-racist info is a basic pillar and various racist statements do not really fit the site's profile. But there are fast-growing alternative sites like realhistoryw where people can expand on these things to their hearts content.

So in future these sorts of threads might have to be deleted, or restricted.