jhosx
Craftsperson
Posts: 19
|
Post by jhosx on Apr 12, 2019 0:45:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by zarahan on Apr 13, 2019 8:26:36 GMT -5
Sounds like a variant of the "hobbit" type creatures. What controversies are you finding re these and similar proto-humans? Can you post some research articles and book references?
|
|
jhosx
Craftsperson
Posts: 19
|
Post by jhosx on Apr 13, 2019 17:46:32 GMT -5
Sounds like a variant of the "hobbit" type creatures. What controversies are you finding re these and similar proto-humans? Can you post some research articles and book references? Well here's the original study. www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1067-9It's not really any controversies that I'm referring to. When I say I'm not sure what to make of this, it's not that I find anything off about the skeletons, it's more that I don't particularly like how complicated human origins are becoming.
|
|
|
Post by Tukuler al~Takruri on Apr 13, 2019 19:44:05 GMT -5
For some pros it's always been complicated. You know, Wolpoff(sp) and the like.
Well both sides were wrong in the multi-regional vs replacement war.
Finally, the 'Happy Medium' synthesis of both factions, twined with the last 5-10 years of genomics and archaeo- anthropology, is leading to new 21st century facts for this 3rd Millennium of forthcoming inconceivable human progress (unless, racism, religion, and xenophobia combine in menace).
|
|