|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 15, 2013 21:27:55 GMT -5
continuing... Africans has greatest variation/variant of SLC24A5. More than quadruple Europeans and Asians(see chart). SLC24A5 (rs1426654*A) is just ONE of the MANY variants found in Africa. It is not absurd to claim it as Europeans. It is forgery and deception....and delusional. Back-migration..... HA!!
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 15, 2013 21:30:20 GMT -5
ALL variants of SLC24A5 is found IN Africa, including SLC24A5 (rs1426654*A). Africa has every gene Europe has and MORE..
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Nov 19, 2013 20:36:36 GMT -5
To the Newbies. What the above illustrate is
1. SSA has close to 20 "unique/novel not found anywhere else" variant of SLC24A5(yellow) while Asia has 3 and Europe has 2. In Europe one of the these novel variants is found in the Etruscan village(Tuscany) Where North African migrants are known to exist. The other is in the Iberian area where North Africans have been populating since pre-history. Novel = ONLY found in those areas.
2. The so called “light skin” gene variant , SLC24A5 (rs1426654*A), is found THROUGHOUT the world including Asia, Africa and Europe. Including in the pygmies of central Africa forest It is NOT novel. If SSA carry the 95% of variants of the novel gene, what makes Euros believe that one of the most common variant is of European origin. That somehow European genes are found in 25% of West Africans where there are no comparable male or female European lineage in those populations. It is not only absurd but downright comical or illogical. That is why both separate research papers concluded that SLC24A5 (rs1426654*A), is NOT European in origin but was within the DNA of AMH PRIOR to leaving Africa.
It is only through genetic drift/necessity , the “sweep”, took place in Europe. However in West Asia, the necessity was filled by another mechanism
Remember, Novel = unique, not found anywhere else.The yellow highlighted ones. The non-yellow=shared between populations=very common. SLC24A5 (rs1426654*A) is very common. That is why Shriver speculated on additive.
|
|