|
Post by asante on Jan 4, 2014 0:50:51 GMT -5
Asante It is more likely that some of them went to the upper Nile and ultimately into Kemet proper to give "their" genetic material to some of the folks in kemet,again the key to all this was the Great Lakes as one of Kemet's cultural incubators,look at it this way the numbering system found on the Ishango Bones of some 20kyrs B.C found it's way into Kemet,keep in mind Cameroon is bordered to Chad which intern borders to Libya to the north,Cameroon also borders to the south east to the Great lakes.... I don't see why not after all according to them the lands of the gods, or ancestors lays to the south some where around the mountains of the moon..Mt Kilimanjaro. The above map is showing just how wide spread the cultural or technological items spans Africa and here is another thing to consider we are not too sure just how far west and south Kush at it's height held sway or dominance. Now I understand looking at alternate theories to explain how these affinities came to be, but the thing is these affinities are explained by African scholars and tribal leaders from Kenya to Ghana as to simply being the result of a gradual migration from Egypt or the Sudan to their current locations. As far as the Ishango bone/ the spread of mathematics is concerned. It more than likely made it's way into Egypt via the ancient Sahara. The Nilo-Saharan who trekked through Central Africa and eventually northward into Sahara of which we know was a primary source for the peopling of the Nile Valley. The Twa (central Africa) who also had a place in ancient Egypt could be an alternate explanation for the spreading of mathematics. I made a previous point regarding the genetic matches in South Africa to ancient Egyptians. South Africa being where it is geographically in relation to the Nile Valley would mean that any affinities between the ancient Egyptians would have had to have gone through the "filter" of Cameroon or possibly the Great Lakes (going by Greenbergs theory). Going by Greenbergs theory it doesn't make sense for South African Bantu's who supposedly have their origins in West African Cameroon to have significantly greater genetic affinity than West Africans groups (their filter). Again these Southern Africans reject a Cameroonian origin and insist through their oral traditions that they came from ancient Egypt. Yes this very well can be true, but why stop at the ancient Sahara? Why not take it into the next genesis which would be Nile Valley civilizations? I must say that I am baffled as to why these African oral traditions claiming to come from Egypt and the genetic evidence to boot, will not suffice for this argument? Here is what an Akan PHD wrote about in his book about the subject: DNA now legitimizes these claims of exodus from ancient Egypt by all of the different black African tribes who comprised what we now call ancient Egypt. Do you want to know what the names of some of the African tribes who comprised ancient Egypt really meant in ancient Egyptian? As you can see also the people of the kingdom of Benin were one of the tribes that comprised ancient Egypt. This coupled with the info above explains why Benin sickle Cell is found in Pre-dynastic Egyptian mummies. They came from ancient Egypt. This is not "Afrocentric fantasy"! This should be plain as day by this point.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 3, 2014 18:17:53 GMT -5
"THE SOUNDING OF ANCIENT EGYPTIAN WORDS' Let this article on the 'sounding' and etymology of Ancient Egyptian words stand as an independent addition to the bank of knowledge already amassed by Cheik Anta Diop, Theophile Obenga and others on the genetic and linguistic relationship between the Ancient Egyptian language and the indigenous languages of Africa. This article forms part of the work on the linguistic sound/meaning correspondences which exist between the Bantu languages and the Ancient Egyptian language. The methodology I have used is to assess only those words which give an exact or near consonantal match between words. By attempting the findings in this way I hope that a clearer understanding will emerge and participants will be in a position to partake with the investigation in simple meaningful terms thus avoiding vague and unnecessary notions about the complexities of the Ancient Egyptian language. I have decided to approach the subject in this investigation by examining the pronunciations of three Ancient Egyptian words which give clear convincing correspondences in sound and meaning. Further words will be addressed in Part 2 of the Rosetta Stones. I have also included a brief account of the Bantu and Kiswahili-Bantu languages and questioned whether the roots of some words are of Bantu or Semitic origin. KOMA KM bring to an end The four examples labelled A, B, C, an D given below show how it is possible to actually speak the Ancient Egyptian words by inserting the correct Bantu vowels between the consonants to give the correct pronunciation of the word. Thus as a simple example, the Ancient Egyptian word for ‘bring to an end’ given by the consonants km must be pronounced phonetically as ‘koma’ in accordance with the Kiswahili-Bantu language and not as kem as given in Egyptology books. The missing Bantu vowels here are o and a not e. By using the vowel e, the sounding of the Ancient Egyptian word gives a false impression of what the word should be and reinforces the notion that the word could be of Semitic origin thus obscuring the true pronunciation of the word. The word ‘koma’ exists in the Kiswahili-Bantu and Bantu languages of Africa and its etymology is purely Bantu in origin. Thus the word koma, ‘bring to an end’ is identical to the Ancient Egyptian word given as km. The Bantu and Kiswahili-Bantu Languages The Swahili language uses the prefix Ki- attached to nouns to define the language. Swahili being the noun stem from which the term Ki-Swahili is derived. Thus Ki-Swahili is the Swahili language and Wa-Swahili refers to the people who practice Swahili culture. In a similar way the English language is known as Ki-Ingereza. The vocabulary of the Kiswahili-Bantu language consists of two distinct vocabularies, Bantu and Semitic; although at times it is not always possible to establish whether a particular word is of Bantu or Semitic origin. Examples of this are included in the analysis. The Semitic component in the language was acquired thousands of years ago while trading with the indigenous populations of Africa who spoke Semitic languages. The Semitic languages originated in Africa and was disseminated outside Africa through the corridor of the Arabian peninsula. In order to differentiate the Kiswahili-Bantu language from its Semitic component I have chosen to attach the term Bantu to Kiswahili to give the term Kiswahili-Bantu which focuses on its Proto-Bantu roots. Throughout the article the term Kiswahili-Bantu will be used wherever possible to focus on the Bantu origins of the language. Thus only Proto-Bantu or current Bantu roots will be considered and a comparison of meaningful vocabulary with the Ancient Egyptian language will be made. The Kiswahili-Bantu language which is better known internationally as just Swahili, is a Bantu language spoken on the East coast of Africa. It belongs to the Sabaki subgroup of North Eastern Coast Bantu languages. The Kiswahili-Bantu language is widespread throughout the East African regions and spoken in many countries including Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Northern Mozambique, Northern Zambia, Southern Ethiopia, Somalia. It is also widely spoken in Somalia and in many parts of the Komoro Islands and Madagascar. According to the linguist Professor Lodhi, in 1993 the estimated number of speakers of Kiswahili-Bantu can be broken down to the following: Mother tongue 5-8 million Second language 28-35 million Third language 30-40 million Total amount of speakers 63-85 million. In order to make an appraisal of the Kiswahili-Bantu language one has to relate its vocabulary wherever possible to its earliest form called Proto-Bantu. The linguist, Professor Assibi Apatewon Amidu asks the question:' 'How does one know that the Kiswahili-Bantu language is part of the Bantu languages like Zulu, Shona, Kikuyu and others'? There is a theory that says, because language is important to the survival of man, people will always carry with them words of their language which will preserve their identity and culture whenever they move from place to place. This means that words which directly affect a person’s survival such as those which refer to things like numbers, words referring to body parts or parts of it, those which refer to trades such as fishing, iron working, architecture and so on, do not get readily lost. Assibi Apatewon Amidu quotes Guthrie (1967) who in his study of Bantu languages found for example that the highest percentage of Proto-Bantu roots in a 200 core sample of Bantu languages could be found in Chi-Bemba spoken in Zambia. Chi-Bemba has 54% of the total whilst Ki-Kongo and Kiswahili-Bantu have 44% of Proto-Bantu roots. Compare this with the Ki-Sukuma language spoken in Tanzania which has 41% of Proto-Bantu roots, whilst Chi-Yao spoken in Mozambique has only 35% of Proto-Bantu roots. Thus by comparing Proto-Bantu roots, the Kiswahili-Bantu language is in percentage terms derived more from an older form of the earlier Bantu language family called Proto-Bantu than say Ki-Sukuma and Chi-Yao. The Ancient Egyptian Language The Ancient Egyptian language has always been considered to be a branch of the African-Asiatic family of languages called Afro-Asiatic which spans Africa and Western Asia. Without going too deeply into the classification of the Afro-Asiatic language, according to Greenberg, the individual branches of the Afro-Asiatic family of languages include the following: (1) Semitic, the largest branch of the Afro-Asiatic language which is spoken since ancient times in most of Western Asia, Mesopotamia, Palestine, Syria, Arabia and Africa. The Semitic language has its origins in Africa. (2) Berber, a group of related languages currently spoken by approximately five million speakers in Northern Africa from the Atlantic coast to the oasis of Siwa in Egypt and from the Mediterranean Sea to Mali and Niger. (3) Cushitic, a family of languages spoken by approximately fifteen million people in Eastern Africa from the Egyptian border in North East Sudan to Ethiopia, Djibouti, Somalia, Kenya and Northern Tanzania. Martin Bernal in his book, Black Athena, sees the spread of the Afro-Asiatic language as the expansion of a culture which was long established in the East African Rift Valley at the end of the last ice age in the 10th and 9th millennia BC. During the last ice ages water was locked up in the polar icecaps and rainfall was considerably less than it is today. The Sahara and Arabian Deserts were even larger. During the increase of heat and rainfall in the centuries that followed, much of these regions became savannah, into which neighbouring peoples flocked. The most successful of these were speakers of Proto-Afro-Asiatic language from the African rift valley. Going through the savannah, the Chadic speakers reached Lake Chad while the Berbers, the Maghreb and the Proto-Egyptians arrived in Upper Egypt. However Martin Bernal did not consider speakers of Proto-Bantu in his analysis. It is the author’s contention, from the linguistic contents, that speakers of Proto-Bantu played an active part at the time of the expansion of Proto-Afro-Asiatic speakers in the Rift Valley of East Africa. These Proto-Bantu speakers going through the savannah formed part of the migration to Egypt. The Bantu languages together with other indigenous languages fused together and became embedded to form the Proto-Egyptian language. It is for this reason that the Ancient Egyptian language contains a substantial amount of Proto-Bantu or Bantu roots. However Guthrie speculated that before the Proto-Bantu expansion from Zaire, there had been several pre-Bantu stages, at which time the Bantu ancestors lived far to the north around Lake Chad. One group from this area made its way to Zaire and became the Proto-Bantu. The Proto-Bantu speakers and Proto-Afro-Asiatic speakers lived along side each other. They traded together, shared and exchanged common vocabularies of words. Ascertaining Bantu or Semitic vocabulary Finding the origins of common words between Proto-Semitic languages and Bantu languages has now become increasingly difficult to ascertain as may be seen by the examples below. Example A SIMBA Ancient Egyptian: snb be healthy Shona-Bantu: SIMBA, be healthy, be strong, powerful Consider Sir Alan Gardiner’s usage of the Semitic word given on Page 3 in his book on Egyptian Grammar. Sir Gardiner gives the Ancient Egyptian word for ‘be healthy’ as: snb . Sir Alan relates this word to the Arabic word salima, which contains the skeletal consonants slm and uses this word as the equivalent word for the Ancient Egyptian word. Had Sir Alan Gardiner referred to Bantu languages he would not have chosen salima. The Shona-Bantu word simba, can be used as a verb or noun Simba means, 'be strong', 'healthy', 'powerful'. Using simba would be a far better choice. Simba also means 'strength', 'force', 'power' 'lion'. Notice the skeletal consonants smb. Thus the Shona-Bantu word simba, with consonants smb gives a closer consonantal match than Gardiner's slm. It is becoming increasing clear in the scheme of things that the choice for the Ancient Egyptian consonants snb are much closer to Shona-Bantu smb consonants than to the Arabic consonants (Gardiner's) slm. Here are the comparisons: Ancient Egyptian: 'be healthy' = snb Shona-Bantu 'be healthy': smb = simba Semitic: 'be healthy': slm = salima Example B HATUA Ancient Egyptian: hat moment, time Kiswahili-Bantu, HATUA, step, pace in walking, a time, period of time, moment, point of time, space The next Kiswahili-Bantu word I would like to examine is the word hatua, a noun and is said to be derived from the Semitic Arabic word khtwa(t). It is listed by I Bosha in his trilingual dictionary, but he does not give its Arabic usage. The Kiswahili-Bantu noun hatua means, step, pace in walking and by implication it is a measure of space, distance and time. It therefore also means opportunity or time. Thus hatua must be derived from the Southern-Soto-Bantu language word, hata, to take a step, to tread on the ground. This in turn gives a measure or pace in walking. Thus the noun hatua means, time, moment or a period of time. It is interesting to observe that the Kiswahili-Bantu word hatua matches the Ancient Egyptian word in sound and meaning, Ancient Egyptian: hat moment, time. The Semitic Arabic word khtwa(t) fails to match the Ancient Egyptian word in sound. This is yet another example which proves that it is difficult to establish the etymology of words, in particular when dealing with Bantu and Semitic words. Researchers have taken the easy option of classifying certain Bantu words as Semitic without looking for their Bantu roots. Example C Semitic or Bantu root? Consider next the Afro-Asiatic word for ‘head’. The root of this word is supposedly derived from Semitic-Arabic, Semitic-Hebrew, Semitic-Akkadian and Semitic-Aramaic. According to Mudupe Oduyoye, ras means ‘head’ in Semitic-Arabic, ro’sh in Semitic-Hebrew, re’sh in Semitic-Aramaic, ras in Ethiopic and rishu in Semitic-Akkadian, rasi in Kiswahili-Bantu. I would now like to analyse the Bantu word for ‘the father of’, which in turn means the possessor of, or one who dwells in a place. The word for father in the Southern-Soto-Bantu language is given as re, rarae and even rara. Thus Re kglo means the great father or the great chief. The word Ra- is derived from the contracted form Re wa which means ‘the father of’ Thus Ra- ‘the father of’ is used as a prefix for nouns denoting function, ownership or position. In other words, the word 'father' is used as 'head' or 'leader'. Here are some examples in which the prefix Ra- is used: Ra-dinku means the father or possessor of sheep, Ra-motse means the father or possessor of the village, a headman or chief of the village. Clearly the Semitic word for ‘head’ is derived from the Bantu contracted form of Re wa, ‘the father of’ and shortened to just Ra-. Example D Semitic or Bantu Roots? I would now like to examine the etymology of the Kiswahili-Bantu word damu, which is the word used for blood. Damu is classified as a Semitic-Arabic word in the Kiswahili-Bantu dictionary and is said to be derived from the Arabic word dam, blood. According to the research, it is clear that the word damu is in fact not a Semitic word and should be re-classified as belonging to the Niger-Congo group of languages. The Bantu languages form part of this group. Joseph H Greenberg’s work on the languages of Africa makes a good contribution when analysing the word for blood in the Niger-Congo group of languages. He also mentions the resemblance of the word for blood between the Niger-Congo and Niger-Kordofanian- languages. Joseph H Greenberg has shown that the Bantu prefix ma- is a formative and associated with substances which are uncountable, usually fluids or liquids. Within the Niger-Congo group of languages variations of the prefix ma- exists and these may also become suffixes of words, -ma. As an example the word for water in Longuda, a Niger-Congo language is given as ma-m and the word for blood is tu-ma. Contrast this with another language from the Niger-Congo group. In the Chamba language the word for blood is given as ie-ma. The -ma suffix also occurs in the Bua language, hu-ma, blood, whilst in the Koke language li-m means water. The word for blood in the Kumba language gives a close approximation to the Kiswahili-Bantu word damu and uses the Proto-Bantu prefix de- or ma- to arrive at the word given as dei-ma, the word for blood. In the Nimbari language de-m means blood. The word for blood in the Southern-Soto language is ma-di. In the Zulu-Bantu language the word for water is ama-da. The suffix da is obviously taken from Proto-Bantu de/ma. It is becoming increasingly clear that the etymology of the Kiswahili-Bantu word damu, blood gives a close approximation in sound and meaning with dei-m the word for blood in Nimbari. Hence damu does not have its origin in the Semitic-Arabic language as has been previously assumed.[/quote]ANCIENT EGYPTIAN AND BANTU THE KISWAHILI-BANTU RESEARCH UNIT FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN LANGUAGE www.kaa-umati.co.uk/ancient_egyptian_and_bantu.htm
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 3, 2014 18:05:29 GMT -5
They have "inscriptions" on rocks in Phoenician. Here's the thing, you can't date an inscription. It could be made at any time. Come on man that sounds silly. Based on this logic we can heavily dismiss all other ancient Egyptian text and what ever information has been deciphered because they cannot be dated either? Why the over scrutiny of this inscription? How and why is this "wishful thinking" on the parts of the tribal elders who maintain these oral traditions? How on Earth can you "debunk" the cultural parallels posted above? That's a very Eurocentric/ignorant perception of history. The name Bantu was designated to this languages because Wilhelm Immanuel Bleek noted that the word "bantu" (or variations of) was the common word used by it's speakers meaning 'the people'. The "Bantu" "people" were noted to have inhabited a town in the Sudan ("the North" as they claim to be from) according to ancient Egyptian text. The Pre-Dynastic Egyptians (of whom many would suffer from " Benin" Sickle Cell anemia) referred to themselves as the "Anu"/Bantu "the people". Seems to indicate some sort of "Bantu" migration or "expansion" (as shown in the map in the OP) into Egypt from Sudan. Yeah by Europeans. Hmm ok let's see. Now four years ago, nobody would have paid the picture below too much mind.: Until this: Let's look, same names, (" Bantu"), necklaces along with the matching DNA. Now where along the path of Greenberg's proposed Cameroonian origin could the ancestors of these Southern African "Bantus" have acquired pharonic dna, and the most of anyone on Earth? If the connection was just sooooo far back as you propose then shouldn't West Africans (Cameroonians especially in this case for Bantu's) have the closest or at least equal genetic affinities towards the ancient Egyptians regardless of the Dynastic family or individual? Referring to Egypt as "Misri" is mostly an East African Bantu way of going about things. Again this explanation is silly. The DNA matches were the regions of the Great Lakes, Southern Africa, and Western Africa, and the common theme in all of those regions is what?...E1b1a/M2. Every single Bantu speaker attest to a southward migration from "the North" and most more specifically say ancient Egypt. In West Africa the Yoruba, Igbos, Bamileke, Akan, Wolof, Hausa, Ewe, Ga Adangme ect ect all claim to come from the East (specially the Nile Valley/Egypt/Sudan). These people are primarily E1b1a (some Nilote in the Hausa). E1b1a shows a disperal into West and southern Africa from where...The Sudan (check the maps above) which correlate with the Bantu elders recount of the dispersal/migration from the Sudan and eventually into their current location. I should have restated the title of this thread to indicate a Sudanese origin and a later expansion into ancient Egypt (as the information shows above). None the less you claim that you poked holes through my theory, but you have yet to explain the prevalence of Benin sickle cell in Pre-Dynastic Egypt and it's random occurrence on the Western shore of Arabia which just so happens to be directly across the red sea for the proposed Sudanese homeland of "Bantu" speakers. You have yet to explain why the spread of E1b1a throughout equatorial Africa came from two migration routes out of the Sudan. This correlates with the Bantu elders oral tradition of their route out of Sudan/Kush (check the maps)? Today however E1b1a is also almost completely absence in the areas of the proposed homeland and expansion of the "Bantu" speakers. unlike just about anywhere else on the continent. As far as your opinion is concerned, you're basically saying that consistent genetic implications and African oral history will not sway you in anyway. You'd rather roll with the theory proposed over 40 years ago by a non African Jewish linguist who didn't speak a single "Bantu" language (and subsequently screwed up heavily in his translations of these tonal languages) and whose theory was shaky from the start. Why?
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 3, 2014 1:32:56 GMT -5
To Reiterate. This recently discovered hieroglyphic translated means a town in the Sudan named "Bantu", which of course is named after the inhabitants of this ancient Sudanese town (The "Bantu", "Anu"/Pre-Dynastic Egyptians "Batu", ect ect ect ect ect). This was discovered after Alfred M M'Imanyara's publication, which validates exactly what he proposed. The "Bantu" people originated in the Sudan and expanded into ancient Egypt. Ancient Egyptian text validates the Bantu people originated in the Sudan. You need to really examine the case of Benin sickle cell that I laid out. What other event could have put Benin sickle not only in Western Arabia, but even found in pre-dynastic Egyptian mummies? This isn't as complicated as people are trying to make it out to be. These Bantu elders are not saying that they came from the Sahara, they say " Misri" (Egypt). Why try to go through hoops to try to explain these overlapping affinities? They came from Egypt just like they say and the evidence above clearly proves. "Greenberg" (non African, European/Jew ish) was wrong.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 2, 2014 16:36:54 GMT -5
Here were some good linguistic similiarities noted by Asar Imhotep back ES.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 2, 2014 16:34:59 GMT -5
Resettlement into "Sub Saharan Africa"
One of the games that genetically recessive Devils love playing is pretending to not know the racial wars that occurred throughout ancient Northeastern Africa (including the so called "Middle East") and the subsequent events that followed. These events include the constant migrations from the Northeast African homeland into interior regions of Africa including Southern, Western, East and Central Africa. As displayed in the early part of the previous section, the denial of our earlier genesis in Northeastern Africa is the weapon used by Western scholars to prop up their false narrative of our-story. The call our people by contemporary locations rather than our actual names (i.e "West African") to set this narrative in stone, and from that will make entire fallacies on genetic origins as it pertains to that field of research. To say that I am t
UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE FULL OF SH!T!
Migration from the Hapi Valley in the 6th century B.C.E.
There were many other civilizations that had been established since our migration from the Hapi Valley around the 6th century B.C.E. The first civilization to be noted to have arisen around this period was the Nok empire in modern day Nigeria. Though the empire is dated to around the mid 2nd millennium BC, it took off technology after the 6th millennium BC with the contributions of those who had recently migrated into the region via Nubia-Kemet.
Nok Civilization (Modern Day Nigeria) 1,500 BC - 500 AD
"The Nok culture of northern Nigeria, a civilization that existed from approximately 500 B.C.E to about 500 C.E., is principally known for its terracotta figures. Relatively little is known about the purpose of these figures or the civilization that created such extraordinary sculptural representations of its people...This work depicts a person of high status wearing elaborate beaded jewelry, and with a crooked baton on his right arm and a hinged flail on the left. These are symbols of authority also found in ancient Egyptian depictions of the Pharaohs and the god Osiris. The Nok culture existed during the late Pharonic period and intra-African trading could have spread Kemetic influences" link
The problem with the latter part of the explanation given above as to how Kemetic influence wound up in West Africa is impossible. There were little to no people in tropical West Africa to trade with prior to the Late period. In fact much of West Africa was uninhabitable swamp land all the way up until around 3-2 B.C.E.. Even after that climatic phase there is still no evidence of large settlements of Niger-Congo speakers in tropical West Africa (the Twa were there however) until around the Kemetic Late Period. This period again is when great biological change is attested by most anthropologist to have occurred in ancient Kemet according to Godde 2009.
Iron Production Diffused from the Hapi Valley into Interior Africa
The production of iron was also a huge technological trait created in Africa (Oboui is the oldest known production found in what is now the Central Republic of Africa) that characterized Hapi Valley civilization (particularly the later Kush), and the spreading of Niger-Congo speakers. It was around this same time as the Nubian capital city Napata was switch to Meroe that a large migration from Kemet into various regions of Sub Saharan Africa occurred, which was around the 6th century B.C.E. This was also around the time that iron smelting first entered West Africa (Nok civilization and a Cameroonian site slightly south of it). All of our people did not leave the Hapi Valley during the 6th century B.C.E.. Some remained in Mereo until it was conquered by Axumite Empire. A few nation states like the Wolof of Senegal left Egypt at much later dates, such as when the Arabs invaded in 639 C.E.
The Nok empire was founded around 1,500 and 1,000 BCE. The appearance of this civilization's foundation prior to the 6th century BCE is likely due to earlier migrations from the Hapi Valley triggered by the constant wars (the first World War- a race war) brought on by the Tamahu. The disappearance of the "Negroid" element of the ancient Egyptian Late Period population noted in the study cited above (Goode 2009) is explained by the emergence of that same "Negroid" element in South, Central and West Africa. The Cushitic Africans became the dominant face of the region after that point. The Nigerian Nok civilization springs up during that time. The introduction of iron which was Hapi Valley technology was seen in the Nok empire during 6th century BCE. Not only iron ties the Nok to the Hapi Valley, but the Nok also retained ancient Hapi Valley beliefs and principles in spirituality as demonstrated with the following artwork;
note the crock attached to the Nok's "Seated Dignitary"'s arm
Ausar's Crock and Flail
More Commonalities between modern "Sub Saharan Africans" and ancient Hapi Valley cultures
While on the topic of Nigeria, other states with a direct link to Kemet did in fact arise. The Yoruba are another group of Nigerians who have an origin in Northeastern African civilization, and specifically Kemet. The story of the origins and migration of the Yoruba patriarch Oduduwa is a testament to the entire thesis of this piece.
Other Ethnic Groups Throughout the vast regions of "Sub Saharan Africa" display the same or respective cultural continuity from ancient Northeast African civilizations
Leopard skin worn by priest and for ceremonial purposes throughout Southern African Bantu's
Top image shows the Fon art on the left hand side, which is reminiscent in its theme, of the ancient Egyptian wall relief of Rameses smiting an enemy on the right hand side. Bottom image shows another example of parallels between west Sahelian/Sub-Saharan art [likely Benin carving] — sporting the head of some carnivorous creature [likely a feline of some sort] on the left hand side, and two ancient Egyptian figurines — one sporting a falcon head, and the other, a feline; what stands out here, is the remarkably similar standing postures, particularly what they are doing with their arms and hands.
In Togo, Benin and Nigeria, the Kutito (among Gbe speaking people) and Egungun (among Yoruba speaking people) are masked dancing ancestors returning to earth to help and punish living people. Jean Charles Coovi Gomez pointed out that this ceremony was exactly the same as what we know of Kemetic "raising the Djed Pillar Ceremony".Egungun ,the Yoruba name of the ceremony means "bone, skeleton". In Kmt, the Djed pillar was considered as the backbone of the neter Ausar. There is ample evidence for mummification in traditional Africa. Félix Dubois reported it among Songhoi people, M.Delafosse among Baule(Akan) people of Ivory Coast, A.M.L Desplagnes among the Dogon and Mossi, J.C.C.Gomez among the Yoruba.
Mummy of the Obi Ijeh of Idumuoghu,Ibusa, Nigeria From Oscar Pfouma "Histoire culturelle de l'Afrique Noire":
On the top, is an ancient Egyptian "paddle" doll, courtesy of the British Museum; in the middle, we have Ashanti examples of the fertility doll, and third image is yet another example of fertility dolls common amongst the Akan.
Fertility dolls are a fairly common theme in Africa, from the Akan speaking groups of Ghana to the Donguena, Evale, Hakawama, Himba, Humbe, Kwanyama, Mukubal, Mwila, Ndimba, Ngambwe, Ovambo and Zemba people of the semi-desert areas of Angola for example, and it appear that the ancient Egyptians were no different in this aspect.
A little trivia on the Egyptian "paddle doll"...
Such dolls are usually found in Upper Egypt and Nubia. When complete they have faces and hair of clay. Hair may also be of faience beads. This one is missing its hair. A number have been found dating to the second half of the 11th Dynasty from tombs in the neighbourhood of Deir el Bahri and are common at Thebes. However, at least two have been found in earlier tombs at Beni Hasan and one at Rifeh. Another was found beneath the Ramesseum at Thebes dating to the 13th Dynasty (Bourriau 1988, 126-127). Most are of 11th Dynasty to Middle Kingdom.
The marks on the body are thought to be tattoos or scarification and the end of the paddle, it has been suggested is an exaggerated pubic area. That such dolls are found mainly in female graves has led Egyptologists to suggest that these are fertility figurines put in graves to ensure fertility in the afterlife. - Courtesy of SWANSEA UNIVERSITY.
More Links this time in the form of serekhs in both cases by an object or an animal and while the Kemetic symbols developed into a full writing system where the name could be read,the Beninese kings used theirs as a memory device. Prince Gagni Xesu (1620) is symbolised by a bird and a drum. Dyn 0 Kemet King Scorpion. King Hwegbeadja (1645–1680) is represented by a fish and a fyke net.
Wrestling originated among our people, and obviously spread throughout the World (Senegalese Lutte).
Stick Fighting seen in ancient Kemet and among the Zulu warriors.
Common Lies about African History that Insecure Genetically Recessive Mutants Resort to in Face of Truth
Western scholarship has took the lie of who we are in regards to history a step further by creating a matrix for World history that relegates every group to the current area of their residence. This is why "West Africans", "Central Africans", and "Southern Africans" are called such and no other name is given for our group other than our contemporary geographic location (hence no collective identity). With this lie they ignore the earlier genesis of our people on the Hapi Valley in Nubia and Kemet and the subsequent migrations from out of Africa.
Lie #1) "There was no wheel invented in Sub Saharan Africa"
One of the most common notions that they (and some East Asians) have regarding African history is that "Sub Saharan Africans" (the PC term for black people) had not even invented the wheel.
While not in "Sub" Saharan Africa the Tassili-n-Ajjer ancient Saharan rock art (dating back to 8,000 B.C.E.) in Algeria below clearly showing our people when we lived in Northern Africa not only with the "wheel" but the beloved "chariot" that they enthusiastically claim to have "introduced" into civilization upon their arrival (Only they can possibly believe that somehow while in the white Utopia that was the Caucus mountains, where they could not seem to create a language to communicate with each other, but somehow shown a leap of intelligence with said engineering feat).
Ancient Mande Ox Drawn Plows
White Lie # 2) "There was no writing in Sub Saharan Africa"
"The Ikom monoliths in Nigeria for example, frequently show several nsibidi designs such as carefully rendered concentric circles, spirals, lozenges, and other discrete figures. These have been dated by some scholars to 120-220 AD. (Source: Alok and Emangabe stone monoliths: Ikom, Cross River State of Nigeria,-Ezio Bassani, Arte in Africa (Modena: Edizioni Panini, 1986), 103. ) "
This makes Nsibdi in Nigeria over 600 years older than written English.
Stone monoliths with Nsibidi designs- Nigeria- From Ross Archive-Yale University.
link
It pains whites tremendously to acknowledge our ancient glory, and their humble origins.
Many simply cannot handle this truth. A common retort by ignorant whites in light of this pain is to accuse those people who are reporting on this ancient glory of our people of being ashamed of the relatively recent history in Sub Saharan Africa (many of our own people are ignorant of the glories of Sub Saharan African civilizations).
(source)
Understand that these whites through their culture that promotes sheer ignorance are saying in fact that they view the recent achievements of Sub Saharan African civilizations as sub-par to all civilizations on Earth, and that they think that blacks are not aware of their attempted mockery of our recent predicament as a result of their inherently wicked nature. They are refusing to acknowledge our early legacy along the Hapi, and then saying that the only thing that we have done in history is that in which they saw in the areas that we lived when they arrived in the 16th century as a result of the World War that they started upon their exodus from the Caucus. Denying this earlier genesis on the Hapi Valley is an attempt by Devils to hide the last Zenith of our people, because of the ancient technology that our people produced during that period (white superpowers since the 19th century deciphering of the Rosetta Stone and the later discovery of Atlantis off the Coast of Cuba have been reverse engineering these ancient black technologies from these Zeniths).
"The reason so much emphasis has been put on Kemet, it is where ancient civilization reached its zenith. It is also the place that many European classicists scholars have declared war against the reality of the original inhabitants being indigenous Afrikans, and that the arts and sciences, which are now practiced throughout the world, were created by these same black people. This is totally unacceptable to these European and Arab scholars who will never admit what they already know."
Considering the fact that "Sub Saharan" Africa has been the home (for most of us) for over the last 2,500 years we have in that time frame created an entirely new genesis of civilizations that retain the principal traditions and ideals of that which were taught in our more splendid (I say "more" because the migration into Sub Saharan was more so like a refugee situation where we left our original home) ancient past along the Hapi, and that most certainly is something to take immense pride in our people for.
A few examples of Refugee Civilizations Founded in "Sub Saharan Africa" After Migration
50 Sub Saharan African cities destroyed by Europeans
White people like to pretend that when they came into "Sub Saharan" Africa (where we recently migrated to) to colonize it after befriending us for 400 years that there were no civilizations.
The Kingdom of Kongo Yes we demanded that they respect us and they complied
The Coming of the Plague that is now knows as Abrahamic Religion
The Devil deliberately took the joy, peace, and freedom away from our people to create the situation in the Congo today.
Kingdom of Benin (more desirable to live in than London at the same time frame)
"Benin City was also one of the first cities to have a semblance of street lighting...In 1691, the Portuguese ship captain Lourenco Pinto observed: “Great Benin, where the king resides, is larger than Lisbon; all the streets run straight and as far as the eye can see. The houses are large, especially that of the king, which is richly decorated and has fine columns. The city is wealthy and industrious. It is so well governed that theft is unknown and the people live in such security that they have no doors to their houses.”
In contrast, London at the same time is described by Bruce Holsinger, professor of English at the University of Virginia, as being a city of “thievery, prostitution, murder, bribery and a thriving black market made the medieval city ripe for exploitation by those with a skill for the quick blade or picking a pocket”.....
Benin City’s planning and design was done according to careful rules of symmetry, proportionality and repetition now known as fractal design. The mathematician Ron Eglash, author of African Fractals – which examines the patterns underpinning architecture, art and design in many parts of Africa –
notes that the city and its surrounding villages were purposely laid out to form perfect fractals, with similar shapes repeated in the rooms of each house, and the house itself, and the clusters of houses in the village in mathematically predictable patterns.
As he puts it: “When Europeans first came to Africa, they considered the architecture very disorganised and thus primitive. It never occurred to them that the Africans might have been using a form of mathematics that they hadn’t even discovered yet."
“Houses are built alongside the streets in good order, the one close to the other,” writes the 17th-century Dutch visitor Olfert Dapper.
Dapper adds that wealthy residents kept these walls “as shiny and smooth by washing and rubbing as any wall in Holland can be made with chalk, and they are like mirrors. The upper storeys are made of the same sort of clay. Moreover, every house is provided with a well for the supply of fresh water”.
"A series of walls marked the incremental growth of the sacred city from 850 AD until its decline in the 16th century...Connah estimated that its construction, if spread out over five dry seasons, would have required a workforce of 1,000 laborers working ten hours a day seven days a week. Ewuare also added great thoroughfares and erected nine fortified gateways.
Excavations also uncovered a rural network of earthen walls 4 to 8 thousand miles long that would have taken an estimated 150 million man hours to build and must have taken hundreds of years to build.
Wall of Benin x
These are just a few ancient interior African civilizations as there are many more (not all were listed on those maps) that can be looked and read up on.
World Pyramid Grid - and Global Consciousness
[/div][/div][/div][/span][/div]
[Here is a breakdown of that segment from the Emerald Tablets of Thot being subliminally interjected into popular children television programming. Listen from around 19:20 to 20:40, and you get the explanation for their Utopian society in the cartoon segment entitled "Ego Trip". The "neurotomicprotocore" in the movie represents the pulsating waves of higher consciousness that radiate from the all seeing eye of Ra sitting atop a tower clearly representing the Great Pyramid of Giza. The artificial "transfer receptors" that the guide in the cartoon references that all of the inhabitants have is code for the pineal gland of melaninated people. In other words the universe as many know it is a collective of melaninated consciousness. The Devil (it which lacks and operates without a consciousness) is allowed to exist in it's dormant state. We melaninated beings are the Gods and our bodies are the physical manifestation of "God"]
There are many more cultural and technological relics that tie all of the World civilizations together through a shared African lineage. It's interesting to note while there are pyramids older and bigger than the pyramid of Giza in Kemet, that pyramid in Kemet is literally the center of the Earth among many more paralyzing facts of it's mathematical relevance to the rest of the Earth.
Information strung together by T-RE' Brown
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 2, 2014 16:29:02 GMT -5
So Who in the Hell are Modern day "Egyptians" And Do They Have A Link To Ancient Kemet?
Needless to say that the modern inhabitants of "Egypt" today are generally remnants of those late period "Caucasoid" invading populations along with some Africoid groups who remained along the Hapi (mostly in Upper Egypt and the rural areas) River aside from the Niger-Congo speakers over the last 2,500 years. We know that most modern Egyptians (particularly urban northerners) cannot possibly be the physical representation of the ancient Kemites, which is based on consistent anthropological (which is the accurate measure of a person's physical appearance) studies that find a distinction in racial types between the Late Period Egyptians and the early Dynasties.
Logically with the physical and genetic distinction going as far back as the Late Dynastic Period the modern Egyptians in the major cities of the North especially bear no physical resemblance to the ancient Kemites. Those African ethnic groups that have remained in modern day "Egypt" are Cushitic and Nilotic (with some genetic remnants of Niger-Congo admixture in southern "Egypt" per SOY Keita 05'). When scientist lie and say that the "Egyptians" of today are genetically descended (or have "continuity") of the ancient Kemites they are referring strictly to the continuity of one African segment of the diverse African Hapi Valley population. That segment is the "Cushitic" branch of Africans who have remained on the Hapi and mixed with the pale Devil invaders, and this is evident through their paternal characteristic E1b1 (formerly called "E3b")/M-215 (green) still seen in "Egypt" today.
The real descendants of the founders of ancient Kemet in the main are highlighted in the dark-mid green (E) along with A & B on the map above as explained through the evidence laid out before it. Most of the impostors in modern day "Egypt" know this themselves. Notice however she can admit that the "Cushitic" /Hamitic branch of Africans was present in ancient Kemet, but she actively rejects the truth about the Bantu populations having established the civilization or even being there.
How is this woman who works around the artifacts of our ancestors not reminded of us? Clearly she is lying and there is also clearly a conspiracy on the part of the "Caucasians" both Western and Semitic to deceive the people about the stories of these ancient African civilizations.
The Cushitic Africoid element is still dominant in the southern regions of modern day "Egypt", and has remained somewhat (a little Arab admixture) in tact since early Dynastic times.
" Genetic continuum of the Nubians with their kin in southern Egypt is indicated by comparable frequencies of E-V12 the predominant M78 subclade among southern Egyptians."
[Hassan et al. Y-chromosome variation.." Am J. Phy Anthro. v137,3. 316-323 These modern southern Egyptians and northern Sudanese (the same people genetically) are in fact remnant of an ancient Africoid (Cushitic) element (meaning not the full representation) of the ancient Kemetic population. The urban people who live in the North (who look like mulattos) are relatively recent migrants from various different invasions. Further explained below.
The Distinct Africoid Populations who Comprised Early Ancient Kemet
1)*The Twa or "Pygmies" (European name) are often credited by various African groups and scholars as the ultimate creators and teachers of science, mathematics, dance etc. These Africans were also apart of the initial northward migration from Central/East Africa along the Hapi. They were an integral part of ancient Hapi Valley culture and beliefs. The so called "leprechauns" of Ireland were none other than the Twa, who were massacred by Catholic "jihadist" lead by Saint Patrick.
In Taiwan there is an annual festival in which the Taiwanese adhere to their ancient tradition and obligation to honor the "Little Black People" who taught them the arts of singing, dancing, and civilization or they will face the wrath of the curse laid upon them by the last remaining Twa. Some may chuckle at the superstition, but these East Asians are not playing about their obligation to maintaining this truth. Below is a great passage on the significance that the Twa have had on human development. "It was simply the returning of a cycle, for it was the Inner African, the Original Twa, who first went in and civilized the Hapi Valley. While Kushite-Kemetic culture represent a technological climax in African culture, technology is not synonymous with civilization. Civilization: the science of harmony with (being CIVIL) the world of man and nature, was first mastered by the Proto-Twa (misnamed pygmies) of Central Africa. They, not the Kushite nor Kemetyu, are the Mothers and Fathers of Civilization. They taught human beings how to live in prosperity and peace for 2 million years. The so-called Homo-Erectus that dates to this period is not a distinct species of man but a race of when all of man was a Proto-Twa or Twa-Papua.
While the European's system is considered more "civilized" by some, their system of civilization is unsustainable and is sure to feed on itself into extinction after only 2,000 years of power. That is a mere blink in time compared with the 2 million year sustainability of the Twa system.
What is your technology worth if you are not at harmony with the world and nature? You will simply exhaust all the resources and your species will become extinct. True civilization is not what you make but what you preserve. Thus, the Twa people of the Congo Rainforest remain the most civilized of all man.
This is why the Kemetyu revered them and documented them as the Twa race of man that civilized the Hapi and Mesopotamia. They founded the temples of Annu at the Delta and were considered gods by the people of Mesopotamia, who called them the Annunaki. The people of Papua New Guinea are direct descendants of the Twa settlers of Oceania, untouched by an external conquest. For this reason, the Proto-Twa would have appeared to have features similar to both modern Twa and the Papua.
The reverence for the Twa was deified as Bes in Kemet. Bes is the divinity of healing. The Twa are master healers. Those that live away from Westernization, deep in the Congo Rainforest, live to be over a 100 years old on average. They have the science of healing so accurate that they can cure AIDS, Cancer, and all other ailments. This is why the Europeans waged a war on them because European society is based on sickness turned into capitalist benefit and a culture that can cure all diseases is an ultimate threat to a wicked economic system based on sickness as a business. Upon discovering their mastery over all ailments, the Belgians had millions of Twa round up and executed.
So, know, that the Kushite-Kemetic are the mouthpiece of civilization but not as the architects. That title goes to the Proto-Twa of the Congo Rainforest, Mother and Father of Harmonious Civilization."
source
The earliest God worshiped in Nubia and eventually ancient Kemet was a Twa God by the name of "Bes". (Egyptian) Bes - The god of childbirth. Imported from Nubia, can be traced to pre-dynastic Hapi Valley culture. (Yoruba) Obatala -A sculptor-god, has the responsibility to shape human bodies, ultimately responsible for child birth. The worship of this very popular God and presence of these "little people" is seen from Africa all the way into parts of Europe, Asia, and yes the ancient Americas. The Twa were the creators of arts and sciences that form the basis of all civilizations that were created by those other groups of Africans listed below. The deliberate misclassifications of indigenous African types is one of the primary tools that Western scientist have used to label the remains of two of the distinct yet primary groups (Nilotic and Cushitic spearking Africans) of ancient Kemites as "Mediterranean" or "Europoid" or generally "Caucasoid. This tactic deceptively leaves the "Negroid" Niger-Congo speaking population as sole the "true" representatives for "the black race". The Forum member Zaharan has done an excellent job over the last decade clarifying the flaws and misconceptions of these numerous studies. Below is the summary of anthropological evidence from the UNESCO conference of 1973.
These Migrations from Kemet brought These Africans Groups into their Contemporary Land Occupations
This deceptive tactic on the part of the racist Eurocentric Western scholars was outed for the crock of shit that it is by leading Bio-geneticist SOY Keita 30 years ago;
The God Ausar (renamed Osiris by the Greeks) is depicted with the stereotypical facial features of a "Negroid" individual. Osiris
Notice how the Zulu Warriors in the video below used the exact same cowhide shields as the ancient Kemitic soldiers above when they are depicted fighting the British in South Africa. This is yet another aspect of ancient Kemetic culture that diffused into Southern African Bantus following our migrations from Northeastern Africa.
The first Dynastic King of ancient Kemet was clearly a Bantoid individual per his facial features. Every single "pharaoh" (and even their offspring) is depicted with these "Negroid" features that are distinct most notably in Africa from the "Hamitic"/Cushitic or Dravidian populations who also cohabited the region. If you notice that not only in Kemet, but across the Mediterranean and Western Asia statuary with these obviously "Negroid" physical features are desecrated most notably around the nose and lips. The statuary that depicts Cushitic looking individuals whom genetically recessive individuals have tried to pass off as "the" authentic Kemites, and live vicariously through are never defaced like the obviously "Negroid" individuals.
Below is Tera Neter Tile from Ta-Seti. It is the oldest civilization on Earth. The people of Ta-Seti as you can see below were the "Anu" or people of the "Bantu" town in the Sudan (direct descendants of Pleistocene Nubians).
"The Anu People
courtesy of Wally
The most significant fact of the founding of Pharaonic Civilization by the Anu people is rarely, if ever, mentioned in texts on Ancient Egypt. Not to mention the Anu is actually worse than, say, writing a history of the United States of America and not mentioning the Pilgrims (aka "Founders"/"Forefathers"). One has to look at earlier texts for this vital information:
The French Egyptologist Abbe Émile Amélineau is credited with the discovery of the Anu and their contribution to Egyptian civilization. It was Amélineau who designated the first black race to occupy Egypt as the Anu. He showed how they came slowly down the Hapi and founded the cities of Esneh, Erment, Qouch and Heliopolis..."
Some of the Strongest Evidence of the "Niger-Congo" presence in Ancient Kemet Is Linguistic The names of many of the older ethnic groups who formed the 42 Nomes of ancient Kemet have literal translations in Medu Neter.
Akan
Akan - the name of a god Akaniu - a class of gods like Osiris
Fante
(An Akan group) Fante - "he of the nose" - a name of Thoth - one of the 42 judges in the Hall of Osiris ("Shante" in modern Egyptian)Yoruba Ourbaiu - great of souls, a title of gods or kings Ouruba - Great God of soul
Egungun (Yoruba) and Djed Pillar (ancient Kemet)
Hausa
Hosa - a singing god (mixed with Nilotic and Cushitic Africans) The Bini
(the original people and founders of the Edo/Benin Empire) Binni - a phallic god
According to the Ancient Kemites, a second Kemetic ruling ethnic/class's ancestral homeland was Punt. They referred to this land as "Ta Nteru" ('Land of the Ancestors'). To emphasize their Puntite origins, the Kemites portrayed the Puntites in the exact same manner in which they portrayed themselves.
Dravidians/Tamil Modern "Indians" of the Sub Continent - Set Worshipers
Based on several lines of evidence including the lecture from Bobby Hemmit (shown below) it seems reasonable to say that the Dravidian population who now predominate in southern India was the population that had migrated from the Hapi Valley following the unification of the region by the king Mena Narmer. Narmer was clearly "Bantoid", and represented the "Bantu" population of the south with emphasis on their cult that worshipped Heru (the higher chakras). The Dravidians were on the other hand the Set worshiping cult (lower chakras) who predominated in the North (as C.A. Diop suggested) and certain areas of Nubia in the Sudan to the south. The biological evidence certainly points to a Dravidian element in the Levant and the Aegean during the formative period of civilization in those regions. What is also interesting to note is that it was from this region that the Hyksos came from, and the Hyksos were a mixed bunch (included many semitic/mixed race individuals by this date), but they were also Set worshipers. For the Hyksos to come into Kemet already worshiping a Nubian-Kemetic diety means that they had a previous history in Africa. Dr. Clyde Winters points to the Nubian origins of the Hyksos by a little known stella that mentions the Hyksos referring to themselves as the Kings of Kush or heqa khasut, "ruler(s) of the foreign countries" (an Old Kingdom Kemetic phrase used to describe Nubian kings). The complete exit of the Dravidian populations from Africa via the later C-group Nubian migration (shown in the previous post) is a point strengthener. We have indisputable proof of their presence in historical African periods, but the mystery of their complete exit and their biological affinities with the Tamahu (whites) and their wish to hide their African origin makes curious minds seek to look down that rabbit hole.
There is a concerted effort in the West to hide the fact that the Dravidians of India are the result of a relatively recent migration from Africa. This is hidden likely because of their close genetic relationship to the Tamahu (with the latter being the genetically recessive version/albinos of the former). Directly prior to the emergence of dynastic Nubia, the Dravidians were apart of the unified Saharan Kushite community during the Holocene period also coined the Ma Confederation by Dr. Clyde Winters. This is shown through common language that he has demonstrated between Manding speakers and Dravidians . These Africans along with Manding speakers migrated from the Sahara into the Near East (Sumer) during the beginning phase of desertification in the 6th millennium B.C.E. and the last phase in the 3rd Millennium Sahara moved into Sudanese Nubia to establish the ancient city of Kerma (known as the C-group Nubian culture). From this second Kushite migration onto the Hapi they left Kerma and migrated into the Arabian Peninsula and along their established ancient Elam as the Elamites (indicated by indisputable cultural overlappings) and later established the Indus Valley Civilizations.
The destruction of the Indus Valley in modern day Pakistan by invading nomadic genetically recessive populations is the event that placed the original blacks of the civilization into the lower caste systems of India. The Tamil and Cushitic populations share the same maternal DNA M-1, and this hapolotype is tied to their shared ancestral populations along the Hapi River Valley. A recent study has found that Pakistanis (which was apart of India until a few decades ago, and is where the actual Indus Valley civilization laid) known as the Brahui are an ancient relic Dravidian population, and it's neighboring population which they were found to be genetically indistinguishable from carry the M1 lineage. Prior to this finding the lack of M1 in the Indus Valley region is what many Eurocentrics feverishly tried to use to deny a relationship between Africa and Dravidians (though they illogically ignore more relevant data such as archaeology, linguistics, anthropology and cultural analysis. The study also found that this African originated M1 lineage is seen on a clearly migratory trail from Senegal, the Sahel, the Levant, Pakistan, Tibet, all the way into Russia. "M1 is found from Portugal and Senegal in the west to the Caucasus, Pakistan and Tibet at the east and, from Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania in the south to Russia at the north (Kivisild et al., 2004; Olivieri et al., 2006; Gonder et al., 2007; González et al., 2007, 2007; Zhao et al., 2009; Malyarchuk et al., 2010; Pennarun et al., 2012; Yunusbayev et al., 2012; Siddiqi et al., 2014) but, its highest diversity is found in Ethiopia and the Maghreb as the isolates detected at the borders are lineages derived from M1a branch in Russia and Tanzania and M1b branch in Guinea Bissau and Tibet. The geographic range of M20 and M51 largely overlaps, showing a common wide are
However, the actual representatives of M1, from the Levant to the Tibet, are derived lineages with ancestors in Africa. Until now, basal lineages of M1 have not been detected in any of the northern or southern hypothetical paths. " Carriers of human mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup M colonized India from southeastern Asia - Patricia Marreroa
link This study below confirms the involvement of M1 in the ancient Hapi Valley civilizations.
"The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity of 58 individuals from Upper Egypt, more than half (34 individuals) from Gurna, whose population has an ancient cultural history, were studied by sequencing the control-region and screening diagnostic RFLP markers. This sedentary population presented similarities to the Ethiopian population by the L1 and L2 macrohaplogroup frequency (20.6%), by the West Eurasian component (defined by haplogroups H to K and T to X) and particularly by a high frequency (17.6%) of haplogroup M1. We statistically and phylogenetically analysed and compared the Gurna population with other Egyptian, Near East and sub-Saharan Africa populations; AMOVA and Minimum Spanning Network analysis showed that the Gurna population was not isolated from neighboring populations. Our results suggest that the Gurna population has conserved the trace of an ancestral genetic structure from an ancestral East African population, characterized by a high M1 haplogroup frequency. The current structure of the Egyptian population may be the result of further influence of neighboring populations on this ancestral population." (Stevanovitch A, Gilles A, Bouzaid E, et al. (2004) Mitochondrial DNA sequence diversity in a sedentary population from Egypt. Ann Hum Genet. 68 (Pt 1):23-39.)
Deceitful White Scholars Get Called Out As mentioned earlier Western scholars are deceptive in their dismissal of the natural physical variability of indigenous melaninated Africans, and the origins of Dravidians recently in Africa. In 1993 a Western anthropologist by the name of C. Loring Brace took a stance on behalf of white supremacy during the height of the "Black Athena" debate, by deliberately fabricating the biological affinities of the ancient Kemites through masking his racializing of the science and denying indigenous African variability. In his study "Cline and Clusters" he concluded that the ancient Kemites were related to the "Caucasoid" grouping that he masks with "geographically defined populations" in Northern Africa, the Middle East and Neolithic Europeans (check the previous post on what early Europeans looked like). He came to that conclusion also by including the modern populations of the Tamil/Indians and Somalis (indigenous black distinct Africans located in "Sub Saharan" East Africa) whom the Naqada culture remains were closest to. The study found in some pivotal series that the Dravidians-Indians were the closest to not only the Pre-Dynastic Naqada period Kemites, but were also closest to the Nubians. That is an overlapping that was unjustly dismissed from the overall conclusion. There is little ever said about the close relationship between the Dravidians of India and Hapi Valley civilizations.
Bio-Geneticist SOY Keita, again spanks the hand of this white supremacist "scholar" with his own rebuttal a decade later:
He further stated that there was no relationship with ancient Kemites and "Niger Congo" speakers whom he made the biological representatives for all of "However, Brace et al. (1993) find that a series of upper Egyptian/Nubian epipalaeolithic crania affiliate by cluster analysis with groups they designate "sub-Saharan African" or just simply "African" (from which they incorrectly exclude the Maghreb, Sudan, and the Horn of Africa), whereas post-Badarian southern predynastic and a late dynastic northern series (called "E" or Gizeh) cluster together, and secondarily with Europeans. In the primary cluster with the Egyptian groups are also remains representing populations from the ancient Sudan and recent Somalia. Brace et al. (1993) seemingly interpret these results as indicating a population relationship from Scandinavia to the Horn of Africa, although the mechanism for this is not clearly stated; they also state that the Egyptians had no relationship with sub-Saharan Africans, a group that they nearly treat (incorrectly) as monolithic, although sometimes seemingly including Somalia, which directly undermines aspects of their claims. Sub-Saharan Africa does not define/delimit authentic Africanity".....
and
"An examination of the distance hierarchies reveals the Badarian series to be more similar to the Teita in both analyses and always more similar to all of the African series than to the Norse and Berg groups (see Tables 3A & 3B and Figure 2). Essentially equal similarity is found with the Zalavar and Dogon series in the 11-variable analysis and with these and the Bushman in the one using 15 variables. The Badarian series clusters with the tropical African groups no matter which algorithm is employed (see Figures 3 and 4).. In none of them did the Badarian sample affiliate with the European series."(S.O.Y. Keita. Early Nile Valley Farmers from El-Badari: Aboriginals or "European" Agro-Nostratic Immigrants? Craniometric Affinities Considered With Other Data. Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 191-208 (2005) (S.O.Y. Keita. "Early Nile Valley Farmers from El-Badari: Aboriginals or "European" Agro-Nostratic Immigrants? Craniometric Affinities Considered With Other Data". Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 191-208 (2005)
link
Brace avoided using key pre-dynastic groups such as the "Negroid" Badarians, and opted for the more "Ethiopic" characterized "Naqada" culture. Keita in his assessment however did not! Keita used Bantu - Niger-Congo speaking and Khoisan populations to make his comparison with the Badarians, and in every series of assessment the "Negroid" groups were whom the Badarians grouped with over the Europeans. The finding of a primary Bantu affinity between with the Badarians was reinforced by the study conducted by Goode in 2009 cited at the end of the previous post.
There is much evidence to believe that this particular group of Africans were the Set Worshiper who were kicked out of Lower Kemet by the first dynastic pharaoh Mena Narmer. The fact that the Caucasian is the genetically recessive albino version of this ancient race of Africans, suggest that the Dravidians largely formed the ranks of the Yacubs "Set" worshiping priesthood who created the Tamahu ("Created white people"), which was in direct opposition of those who worshiped Horus. This Set worshiping population of Kushites brought the Set worshiping Hyksos (semites) into Kemet during the 2nd millennium B.C.Cushitic Speaking Africans
The lighter skinned Habesha (Semitic) populations who reentered Africa via the Arabian Peninsula have nothing to do with Ancient Kemet. These Semitic Africans rather, were the ones who took over the Axumite empire from the Bantus, which eventually destroyed Kush. It is the dark skinned Oromo (evident by their name having translative meaning in Medu Neter like the Niger-Congo speakers shown above) and Somali populations who have integral relations with ancient Kemet.
Oromo
Oromo is derived from 'orma' - person to 'oromo' - people in the Oromo language Orma ; Oromo - the name of a god
Modern Beja - Medjay Nubians
The map below details the Cushitic Y-DNA (paternal) M-215's initial migration from Punt (Ethiopia-Eritrea) north into Kemet and it's descendants (V-12 and V-32) later leaving Kemet. This is showing the back migration of these Cushitic/Hamitic Africans who left Kemet and also migrated further south into the eastern parts of Sub Saharan Africa such as Somalia and Oromia, Ethiopia (V32). In modern day northern Sudan-southern "Egypt" V-12 signals these Cushitic people as descendants of Kemet.
The African groups above are remnants of those Cushitic Kemites who migrated from these civilizations with the Anu/Bantu from the constant threat of war along the Mediterranean with the chaotic Tamahu who were using their newly obtained knowledge from blacks of civilization, bathing, speech and what not to put our once peaceful advanced existence into a war state.
Amélineau adds,
"These Mesnitu had overthrown the original ruling ethnic/class, the Anu (those belonging to Osiris's ethnic group; and yes, Osiris was a real life personage), who had previously established its domination over all of Kemet through military conquest and political unification. Their place of origin was also "Ta Seti" ('Land of the Bow') in the Sudan."
From the Kememu:
Anu the city of Heliopolis (Coptic; On)
Anu Meh Anu of the north (Heliopolis)
Anu Shemo Anu of the south (Hermonthis/Ermant)
Anu Monti Anu of Hermonthis
Anu Tem the Anu of Tem (Hermonthis)
Anu Re the Anu of Re
Afdu Ikhu the Four Ancestors (of the Anu)
Ugrit Goddess of the Duat of Anu
Djandjané Anu the Anu Court of Judges: Tem; Shu; Tefnut; Osiris; Thoth
Anu n Ptoh the Anu of Ptah (Denderah)
Anu n Nut the Anu of Nut (Denderah)
The domination of the Bantu Africans in Kemet along their initial northwad expansion from would explain why there is a massive Sphinx with a Bantu individual all the way in northern Kemet. The civilization of Kemet itself was a confederation of these distinct Africans (including the one below), but as shown by the findings of UNESCO the Bantoid element of the population was the largest in number. We find that the language of Kemet was interchangeable with the Bantu populations with the names of the long existed groups having a direct translation in the ancient Kemetic language. We find that in some Cushitic groups like the Oromo, but that is it. The bulk of Cushitic Africans were likely hinged along the Red sea as the linguistic evidence shows in the map above that they were almost exclusively found in the Eastern front of the Nubian & Kemetic desert. We find much evidence however that the Dravidian populations should be identified as the "Mediterranean" branch of the population as opposed to the Cushitic speakers who now dominate Northeastern Africa. The gracile features shown in some of the Kemites depictions most likely reflect those black Dravidian populations who have since left Africa and relocated into India. The Nilotic groups on the other hand shown in the last part of this section were a pivotal part of the society since it's inception as well despite being the smallest percent numerically of the African indigenous elements.
Their occupation of the Hapi Valley and Eastern Africa had been continuous for over 30,000 years. The migration out of Africa that brought the Neolithic to other parts of the World is what is detailed in the map below. This particular migration included the "Bantu" and Cushitic populations ultimately from Punt as shown in the map below. Western scholars deny the truth however. What's interesting about the relationship between both the Bantu and the Mesnitu is that they are genetically brother populations with both respective branches of Y-DNA haplogroup E forming what is referred to as the PN2 clade.
Basil Davidson on the people of the ancient Sahara
4) Nehesi - Nilotic Africans
This group is the tallest of all people in the World, and are noted to be heavily melaninated. This group of Africans were an integral part in the emergence of Hapi Valley civilization per DNA and cultural relatedness, and were characterized most notably as the populations of Upper Nubia (South Sudan today). In the depiction below we clearly see Nilotic individuals being depicted as the Nubians. Western scholars deliberately misclassified this group of Africans as "European" or "Cro Magnon" in older anthropological studies
Shown in formation much like the ancient Kemites in the Anu section above, the ancient Nubians particularly further to the South were characterized by Nilotic Africans. We note the physical distinction between these soldiers known as the famous archers of Ta-Seti shown as more melaninated and tall, contrast with the Kemetic soldiers who are shorter, use cow hide shields along with spears (compared to the Bantu Zulu warriors above) and appear to be a reddish brown - brown color (one of the many variation of black skinned Africans).
Prior to the dynastic period all of these groups were present in the ancient Sahara until the 4th millennium B.C.E. This group while black skinned is genetically distinct from the haplogroup E carrying Bantu and Cushitic Africans, as being characterized by haplogroups A and B. There are some groups like the Tutsi of Rwanda who are lightly admixed with Nilotes, and this admixture gives them a more gracile physical distinction from their almost fully haplogroup E (M2 lineage) carrying Hutu neighbors.
Nilotic Africans largely live along the Hapi Valley in South Sudan, and along the Great Lakes with some isolated pockets in the Saharan nations of Chad and Niger (remnants of their inhabitants in the region millenniums prior). Recent genetic evidence on the original "A-group" Nubians confirms that they were largely Nilotic Africans who had a major role in the initial state formation of both Nubia and subsequently Dynastic Kemet prior to the other groups arriving from the Sahara.
"Accordingly, through limited on number of aDNA samples, there is enough data to suggest and to tally with the historical evidence of the dominance by Nilotic elements during the early state formation in the Nile Valley, and as the states thrived there was a dominance by other elements particularly Nuba/Nubians"
It was from this A-group that the Qustul incense burner was found, which is the proof once again that the World's oldest recorded monarchy/civilization came out of Africa.
Examining the Evidence of the Subsequent Genesis of Hapi Valley Civilization Starting Up in "Eastern Asia" and in the "Americas"
Early African Presence in East, Southeast Asia and Pacific Islands
Genetic Evidence Confirms The Involvement of Niger-Congo Speakers Into South and East Asia
Recent genetic studies have also confirmed the migration of "Bantu" and Cushitic Africans into southeast Asia with the finding of both E1b1 and E1a in Neolithic Indus Valley (7000–5500 BCE ) populations moving into Southeast Asian .
Link
Sickle Cell and other related hemoglobin disorders found throughout Southeast Asia, thus proving that their relationship is in fact biological and not superficial.
Malaria resistance (passing only from parent to offspring) is found in all local populations adjacent to all ancient civilizations (through the Fertile Crescent, Southern Europe-Greece-Southern Italy south into the Arabian Peninsula (with the area known as Mecca being a focal point), the Indian sub continent, Southeast Asia - southern China), and Central America (Olmec and Mayan civilizations). The strong presence of our African ancestors in this migration from the Hapi Valley (Kemet and Nubia) into Asia is the only way to explain how sickle cell migrated into those regions.
The Eastward migration from Africa of the Nagas (A Black Individual/Leader who has reached the Christ Consciousness)
ALL OF THE ORIGINAL BUDDHAS THROUGHOUT ASIA WERE DEPICTED AS "NEGROID" (wide nostrils, black skin, tightly coiled hair/braided/locks, large lips).
Even in modern times Southeast Asians are still melaninated.
African Origins of the Original Chinese Civilization The Indus Valley Civilizations by way of ancient Hapi Valley Civilization is what established ancient China. read more
The Black T'Sang of the Shang Dynasty unified China to form the first Chinese civilization between 1,600 - 1,046. This was long before the "Mongoloid "/"yellow" race of the Han Dynasty that now dominates the region today. The word T-Sang literally means "black".
African Origins of Montu Arts ("Martial" which was later adopted is a Roman word)
Fighting arts did not originate in China nor India! It was from the Hapi Valley that combative arts originated, and made it's way across Asia.
They were pushed off of the Mainland into Southeastern Asia and into the various Island Chains.
Fiji Headrest
Ancient Kemetic Headrest
Akan (West Africa)
Australian Mummies The Australian Torres Straight Islands contained mummies that were mummified in the same process as that of both Kemet and the Libyan Saharan regions.
"The Macleay Museum at Sydney University has a mummified corpse of a Darnley Islander (Torres Strait), prepared in a fashion that has been compared to that practiced in Egypt between 1090 and 945 B.C.
It was reported in Australian newspapers circa 1990 that a team of Marine archaeologists from the Queensland Museum had discovered extensive cave drawings on many of the Torres Straits Islands. Some of the cave drawings, on isolated Booby Island, were of a Macassan prau which is a unique vessel with telltale double rudders and triangular sails used by beche de mer (sea cucumber) fishermen out of the Indonesian island of Sulewesi.
The archaeologists declared the Torres Islands the "crossroads of civilizations" and were quoted as saying,
"Now it’s a new ball game in an archaeological sense."
In 1875 the Shevert Expedition found similarities in Darnley Island boats and ancient trans-Nile boats.
Island boats were used to row corpses to sea and leave on a coral reef. Egyptian practice was to ferry corpses across or down the Nile for desert burial.
Similarly, it was pointed out by the Kenneth Gordon McIntyre in his book The Secret Discovery of Australia (Picador, 1977) that the island of Mir in the Torres Strait was similar to the Egyptian word for pyramid, "mir" and even that the name for Egypt is "Misr."
The Various African Migrations to Turtle Island - Ancient America
"..We find the dark races on Earth confined to no particular zone but spread as it were pole to pole; from the Artic to the Antarctica circle. But it is in America, the last discovered by the civilized European, where we find the stronghold of the colored race" - The Races of Men: A fragment - by Robert Knox (185) Chapter VI - Page 148
Recent Genetic Evidence Confirms "Australoid - Proto Negroid" Populations Were the First Peoples In America Not Mongoloid Asiatics Migrants
Let's start by saying that it is no longer disputed if Africans arrived in America prior to 1492 even to Western scholars. The South American woman that they named Luzia has been designated as "Africoid", and the metric distinction was the subject of believe it or not a televised documentary and has been acknowledged by the Western sources like the Smithsonian as the oldest people in the America's. There has also been recent genetic work, which finds "Niger-Congo" E1b1a in Eastern Island, and off the Pacific coast of South America;
Genetic Diversity of Easter Island (Rapanui) Population from Identifiler® Plus autosomal, Y-filer®, and Y-Plex™ 6 Y-STR LociLaura Guadian B.S."Studies of Rapanui Y-STRs have suggested the presence of predominantly African and Amerindian admixture in this population inferred from high prevalence of haplogroups E1R1a, and Q, respectively). Haplogroups frequency distribution (Figure 2a) and haplotype network resulst (Figure 2b) also demonstrates evidence of European admixture. These results can be explained by an expansion out from Africa into the Pacific that occurred around 3,500 AD (35). In this migration the people went east to Samoa and Tonga, who’s inhabitants later reached Easter Island. Rapanui autosomal STRs were found to be admixed of three different populations, even at individual level (Figures 3a and 4a), while their Y-STR structure, was predominantly constituted of a single population ancestry (Figure 3b and 4b). Y-STR results point toward that male lineages are probably a consequence of conquerors who reproduced with Rapanui women."And
HLA in Uros from Peru Titikaka Lake: Tiwanaku, Easter and Pacific Islanders. Hum Immunol. 2018 Nov 13.
"Uros people live in floating reed islands in Titikaka Lake in front of Puno town (Peru). They could have started Tiwanaku culture and shared genes and culture with Pacific Islanders; it is particularly relevant the giant hat covered men statues found in both Tiwanaku at Titikaka Lake shore and Easter Island (3700 km far from Chile in Pacific Ocean). These giants monoliths are very similar one another and unique in America and Pacific Islands. The following HLA alleles are shared in a specifically high frequency between Uros and Pacific Islanders : HLA-A*24:02, HLA-B*35:05, HLA-B*48:01, HLA-DRB1*04:03, HLA-DRB1*08:02 and HLA-DRB1*09:01. Uros also have 3 unique HLA haplotypes: A*24:02-B*15:04 - DRB1*14:02-DQB1*03:01, A*68:01:02-B*35:05-DRB1*04:03-DQB1*03:02, A*24:02-B*48:01-DRB1*04:03-DQB1*03:02. Also Uros seem to be one of the most ancient population in Titikaka Lake that could have started Tiwanaku culture. Prehistoric contacts between Amerindians and Pacific Islanders are strongly suggested by genetic and cultural traits. It is not discarded that Uros could have come from Pacific Islands: Uros show melanic skin and are dolichocephalic; in contrast, surrounding Aymara people have a clear skin and are brachicephalic. The Kon-Tiki project led by Thor Heyerdahl showed that a simple sailing is possible between Peru and Polynesia Islands; also, the most ancient skull found in America is of black origin: Luzia, suggesting that first America peopling was also carried out by Black/coloured people."
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima in his book "They Came Before Columbus" in the "Postscipts and other finds section" at the end of the book, had put context to the findings of the Africoid - Australoid skeleton remains. As mentioned in the exert in "The Origins of Primitive Man" at the top of this second post, these first "American" settlers were Pacific island migrants of a Twa (misnamed "pygmy") race. This Africoid race, while melaninated were distinct from the later Olmec - Africans who brought the old World style civilization to the Americas.
Pre-Colonial "American" Race Wars
As mentioned earlier the Twa were the first in the Americas, and this was followed by the Mongoloid element according to Van Sertima. Dr. Van Sertima mentions that this Mongoloid element came most likely across the land bridge around Alaska and Russia during the end of the last Ice Age. He also mentions that there is some evidence of later migrations from the same region of World. The skin color of these "Mongoloids" who came to the Americas has never been verified. I think that's important to note, because the Eskimos of the Arctic region of the North Pole while being Mongoloid and in extreme cold (the supposed reason for skin, eye and hair color change) have melanin contents that are within the range of so called "Sub Saharan Africans" (that includes "black" melaninated hair and eye colors). We also have sufficient genetic evidence that pale skin and depigmented eyes and hair are only around 6,000 years old. That 6,000 year date is interesting, because researcher Dr. Clyde Winters insist that a "white" element did not enter into the Americas until around 6,000 BC. Could this element of Asiatic origin be the later migrations that Dr. Van Sertima was hinting at in his book? Dr. Van Sertima makes mention of the fact that the Australoid Twa populations were absorbed into the greater (in number) Asiatic migrants. It is my own conjecture (for whatever it's worth) that this absorption of this earliest Twa element accounts for the relatively short stature of many contemporary Latin Americans in comparison with most Africoid and Tamahu populations. These Latin American populations today, while many (especially in southern Mexico-Central America) are still black from this Olmec - Egypto-Nubian migration, are generally referred to as "Brown" in the USA today. We know that the general populations of Mexico and Central America are "Mestizo" or a mixture of the aboriginal Natives and European colonialist post 1492. We know that the pale European element obviously lightened these populations who today are still "brown" in skin color. To reinforce the earlier point of this early Asiatic migration characterized by melaninated individuals, it would only make sense that the populations of the Americas were generally melainated within the range of so called "Sub Saharan Africans" prior to the pale European admixture post 1492.
Oral traditional place ancient "blacks" in pre-colonial America for thousands of years.
In reference to Dr. Clyde Winters assertion of a later migration around 6,000 BC from Asia of pale skinned individuals, it must be noted that just about every aboriginal native American group attest to an ancient race of nomads that contained "white giants" who were cannibals coming from Asia, and traveling throughout the land masses of the "Americas". These later pale skinned populations according to many scholars and oral traditions of the natives were the cause of "race" wars in pre-columbian America. The depictions of many Meso-American civilizations even post Olmec, show wars between people of distinct skin colors. These wars were even recorded as late as medieval Mexican - Central American (Mayan) cultures, which were highly influenced by West African Mande - Muslim migrants.
"Sailing the Mouth of the Straights of La Maire, they met with very tempestuous Weather, and seventeen of their Men going ashore, were Devoured by the Cannibals of Terra del Fuogo. These People being all Whites, and of large stature, Paint themselves Red, and go stark naked, except some of highest quality who tie a Deer Skin about their Necks; and the Women cover their Nakedness with a piece of Leather....Lastly, they are So Salvage, that they seem rather to be Beasts than Men, knowing no Religion, ill Natured, Cruel and Treacherous."
These "white giants" were eventually subdued as depicted in the later Africoid-Aboriginal American civilizations. The Mayan and Aztec civilizations among others would depict these wars with this pale race.
The Columbian Europeans was a prophecy of many Native Americans. The Europeans were so successful in their colonization of the native Americans, because they teamed up with the later Asiatic migrants (who knew the land) to subdue the aboriginal Africoid inhabitants of America. In America many of the natives were forced into chattel slavery once subdued in the wars. It is interesting in the situation today in which the stereotypical pale skinned Mongoloid Native American has been confined to the reservations. These pale native Americans were double crossed by the Europeans whom they aligned themselves with. Many of the Mestizo populations in Latin America now how European - American attitudes towards the blacks who have been in place there for thousands of years. It is also interesting to note that in the USA (no where else on the two continents), you have lily white skinned Americans (or in some cases whites with 1/100th native ancestry) claiming to be native Americans due to their European ancestors paying $5 in the dolls rows to be classified as Native Americans at the beginning of the 20th century.
During this identity switch the melaninated natives who resembled Africans in appearance and skin color (according to early European explorers) and whom were enslaved were reclassified as "colored", "Negro", and today "black" or "African Americans". This is a deliberate attempt by the USA to legally deny the land rights and reparations of the "black Americans" who have been taught over the century to legally distinguish ourselves as "recent" African slaves (which did take place as well, but to a lesser extent than reported). The brainwashing is so thorough, that many blacks insultingly dismiss the sacred words of their recent ancestors who routinely acknowledged that we have "Native American in our family" as "wishful thinking". Cranial evidence on the Olmecs or Xi People
The outright refusal of European scholars - The Smithsonian to acknowledge these long known verified findings of "Negroid" cranial remains (made by Europeans ironically) in Olmec sites is one of the most pivotal examples of what film maker and black activist Tariq Nasheed refers o as "I'm white and I say so". For this reason, any black person with good sense would never wait on Western verification of the context of ourstory. The anthropological evidence cited in the books of Ivan Van Sertima is concrete evidence of distinctly "Negroid" remains found in the ancient Olmec (the first civilization in the Americans) sites that white scientist refuse to acknowledge.
"Diehl and Coe (1995, 12) of Harvard University have made it clear that until a skeleton of an African is found on an Olmec site he will not accept the art evidence that there were Africans among the Olmecs." "This is rather surprising because Constance Irwin and Dr. Wiercinski (1972) have both reported that skeletal
remains of Africans have been found in Mexico." Dr. Wiercinski (1972) supports this claim with skeletal evidence from several Olmec sites where he found skeletons that were analogous to the Negroid type black. Wiercinski discovered that 13.5 percent of the skeletons from Tlatilco and 4.5 percent of the skeletons from Cerro de las Mesas were Africoid (Rensberger,1988; Wiercinski, 1972; Wiercinski & Jairazbhoy 1975).
BookGenetic evidence of Niger-Congo Populations in Pre-Columbian American Civilizations
Another piece of little known evidence of the "Niger-Congo" strain of Africans coming to the America's is the finding of sickle cell anemia in ancient Mayan remains. Sickle Cell Originated (Benin sickle cell which was found in Pre-Dynastic Kemetic mummies) in Sudanese Nubia, just like the Niger-Congo/Bantu SpeakerslinkOnce again notice how the distribution of sickle cell correlates almost perfectly with the location of Niger-Congo speaking populations, whom Sarah Tishkoff's massive study acknowledges as a genetic entity rather than an arbitrary linguistic grouping. A.6' 7,11 X-ray findings of the skulls in Mayan Indians were suggestive of sickle cell disease.20 It has also been described in Mexicans. The sickle cell trait was found in 7.3 per cent of a series of over eight thousand Negroes,9 with a higher percentage in South African natives.10
Another piece of confirmation of ancient Kemites and Nubians extensive travels to and from this area of the World is via the fact that mummies throughout the Hapi Valley have been found to have had tobacco and cocaine residue (the white "scientist" apparently acted a fool upon reading these findings, and this study addresses those concerns).
"The recent findings of cocaine, nicotine, and hashish in Egyptian mummies by Balabanova et. al. have been criticized on grounds that: contamination of the mummies may have occurred, improper techniques may have been used, chemical decomposition may have produced the compounds in question, recent mummies of drug users were mistakenly evaluated, that no similar cases are known of such compounds in long-dead bodies, and especially that pre-Columbian transoceanic voyages are highly speculative. These criticisms are each discussed in turn. Balabanova et. al. are shown to have used and confirmed their findings with accepted methods....
“The initial reaction to the findings of Balabanova et. al. was highly critical. These criticisms were not based on a known failing in the authors' research methodology, rather they were attempts to cast doubt on an implication of the research - that cocaine and nicotine were brought to Egypt from the New World before Columbus. This conclusion is not acceptable to conservative investigators of the past. In fact it suggests a deep-rooted aversion to what Balabanova suggested might mean an unraveling of aspects of history contrary to basic reconstructions. This aversion, according to Kehoe (1998) stems from the conviction that Indians were primitive savages destined to be overcome by the civilized world - that the acme of evolutionary success resided in the conquering race itself. ‘Childlike savages could never have voyaged across oceans.’ “
“Balabanova's findings bring yet other evidence forward that humanity is not so easily pinioned into the pre-conceived notions of primitive and advanced - even as this might be related to the presumed technology of earlier times. The quest for discovery - to find new worlds - is not just a modern selective advantage of our species. Perhaps it is the defining characteristic. “ Djed - Shown in both Kemet and ancient America
john ogilby america | ... the book America ], c1673 by Arnoldus Montanus (Ogilby), Amsterdam The North American Mound Builders
North America (especially the Mississippi river and it's tributaries) is littered with mounds. These mounds are relatively recent structures that date the Middle Ages. The only other place where they are noted to be found are in Western African Mande civilizations, as a defense against fortification. The age dating of these mounds, and the correlation with Mande culture implies that this was the result of the massive migration of Abu Bakr III's Malian fleet that settled in North America (many say Mexico) during the 14th century AD.
St. Louis Pyramids
Mississippi Mounds
Many of us are descended of Native Americans - Africans who had made this land home for millenniums before Columbus arrived or the first "slave" ships came across the Atlantic. Stop disrespecting the integrity of our elders and ancestors who insisted that we have "Native American in our family", by claiming that this statement is one of "self hate". If you understand that the Native American ancestry is an ancient or long standing African presence (which infused with some of the much more ancient American populations in most cases) then this should be respected as fact!
Dr. Clyde Winters (who is very accessible) has detailed the African origins of haplogroup R, and these early African native Americans are responsible for the haplogroup being found in what essentially makes us aboriginals to America with an African origin of course.
STUDY-PDF LINK
The Tamahu - "The Created White People" (Genetically Recessive Inbred, Albinoid, Mutant Invasions)
Many people fear referencing the Dr. Yacub story because they think that there is no scientific evidence to validate anything stated in it. The most pivotal fact that science has verified with regards to this "story" is the age of Caucasians. The odds of the 6,000 year date of the Tamahu's existence as told by the centuries old story should be far fetched and based in nothing dealing with science (according to some). To the naysayers tell me the odds of not one, but multiple genetic studies proving that pale eyes, hair and skin are only 6,000 year old mutations. There are no coincidences! These mutants are a by-product of the lower consciousness of the original melaninated man...Therefore they should not be hated because us blacks set the standard for how low they can go. The bad shat is already in the black man, but the highest of high is also within the black original man. The highest of high however is non existent in the Tamahu, who cannot get past their heart chakras. There intent and purpose is to normalize low frequency behavior to deter the original man from reaching that highest point/The Dragon, which is synonymous with their inevitable demise.
Understand black people that many Caucasians play dumb, but are fully aware of the information below. "A veritable savage tattooed on various parts of his body" - Champollion "Interestingly, the ancient Egyptians recorded the Tamahu, which means created white people.
Egyptian writings also refer to whites as Typhonians or People of Seth, both meaning “the devils.” After these “white devils” were first released into the Black community of the Near East 6000 years ago, they caused severe strife, thus the Africans rounded them up, stripped them of everything and exiled them to the caves and hills of the Caucasus Mountains. This explains the sudden appearance of white people in this region. To prevent their escaping Africans installed a series of guarded walls blocking all exits along that area from one sea to the other! Thus “roping” them off (hence the word Europe). These walls have been witnessed and recorded by many European writers, including Pliny. Thus, totally cut off from civilization, the whites degenerated into uncivilized, nomadic savages. They remained this way for 2000 years until ‘Allah mercifully sent an Egyptian priest named Musa or Moses to civilize them.’
This explains the otherwise unknown reason why suddenly about 2000 B.C.E, vast hordes of these white barbarians left the Caucasus region and stormed all the (Black) centers of civilizations throughout Mesopotamia, the Near East, Africa and India, destroying and usurping them.
more Biological Differences
Since whites have subjugated our people for 4 centuries and dehumanized us in their societies we as blacks have fought for "equally" rather than advocating for our superiority over them. For this reason when their scientist finally began to let up on overt racism, and started claiming that we were all equal to help our integration into the society we blacks with our inferiority complex gladly accepted that. In reality we original melinanated people are eternal divine beings with a completely different standard of consciousness, whereas they are abnormal Frankenstein like creations placed into our reality within a portal called "time" catered for their existence. The society has blacks thinking that their acknowledgement of "equality" is their "mercy" on our people, but that's weak shit...and I'm not on that!
Pale Skin Is a 6,000 year Old Genetic Condition - Albinism
The Tamahu or "Whites" are scientifically defined as "Mutants" (Genetically Recessive Inbred Albinoid Mutants) & Their Reproduction is Stagnant Due to This Fact
The testament to the unnatural origins of "Caucasians" is the fact that their lack of genetic diversity has reduced their numbers to an irreversible negative growth all over the World. When they say and live by codes such as "stick to their kind", they are essentially inbreeding a genetically depleted source, and from that infertility in their females has resulted (along with a host of strange genetic diseases and disorders that only they carry). The more "enlightened" members of that group are very aware of their dire genetic situation, and subsequently socially engineer the population to unconsciously supplement their genetic bases with the needed melanin. Essentially genetically recessive populations have to start a miscegenation campaign every few centuries, and today we are in the midst of such a campaign.This happened heavily when the Tamahu first migrated from the caves, and overran the Near East and the Aegean around 1,400-1,200 BC as detailed in the sections above. This mixture with the aboriginal mealninated Africans of the lands that they overran was so complete that the mixture (Semitic) still defines the populations in those regions to this date. Later in history with the ancestors of contemporary Western-Central European who were last tribes to leave the Caucus (known as the Barbarians) this mixture happened around 711 AD with the African Moors entering into Europe. After ruling southern Europe for close to a millennium, even after the Moorish expulsion in 1492 there were huge numbers of Africans remaining throughout Europe. These Christianized Africans (largely men) had intermarried with the genetically recessive women, so heavily during this immediate post Moorish time period, that many of the family crest of the most common surnames in Western Europe depict Africans as the patriarch on their emblems. This is where the dark haired, dark eyed "whites" got their "non recessive" traits look from. As the quote below from the Latinized Romans acknowledges these Barbarians had a uniform look of complete genetic recessiveness (albinism) prior to their obvious admixture with the Moors and absorbing some of the remaining Africans from the European Neolithic-Bronze Age upon the initial push westwards.
Tac. Ger. 4
- "For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of inter-marriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them." The issue with the Tamahu's birthrates today is that they have been inbreeding among this small population of "whites' in the name of "preserving whiteness" to the point that they have depleted the genetic material needed (melanin) to sustain their population's continuance. They have resorted to mass killings of blacks in so called "nature" disasters (HARP) to steal the melaninated organs of our people (because they function much better, especially when taken care of), along with fertility clinics and all sorts of abnormal concoctions in their futile attempts to remedy what is natural (their extinction).
The Renewed Miscegenation Campaigns Today they use their black puppets (many of these blacks who do this have low self esteem, and subsequently hate themselves and subsequently hate their race) to promote that plot against our race through willing participation of weak minded Blacks who neglect or are ignorant of ALL of the facts presented here about our people and genetically recessive mutants. Some of these blacks who choose such a path are so dumb and have such an inferiority complex that they will go as far as cry or outwardly denounce these facts without any serious scrutiny, to show their loyalty to the oppressors of their people. In the United States of America the use of the divide and conquer strategy is once again being utilized by the whites, but this time it is to divide the genders. The whites have disenfranchised Foundational Black Americans since the end of chattel slavery, and since the 1963 passing of the Civil Rights Law the financial destitution of our race has been solidified with integration (killing black support of black businesses). This created economic hardship for blacks particularly men who were the breadwinners (like in any race). To create further chaos on top of extreme poverty the US government in the late 60's through the Demoncratic lead Oval Office offered free and subsidized housing to BLACK WOMEN, that required that no man be in the home (a war strategy to bastardize a whole generation of our children/Generation X). In coming decades the government put dope on the streets of these impoverished black ghettos, and set up heavy handed penalties that targeted black men for jail at a rate that has made black men the most incarnated group in World history. These laws passed in the 90's (by the Demoncrats) worked to bastardize another generation of blacks to be sent into slavery (jail per the 13th amendment) once they get old enough, while in the same period offering black women free education (the crime bill laws prevented black men who had sold drugs the same financial resources to go to school once they got out of jail) . In 20 years this made black women the most educated group in America, while black men are again the most incarcerated. This has created a economic power imbalance in the black households that gives black women more access to the American dream than black men, which is the opposite of any other race. Many of these women have developed attitudes of superiority against their own men, and in fairness many of the men act bastardy (self hating and effeminate) as a wide spread (over 3/4ths) result of single mother upbringing, and through the promotion of extremely bastardy behavior via their hip hop role models (lil Wayne and many others) since there were no fathers to style after. The result of this imbalance creates the ignorant views shown in the video below, and the Devils who own the media platforms will promote this views as a "movement" to those in our group ignorant or careless enough to follow it. The creation of mixed offspring is being promoted in Western society to give them the best of the society through a scenario that often involves a well to do black father (often a pampered coon athlete or a token/white chosen black man) who chooses a Caucasian woman. The society is ran on a system that is designed to defecate on our people, but will be kinder to the mixed race offspring (they still aren't "white"), so kind that they cannot possibly relate to their melaninated halves 400 year ordeal with the pale Devils. The mixed offspring will then adopt the subtle hostilities of the recessive half of his/her genetics, and will likely choose a "Caucasian" woman or man to reproduce with. In time that offspring's lineage will be fully Caucasian. That is their simple yet effective plan.
Tamahu Lack of a Functioning Pineal Gland/Third Eye
Hence they are a by-product of our lower consciousness, and simply cannot ascend past the heart chakra. When they have attempted to do this through studying they spontaneously combust due to the "serpentine fire" of the Kundalini traveling up their non melainated/protected bodies like the melaninated rulers of ancient times.
As Bobby Hemmit explains in the opening video of this section, the ''mutation'' known as Caucasians was created by the ancient priesthoods of ancient Kemet after the fall of Atlantis (high consciousness). There was a civil war essentially between Set Worshipers and those priest who worshiped Heru. Set represents the lower chakras, and it was from those lower chakras that the Tamahu (created white man) was grafted off of;
,and for this reason they are a man-ifestation of our lower selves. The process of created these lower consciousness beings was through the metaphysical sciences of Tantra sex (sexual magic), and those new genetically recessive babies were created off of the lower chakra (child a set/them) rather than the higher chakras (child of Horus/heru/us), and this is why their pineal glands are calcified"
"Most whites have calcified pineal glands which thwarts Melatonin
production, thereby limiting their moral capacity. Located in the brain,
the tiny pineal & pituitary glands regulate the body's other glands.
Esoteric tradition regards the area of these glands as the third eye, seat of the soul, and the mystical Uraeus represented by the cobra on the forehead of Egyptian royalty/crowns. Why did Africans view the European
as a child of God, but the Europeans viewed the African as a soulless
savage? Because of "melatonin," described as a mentally & morally
stimulating humanizing hormone produced by the pineal gland. Scientific
research reveals that most whites are unable to produce much melatonin
because their pineal glands are often calcified and nonfunctional.
Pineal calcification rates with Africans is 5-15%; Asians - 15-25%;
Europeans 60-80% This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences
between Blacks and whites, causing some Black scholars to raise the
question that the European approach, that of the logical, erect, rigid,
anti-feeling posture, reflects a left brain orientation and reflects that
they lack the chemical key of melatonin to turn on their unconscious and
therefore cannot get into feelings. Carol Barnes writes "Melanin is
responsible for the existence of civilization, philosophy, religion,
truth, justice, and righteousness. Individuals (whites) containing low
levels of Melanin will behave in a barbaric manner." Melanin give
humans the ability to FEEL because it is the absorber of all frequencies
of energy. Dr. Welsing writes "Since melanin is a superior absorber of
all energy , it is essential to establish this understanding of God and
'all energy.' The fact that the albinos (whites) lack melanin may also
help to explain ...why, in the view of many non-white peoples, they
(whites) lack 'spirituality" and the capacity to tune in to, and thereby
establish harmony and justice..."
The melanin of Caucasians unlike everything else in this universe that is Carbon based (666 on the periodic table), is SULFUR based. Sulfur of course is the element associated with the Biblical Devil (not a coincidence)
"What they note as Hyperhomo-cysteinemia, a blood disorder marked by an excess amount of Sulfur amino acid(s) shows a prevalence near 15% in European, Middle Eastern and Japanese populations, compared with a range at or below 1.4% in African Americans, among them, the condition can and will fluctuate seemingly sporadically and spontaneously as a result of constantly changing dynamics such as temperature and even emotion(s). Thus, the rate of Hyperhomocysteinemia or the presence of excessive amounts of Sulfuric amino acids in Caucasian persons cannot be measured by tools that render static results.
They Grow Tails..
They grow TAILS FAMILY....
The Life Giving Sun/Ra Kills them
The Semitic Branch of the Tamahu
Arabs and Jews
We have seen examples throughout history of infighting in which there are atrocities against Jews (particularly dealing with the Jewish Semites in this section) whenever possible. The context behind the rift from an Abrahamic perspective between Jews and Gentiles is never expounded on. When "Moses" (we know of Africans with the name "Moses" such as "Thutmose"/"Ahmose") came into the Caucus mountains in an attempt to civilize the Tamahu he (being African) was met with hostility by the vast majority of the population. He was said to have had to sleep within a ring of fire to keep the Tamahu from killing him. It was only a minority of the Tamahu who accepted the doctrine that their original inner Earth descended creator (Yacub) left to them through Moses. These Tamahu who accepted the sorcery are called "Jews". The doctrine that they were taught was "tricknology". This allows them to maneuver their agenda's within a society (that they do not create) to benefit them during the low period of universal consciousness. Look at what Isreal does today! It is nothing short of sorcery that they use to control the United States and Britain. The fact that the gentiles were named after a Kushite God (Aryan) is a clear indication that these backwards people were militarily trained by Kushites (some were set worshippers) prior to their exit. The Gentiles left the caves last (the real "Exodus), and the ancestors of modern Western Europeans being the last tribes out. Semites Are Fixed Race Mulattoes
The mixing of these Caucasians and the aboriginal black inhabitants of Western Asia resulted in what we call "Semitic" people (which literally means semi white and semi black).
"All Semites (Arabs and Jews)…are mixed breeds of Blacks and Whites; the Arab race cannot be conceived as anything but a mixture of Blacks and Whites; the entire Arab people, including the Prophet, are mixed with Negro blood. - C.A. Diop
"The Arabs descend from Aryan nomadic groups that took over the indigenous Black population millenia ago (the Black Sumerians, Canaanites, Sabaeans, etc). The Kemetyu encountered these beige Aryan-Arabs and called them all Namu (root of the word "Nomad") which meant "aimless wanderer."
Because the Aryans/Aryabs were barbarians who spoke various languages, they initially adopted the Cushitic language that dominated West Asia. Their creolized dialect became known as "Semetic." However, they were not racially Cushitic any more than Francophone Africans are French.
Even the name Arab means Aryab or Aryan. They migrated from the Caucasus mountains to what is now Jordan, as brothers to the Caucasoid Hebrews. That was their main base until they were ousted from Jordan by the Romans in 200 ce. This is when they moved to Arabia, took over, and eventually established Islam. The evidence of the Aryab's Aryan heritage is very clear. All of their customs and worldview are not African. There is not one African religion where God does not have a Wife, only Aryan-Euros play that; where women are made docile and must cover their heads, or where nature is not equated with God. The deification of women thru the Goddess and the elevation of women as independent owners of property, sovereign, etc, are very very African and found in every single African culture (including Kemet) which is why the absence of deification of women and their equality with man is evidence that they are not of African culture."
As demonstrated in the video above the first sign of these "Semitic" people (or any non black people in recorded history) was when they appeared at the northern border of Kemet as goat herders who were going through a severe famine.
These people would be referred to as the Hyksos (Shepard Kings and rulers of foreign lands) and came trickling into Kemet around 1780 B.C.E.. They were famished guest welcomed into the land who built in number and took over a part of Lower Kemet where they had settled. Once they took over lower Kemet they acted barbarically towards the native Kemetic population for a little over a century before being repulsed by king Ahmose I.
The Hyksos (Which means foreigner in Kemetic language) were the first written record of any non black people. Now these people also had the name "heqa khasut" which means kings of Kush. These were a Set worshiping people before they came into Kemet as famine induced beggars. This was a mixed group with Set Worshiping Africans at the head of the group. These leaders were likely the group of African Set worshipers who the Heru worshiper King Mena Narmer had defeated and expelled from the land during Kemet's unification in 3,100 BC.
ARABS
Side notes on the origin of Arabs much later, and it's label is by no means indicative of the "race" of an individual who identifies as such. The word Arab translates into "aimless wanderer" or nomad. The black element of the "semitic" Arabs that Diop is referring to is the Cushitic African type who migrated outside of Africa where they went into and remained in the Arabian peninsula. The Arab culture was created by them based on their Cushite culture. It was this population that formed the initial body of Muslims who came into Northern Africa via Roman "Egypt" at the time (hence long after the fall of Kemet) much later after the fall of dynastic Kemet in the 7th century CE. These Arabs failed to conquer the African stronghold further south in Nubia after two violent attempts, and on the third attempt entered peacefully. The converted African Muslims further north and West however would become known as the Moors who conquered and civilized Spain in 711 A.D. and subsequently southern Europe.
The African converts of Islam in many cases choose this outside religious identity over their original African one or mixed the two. Through this African-Muslim identity crisis is what lead to Islamic-African enslavement not Semitic Arabs coming into Africa. The Muslims enslavement cultures came after it was hi-jacked towards the end of the 800 year African-Moorish dominance of the Mediterranean by Semitic Turks (who enslaved all people no matter what color). Egypt and northern Sudan went through a thousand years of Islamic-Turkish Arab cultural domination since.
Original Arabians Peninsula Inhabitant
Remnants of invading Caucasoid populations from Turkey in Arabia today
“Mr. Baldwin draws a marked distinction between the modern Mahomedan Semitic population of Arabia and their great Cushite, Hamite, or Ethiopian predecessors. The former, he says, ‘are comparatively modern in Arabia,’ they have ‘appropriated the reputation of the old race,’ and have unduly occupied the chief attention of modern scholars.”-- Charles Hardwick (1872)
The "Caucasoid" Legacy
There has been a steady encroachment and pushing south of the melaninated peoples who once inhabited every continent and landmass, by the albinoid mutants since they were released from the caves. They act like a cancer that spreads and destroys. Hiding the truth of this matter has been a focal point of Western institutions. The evidence provided on the last post in the Natufian-Neolithic section and others goes into detail of the original African migrants who settled and civilized Europe, but the Tamahu hide this fact through obscuring the outright narrative. There own scholars in some cases outright called them the savage cancers that they were to the blacks who were aboriginal to Asia AND Europe before they finally came to those regions. Through hiding the fact of this consistent encroachment of the pale populations (which includes East Asians) onto the lands and former lands of the melaninated peoples all around the World, they create narratives that attempt to frame those melaninated peoples whom point this out as "history thieves". Only a Devil would lie in such ways.
The ancient civilizations were in place throughout the World in highly advanced states prior to the release of the Tamahu from the Caucus mountains after 2,000 BC. The Indo-European were introduced to all forms of agriculture and civilization through their interactions with our ancestors. The funniest part about white's who try to dismiss this by trying to relegate these facts and narrative to "new aged Afrocentrism" is the fact that even amidst the most blistering ignorance of the 19th and 20th centuries there were in fact some Caucasian "scholars" who had no issue with telling the truth about their extremely humble origin.
The North American Review Volume 0139 Issue 334 (Sept 1884)
Title: Our Remote Ancestry [pp. 246-256]
Author: Winchell, Alexander, Prof.
Collection: Journals: North American Review (1815 - 1900)
("Penetrating the Earth like miserable ants" until 2,000 B.C.E.)
The Tamahu have never created a civilization in their 6,000 year existence. Africoid populations form the basis of all civilizations around the World. The Tamahu have gained a superiority complex which is the adverse affect of having an inferiority complex. Their inferiority complex originated from the fact that they knew right off the bat that they were locked into the Caucus for thousands of years in a miserable state of existence all by themselves. Every ounce of innovation that they appear to have comes from a black base of knowledge, and the very fact that they did not even have a language of their own while in those caves is all the proof needed of their mental inferiority. The necessity of basic communication in accomplishing anything as a collective need not be explained. The fact that they were even placed into such a confined area, rather than being slaughtered or enslaved by those who put them in a confined area is proof of their humbling defeat as a people and the moral superiority of those who put them there.
They find it extremely difficult to acknowledge that not only are melaninated people more physically dominant, but are clearly the root and flower of human intelligence. During their early history when they left the Caucus they were educated (not civilized) and militarily trained by a rogue African priesthood, which is how they even got the name "Aryan" in the first place. The name Aryan was originally the name of a Kushite Goddess. The Tamahu were originally uniform in appearance or "pure" (as Hitler stated), in that only their genetically recessive traits defined their external anatomical features. According to the book cited above ancient Sumer was never "white", but rather "Hamitic"/Dravidian. It was the additional of those recessive traits into the gene pool that gave the region it's mixed appearance, and as the book above states "semiticized" the original black population base. This pattern that intermixed the population of Sumer followed in neighboring the Indus Valley. Both of the original inhabitants refer to the "Tamahu" (in their own names given) as savage nomads who were recent cave dwellers. They added nothing to these civilizations. Instead once they mixed in they only refined the original cultures of the black people who were there until it had nothing of value left. Hence why the area of Mesopotamia -Sumer turned into nothing more than successive war mongering barbaric states. The only thing that the descendants of those savages brag about are war victories (for a short time that is).
The Tamahu will have people think that they took over those civilizations through pure fighting superiority, when in reality they being savage Barbarians disregarded any of the formal established rules of combat that all African populations adhered to around the World. They would also always (until this last century with modern technology) try to team up with other African dominated populations to pit one against the other (South Africa with the British and Boers for recent example). In order to destroy one group while gaining the trust of the other one, and eventually taking the group that they teamed up without when their guard is down.
Unlike the melaninated peoples of the World, the Tamahu do not fight in a direct manner. They are so desperate for victory that they do not have the same since of honor as blacks have. They instead must resort to cowardly and disgraceful acts to win wars. The ancient Kemites wrote in the Heretic Papyrus about the Tamahu's dishonorable nature by referring to them as barbarians who were swine herders and Shepard (the lowest). They also referred to them as thieves who "shun a united army and do not announce the time of battle", but instead when they were ready to strike simply bum rushed unsuspecting civilizations. In other words the Tamahu were the World's first terrorist! Despite that fact however they were unsuccessful in their attacks on ancient Kemet for close to a thousand years.
Teaching for King Merykara
"Speak thus concerning the barbarian: As for the wretched Asiatic, unpleasant is the place where he is (with) trouble from water, difficulty from many trees, and the roads thereof awkward by reason of mountains. He does not dwell in one place, being driven hither and yon through want, going about [the desert] on foot. He has been fighting since the time of Horus; he never conquers, yet he is not conquered, and he does not announce a day of fighting, like a thief whom a community has driven out. But I lived, and while I existed the barbarians were as though in the walls of a fortress; [my troops] broke open [///]. I caused the Delta to smite them, I carried off their people, I took away their cattle, until the detestation of the Asiatics was against Egypt. Do not worry about him, for the Asiatic is a crocodile on his riverbank; he snatches a lonely serf, but he will never rob in the vicinity of a populous town."
Other scholars have noted how they fight. Once again it shows that they do not let their intentions known upon contact. They come into a civilization or culture as "friends", but their entire intention is to get into the civilization or culture to overtake it and hand it over to their own kind. The same thing can be said with Hip-Hop culture today. It started with token white boys like Vanilla Ice and Eminem, and since then they have tried to use their media platforms to normalize seeing our known enemies performing our art. That's why I will never co-sign the "cool white friend". They should be checked hard at every encroachment.
"First, they settles in a country in small groups and were partly assimilated. Over a period of time their numbers increased. Once they reach a numerical majority they joined forces with other Indo-European speaking groups to militarily overthrow the original inhabitants in a specific area and take political power. Since these communities occupied by the blacks often saw themselves as residents of a city-state, they would ignored the defeat of their neighbors. This typified their second form of invasion of the countries formerly ruled by the Proto-Saharans/Kushites/Blacks.
Blacks have failed even today to recognize that even though whites are highly nationalistic and engaged in numerous fratricidal wars, they tend to unify temporarily to defeat non-European people. As a result in case where the Blacks have been politically organized into states or Empires, rather than isolated city-states, the large political units have lasted for hundreds of years as typified by ancient Egypt, Axum, Mali and ancient Ghana."
Their most effective tactic is "divide and conquer" in which the Greek Philip II and his son Alexander the of Greece first use and perfect throughout their conquest across the already war torn Mediterranean. It was only through divide and conquer that Rome defeated Carthage, which could have ended Rome before it started. This strategy was used by their most famous conquerors including the later Julius Caesar and Napoleon. Many people get the misconception that it was Europe's "military might" that allowed them to colonize Africa in the 19th century, but in reality they knew that this would be their suicide, especially before the development of advanced guns of the late 1800's. In reality Europeans spent 400 years in Africa prior to colonizing it learning from the locals and pitting the people against each other. The same story is repeated with their encounters everywhere that they step.
Western Europeans Ancestors were Barbarians & They Are Constantly Stealing & or Deliberately Misapplying History
There is a constant effort by Western Europeans (especially Anglos) to tie themselves with the perceived glory of the early European civilizations Greece and Rome. They do this when they are confronted with the fact that they came from known Barbarians who were ostracized (to the point of building walls to keep them out) by the already miscegninated inhabitants of these "European" civilizations.
Tac. Ger. 4 - "For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of inter-marriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.
and
[4.109] The Budini, however, do not speak the same language as the Geloni, nor is their mode of life the same. They are the aboriginal people of the country, and are nomads; unlike any of the neighbouring races, they eat lice. The Geloni on the contrary, are tillers of the soil, eat bread, have gardens, and both in shape and complexion are quite different from the Budini. The Greeks notwithstanding call these latter Geloni; but it is a mistake to give them the name. " (The Tamahu are referred to as the "Budini")
As you've read above the Barbarian tribes who roamed throughout northeastern Europe by way of the Caucus are the ancestral legacy of modern Western European. They have nothing to do with Greece nor Rome (besides being enslaved by the latter). The Barbarians were then pushed into Western Central by a more dominant nomadic people known as the Huns. In response to being pushed out of their recently settled areas they went on a rampage that destroyed the Western Roman empire, and no civilization was put in it's place by the Barbarians. The fact that they were not intelligent enough to erect their own civilization in it's place is further confirmation that they do not come from a legacy of civilization. Western scholars just published a study in 2018 acknowledging that this migration of the "barbarians" were in fact the ancestors of contemporary Western and Central Europeans being set into their contemporary locations.
"Introduction
Western Europe underwent a major socio-cultural and economic transformation from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages (i.e., third to tenth centuries CE). This period is often characterized by two major events: the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, and its invasion by various western and eastern barbarian/non-Romanized peoples such as the Goths, Franks, Anglo-Saxons, and Vandals, as well as by nomadic Huns; as such it has come to be known as the Migration Period.
Because barbarian populations of the Migration Period left no written record, the only direct evidence of their societies comes from their archeological remains, chiefly grave goods, that have been used to make inferences about group identities, social structures, and migration patterns. Unfortunately, grave goods represent a limited and highly curated portion of material culture, and with little other archeological data available, fundamental questions about barbarian social organization and migration remain unanswered6 and vigorously debated. Were specific barbarian peoples described in texts culturally and ethnically homogeneous populations, or were they ad-hoc and opportunistic confederations of diverse, loosely connected groups? What role did biological relatedness, being that of close kinship relations or long-term shared ancestry, play in the organization of these barbarian communities and how are such relationships related to patterns of material culture?"
The "Barbarians" laid in savage ignorance in Western/Central Europe, encroaching further south and west into Northwestern Africa. They warred in that region until the Moors (Hamites & Semites of Arabia and Niger-Congo speakers of Northwestern Africa at the time) came and civilized this fresh batch of cave people through entering Spain and Italy and setting up shop for 800 years. This African Muslim occupation of Europe, is almost completely swept under the rug in most United States educational systems. No one in grade school was told of this monumental event that lead directly to Columbus discovering America and the enslavement of the World.
It is interesting when one thinks about it.....Almost like these people (The Moors) were continuing the cult of the Set worshipers (Moses) a thousand years prior. They gave these savages all of the tools needed to enslave the black World. Why would they do this? They also taught them Free Masonry and introduced Western Europeans to all sorts of secret societies based on ancient Kemetic science.*I have a theory....based on the information laid out that these pale people are really only the front group for the descendants of the Yacubist black Set worshiping cult that began in and around Kemet, and were expelled. There were blacks (The moors for example) who simply wanted to rule other blacks for wicked purposes for thousands of years, and a slave army of unconscious beings (the Tamahu) are the weapon to make that happen. All of our anger and resentment being harnessed towards them is a waste of time. As I've stated they are the by product of a low universal consciousness that will change rather the people at the top want it to or not. I believe that these black yacubist are simply taking advantage of the low period, and exploiting the ignorance of their black brothers and sisters to enjoy their power and wickedness in this era.
The Tamahu were not subjugated under the Moorish empire, but were instead educated to take over the World. As far as the Tamahu themselves are concerned the harsh reality of them being handled by their genetic parents for their own good has bruised their ego. Not to mention that during this period the Caucasoid women WERE CHOOSING! The remnants of sickle cell in Southern Europe (Spain and Italy) has largely been attributed to the Caucasoid women willfully choosing to have sex with their phallic-ally blessed African rulers.
During American enslavement African women were forced to have sex with the less phallic-ally developed Caucasian men. The "bed-wench" culture as a result of Stockholm syndrome began to take affect. It took centuries of brain washing by the Tamahu to manipulate the views of natural selection. The need for economic or sometimes social upward mobility in the evil societies that they have forced the entire World into has been a major catalyst behind the altering of natural selection even to this date.
The Tamahu continued the divide and conquer strategy. This is the story behind every victory that they have managed to secure against the original people of the planet. In the picture below depicting the Madhi rebellion look at who the British used as soldiers to quell it in the name of Britain. The same thing happened during the conquering of the Ashanti during their wars with the British as well. The British used the neighboring Hausa tribe to do the dirty work with the advanced weapons against the Ashanti. They then put the two ethnic groups along with a few others into one colonial district that they call Nigeria today. This is the story of their imperialism.
Their lack of a higher conscious as a result of a calcified pineal gland characterizes the Tahamu interaction with the natural World. The natural animals of the World did not become endangered or extinct until the Tamahu arrived on every land. The Tiger population for example shown below depicts the historic range of the beautiful cat versus the current range. All of this murder of these beautiful cats like every animal on Earth coincide with height of European imperialism and the famed game hunting of the British that the engaged in on every continent with just about every large reputable animal;
Not only are they a threat to actual aboriginal people, but every living thing on this Earth. Perhaps..that is why they are the only creatures that are killed from simple exposure from the life giving sun.
They blindly and enthusiastically fight in wars where they know that they have the advantage, and just to realize after their caveman blood lust wears down the catastrophic mistakes that they have made due their ego (they will call it "ignorance")...This is a pattern only with whites.
The entire point of the existence of these Devil's is to keep consciousness low among our people through their subjugation of their evil societies. They fear the results of consciousness rises. The return of consiousness in the Universe is represented by the return of the star Sirius B as told by the Dogon (who Caucasians now trail all day everyday).
The Devils understand fully who what we are, and are taking advantage of a dormant consciousness. They try to act as resistors to our current.
The Breakdown of African Civilization - The time right before the big 2,500 year drop in World Consciousness
THE LAST BLACK STRONGHOLD OF THE WORLD'S ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS
Since the first non black (mixed) group were recorded (the Hyksos) shortly after the release of the Tamahu from their imprisonment in the caves of the Caucus (2,000 BC) the ancient Bronze Age civilizations were thrust into seemingly endless race wars of control of ancient Atlantean knowledge. The civilizations originally founded by African migrants outside of Africa like Mesopotamia, Indus Valley, Minoan, China etc were overran by the depigmented mutants, who today pretend to have always owned them (similar to how black cultures in the US were and are still overran and usurped like Rock n Roll, Hip hop, Dub Step etc etc). Kemet and most importantly Nubia were the last bastions of black domination in the ancient World. For around 1,000 years after the Hyksos, Kemet essentially had to become imperial to protect itself from inevitably being swallowed by white barbarians who continuously tried to attack. Kemet never lost to these Asiatics, and amassed a substantial number of prisoners of war. As is traditional in African customs these POW's were eventually freed into the Kemetic society. These non black POW's particularly in the north in the Delta had began to be overrun the region. Through willing submission and fake loyalty to the culture these non black leaches essentially became the gate keepers in the civilization just by their proxy location at Kemet's northern entrance.
Ramses II -Battle of Kadesh Ramses II
Ramses II - Sea Peoples - via Libya
Thutmoses - Battle of Megiddo
King Tutankhamen - Assyrians
RAMSES III Kemet's Last Great Pharaoh
Ramses III was the last pharaoh of Kemet to have unwavering authority over both northern and southern Kemet. No natives thought to challenge his rule, and as such black unification was in place in the face of albinoid danger. This examples shows that without the element of surprise or deception the Albinoids did not stand a chance in a head on battle against an organized melaninated army. Below is an exert from the divine book by Cheikh Anta Diop African Origins of Civilization that details the major Battle between Ramses III's all black army and the Indo-Aryan/Kakasoid Sea Peoples (discussed in sections above) who overran all adjacent areas of the Mediterranean.
"This lasted until Setnekht created the Twentieth Dynasty (1200). After he had reigned for two years, his son, Ramses III, succeeded him under extremely difficult conditions. He had to face a new invasion of "sea peoples," by land and sea, especially by the Palestinian Philistines...... The most formidable coalition ever witnessed during Antiquity was formed against the Egyptians. It comprised the whole group of white-skinned peoples who had been unstable since the first migrations in the thirteenth century; . . . .. . Thanks to superior organization, the Egyptian armed forces scored a dual victory, on land and sea, over that second alliance. The fleet of the "Peoples of the North" was entirely destroyed and the invasion route through the Delta was cut. At the same time a third coalition of the same white-skinned Indo-Aryans was being assembled, again in Libya, against the Black Egyptian nation.
Yet, this was not a racial conflict in the modern sense. To be sure, the two hostile groups were fully conscious of their ethnic and racial differences, but it was much more a question of the great movement of disinherited peoples of the north toward richer and more advanced countries. Ramses III demolished that third coalition as he had destroyed the first two. ...... Such was invariably the procedure for acclimating white-skinned persons in Egypt, a process that became especially widespread during the low period. By bearing this in mind, we may avoid attributing a purely imaginary role to people who contributed absolutely nothing to Egyptian civilization. Ramses III then carried his defense to Phoenicia (Djahi, in Ancient Egyptian9), on the northern frontier of the Egyptian Empire. He took personal command of the fleet and, near the Palestinian coast, he annihilated the fourth coalition in 1191 B.C.E
This disaster was unprecedented; the enemy fleet was totally destroyed to prevent its escape. A new slave labor force was now available. But he could not import an entire people into Egypt. So he settled them on the very land where they had been defeated. This was the origin of the Philistines. The "sea peoples" were definitely demoralized after that setback. Yet, we can understand, after all those upheavals, to what extent the ancient ethnic groups must have been disrupted all around the Mediterranean, except for Egypt which alone had been able to repulse the Indo-Aryan invasion. Meanwhile, the Libyans in the western part of the Delta, were organizing still another coalition, the fifth directed against the Black Egyptian nation by the Indo-Europeans. Ramses III defeated them at Memphis in 1188 B.C.E After that date the White Libyans never again revolted against Egypt, but they tried by every possible means to infiltrate peacefully and to settle there as serfs or semi-serfs, working at various kinds of manual labor, as farmers or artisans, especially in the Delta.
These people, whose alien slave origin was obvious, would gradually be freed by Egyptian law. Later, some would become notables as a reward for "loyal" services to the Egyptian ruler. Yet, their slave origin would never be forgotten by the true Egyptian national, even when they took advantage of troubled periods to exercise control of a given district in the Delta where military command had been entrusted to them by the Pharaoh. We shall see how these foreign elements, who felt no real sentimental attachment to Egyptian soil, were to undermine political mores beginning with Psammetichus. To protect the country against invasion, Ramses III had to resort to conscription, drafting one Egyptian national out of ten (cf. Pirenne, II, 476). Because of their immunity, we do not know whether this measure was applicable to the temple properties. Since Ramses II, Libyans and other White foreigners who were recruited into the auxiliary armed services had farmed land belonging to the royal domain, of which the well-informed Egyptian administration kept a strict accounting. To prevent their flight in troubled periods, Ramses III had them all branded with the seal of the local administration. This old Egyptian practice leaves no doubt about their slave status, whether they were farmers in peacetime or enrolled in the auxiliary forces in time of war. Authors often misuse the term "mercenaries" to designate those who were, in fact, slaves bearing the indelible mark of their royal master. . . . The Egyptian army was losing its nationality. It was rapidly becoming a force of free mercenaries or semi-slaves commanded by national officers; only the high command and a few detachments of archers remained Egyptian (cf. Pirenne, II, 477). This procedure reached its climax under the Libyan usurpers of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty, more precisely, under Psammetichus."
-The African Origins of Civilization -Cheikh Anta Diop
It is also apparent that Caucasians saw it as better to live in our African system among our people that they were willing first to get killed in battle trying to gain entrance, and then rather than going back to their all white Utopia they actually offered to relegate themselves to a low social status just to live among us. According to the actions of Caucasians it was better for whites to live at our feet than it is for them to stand on their own. For these reasons I ignore their current proclamations of supremacy!
Since 1765 B.C.E. (a mere 235 years after they were released from the caves) when the treacherous mixed race Set worshiping Hyksos were allowed into Kemet, these Typhonians/Devils (their original name) have signaled nothing more than war and chaos to the World as was stated by the ancient Kemites. This constant state of war that suddenly began to characterize civilizations is the beginning of a World War between white and black.The Kemites according to Dr. Chancellor Williams trusted these non black foreigners enough to allow them into the African kingdom known as the "black land" slowly. This process began to amalgamate the population in the Northern most region around the Delta. This trust lead to a catastrophe for our people.
"The Destruction of Black Civilization"
Internal political strife within Kemet "the black land" centered around the loyalties of mixed breed individuals who were being deliberately bred by genetically recessive males from the outside. This was a wicked yet ingenious plan on the part of the recessives to use the natural love that Africans have for those who carry our lineage, and the mentally prepped mulattoes who would carry out their plans against their "own" people in the interest of the recessives.
The individual who is mixed race is not a problem, because he or she is born mixed race. Those mixed race individuals who are ambiguous with their identity are the problem. The Boondocks did a powerful episode about the legend of "Catcher Freeman". The plantation owner's son (a mulatto) was caught in the loyalty with a planned slave rebellion, and wanting to be accepted by his father who also held him in bondage. The fence riding mentality that is the danger to black unity is the target of this brilliant episode.
MIXED LOYALTIES & THE MODERN PATTERNS THAT MIRROR THE ANCIENT DESTRUCTION OF BLACK CULTURE & CIVILIZATION
It is very important to relate the lessons from history to modern day context!
Below are more modern examples of fence riding mulattoes, and in particularly those who use their black ancestry to enter into and eventually amalgamate our black culture for their recessive side. The Breakfast Club shock jock Charlemagne pointed out how the mulatto rapper "Logic" exploits his black side that he never outwardly identifies with for our culture that he markets to and for the genetically recessive side that he identifies more closely with. His name "Logic" is an underhanded slap in the face to the black hip hop culture, as to say that his "superior genetically recessive genes" enables an introduction of "logical" (genetically recessive) thought in a genre full of brain dead Negroes. Too bad none of his albums don't really produce....HITS! It appeals to genetically recessive people, and illustrates a classic mulatto game. The shock jock brutally pointed this out, and Logic obviously did not have a response. He instead had what looks to be a pale boy melt down. The widely publicized mayo pity party did however boost his sales for week. Rapper like Drake are also in this same category, and this is why they will be promoted to non black audiences. Once they are validated by the black culture (through paying old busted down black artist who earned reputations from back in the day) they attempt to run off with it to genetically recessive land, who wouldn't otherwise know anything about what black folks have created. People who identify as black would NEVER insult our people in this manner (blackface). Drake however is a Jewish Canadian raised in a wealthy Jewish suburb, was an actor on a pale mutant show full of pale mutants doing pale things. This mixed breed Canadian was heavily cosigned by the hottest name in the game at the time Lil Wayne (2009), and from that spring board the media corporations backed this mixed Jewish rapper like they've never done any rapper in history. A short generation of kids were brain washed into thinking that Drake and Eminem are legit top rappers through constant media- social media propaganda.
On the other hand we have a mixed individual like J-Cole (white mother) who identifies as "black"! His music, political views and swag reflect that he identifies as black. In fact he is one of those mulattoes that you'd almost have to see his white mother to know that he is actually mixed rather simply a light skinned Negro. "Fire Squad" check the lyrics around 2:55.
Different Mulattoes! One is certainly on the melanianted side, while the others are ambiguous. "The Destruction of Black Civilization" states in it's solution chapters that special recognition must be given to the J-Cole - mixed folk of the World who despite the social-economic disadvantages identifies with the melanianted side. The Negroes who trusted the non black POW's FORGOT the lessons of the Hyksos written on the walls 1,000 years prior, and had to learn the lesson harder! Some of the Negroes in Africa and particularly America today have forgotten the lessons of not only slavery, but Jim Crow that ended in the lifetimes of present generations.
After the Aryans invaded the Indus Valley civilization in modern day Pakistan it was destroyed, and the subdued inhabitants who did not flee further eastward were placed in a horrific ancestry- color based system that still goes on to this date. The Indians placed at the top were the lightest in complexion known as the Brahims and those placed at the bottom are the black skinned Sudras and the mixed class offspring beneath them are called "untouchables".
The same thing happened in Haiti after the war for independence was won. This is the dangers of blacks lending their genetics to whites. If the black parent is not insistent that their mixed race child is raised to identify as black then they have failed the entire black race. This is because they instead of using their melaninated genetics to create a new young unambiguous solider for the race they chose to use their genetics to create an individual that can go either way...That strengthen the race to you dumb ass "love is love/love has no boundaries/race has nothing to do with love swirlers" reading this....
LISTEN TO THE SILLY, DUFUS, COON AZZ IN THE PURPLE SHIRT. THESE MF'S NEED TO BE DEALT WITH....., BECAUSE THEY ARE LETTING HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF TO OUR PEOPLE'S DETRIMENT. IT IS ALL DUE TO THEM REFUSING TO TRAIN THEMSELVES TO BE LOYAL TO YOUR RACE. THEY INSTEAD FALL FOR TE-LIE-VISION PROPAGANDA TO DESTROY OUR RACE THROUGH A LACK OF EXCLUSIVITY.
BRAZIL - AN EXAMPLE OF THE DETRIMENT OF SWIRLING TO BLACKS
Brazil receives the majority of the enslaved Africans during the Transatlantic slave trade, and after the emancipation of those Africans the majority of the nation's populations was black. To level out the social-political power that blacks would soon gain the white elites of Brazil literally imported thousands of Eastern European trash to literally "whiten up" the country. The end result is a huge population of mixed race people coming from a nation that was relatively recently majority black. It has only been about 10 years that these mixed race individuals started to acknowledged their black ancestry, and identify as "mixed", which makes "mixed" people the majority of the population. Those same "mixed" folks treated the undeniably black folks like complete shit, because they wanted to appease to the side with the power. You have slow black males who say dumb shat like "if we mix races then there would be no more racism" or "I'm going to go on a swirling campaign to "hurt the white man", which they really are only trying to justify their lust for translucent flesh due to their sickening inferiority complexes. Swirling mindsets begin young and tends to be in the household (child of a coon), and are almost exclusively due to the propaganda of the sexualization of genetically recessive people. In the words of Dr. Umar Johnson...that weak shit can not be respected by me, and I think that the evidence that I present should suffice for justification of my views. Don't care about "hurt feelings" when telling the TRUTH. My peoples survival is more important than YOUR FEELINGS! The Hapi Valley Last Stand - 25th Dynasty Did It For The Culure!
The original black dynastic culture on the Kemetic end of Hapi Valley civilization was being tainted and destroyed by the whackness of the pale Asiatic and European imitators who made it their life's mission to gain access to what we do. The end result of Mena Narmer's managed integration policy (which is what really distinguished Kemet from the regions south of the first cataract following unification) ended with those non Africans immigrants almost completely destroying the culture that they appropriated. This was enough for the Africans south of the first cataract to say enough is enough, and march down the river to set the culture straight once again. Ending the Third Intermediate period in ancient Kemet following the Libyan Dynasties, Nubian pharaoh Piye conquered a divided Kemet in 747 B.C., and his Nubian dominance was reinforced by his successor Shabaka and later his successor Shebitku in face of Assyrian threats against control of Kemet. The pharaoh Taharqa followed Shebitku in reign, and lead this 25th dynasty to initial victory against the Assyrians. This repelled them from Kemet and from neighboring Jerusalem (thus saving the "Hebrews" from destruction which is a historical event noted in the bible) thus maintaining a brief period of peace in in the region on top of his 15 year reign. He restored many temples, and reinstated the old ways in ancient Kemet. The map above fails to show what was the greatest territorial extent of Taharqa's Kingdom at the height of the Dynasty. The limit went as far as modern day Spain where ancient inscriptions clearly relay Taharqa's dominion over the land.
As stated the Assyrians lead by king Esarhaddon (black) made an unsuccessful attempt to enter Kemet before successfully doing so with the treacherous (they let them sweep right into Delta) acts of the mixed blood native born kings of the North (who began to dominate this region towards the later dynasties). It is with the defeat of Taharqa (25th Dynasty Nubian pharaoh of Kemet) that northern Kemet was taken over by the Assyrians (originally were also black). Though Southern Kemet was thoroughly held in African grip.
Taharqa (named as a powerful King in the Bible).
After Taharqa's death two years after his defeat a new coalition of our people was formed under Shabaka's son pharaoh Tanutamon that repelled the Assyrian control of the north, and made the treasonous kings of northern Kemet humbly surrender their support for Assyria. The Assyrians retaliated and advanced south and sacked Thebes. This event begins the Late Period of Kemetic history, and this is also the 26th Dynasty.
It was during this 26th Dynasty period from Upper Kemet and Kush that most of our ancestors eventually migrated into their contemporary locations in Western, Central and Southern Africa. Herodotus also confirms that a 250,000 strong southward migration of Kemetic soldiers occurred around the 7th and 6th century B.C.E. as a result of Assyrian appointed ruler of the Kemet, Psamtik I making the mixed race Greek mercenaries (paid to kill) the new defense for a weakened Kemet. Herodotus's account coincides with what is actually recorded in ancient Kemet. Those native Kemites in the army were distraught over the preferential treatment that the Greek soldiers appeared to have got, which caused rebellions, and perpetuated the southward migrations of our people from Kemet as described by Herodotus.
At the time Assyria was rife with civil war that preoccupied it's army, and this allowed Psamtik I to wave off Assyrian authority with the newly formed alliance with the Greek mercenaries as he planned. After the collapse of the Assyrian empire and it's control over Kemet Psamtik II extended Kemetic control into neighboring Nubia again.
The next pharaoh was Apries (Wahibre), who like and unlike Taharqa attempted to defend Jerusalem from the Babylonians and was unsuccessful in doing so. Apries like Psamtik I also promoted the use of Greek mercenaries in Kemet's army. In defending a following attack on neighboring vassal Libya, by Dorian Greeks, Kemet's army was defeated. This lead to native Kemites to distrust in Apries, because they believed that Apries plotted to lose as a way to reaffirm Greek mercenaries a prominent place in Kemet's army. As a result civil war broke out between the native Kemites and the mixed race Greek mercenaries. This lead to a rebellion in Thebes in which native Kemite soldiers declared one of Apries generals "Amasis" the pharaoh. With the support of the native Kemite army Ahmose II (Amasis was his imposed Greek name) took the throne, which lead to several attacks in which Apries gathered foreign armies (Babylon) to reassert his power. With the contentious aid of Greek mercenaries Ahmose II defeated Apries for control of the North, while Apries held the middle region of Kemet. He attacked once again and was defeated and killed by Ahmose II (buried with honors). Ahmoses II then had control of all of Kemet. The continuous threat from the rising also mixed race Persia meant that an extended alliance with the Greeks for the battle wary Kemet was necessary to maintain to keep it's sovereignty under Ahmoses II until his death in 526 B.C.E. Psamtik III the son of Ahmose II reigned for 6 months after Ahmose II's death before the Persians overcame the "alliance" (largely due to the treacherous Greeks mercenaries recanting their alliance with Kemet before the battle) and ushered in Persian control.
Divide and conquer - A "Egyptian" servant of the Psamtik III was sent to Persia where he angrily told the Persians a secret regarding the Kemetic military that proved to have been effective in battle. Here is what Herodotus stated regarding the battle that took Kemet.
"Polyaenus (Greek) claims that Cambyses (Persian King) had his men carry the "sacred" animals (cats) in front of them to the attack. The Egyptians did not dare to shoot their arrows for fear of wounding the animals, and so Pelusium was stormed successfully. Herodotus, however makes no mention of any such strategy."
Kemet eventually wrestled away from Persian control in 404 B.C.E during the 30th Dynasty. The last native Kemetic pharaoh was Nectanebo II, in which Kemet prospered under. Following yet another alliance of Greece and Persia who again attacked and defeated the threat of a rising Kemet. The Greeks (our one time allies) who came in next under Alexander, and renamed Kemet "Egypt". The Greeks who were aware of the debt of that their own knowledge had great respect towards the "Kemites" and the traditions. The Romans would come in after that. Then the spread of Islam would bring in the Arabs.
Invincible Nubia
Possible migration routes of Bantu from Central Sudan
While the Africans of Kemet proper struggled to oust the Assyrian and Persians the wealthy nation of Kush just further to the south was never invaded by these Asiatic powers. Remember that while Kush did lose the gained territory of Kemet to the Assyrians, Kemet was simply their colony at the time not their home base. The Assyrians did not dare try to invade the home base as they loosely had control of the rebellious Kemites in the south on the Nubian border as it stood. The Assyrian invaders as mentioned were eventually ousted by the native Kemites. Then in comes the Persians. After their cowardly tactics of strapping the sacred cats to their soldiers chest the Persians charged in at the battle of Pelusium. This act got them into Kemet during 525 BC. Herodotus reports however that the Persian ruler Cambyses attempted to take over Kush after sacking Thebes in southern Kemet. He sent two campaigns heading into Nubia. One was stated to have succumb to inadequate preparation for the voyage, and coupled with the response of a counter Nubian campaign forced them to redraw back into Kemet. The other came by way of the Kemetic Western Desert comprised of over 50,000 soldiers. This second group was Cambyses so-called "Lost Army" that was supposedly lost in a "sandstorm" that consumed them, but in reality the Nubians who they came for tapped that azz.
After defeating the Persians, the Greek ruler Alexander felt compelled to test his luck by following the real Kemetic populations of southern Kemet in the new African stronghold of Meroe further up in Nubia where the gold, sacred ostrich feathers, frankincense and myrrh was. The story that is never told however is that the Queen of Kush at the time was awaiting Alexander perched on top of a Nubian war elephant, and backed by a ready Kushite army. Alexander did not want that action, so he peacefully took his pale azz back to what had become the Greek Provence of "Egypt". The Romans would later attempt to do the exact same thing after they had taken over the old Greek territories including "Egypt". The Romans were defeated in battle against a female lead Kushite army. The Nubians even enticed war with the Romans by going into Thebes and decapitating the Roman Emperors statue. The success of the Nubians in defeating the Roman army is seen in the fact that Nubia never paid tribute to Rome, unlike other nation who has gone against Rome. Western scholars will rarely call it for what it was.
Meroetic Kushite empire remained in tact for over a millennium, but due to internal African warfare with the Africans of Axum (horn of Africa) the Kushite kingdom eventually collapsed. The success of the Axumite empire brought a rise of Christianity into the region. Around the 7th century A.D. however Muslims attempted on two occasions to invade Nubia by way of "Roman - Egypt", but both attempts were, thwarted. The accuracy of the Kushite's archer's was recorded to have left many Arabs blind with the arrows being aimed at their eyes. Through treaty offered by the pesky Arabs they were allowed to trade in Nubian territory on their third attempt, which was peaceful. Slavery was a factor in the treaty to end the pesky Arabs attempts to take over Nubian land. This Arab treaty pitted Africans against Africans subsequently. Once the Arabs were in the land they have brought over a millennium of barbarous slavery and abuse of the descendants of the "friendly African" who let those whom initially let their ill intentions known.
Lesson here is value the divinity of the Melanin that's inside of you!
|
|
|
Post by asante on Jan 1, 2014 23:44:12 GMT -5
The information of the current thread is directly linked to this thread.
The Hapi ValleyThe Roman invaders renamed the African named " Hapi"/" Happy River", into "the Nile", " Nil". Latin - Definition of " nil" - " : NOTHING, ZERO... Tricknology 101 Thank you Dr. Ben "THE WHOLE EFFORT OF MODERN SCIENCE, UNTIL THE PAST FEW YEARS, HAS CONSISTED IN DENYING, DESPITE THE FACTS, THIS ROLE OF THE NEGRO IN THE ACQUISITION OF CIVILIZATION".. C.A. DIOP; AFRICAN ORIGINS OF CIVILIZATION, PG 250
"OUR PRIDE IN OUR HISTORY IS NOT DETERMINED BY THEIR LIBERAL SENTIMENTS, BUT RATHER HARD EVIDENCE" - Ivan Van Sertima
link
Table Content:
POST # 1
1) Introduction - Main Thesis *The Bio-Cultural Designation of Our People As "Niger-Congo" Speakers *You Have to Know the History Before You Know The Mystery *White Lies
2) Examining Pre-Historic Evidence *Usage of the Term "Negroid" * The Racial Affinities of the Oldest AMH (Anatomically Modern Human) Remains in the Kemet *The Great Sphinx's True Age, Racial identification and Historical Implications *The Natufians, who were they; what did they look like and social-politics associated with those facts
3) The Language Factor Controlling The Narrative Exposing the Lies of Mainstream Linguistics & Spot lighting True Linguistic Relationships * The creation and promotion of the false "Afro-Asiatic" Language *Examining the false narrative of the "J. Greenberg Bantu Migration" *Examining the evidence of ancient Northeast African presence and origins of the Bantu-Niger Congo speaker *Examining the close relationship, co-mingling, and joint migrations between Niger-Congo speakers and so called "Afro-Asiatic" languages
4)The Origin of Civilization in Nubia and it's spread around the old World *The Fertile Ancient Sahara Period & the Next Phase of Civilizations *The Phantom African Population - Dravidian/Tamil Factor *Listing of ancient Civilizations and the Evidence of their African Bio-Cultural Affinities by World Regions *The Near East/Sub continent *The Levant and Aegean *The Tamahu/Whites and their affect on the already Listed Originally Melaninated Cultures/Civilizations in Europe and Asia *West Africa- Dhar Tichitt & the Mande
5)The Bio-Cultural Affinities between Niger-Congo speakers and ancient Kemet
6)The Genetic Evidence of Mass Migrations of "Niger-Congo" Speakers from Nubia-Kemet into Sub Saharan Africa *Pre-Genetic era theories of mass migration from Northeastern African Civilizations *Modern Genetic Evidence to validate the migrations * Recent Controversies created from Disingenuous scholars
POST #2
7)Modern Day Inhabitants of "Egypt" and the False Narrative of Their Claims to the Ancient Legacy of the land
8) Distinct Africoid Populations who Comprised the populations of ancient Kemet *Discuss the Twa and their pivotal role in the creation of all civilizations *Reading in between the lines to breakdown the populations of ancient Kemet based on biological information using UNESCO 1974 findings as a basis
9)Examining the Evidence of the Second and Third Genesis of Hapi Valley Civilization Starting Up in "Eastern Asia" and in the "Americas" *Eastern Asia's African origins *Ancient China's Hapi Valley - Indus Valley connections *Genetic Information on the Americas first inhabitants *Bio-cultural evidence of the Olmec's Africoid Origins *The Context of the "Race Wars" in Pre-Colonial Americas *The evidence of a continued lineage among the ancient and modern blacks of America
10) The Tamahu - The Whites *The examination of their "mythical" Origins with modern evidence to validate or rebuke *Biological evidence not publicly known that distinguishes the Tamahu from Melaninated People *The Semitic Branch *A brief summary of the History that our people have had with the Tamahu over time *The legacy of the Tamahu
11)The Breakdown of African Civilization - The time right before the big 2,500 year drop in World Consciousness *Our dealing with the rise of the Semites and the Tamahu and the end of our dominance around the Globe *Ramses III and the successful last stand that was put up against them *The Destruction of Black Civilization - From Within/The Mulatto Factor *The End of Kemet and the rise of the Tamahu lead nations *Nubia and it's impeccable resistance to outside invaders until it's end
POST #3
*The Rise of interior African civilizations as a result of the scattering of our people through "Sub Saharan Africa" following the destruction of our unity in Northeastern Africa *More Cultural Comparisons between ancient Kemet and modern populations throughout "Sub Saharan Africa"
Main Thesis
Alkebulan On TopThe real position of Earth is upside down as opposed to that which we are accustomed to seeing on so called "normal" (Eurocentric) images of the Earth. Below is a Moorish (indicated by the colonization of southern Europe seen at the bottom) map which shows African states and the actual black African reference to this most ancient land which modern people migrated from.
Article
Let's start with the acknowledgment of these two pivotal facts. The Bio-Cultural Designation of Our People As "Niger-Congo" Speakers
* Bantu is the largest sub grouping within the "Niger Congo" languages If you notice I tend to put quotation marks around the term "Niger-Congo", because ultimately it is a Western designation for our group. While Bantu sounds good to call us, we must remember that the West African populations whom still have overlapping linguistic ties and are genetically bound with Bantus, do not fully speak "Bantu" languages. The issue is....We don't even have a collective non Western derived name for our greater African family to refer to ourselves. This must be addressed. The Africans who came with the Pre-Columbian Olmec and Mande migrations to the Americas and the transatlantic enslaved trade are almost exclusively of this "Niger-Congo" African genetic stock as the studies immediately following the next paragraph lays out.Indigenous Africans house over 90% of the human genetic diversity. This fact essentially disproves the notion of race as we know it. Pale/depigmented people for example are a "genetic condition" rather than a "race". From a genetic perspective the only groups on Earth that can be legitimately distinguished into "races" are the different types of Africoid ("Sub Saharan Africans" in the graphic below) populations. There is more genetic diversity between two Africans in what is today "Nigeria" than there is between an Irish and a Han Chinese individual.
(Tishkoff 2009)
"In addition, craniometric variation also shows agreement with genetic data in showing highest levels of diversity in sub-Saharan Africa than in other geographic regions (Relethford and Harpending, 1994). Further, there is a clear decline in levels of craniometric variation as geographic distance from East Africa increases (Manica et al., 2007; von Cramon-Taubadel and Lycett, 2008; Betti et al., 2009)." -- John H. Relethford* (2010). Population-Specific Deviations of Global Human Craniometric Variation From a Neutral Model. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 2010
and
"Africa is the source of all modern humans, but characterization of genetic variation and of relationships among populations across the continent has been enigmatic...We identified 14 ancestral population clusters in Africa that correlate with self-described ethnicity and shared cultural and/or linguistic properties....The ancestry of African Americans is predominantly from Niger-Kordofanian (~71%)" - Tishkoff 2009 The second fact There were numerous Pre-Historic migrations from Africa that brought our people into every corner of the Earth long before the establishment and expansion of "historical" civilizations, and it was later Africoid (an indigenous African population) migrants who established those civilizations. There is a persistent yet debunked Western lie that traditional African boats (such as those made from reed as seen on walls of Kemet) could not sail very far or that Africans did not travel outside of Africa unless enslaved. The fact that the oldest humans on every continent are Africoid means that all attempts by haters to say that later groups of Africans were incapable of doing so can be flicked off. Those populations who descend from those who usurped our lands and civilizations often get offended at the mentioning of these facts. Their pride has been entangled in what our ancestors taught their ancestors. This is a paradigm shift to those who are used to the false and recent notion of Africans needing to be "civilized".
The oldest permanent structure on Earth is Adam's Calendar in South Africa. This ancient astrological structure is on the same 31 degree longitudinal line as the Great Zimbabwe and the Great pyramid of Giza, and is over 200,000 years old. This along with recent genetic evidence indicates that the earliest of man may have originated in Southern Africa, diverged genetically from the Twa and the San and migrated north and east towards the Great Lakes where they would later interact with the Twa of Central Africa, and from there migrate north along the Hapi River. The Twa ("pygmies") who dominated Central Africa and parts of the Great Lakes were considered the progenitors of civilization. It is from the Great Lakes where the ancient Kemites claim to have originated ("the Mountains of the Moon where the God Hapi Dwells"). It is not to mention that the first Christ figure was the Twa deity Bes who would later become the God "Heru" in Hapi Valley mythology. It is from "Heru" of Hapi Valley civilization that the modern Jesus "Christ" story came. Take note of the fact that the only living humans with an actual recollection of dealing with the Annunaki are modern Africans.
The people who have been deemed "African Americans" (since Jessie Jackson coined the term in the late 1980's), "Afro Brazilian", and other African diaspora throughout the continents of America who are generally of the E-M2 lineage, ancestors belonged to the Western classified Niger-Congo/Kordofanian languages, have broad facial features (Western defined as "true Negro") are the living inheritors of the legacy of ancient Hapi Valley civilization.
WE DID NOT ORIGINATE IN THE AREAS SHOWN IN THE MAP ABOVE (WEST, SOUTH, CENTRAL AFRICA), BUT AS ATTESTED TO BY THE ORAL TRADITION OF EVERY ETHNIC GROUP WE ORIGINATED IN NORTHEASTERN AFRICA, IN PARTICULARLY NUBIA. FROM NUBIA OUR ANCESTORS EXPANDED NORTHWARD CREATING KEMET AND ESTABLISHING DYNASTIC CIVILIZATIONS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
"It was pointed out that the study of the Blacks must begin in Egypt because most of their indestructible monuments are there ; and, further, because many of the artifacts archaeologists have been uncovering during the past seventy-five years as "Egyptian" are in fact "African ." Yet the very "Heartland of the Race" and the cradle of civilization were actually further south below the First Cataract, centered around the capital cities of Napata and Meroe . From there black civilization spread north, reaching its most spectacular achievements in what became known as "Egyptian Civilization ."
Destruction of Black Civilization Pg 44-45 YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE HISTORY BEFORE YOU LEARN THE MYSTERY!
Prior to the declining period of World consciousness around 10,000 B.C (the end of the Atlantean Zenith) when the World was entirely melaninated, we have a transition in civilization centering into a physical realm that is centered along the Hapi Valley and in the ancient fertile Sahara. Dynastic civilization starting as early as the 6th millennium BC beginning with Nubia/Saba/Ta-Seti in the areas between Sudan and the Southeastern Africa. The Qustul incense burner is the proof of Nubia being the oldest dynastic civilization on Earth, as it illustrates not only the World's first writing system known as Medu Neter (incorrectly credited widely as the "hieroglyphs" to the adjacent Kemetic Africans) but also the World's first monarchy (with notation of 12 more rulers prior to the one depicted).
There is a clumsy yet widespread Western lie that our people were essentially "stationary" for around 10,000 years following an initial Western migration from Eastern Africa around 12,000 BC. Western scholars (J. Greenberg) then clam that from a West African point that is now "Cameroon" there was a sudden emergence and major dispersal of "Bantu" branch speaking Niger-Congo speakers into Central, South-Eastern, and Southern African origin to which they call the "Bantu Migration". This falsified history was put in place to mislead the World about who we are, and what we have accomplished as a people over the last 12,000 years. Particularly the West wishes to deny our connection to Hapi Valley civilization, and the subsequent fact that our people created every civilization in the World. The lie is thoroughly exposed in the following sections with the use of recent genetic evidence, linguistic and archaeological evidence. There is overwhelming evidence that our people had a dominant and long standing presence along the Hapi Valley from interior eastern Africa down into the Delta along the Mediterranean going back as far as the Nazlet Khater man found in "Egypt" over 33,000 years (also discussed in the next section). Hapi Valley civilization is tens of thousands of years old, and has gone through many zeniths. If we wish to include it as evidence (some do not) we can count at least 25,000 years according to the supposed Emerald Tablets of Thot. It is interesting that that date correlates with the so called "Doomsday Clock Theory" (or reawakening of consciousness for the original people) regarding the age of Great Pyramids of Giza and the Sphinx proposed by Graham Hancock..
To reiterate the post Atlantis era of civilization began with Nubia (starting between the 6th and 4th millennium BC) as it is the oldest, longest lasting and greatest (most contributing) civilization in World History. The concept of Nubia and Kemet being two seperate nations is a Western fallacy that was set in place in order to imply that there were racial distinctions in the region. There was a series of migration of the Africans from the Hapi River Valley that formed the basis for all civilizations around the World. The age and shear depth of knowledge that showered the World from this continuous Hapi Valley civilization is insulted by the mere 5,000 year date given by "traditional"(proven to be racist liars) Western historians and their paid stooges.
White Lies
The Piltdown Man - Breaking Away from "Orthodox History" White people during the heyday of their overt scientific racism (19th to late 20th century) were in agony over the indisputable facts that humanity and civilization originated with melaninated Africans. These facts came through their own "scholar's" consistent findings (some shown below). To remedy their deflated egos, they resorted to gluing together various parts from hominoids and primates skulls to make a fake skull. They then claimed to discover this abomination in England/Europe in order to give Europeans the claims to the origins of humanity. The white Western World let this shit ride for decades before someone finally stepped up to end the madness....This is who we are dealing with! This is how far they took it to steal a legacy that does not belong to them. For this reason EVERYTHING that they present even to this day MUST be taken with a grain of salt and independently investigated.
To this very day whites are obsessed with manufacturing a false history for themselves through stealing our stories carved on the walls of the temples of the civilizations along the Hapi River.
Whites are quite simply impostors, and their TV (tel-lie-vision) and major social media platforms are their main tools used to propagate their lies. Their entire identity in every region that they inhabit is the direct result of a Frankenstein-like patch job of aspects from the various aboriginal black cultures that they have encountered. Their languages are not even theirs! The Indo-European language is a collective hodgepodge of languages that existed among the blacks of Asia and Europe that they stolen from (further explained below). Let's take the modern use of the word "bro". If you listen to any conversation between white boys of an age range from 14-35, "bro" is a regular noun in their vocabulary that they think is "all American" (meaning white). In reality the word "bro" is short for "brother", which is short for the 1960's-70's black term of endearment "Soul Brother" (proof from an 80's flick). If you tell these silly young white boys who have been programmed to hate melaninated people this truth about his daily vocabulary he will deny it. Meaning that nothing taught or contributed by us to them for their enlightenment can be appreciated by them! That goes for civilization nor even the use of speech can be appreciated by them. That is proof that integration with them is impossible, without the destruction of the other people involved. Those who are not aware of the truth are those who are indoctrinated into this society, and who sadly often take their lies at face value. The people (all racial groups in the West) who do believe these lies find themselves worshiping genetic pale recessiveness, and eventually through programming choose recessive people over their own people to mate with. It's due to being mislead into a shameful pattern of self hate . The proponents for this coonery will say shit like it's "my preference" or "you love you who you love" or "love has no boundaries". When in reality it's not "preference", it is socially engineered (Coming from Top of the line media and pornography sites marketing whites and their pets as the default "hot" category) fetishes. The "You love who you love" rhetoric doesn't seem to apply to BROKE PEOPLE... It's amazing how weak minded race trading swirlers will not let racial lines (to the detriment of your own race) deter them from love, but can't seem to look below the poverty line for their mate through that powerful force known as "love". Societal convenience in the form of "exotic sex"/fetishization and access into the gentrified world is the primary reasons for this "love", by those who do not care about the black race, or at least sticks it's value to a low place on the totem (further discussed in the next post).
Examining Pre-Historic Evidence
33,000 Year Old "Negroid" Skull Is The Oldest Human Found In Nubia-Kemet
,Prior to advent of dynastic civilizations starting with Nubia in the 6-4th millennium B.C.E. there was still a cultural continuum along the Hapi Valley (both Nubia and Kemet) demonstrated through what Western scholars have coined the Nubian complex. This culture originated deep in inner East Africa stretching north into Kemet and was found extending across the Red Sea into Arabian Peninsula (really just northeast Africa) over 100,000 years ago.
Affad - 23
Some of the proof of our early ancestral legacy of civilization can be seen in the recent revelation of the World's and Africa's second oldest permanent settlement found in Ta Seti (Sudanese Nubia) at an estimated age range of 15,000 to 70,000 years shown below.
Remnants of the Paleolithic settlements in Affad, Sudan.
"Archaeologists from the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology in Poznań have unearthed a very ancient village, which dates back an incredible 70,000 years, according to a news announcement in PAP. The settlement is the oldest known early Homo sapiens site with sizeable permanent structures in Africa and points to a much more advanced level of human development and adaption in Africa in the Middle Palaeolithic than previously realised."
link Usage of the Term "Negroid" Dr. Ivan Van Sertima in his author's notes of "They Came Before Columbus" breaks down the reason why despite the stigma the "racialized terms" such as "Negroid" are being used in these types of assessments. Some will cry foul at the use of the term, but as Van Sertima points out that despite the "hurt feelings" this is still despite the availability of genetics a "precise science" in distinguishing core populations. Some Western academics have defined this patterned as "True Negroid", which is unique to the most widespread type of Africans on the continent the so called "Niger Congo" speaking populations. The Racial Affinities of the Oldest AMH Remains in the Kemet Thomas A., Morphology and affinities of the Nazlet Khater man, Journal of Human Evolution, vol 13, 1984."The "Negroid" remains of Nazlet Khater from 33,000 B.C.E. is apart of the Nubian complex. To reiterate a consistent stream of the oldest known human specimens in ancient Kemet are confirmed to have a "Negroid" morphology, that is unique to the Niger-Congo speaking populations of Africa today. This logically places our early prehistoric habitation in Northern Africa.
The Sphinx Is Over 10,000 Years Old & Represents A "Bantoid" Individual Another piece of evidence which confirms that Kemet has long been an advanced civilization that has been dominated by Bantu populations (the latter is also proven by the morphology of the Nazlet Khaterr, Wadi Kubbaniya and Waldi Halfa) is attested to by the true age of the Sphinx.
The Sphinx is aligned with the star constellation of the LEO dating back to 12,000 -10,000 B.C.E.. The water erosion on the Sphinx is also confirmation that the Sphinx dates back to well over 5,000 years ago. The erosion came from the floods of the ending of the Ice Age, and with this fact known it only makes sense that the structure dates back to a much earlier time (I've seen estimates of it being constructed over 100k years ago). "extreme erosion on the body of the Sphinx could not be the result of wind and sand, as has been universally assumed, but rather was the result of water. Geologists agree that in the distant past Kemet was subjected to severe flooding. This period coincides with the melting of the ice from the last Ice Age (13,000-10,000 B.C.E). Wind erosion cannot take place when the body of the Sphinx is covered by sand, and it can be proved that the Sphinx has been in this condition for nearly all of the last five thousand years - since the alleged time of its 4th Dynasty construction. Furthermore, if wind-blown sand had indeed caused the deep erosion of the Sphinx, we would expect to find evidence of such erosion on other Kemetic monuments built of similar materials and exposed to the wind for a similar length of time. ... this means the Sphinx was carved before Kemet was inundated with the waters of the great Ice Age floods, and that those waters caused the unique erosion patterns on the Sphinx." The Sphinx's true age completely defies the Western notion of World populations being "primitive" prior to the end of the Neolithic. The Sphinx also predates Gobekli Tepe that is often raved about in "fringe" circles by Europeans and West Asians. The very engineering feat that the Sphinx is proves that tremendous social structure and organization must have been in place in these Hapi Valley populations. There must have been a highly developed knowledge of engineering, mathematics, astrology, and physics on top of organized social participation to have taken place in order for this feat to be accomplished.
Evidence has proven that Africans from Sudanese Nubia migrated into ancient Canaan over 13,000 years ago, and they will be referred to as the "Natufians". It was the resource strained and subsequently conflicted Hapi Valley population of Jebel Sahaba of Sudan during 13,000 B.C.E. (Pleistocene Nubians) who migrated into the Fertile Crescent during 12,500 B.C.E., and subsequently spread the Neolithic into Europe (as shown in the maps above). These people were found to be undoubtedly "Bantoid" and most of short stature (around 5'5 which is taller than the Twa average by about 6 inches), and again came from the Sudan - Nubia!“..one can identify Negroid traits of nose and prognathism appearing in Natufian latest hunters (McCown, 1939) and in Anatolian and Macedonian first farmers, probably from Nubia via the unknown predecesors of the Badarians and Tasians....". (Angel 1972. Biological Relations of Egyptian and Eastern Mediterranean Populations.. JrnHumEvo 1:1, p307 and"They were clearly a Negroid people, said Sir Arthur, with wide faces flat- noses and long large heads." 1932 NY Times (Discovery of the Natufians) Here is archaeological evidence. "Ofer Bar-Yosef cites the microburin technique and “microlithic forms such as arched backed bladelets and La Mouillah points" as well as the parthenocarpic figs found in Natufian territory originated in the Sudan." --Bar-Yosef O., Pleistocene connections between Africa and South West Asia: an archaeological perspective. The African Archaeological Review; Chapter 5, pg 29-38; Kislev ME, Hartmann A, Bar-Yosef O, Early domesticated fig in the Jordan Valley. Nature 312:1372–1374. A recent study (and several older ones) has noted that Pleistocene (Jebel Sahaba) Nubians were identical to West African/Bantu populations ("Negroid") as opposed to contemporary "Cushitic" or "Nilotic" populations in the Sudan. "In contrast, Irish and Turner (1990) and Irish (2000, 2005) noted that Pleistocene Nubians (in particular those of Jebel Sahaba skeletons) were as a group quite different from recent Nubians for dental discreet traits yet shared great phenetic affinity with recent West African populations." -- T.W. Holiday 2013 ("Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample")
(Jebel Sahaba/Pleistocene Nubian skull)
This wave of African migration into the Near East from the Hapi Valley around 12,500 B.C.E. is what initiated the spreading of the Neolithic settlements lead by the Twa into the Near East and further into Europe. The Deity Bes is associated with the Twa (misnamed pygmies) and has been worshiped outside of Africa in ancient Europe, Asia, Australia and the Americas. The fact that the Natufians were "Bantoid" explains why their descendants who went into Europe are not related to Caucasians in Europe nor the Middle East today. Pale People tend to try to worm around their 2,000 B.C. exodus (from the Caucus), and attempt to default claim "European history"prior to this period (Stonehenge for example). “The Niger-Congo speakers, Congo, Dahomey and Haya, cluster closely with each other and a bit less closely with the Nubian sample, both the recent and the Bronze Age Nubians, and more remotely with the Naqada Bronze Age sample of Egypt, the modern Somalis, and the Arabic-speaking Fellaheen (farmers) of Israel. When those samples are separated and run in a single analysis as in Fig. 1, there clearly is a tie between them that is diluted the farther one gets from sub-Saharan Africa" .....The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants... It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa...Interestingly enough, however, the small Natufian sample falls between the Niger-Congo group and the other samples used. Fig. 2 shows the plot produced by the first two canonical variates, but the same thing happens when canonical variates 1 and 3 (not shown here) are used. This placement suggests that there may have been a Sub-Saharan African element in the make-up of the Natufians (the putative ancestors of the subsequent Neolithic), .. When canonical variates are plotted, neither sample ties in with Cro-Magnon as was once suggested.
(Brace et. al. (2006). The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form. Gobekli Tepe This initial migration of the Neolithic farmers beginning in Nubia stretched into ancient Anatolia (and ultimately Western Europe and eastern Eurasia). One of the most profound remnant of these people's settlement into this region is the 12 pillar zodiac aligned structure Gobekli Tepe which dates back to the 10th millennium B.C.E. (which is younger than the Sphinx of Kemet). In this painting below in Catal Huyuk, Turkey depicts in accordance with anthropological evidence clearly Africoid individuals with the typical Hapi Valley human (not mankind) coloring scale, traditional African leopard skins, and even tightly curled hair. An interesting cultural link to note Gobekli Tepe and modern peoples is shown with them and the original natives of Australia. There is considerable evidence for the theory stating that those aboriginal populations migrated to the Island relatively recently (than the 60k year OOA date) and that the site in Turkey was one of their own structures. The Neolithic and certainly Mesolithic eras are regarded as "primitive" by Western scholars, so this 11,000+ year old structure in modern day Turkey; the 12,000 year old Sphinx of Kemet; 200,000 year old Adams calendar in modern South Africa; The 15-000 - 70,000 year old settlement in Affad 23, modern day Sudan that defies their logic are never put into historical context by Western historians. Acknowledging these structures would castrate their entire paradigm of History, because there is no way that the West can attribute them to non whites. Western historians have a major issue with trying to maintain their fictitious tales of human being devoid of intelligence for 99.99% of our existence on Earth. It makes no logical sense without explaining what cataclysmic event caused the breakthrough in what was a quarter million plus year intellectual stalemate. The words of ancient writers also give credence to the brilliance of humanity prior to the last 6,000 years from Kemetic and Indian writings all the way to the late coming ancient Greek scholars. This brilliance and retardation of humanity has been characterized as a natural cycle, and the low frequency "white man" is the by-product of the low end of the cycle in consciousness (hence only temporary). "Basal Eurasian" Deception and It's African Origins
"The Genomic Piltdown man" - Dr. Clye Winters
In modern genetics (which is still a new field of research full of kinks and pressure from social - political manipulation) an attempt to try to lessen the blow of the known fact of an all melaninated ancient World, Western scholars have created a term "Basal Eurasian". According to Western scholars these people were depigmented non Indo-European people (which is ironic when we consider the fact that Indo-Europeans and their branches are the only recorded non melaninated people in existence ) roaming "Eurasia" prior to the Indo European migration from the Caucus after 2,000 B.C. (Oh and white people HATE when this fact of their habitation and exodus from the caves is insisted upon in these discussions). Basal Eurasian DNA is essentially the DNA that Africans carried out of Africa during various periods and settled into all parts of Eurasia with, which was subsequently absorbed by the pure Caucasians populations turning them into semitic (semi recessive semi melaninated) populations of that region today. The Semitic populations today affected by white supremacy often wish to denounce the Africoid element of their fixed mulatto races, so they like to pretend that their mixture is an element in of itself. They denounce the original waves of settlement of the region by African migrants. Non melaninated people lie so much, that they will discount the only valid evidence to determine what a person or population looked like (physical anthropology), to make the Natufians (the same ones who were "clearly Negroid" from the findings above) look like them, because they took over the area.
Niger-Congo Languages at the Root of "Indo-European" Languages
The people who are considered "Caucasian" did not have a language, culture, and certainly not a civilization in the mountain range territory that they inhabited for thousands of years. As they were released from the caves those recessive hoards swallowed the smaller melaninated peoples who originally inhabited Eurasia (both Hunters and Gather populations and the Neolithic farmers) and absorbed their cultures, languages and technological innovations. The languages of those Neolithic populations of the Levant who made their way up to Europe was Niger-Congo. This has been confirmed by the fact that the Minoans were found to have spoken an Niger-Congo language.
GJK Campbell-Dunn -
All of which is cosigned by more recent studies such as the one released by Ricaut in 2008. Podcasters such as Joe Rogan often feature guest who speculate on the wave of high civilization that the World was on prior to 10,000 BC. These people often play the game demonstrated above of pretending the the people whom inhabited "Eurasia", and particularly Western Asia and Europe during these Mesolithic and Neolithic periods were "Indo-European" Caucasians. These people are amazing because they can go into great detail of these ancient sites, but act completely obvious to what consistent bio-cultural evidence has proven with regards to who these ancient "Eurasians" were. Peer Reviewed Genetic Evidence Confirms the African Origins of the Natufians and the Migration into Europe
Cont. details the introduction of the nomadic Caucasoid population into the civilized melainated World --F. X. Ricaut, M. Waelkens. (2008). Cranial Discrete Traits in a Byzantine Population and Eastern Mediterranean Population Movements Human Biology. 80:5, pp. 535-564 :It is these findings of a chain of migrations that brought "Sub Saharan African biological affinities" associated with the Neolithic into the Near East, Europe and Asia that modern scientist confirm the racial identity via artistic reconstruction of those selected individual skeletal remains dating to these periods in Europe. i.e. Cheddar Man
The builders of Stonehenge Recent DNA analysis also find "designated" African DNA markers throughout Natufian samples The African Origins of Cattle Domestication is another pivotal piece of evidence to this equation;
The Language Factor - Controlling the Narrative
According to Dr. Clyde Winters the Ancient Kemetic Language was Lingua Fraca that worked as a bridge of communication between the various distinct languages spoken by the melaninated African who inhabited the civilization. Western scholars have lied about the ancient Kemetic language being apart of a made up language family that Western scholars call "Afro-Asiatic".
(THEOPHILE EXPOSING THE LIE THAT ANCIENT KEMITES SPOKE AFRO-ASIATIC OR THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH A LANGUAGE FAMILY) Language has been a major factor in identifying different population origins and interactions. The lies and myths surrounding the languages spoken by ancient peoples has been a crux for white supremacist notions following an "orthodox historical" approach. The lie that Niger-Congo speakers did not have involvement in Northeast Africa after the end of the Ice Age (12,000 BC) is essential to their attempts to write us out of history. In the graphic below the African language families are grouped differently by three linguist including Theophile Obenga. Obenga dismantled the Western lead notion that Niger-Congo languages are not closely related to "ancient Egyptian" (and other so called "Afro-Asiatic languages) as well as Nilo-Saharan languages. Obenga has contributed painstaking research over the past four decades has been crux to the narrative of this post by proving conclusively that Niger-Congo (with a focus on Bantu) along with the other mentioned languages originated and co-mingled in Northeastern Africa along the Hapi Valley and Saharan region before dispersing to their contemporary locations, and he calls this language family "Negro-Egyptian".
The ideological aspect (essentially white Egypt) of an Afro-Asiatic language family is what keeps it alive in Western academia. The reason why the Afro-Asiatic language is a false narrative is because, the Afro-Asiatic language has never been reconstructed as Obenga has pointed out.
Here excerpt from Language Classification: History and Method (2008) by Campbell and Poser:
The Creation and Promotion of the False "Afro-Asiatic" Language & The White Liberal Deception
There no mistaking the fact that this entire concept of the Afro-Asiatic language family is nothing more than a revamped PC 21st century version of the Hamitic Hypothesis or Hamitic-Semitic languages. In the picture below is an untrue statement regarding Niger-Congo and other African language groupings by UCLA'S Christopher Ehret. Christopher Ehret is a deceptive "white liberal" who likes to team up with "pro black" scholars who are also under the thumb of white supremacy (since they employ them and fund or not fund their research), to promote covert white supremacy. Christopher Ehret specializes in promoting the existence of this fake language family, which means that he specializes in the denial of the relationship between Niger-Congo speakers to ancient Northern and Eastern Africa. Interesting Ehret was initially promoted by the Western establishment to refute Theophile Obenga's stance relating ancient Kemetic to Niger-Congo languages, but he ended up agreeing with Obenga on the validity on "Negro-Egyptian".
Below is a piece that he wrote in which he acknowledges the undeniable fact that Niger-Congo originated in Northeast Africa (Nubia) due to the fact that it is the sibling of Cushitic languages (which he considers "Afro-Asiatic") which is undeniably East African in origin, but attributes the absence of Niger-Congo in the region's history to do an undisclosed yet major migration from Nubia into West Africa. Christopher Ehret in the video below is spewing the common lies on the subject under the guise of a white liberal ally. He starts off the lecture at the 21 minute mark by rebuking the obvious flaws of the study by Schuenemann in 2017 that proclaimed the ancient Egyptians were Neolithic Turkish migrants. A weak minded Negro would be so happy that that that "good white man" is rebuking that bullshat racist study, that they would allow that "good white man" to mozzy on in with his equally anti black African fables that again remove our people from ancient Kemet. His lies are nothing more than the debunked narrative of the origins and migration of Afro-Asiatic Cushitic East Africans. One major fact that falsifies the notion of Africans inhabiting and spreading from what is now Cameroon is the glaring fact that Tropical West Africa was uninhabitable swamp land until the 2nd millennium BC per McIntosh & McIntosh 1981 ,1986. In Ehret's passage above he cites no evidence whatsoever to support this fictional migration of Niger-Congo speakers from Eastern Africa into Sub Saharan West Africa during the 12,000 BC period at the end of the Ice Age. The passage by Ehret also completely disregards the genesis of civilization resulting from our northward migration from the East African Nubian origin (that they even acknowledge indirectly) of our people up into Kemet. J. Greenberg's Bantu Migration Theory from West Africa (Below) - Cameroon Debunked
Many African centered scholars such as CA Diop, Theophile Obenga, and more recently, Israel Ntaganzwa, Ferg Somo etc etc have debunked the Western fallacy in regards to the ancient Kemetic language having nothing to do with Niger-Congo and Nilo Saharan languages. These fallacies were put in place to manufacturer a cultural-linguistic distinction between Kemet and modern inner African populations. Western proponents assert that ancient Kemetic language as being an "Afro-Asiatic" language (grouped with contemporary Eastern (Omotic, Cushitic)- North (Berber) African languages and the African derived Western Asian "Semitic" languages). This has been thoroughly exposed and debunked at least since 1974 during the UNESCO Conference. No Western scholar at the time had dared to risk their reputation by stepping to the assertions of Obenga and Diop in their linguist correlations. They later tried to present Christopher Ehret in the 90's as the "liberal alternative" to "extreme Afrocentrism" (their labels). He ended up looking stupid by ultimately having to concede that Obenga's linguistic groupings (hence "Negro-Egyptian") were correct, but in the same token they wanted to continue on with their lunatic theory of "Afro-Asiatic" as though Obenga's legitimate linguistic groupings did not outright refute the notion of an "Afro-Asiatic" language family (basically the "I'm white and I say so" treatment as was done in UNESCO decades prior). The African scholars also debunk the Western - Greenburg Model of the "Bantu Migration". This lie is one that was created by Western scholars to hide the earlier genesis of civilization of our people when we resided in Northeastern Africa, as detailed above. The Bantu migration myth states that all Niger-Congo speakers huddled around the Niger river basis for around nine millenniums, and then suddenly around the 3rd millennium BC began to migrate into Eastern and Southern Africa. The Bantu migration from West Africa is in conjunction with the modern day Hamitic Hypothesis known as the Afro-Asiatic migration, which completely voided out the involvement of "Niger-Congo"/Bantu speaking Africans. No Africans in those regions except for the Twa have an oral tradition that puts their origins in interior Africa. Samwiri Lwanga-Lunyiigo - UNESCO
Recent Genetic Evidence makes it clear that the Bantu Migration from West Africa (the map above) is impossible; credit due to "XYman"
The Bantu expansion revisited: a new analysis of Y chromosome 1 variation in Central 2 Western Africa Valeria Montano, Okorie Anyaele, David Comas5 2
This is consistent with previous regional studies on Y chromosome diversity carried out in sub-Saharan Africa or in other continents which** failed** to detect a robust correlation between genetic and linguistic distances In this way, we were able to detect some noteworthy differences within and among Bantu-speaking populations, mostly due to haplogroups E1b1a7a (U174), E1b1a8a (U209), and E1b1a8a1 (U290), which contribute to their high level of inter-population differentiation and to the presence of distinct regional patterns of genetic variation. All these findings CONTRADICT the current VIEW of Bantu speakers as a homogeneous group of populations whose gene pools are mostly if not exclusively the result of a relatively recent population expansion”
and A genomic analysis identifies a novel component in the genetic structure of sub-Saharan African populations - Martin Sikora 2011
"Studies of large sets of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data have proven to be a powerful tool in the analysis of the genetic structure of human populations. In this work, we analyze genotyping data for 2841 SNPs in 12 sub-Saharan African populations, including a previously unsampled region of southeastern Africa (Mozambique). We show that robust results in a world-wide perspective can be obtained when analyzing only 1000 SNPs. Our main results both confirm the results of previous studies, and show new and interesting features in sub-Saharan African genetic complexity. There is a strong differentiation of Nilo-Saharans, much BEYOND what would be expected by geography. Hunter-gatherer populations (Khoisan and Pygmies) show a clear distinctiveness with very intrinsic Pygmy (and not only Khoisan) genetic features. Populations of the West Africa present an unexpected similarity among them, possibly the result of a population expansion. Finally, we find a strong differentiation of the southeastern Bantu population from Mozambique, which suggests an assimilation of a pre-Bantu substrate by Bantu speakers in the region.
The third PC allows us to discriminate between western/central (Mandenka, Yoruba), eastern (Maasai, Luhya), and southeastern populations (Mozambique), IRRESPECTIVELY OF LANGUAGE FAMILY. This is the PC that is mostly correlated with geography (Figure 2c), and the fact that it is the third RATHER THAN THE FIRST COMPONENT, as would be expected if isolation by distance was the predominant force shaping genetic diversity,16 implies that directional population movements (such as the Bantu expansion) and barriers to gene flow (such as that between food producers and hunter gatherers) are more relevant than geographic distance to understand the genetic landscape of sub-Saharan Africa. The distinction between west and southeast Africa is also shown with K4; at K5, the Niger-Congo speaking Luhya are separated from the rest. The new component that appears at K¼6 is restricted to African Americans and Biaka Pygmies, and is the last component that can be attributed to specific populations.
but not Pygmies). Among Niger-Congo populations, geography is the main factor explaining the genetic differences, with a remarkable similarity among western populations (Yorubas and Mandenka), which could reflect a burst in the expansion to the west, related to iron technology and Niger-Congo languages. (ii) The southeastern Bantu from Mozambique are remarkably differentiated from the western Niger-Congo speaking populations, such as the Mandenka and the Yoruba, and also differentiated from geographically closer Eastern Bantu samples, such as Luhya. These results suggest that the Bantu expansion of languages, which started 5000 years ago at the present day border region of Nigeria and Cameroon, and was probably related to the spread of agriculture and the emergence of iron technology,17–19 WAS NOT A DEMOGRAPHIC HOMOGENEOUS MIGRATION WITH POPULATION REPLACEMENT IN THE SOUTHERNMOST PART OF THE CONTINENT, but acquired more divergence, likely because of the integration of pre-Bantu people. The complexity of the expansion of Bantu languages to the south (with an eastern and a western route20), might have produced differential degrees of assimilation of previous populations of hunter gatherers. This assimilation has been detected through uniparental markers because of the genetic comparison of nowadays hunter gatherers (Pygmies and Khoisan) with Bantu speaker agriculturalists.2,21–24 Nonetheless, the singularity of the southeastern population of Mozambique (poorly related to present Khoisan) could be attributed to a complete assimilate on of ancient genetically differentiated populations (presently unknown) by Bantu speakers in southeastern Africa, without leaving any pre-Bantu population in the area to compare with"THERE WERE NO OTHER AFRICANS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA BESIDES THE KHOISAN TO MIX WITH, AND THAT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MOZAMBIQUE BANTU'S AND THE KHOISAN HAS BEEN FOUND IN THE SAME STUDY TO BE POORLY RELATED!!! There was no phantom African population (map of Southern African populations/language families below) for them to mix with to be differentiated. This means that their genetic differentiation from other Niger-Congo speakers was long in place, but they with the other Bantu's were supposed to come from a "common West African origin".
Thus a common Cameroonian ancestry for Bantu speaking populations as the Greenberg Bantu Migration theory states has been debunked!!! The Exert below from E. Welmers further undermines the Bantu Migration from West Africa narrative by bringing archaeological proof with the basenji dog that the Niger-Congo languages originated in upper Nubia, and spread into interior Africa.Archaeological Evidence of the Northeast African Origin of Niger-Congo Speakers
Understand that Western scholars are insidiously trying to keep this information hidden, and while in face deny that they are trying to steal our history but will continue to steal our history (understand that both are the faces of whites now look at the situation in the World). This article below was written by an AFRICAN linguist and it pertains specifically to the "Bantu" branch of Niger-Congo speakers.
The Niger-Congo/Bantu Language Family (African American/Black Caribbean/Black Central-South American extended populations) THE REAL BANTU MIGRATION FROM THE SUDANBATU, THE BANTU (General Niger-Congo Speakers)
By Ferg Somo
For the first time ever the set of hieroglyphics above leaves an indelible print which traces back the existence of the Bantu people during ancient times in the Sudan and Kemet. The following variations in pronunciation of the word 'Bantu' give an insight on how the word may have been pronounced in different Bantu languages. The list of the various pronunciations was provided by Israel Ntangazwa. Some of the variations in pronunciation are new to me.
SOME VARIATIONS IN PRONUNCIATION OF THE WORD 'BANTU' THE PEOPLE BANTU, BATU, ATHO, WATU, ATU, ACHO, BOT, BANU, BANHU, ADU
The hieroglyphics shown above spells out the word 'BATU' in keeping with the current original word 'BANTU'. The maps shown below trace the possible migrations of the Bantu people. The origin of the Bantu people is a controversial issue and has been deeply debated.
Below is an account which questions present day ideas about the origins of the Bantu people. In his book on the 'Restatement Of Bantu Origin and Meru History' the Kenyan scholar Alfred M M'Imanyara provides the evidence for a southerly migration from Kemet of the Bantu people.
THE NIGER- CONGO HYPOTHESIS
The Niger-Congo hypothesis developed by Joseph Greenberg on Bantu languages state that the Bantu originated in West Africa, the Cameroon, and migrated across the Congo basin into Southern and East Africa.
Guthrie on the other hand did not commit himself but said that the Bantu dispersal lies within an elliptical area towards the centre, in the woodland region of Katanga.
The Niger-Congo hypothesis needs to be re-examined further as one has to take into account oral traditions from groups of present day Kenyan Bantu elders who recall a southerly migration from Kemet.
The following sources of accounts of migrations of some of the Bantu speakers in Kenya are taken from:
i) Kenya an official handbook
ii) Story of Africa from earliest times, Book one, A.J Willis
iii) Longman GHC, E.S Atieno Odhimbo, John N. B. N. I Were
Almost all the Bantu people living in Kenya speak of a migration from up North. The people of Marachi location are known to have come from Elgon although other clans of the same group came from Kemet. They came in canoes on the River Hapi as far as Juja, Uganda and later moved eastward into lake Victoria. They changed course until Asembo and separated with the Luo who walked along the lake shore but the rest crossed into South Nyanza. They then turned northwards and reached Butere and then moved on to Luanda and to Ekhomo. The Luo people were behind them right from Kemet.
The people of Samia location came from Kemet on foot. The Abakhekhe clan too originated from Kemet on foot. The Abachoni clan originally came from Kemet on foot. The people of Bukusu originally came from Kemet in canoes.
Possible migration routes of Bantu from Central Sudan
The Luhya oral literature of origin, suggest a migration into their present-day locations from the north. Virtually all sub-ethnic groups claim to have migrated first south from Misri, or Kemet. In one of the Luhya dialect the word 'Abaluhya' means 'the people of the North', or 'Northerns'
Other sources report that the following Bantu people, the Luhya, Baganda, Nyarwanda, Rundi of Burindi, Kikuyu, and the Zulu all claim a southerly migration from Kemet. Moreover there are many groups of Bantu speakers from Tanzania, Mozambique, Congo, Zambia, Malawi, South Africa, who testify a southerly migration from Kemet. There are even groups of people from West Africa who migrated from Kemet into their present day location.
Apart from the oral traditions provided by Bantu elders, the evidence is also based on linguistic, historical, scientific and cultural studies done by Cheikh Anta Diop.
The following maps are taken from Alfred M M'Imanyara 'The Restatement of Bantu Origin and Meru History' published by Longman Kenya,
According to Alfred M M'Imanyra the following maps show the homeland of the original Bantu people in Kemet. This careful information has been derived from traditional sources provided by Bantu elders in the course of his research. I would like to support Alfred M M'Imanyara's work by sharing with him the important discovery of the of hieroglyphics above which mentions a Sudanic town of unknown situation. Clearly the town would have to be named after the people inhabiting the town, the 'BANTU' or the 'BATU', the people.
Original homeland of the Bantu up to 1500 A.D
Dark shading: Possible ultimate origin of the Bantu
Cross shading: Area of Bantu expansion into Kemet
Bantu Migration Routes from Cush and the Island of Meroe
Migration of the Bantu
Note: The settlements of the Bantu in West Africa may have been a result of two streams of Bantu emigrants: one from the Congo basin and the other directly from the Hapi valley."
The so called "Afro-Asiatic" Migration Throughout north and east Africa and into the Near East and Europe involved Niger-Congo Speakers Today however however Western scholars through the recent invention of the Afro-Asiatic language family (aka "Afrisan", "Afrasian","Hamitic-Semitic" ect), the old Hamitic Hypothesis is being revamped by implying that this northward migration from Punt is said to have occurred only involving the distinct "non Bantoid" Hamitic/Cushitic (narrow noses and thin lips like Ethiopians and Somalis) type of Africans who are also from the Northeast Africa. Western scholars say that these Africans carried the so called "Afro-Asiatic languages" throughout Africa and Asia as a result of this migration shown in the map below.
The Notation of Sickle Cell (A Niger Congo genetic trait) Along the So Called Afro-Asiatic Migratory Trail Inside and Outside of Africa, and The Fact that Sickle Cell Originated in Sudanese Nubia - Northeast Africa
Proof
You can compare the Afro-Asiatic migration pattern in this map to the distribution of sickle cell cell (an ignored genetic marker for Niger-Congo speakers) through the Levant and Southern Europe and see that that Niger-Congo speakers were clearly involved in these migrations.
In the map below the root Cushitic genetic marker "M-215" is shown migrating from Punt in the Horn of Africa northward into Nubia-Kemet and out into the Middle East and Europe. Many Westerners will try to void out Niger-Congo speakers in this migration, because there is little E1b1a in an area (they only attribute it to some sort of slave trade), while they discount the facts that haplogroups such as J (the so called "Semitic" marker) have frequencies of over 40% in the Bantu-"Hebrew" speaking Lemba of South Africa. They also discount the fact that Y-DNA haplogroup R (thought to be exclusively the "white" Caucasian genetic marker) is found in it's highest frequencies in "Sub Saharan West Africa" - Cameroon. That's not even including the fact that sickle cell found in those areas as shown in the map above acts as backup genetic evidence as ancient relic of our ancient presence. Despite Niger-Congo speakers (who bear no physical distinction from the rest of the greater population) being found with those non M2 lineage markers Western scholars often times will discount the physical morphology of an ancient individual (if they look like us), and pronounce that the aDNA marker of the ancient person was "non African" to imply that the physical appearance could not have been Africoid to fit their "ideal" narrative. They also deliberately ignore this fact;
Dr Spencer Wells, Harvard evolutionary geneticist: "There is more genetic diversity in any single African village than in the whole world outside Africa." Despite knowing this very well known fact some geneticist deny the Hapi Valley African origins of Basal Euasian DNA as shown with the Naufians.
From the information above we see details of this later migration from inner eastern Africa northward into Kemet,and then bi-direction into Northwest Africa and out of Africa at the end of the ice age around 13,000 B.C. We see this migration of African languages being called the "Afro-Asiatic Expansion", but there was nothing "Asiatic" about these people or languages, because they all originated in Africa with the possible exception of "Semitic" languages (which could have also originated with Africans in Africa). Following Obenga's Negro-Egyptian linguistic breakdown, this migration into these areas also included in the Niger-Congo speaking populations. The fact is that it was really a dual migration which included the Niger-Congo speaking "Bantoid" Pleistocene Nubians who are an ancestral group to contemporary equatorial E-M2 lineage carrying "Bantoid" African populations along with the other African branches of the so-called Afro-Asiatic languages. This is something that is attested to by African scholars (and actual speakers of the languages).
"Linguistic Ties Between Ancient Egyptian and Bantu: Uncovering Symbiotic Affinities and Relationships in Vocabulary"
Book by Ferg Somo
The Ancient Kemetic language has always been considered to be a branch of the African-Asiatic family of languages called Afro-Asiatic which spans Africa and Western Asia.
Without going too deeply into the classification of the Afro-Asiatic language, according to Greenberg, the individual branches of the Afro-Asiatic family of languages include the following:
(1) Semitic, the largest branch of the Afro-Asiatic language which is spoken since ancient times in most of Western Asia, Mesopotamia, Palestine, Syria, Arabia and Africa.
The Semitic language has its origins in Africa.
(2) Berber, a group of related languages currently spoken by approximately five million speakers in Northern Africa from the Atlantic coast to the oasis of Siwa in Kemet and from the Mediterranean Sea to Mali and Niger.
(3) Cushitic, a family of languages spoken by approximately fifteen million people in Eastern Africa from the Kemetic border in North East Sudan to Ethiopia, Djibouti, Somalia, Kenya and Northern Tanzania.
Martin Bernal in his book, Black Athena, sees the spread of the Afro-Asiatic language as the expansion of a culture which was long established in the East African Rift Valley at the end of the last ice age in the 10th and 9th millennia B.C.E. During the last ice ages water was locked up in the polar icecaps and rainfall was considerably less than it is today. The Sahara and Arabian Deserts were even larger. During the increase of heat and rainfall in the centuries that followed, much of these regions became savannah, into which neighbouring peoples flocked.
The most successful of these were speakers of Proto-Afro-Asiatic language from the African rift valley. Going through the savannah, the Chadic speakers reached Lake Chad while the Berbers, the Maghreb and the Proto-Kemite arrived in Upper Kemet. However Martin Bernal did not consider speakers of Proto-Bantu in his analysis. It is the author’s contention, from the linguistic contents, that speakers of Proto-Bantu played an active part at the time of the expansion of Proto-Afro-Asiatic speakers in the Rift Valley of East Africa.These Proto-Bantu speakers going through the savannah formed part of the migration to Kemet. The Bantu languages together with other indigenous languages fused together and became embedded to form the Proto-Egyptian language. It is for this reason that the Ancient Egyptian language contains a substantial amount of Proto-Bantu or Bantu roots.
However Guthrie speculated that before the Proto-Bantu expansion from Zaire, there had been several pre-Bantu stages, at which time the Bantu ancestors lived far to the north around Lake Chad. One group from this area made its way to Zaire and became the Proto-Bantu.The Proto-Bantu speakers and Proto-Afro-Asiatic speakers lived along side each other. They traded together, shared and exchanged common vocabularies of words" link.
The Origin of Civilization in Nubia and it's spread around the old World
The Fertile Ancient Sahara Period & the Next Phase of Civilizations (6-4 millennium BC)
The first "Afrocentrics" were European researchers!
"THE MEDITERRANEAN RACE
Preface
WHEN this little book was first published in an Italian edition in 1895, and in a German edition in 1897, I was still unable to obtain many anthropological data needed to complete tha picture of the primitive inhabitants of Europe. In the English edition the book is less incomplete, richer in anthropological and ethnological documents, and hence more conclusive; it also contains replies to various objections which have been brought forward. This English edition, therefore, is not so much a translation of a work already published as a new book, both in form and arrangement
The conclusions I have sought to maintain are the following :- +
(1.) The primitive populations of Europe, after Homo Neandertkalensis, originated in Africa; these constituted the entire population of Neolithic times.
(2.) The basin of the Mediterranean was the chief centre of movement whence the African migrations reached the centre and the north of Europe.
(3.) From the great African stock were formed three varieties, in accordance with differing telluric and geographic conditions: one,.,peculiarly African, remaining in the continent where it originated; another, .the Mediterranean, which occupied the basin of that sea; and a third, the Nordtic:, which reached the north of Europe. These three varieties are the three great branches of one species, which I call Eurafrican, because it occupied, and still occupies, a large portion of the two continents of Africa and Europe.
(4) These three human varieties have nothing in common with the so-called Aryan races; it is an error to maintain that the Germans and the Scandinavians, blond dolichocephals or long-heads (of the Reihengraber and Viking types), are Aryans; they . are Eurafricans of the Nordic variety.
(5.) The Aryans are of Asiatic origin, and constitute a variety of the Eurafrican: species,• the physical characters of their skeletons are different from those of the Eurafricans.
(6.) The primitive civilisation of the Eurafricans is Afro-Mediterranean, becoming eventually AfroEuropean.
(7.) The Mycenrean civilisation had its origin in Asia, and was transformed by diffusion in the Mediterranean.
(8.) The two classic civilisations, Greek and Latin; were not Aryan, but Mediterranean. The Aryans were savages when they invaded Europe: they destroyed in part the superior civilisation of the Neolithic populations, and could not have created the Greco-Latin civilization
(9.) In the course of the Aryan invasions the languages of the Eurafrican species in Europe were transformed in Italy, Greece, and elsewhere, Celtic, German, Slavonic, etc., being genuine branches of the Aryan tongue; in other cases the Aryan languages underwent a transformation, preserving some elements of the conquered tongues, as in the NeoCeltic of Wales. Some of these conclusions no longer arouse the same opposition as when I first brought them forward. The arguments meeting with most resistance are those tending to overthrow the ancient conception of an Aryan civilization.
THE FUTURE WILL ENABLE US TO SEE THESE QUESTIONS MORE CLEARLY. G. SERGI.
ROME, Feoruary, 1901."
As we can see, what is being presented by myself is nothing more than a rebirth of the truth. The truth that the West has known for hundreds of years, but has tried to bury in a sad attempt to spare their fragile egos. As shown above the Hapi Valley is the ultimate source of Neolithic. Following the spreading of the Neolithic outside of Africa which began with migrations that occurred after the end of Ice Age by the Natufians (12,500 BC) were several other successive migrations of Africans throughout the northern half of the continent and outside of Africa. One of the reciprocal affects of the climate change at the end of the Ice Age (13,000 BC) was the shrinking of the Hapi River Valley that most of the Africans once inhabited. Conversely new heavy rains vitalizing the adjacent Sahara desert to the West for a few millenniums triggered a migration of those Africans from the Hapi River Valley to the Sahara. They brought with them the Neolithic that has been said to date back to the Hapi Valley to at least around 15,000 BC. Lake Chad which was enormous at the time, and a river Valley much like the Hapi River formed going though what would be Libya into the Mediterranean (shown in the map below) . Scholars have speculated that Lake Chad and that river was the location of a major civilization. The different types of Africans who lived in the ancient Sahara during the fertile period included the Niger-Congo speakers, Nilotes, Cushitic speakers (Hamites) and Dravidians (of India today). When these Africans migrated from the Sahara during it's different drying phases the spreading of post Atlantis civilization began. One of the major Neolithic Megalithic Saharan sites is Napta Playa (the Western Desert) which is shown in the following picture. This is the original "Stonehenge" predating the one in Europe by thousands of years. ( Megalithic structures are a relic of the cultures of Niger-Congo speakers even after we left the Hapi Valley and moved into tropical Africa) In the Egyptian Western Desert, the beginnings of human occupation date as early as ca. 9300 BC. Occupation continued until the middle of the third millennium BC when final desertification of the area no longer afforded human occupation. One of the areas occupied intensively during the early and middle Holocene was Gebel Ramlah. Some groups (using cemeteries E-01-2, E-03-1, E-03-2, and E-09-4) show some affiliation with sub-Saharan Africans, readable in the pottery assemblage and other grave goods, as well as some morphological features (Irish 2010; Kobusiewicz and Kabaciski 2010; Czekaj-Zastawny and Kabaciski 2015)... q ualitatively, there are no obvious differences among all populations from Gebel Ramlah at the beginning of the Final Neolithic. Thus, the two groups, culturally different, were likely not much different biologically, possibly deriving from the same region of Africa. " --~Czekaj-Zastawny et al 2018. Gebel Ramlah—a Unique Newborns’ Cemetery of the Neolithic Sahara. African Archaeological Review volume 35, pages 393–405 When the fertile Sahara period ended and the region returned to desert some of the Niger-Congo speakers would migrate into West Africa (Mande speakers), but most would immediately head east onto the the Hapi River Valley, establishing the oldest known monarchy in Nubia-Ta-Seti, and points onward into the Levant, Europe, Asia and America.
This map depicts some of the migration sequences from the Sahara, Ta-Seti and Kemet into the Levant, Europe and South and East Asia. The Phantom African Population - Dravidian/Tamil Factor Their African Origins
As the ancient Sahara began to dry most of the migrants from the region would migrate back onto Hapi Valley to establish dynastic Ta-Seti (Nubia) the World's first "recorded" monarchy, and it is postulated to date back as far as 5,900 B.C.E. according to archaeologist Boyce Rensberger. From the second stop of Nubia along the Hapi river the ancient Kushites migrated into the fertile crescent, the adjacent Arabian Peninsula and points eastward. Africans migrating from this region are responsible for the spreading of this indigenous African cultures to establish "civilizations" as defined in the traditional sense throughout Africa, " Hindu Kush" and the World. The Greek historian Herodotus and later Historians have verified that there were two sets of "Aethiopians" those in Africa and those and Asia. The Dravidians of India originated in Africa with the rest of the Africoid "races", and were apart of this migration as well. “In modern geography the name Ethiopia is confined to the country known as Abyssinia, an extensive territory in East Africa. In ancient times Ethiopia extended over vast domains in both Africa and Asia." “It seems certain,” declares Sir E. A. Wallis Budge, “that classical historians and geographers called the whole region from India to Egypt, both countries inclusive, by the name of Ethiopia, and in consequence they regarded all the dark-skinned and black peoples who inhabited it as Ethiopians. Mention is made of Eastern and Western Ethiopians and it is probable that the Easterners were Asiatics and the Westerners Africans.” (History of Ethiopia, Vol. I., Preface, by Sir E. A. Wallis Budge.)There are a plethora of evidence shown with linguistic and cultural exchange between these various Africoid groups with the Dravidians (also Africoid) supporting this interaction in their African Sahara and on the Hapi Valley prior to the migrations across Asia all the way to China. Further proof of the Tamil's origins and interactions in Africa comes through the language. Much like the map above showing the origin and east-west bi-directional migration of millets in the ancient Sahara, which brought the millets to West Africa and into the Near East, the Tamil language is spoken not only in India, but also in what is now Cameroon in West Africa.
The Twa followed by proto-aboriginal Australian, had already been throughout "Ta Neteru" (throughout the Tropics) from much earlier migrations ( also into northern Asia establishing the Ainu cultures of proto Japan) out of Africa that placed them throughout Asia, and the Americas (where the so called "good hair" seen in us - via our "Native American ancestry" really comes from). The more recent migrations from Africa have placed the M2 lineage - E1b1a (Niger-Congo speaking population) in the World's most isolated island Easter Island. A good amount of evidence suggest that the same Africoid migrants likely settled on the Pacific islands of Hawaii as well.
On the map below if you also notice the dates (while inaccurate for Kemet) all state that these civilizations are older than 2,000 B.C.E. Notice that Ta-Seti/ancient Nubia is no where on this map below given to our children in school to learn their "HIS-story (because universal thought comes from our consciousness, which is why "My-stery" has the meaning that it does). The Qustul incense burner depicted was the initial proof of Nubia being the first dynastic civilization on Earth. It shows a pharaoh identical to what would later characterize Kemet prior to Kemet's founding dynasty by Mena Narmer. The finding by Keith Seal also depicted 12 other African kings before the one presiding on the incense burner. This gave it hundreds of years on Kemet's first dynasty (which is when Western scholars will call Kemet a civilization). Many scholars place the origin even further back. According to Boyce Rensberger it was around the early 6th millennium that dynastic Ta-Seti is said to have came into existence. Boyce Rensberger reports in the 1979 NYtimes article about the discovery; "Nubian Monarchy Called Oldest"...."Evidence of the oldest recognizable monarchy in human history, preceding the rise of the earliest Egyptian kings by several generations, has been discovered in artifacts from ancient Nubia.".... "The first kings of Ta-Seti may well have ruled about 5900 BC. During the time of the fifth generation of their rulers, Upper (ie, southern) Egypt may have united and became a greater threat to Ta-Seti." - Boyce Rensberger Western academia is so dedicated to the notion of recessive supremacy that the person who discovered this history altering artifact in Nubia chose to take the discover to his grave. That pink Devil chose death over the revelation of the fact that civilization began in Africa. Dr. Ivan Van Sertima details the situation.
Ta-Seti's origins date has an estimate according to Rensberger that coincides with the beginning phases of desertification. None the less the estimate is not recognized by Western academia. The second phase of desertification during the 5th and 4th millennium B.C.E. brought a new wave of Kushites (dubbed the "Ma Confederation" by Dr. C. Winters) from the Sahara, and subsequently the spreading of Bronze age civilization followed. A more recent depiction of what academia is calling the oldest Pharonic depiction on Earth has once again validated Ta-Seti as the beginning point for civilization.
Nag el-Hamdulab Rock Paintings
link
The abandoning of these pre-dynastic sites in Ta-Seti lead to the rise of Kemet's first dynasty by 3,100 B.C.E. as those Africans from Ta-Seti moved slightly north from Lower Nubia into Upper Kemet. The location of the rock art was slightly north of Aswan within what Western scholars defined as Nubian territory and culture.
The culture's were so identical that first dynasty Kemet was referred to as a "Sudanese transplants" by some scholars. " Populations and cultures now found south of the desert roamed far to the north. The culture of Upper Egypt, which became dynastic Egyptian civilization, could fairly be called a Sudanese transplant."(Egypt and Sub-Saharan Africa: Their Interaction. Encyclopedia of Precolonial Africa, by Joseph O. Vogel, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California (1997), pp. 465-472 ) Writing
Western scholars in their attempt to emphasize the false notions of Mesopotamia being the cradle of civilization often credit this satellite city-state civilization with the first written language. In reality the origins and spread of writing follows the traditional sequence of migrant cultures stemming from Africans, the writing styles of neighboring ancient Canaan, the Levant, the Greco-Roman alphabet (what English, Spanish, French etc came from) came directly from ancient Hapi Valley Medu Neter.
Here's a more simplified version of the comparisons. "The tomb is dated to c. 3250 BC and demonstrates that such writing (on bone and ivory labels) is a more advanced form of writing than was evident in Sumer at that date. It is argued, therefore, that the Egyptian writing system, which is in any case very different from the Mesopotamian, could not have been the result of influence from a less-developed system existing at that date in Sumer." "The Study of Writing Systems", in The World's Writing Systems, ed. Bright and Daniels, p.3 Instead evidence implies that the opposite is true: He concluded his presentation by noting similarities between specific Egyptian and Mesopotamian objects and suggesting that perhaps there is an initial influence of Egyptian writing on Mesopotamia because there are signs on Mesopotamian objects that are only "readable" from the standpoint of the Egyptian language, but not the Mesopotamian language.
"Too Much Stuff": Recent Finds in Predynastic Egypt By Mario Beatty, Ph.D. C-Group Nubian Migration into Southwest Asia
Scholars have proved that the population that comprised the culture that formed in the Sudan coined the "C-Group Nubians" (Dravidian and Niger-Congo speakers aka Kushites) who left the Sahara established the city of Kerma in Nubia beginning around 3,000 BCE. Numerous older scholars have made note and theories of these cultural and biological affinities as noted in the article below written by the Afrocentric "Boogeyman" Clyde Winters;
"Archaeological research has confirmed that cultural interaction existed between the contemporary civilizations of the 4th and 3rd millenia B.C. Extensive trade routes connected the Proto-Dravidians of the Indus Valley, with African people in Egypto-Nubia, and the Elamites and Sumerians. P. Kohl discovered that vessels from IVBI worshop at Tepe Yahya, have a uniform shape and design. Vessels sharing this style are distributed from Soviet Uzbekistan to the Indus Valley, and Sumerian, Elamite and Egyptian sites. (2) In addition, we find common arrowheads at Harappan sites, and sites in Iran, Egypt, Minoan Crete and Heladic Greece.
It appears that the locus for this distribution of cultural traditions and technology was the Saharan-Nubian zone or Kush. This would explain why the Sumerians and Elamites often referred to themselves as “ksh”. For example the ancient Sumerians called their dynasty “Kish”. The words “kish”, “kesh” and “kush” were also names for ancient Nubia-Sudan.
The Elamites also came from Kush. According to the classical writer Strabo, Susa the centre of the Elamite civilization was founded by Tithonus, king of Kush.
B.B. Lal has shown conclusively that the Dravidians came from Nubia and were related to the C-Group people who founded the Kerma dynasty.(3) They both used a common black-and-red ware (BRW) which Lal found was analogous to ceramics used by the megalithic people in India who also used analogous pottery signs identical to those found in the corpus of Indus Valley writing. (4)
Singh believes that this pottery spread from Nubia, through Mesopotamia and Iran southward into India.(5) The earliest examples of this BRW date to the Amratian period (4000-3500 B.C.).
This same BRW was found at the lowest levels of Harappan sites at Lothal and Rangpur. After 1700 B.C. This ceramic tradition spread southward into megalithic India.(6) It is also found in Uzbekistan and China.
List of Sources
Mesopotamia - Sumer (Established 3,100 BC)
Ivan Van Sertima on Kemet vs Sumer
To start let's dismiss the Western myth of Sumeria being the "first" civilization on Earth. Professor Ivan Van Sertima does a wonderful job at showing the absurdity of comparing Sumer to ancient Hapi Valley civilization in age or "accomplishments". You will notice Eurocentric scholars will recite this fallacy as though it is a divine fact. This city-state in between the Tigris and Euphrates came into existence as a result of the migrations during the first desertification phases of the ancient African Sahara around the late 7th millennium B.C.E. Keep in mind that this is only the agricultural foundation of what would by about 5,000 years later become a dynastic civilization like that first seen in Africa with Nubia. Notice in the map below how the settlement sites during the later period during the 2nd desertification phase approaches the Kemetic border on the Sinai Peninsula . Evidence proves that these African migrants did not stop at an invisible continental border but instead settled into the adjacent Fertile Crescent, and extended eastward into Eurasia from there. These Africans would of course eventually settle and establish Sumeria. Bio-Cultural Analysis
"First there is the Eurafrican .. In ancient times, this type is found in Mesopotamia and Egypt and may be compared with the Ombe Capelle skull. It is possibly identical with men who lived in the high desert west of the Nile in paleolithic times.." (-Penniman, T.K. "A Note on the Inhabitants of Kish.." Excavations at Kish, 1923-33 Vol 4. pp 65-72)
Notice the ridiculous term "EuraAfrican" (to suggest degrees of white admixture) is used to describe indigenous African physical diversity in the older anthropological studies as noted earlier. Those Africans in the "High desert west"/Western Kemetic Saharan Desert were Niger-Congo speakers and Dravidians (who originated in Africa and now live in India) who have "narrow"/gracile facial features. Genetically recessive scientist use to lie and claim that those gracile facial features indicated that they were mixed race. Those features also exist in the Cushitic populations. It was mentioned earlier leading Bio-Geneticist SOY Keita has dismantled those misconceptions that these indigenous groups are the result of admixture from Caucasoids. The study below conducted less than a decade ago confirms that those remains in the Egyptian western desert were in fact black-melaninated Africans. "..the Qarunian (Faiyum) early Neolithic crania (Henneberg et al. 1989; Midant-Reynes 2000), and the Nabta specimen from the Neolithic Nabta Playa site in the western desert of Egypt (Henneberg et al. 1980) - show, with regard to the great African biological diversity, similarities with some of the sub-Saharan middle Paleolithic and modern sub-Saharan specimens....This affinity pattern between ancient Egyptians and sub-Saharans has also been noticed by several other investigators..This finding is in agreement with morphological data that suggest that populations with sub-Saharan morphological elements were present in northeastern Africa, from the Paleolithic to at least the early Holocene... "
--Ricaut and Walekens (2008) 'Cranial Discrete traits..' Human Biology, 80:5, pp. 535-564 The ancient Mesopotamian remains are identical to those found in the Paleolithic-Neolithic "Egyptian" Western dessert, and we can further read that the "ancient Egyptians" of the Western desert were the same as modern day "Sub Saharan Africans". Notice the statement that the ancient Kemites are consistently regarded as "Negroid" by other researchers. This correlates with the Kushite foundation of the civilization that was noted by archaeologist John Baldwin. He was the archaeologist who first deciphered the Conifer script of Mesopotamia and was certain that Nubians founded this Western Asian civilization."After deciphering the cuneiform script and researching ancient Mesopotamia for many years Henry Rawlinson (1810-1895) discovered that the founders of the civilization were of Kushite (Cushite) origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black people who called themselves sag-gig-ga or “Black Heads.”
John Baldwin wrote in his book “PreHistoric Nations” (1869): “The early colonists of Babylonia were of the same race as the inhabitants of the Upper Nile.” and
Chandra Chakaberty “A Study in Hindu Social Polity” - “based on the statuaries and steles of Babylonia, the Sumerians were “of dark complexion (chocolate colour), short stature, but of sturdy frame, oval face, stout nose, straight hair, full head; they typically resembled the Dravidians, not only in cranium, but almost in all the details.”
and then migrated into the Arabian Peninsula and throughout the Fertile Crescent (which were known as extensions of Kush) to establish the Elamite and Indus Valley civilizations. It was only around 2,600 B.C.E. when Mesopotamia's first dynasty was established by these Kushite migrants.
Mohenjo Daro/Indus Valley Civilization (C-Group Nubians 2,600 BC)
Dr. Clyde Winters points out that the ancient Indus Valley Harpappan Script is identical to the 5,000 year old proto-Saharan script that was used by the Mande speakers (dated as far back as 3,000 BC) who brought it as they migrated from the drying Sahara into the fertile crescent heading east all the way to China. Genetic Evidence
Several recent genetic studies confirms an eastward migration migration from Africa into Asia, which involved genetic markers typical of Niger-Congo speakers. The samples from the study in the link identifies two paternal lineages. One that predominates in Niger-Congo populations of Mali (Dogon) and in another found mostly in East African Cushitic populations that was carried them into south Asia The African lineages that were carried were E1b1 and E1a, which were identified in Neolithic Indus Valley (starting around the 8th millennium BC) remains. The earliest populations of the region were characterized were the Twa followed by Australoid however, as the anthropolgoical evidence points out in the following passage. The elements were simply infused into the more recent African migrants who came following the drying the Sahara. link
Anthropological Evidence "The Chanhu-daro burial is a unique funerary practice of the Indus Civilization, unencountered at other Indus sites; 2) the cranium’s phenotypic features are outside the range of morphological variation present in the macropopulations of the Indus Civilization, but fit closely with those of individuals of East African ancestry, possibly Nubian or Ethiopianhe Chanhu-daro cranium sought to fit it into one of the racial classifications current during the first half of the last century. What is relevant to Krogman’s and Sassaman’s study is not that they placed Chanhu-daro with a “Proto-Mediterranean type” and compared it to other specimens assigned to this racial category, namely the skeletons from Mohenjo-daro and a Sialkot (a single skull collected in 1912 in the western Punjab) as well as specimens from Iran and the Near East. Rather it is significant that these American anthropologists recognized that the Chanhu-daro cranium was not a “perfect fit” within the sorting criteria of cranial traits used to define the macropopulations of the Indus Valley. They wrote that the specimen “is Negroid in its low flattened vault, in its broad nose with its “traughing” or slight sulcus praenasalis, in its diminished sub-nasal height and low orbits, and possibly its (cranial) length and occipital fullness” (Krogman & Sassaman, 1943)...As other racial classifications for the populations of the Indian subcontinent emerged, a persisting them was that a “Negroid” or “Negritoid (pygmy) racial element was present, and was especially evident in southern India."
link
The study above regarding the crania of Indus Valley remains notes that they fit closely with East African and or Nubian cranium. More confirmation of this greater Nubian empire that extended into India, that modern Western scholars like to have amnesia about. Many Dravidian scholars have noted that they originated in Africa for decades prior to "Afrocentrism". These Dravidians also tell of a sunken continent in the Indian Ocean from which they came, and or transmigrated to and from Africa through. Western scholars cover their ears to these facts (I say facts, because the chain of islands in the Indians ocean make it's existence clear). This was a highly innovative, peaceful and beautiful civilization created by a mixture of Tamil and Bantu-Niger-Congo speaking African migrants intermingling with the pre existing Twa and Australoid populace.
This civilization was destroyed by invading "Aryans" who ravaged the greater region from 1,500 to 1,200 BC (detailed by Dr. Ivan Van Sertima in the clip below in the Aryan section). The mulatto offspring of the Dravidians and the "Aryans" often feel obligated to protect the terrorist legacy of their "Aryan" parents, and insist that the coming of those Devils had nothing to do with the destruction of the civilization all in the same period (which is a pattern). Some of the original inhabitants resisted the invaders migrating further north and east, and others were subjugated into the bottom of the caste system that still goes on today. The more melaninated southern Indians Dravidians still have respect towards their ancient African origins. Some Indians of higher caste so delusional about the situation that occurred. They will regard acknowledging this obvious scenario as "outdated""Methodological issues in the Indo-European debate - Michel Danino July 2019
Abstract The Indo-European debate has been going on for a century and a half. Initially confined to linguistics, race-based anthropology and comparative mythology, it soon extended to archaeology, especially with the discovery of the Harappan civilization, and peripheral disciplines such as agriculture, archaeometallurgy or archaeoastronomy. The latest entrant in the field, archaeogenetics, is currently all but claiming that it has finally laid to rest the whole issue of a hypothetical migration of Indo-Aryan speakers to the Indian subcontinent in the second millennium BCE. This paper questions the finality of this claim by pointing to inherent limitations, methodological issues and occasional biases in current studies as well as in the interpretation of archaeological evidence."
In the video below everyone can see how delusional these "higher caste" Indians are about their "Aryan" involvement in ancient Indus Valley.1 The absurdity in their analysis of the destruction of the Indus Valley civilization is illustrated here by scholar Manu Ampim;
Start around : 1:15:00
Genetic studies have proven that the founding neolithic populations for the Levant region including ancient Canaanite, Phoenicia, Anatolia, and Greek civilizations were the result of those same waves of African migrants (nicknamed "Basal Eurasians") starting with the Natufians. The second population wave were the ancient African Saharan migrants, who founded those civilizations in those regions around the Mediterranean coast around the 3rd millennium BCE. These civilizations flourished prior to the middle of the second millennium. The obvious reason for their collapse being the invasions and constant warfare with random nomadic "Aryan" hoards who were militarily trained (hence how they even got the name "Aryan") upon their release from the Caucus. The result of the mixing of the races (the original blacks being civilized and the later whites being savages) created fixed mulatto races first in the regions adjacent to the Caucus. As a result of that mixing we see cultural devolution from innovative relatively peaceful Africoid civilizations into a series of barbarous states such as the Hittite, Babylon Assyrian, Persian etc civilizations. In many of these early mixed race civilizations however it is clear from visual artistic evidence that the black elements of the civilizations were still at the head of many states in the regions. For this reason the Kemites early on to an extent were able to establish lines of diplomacy with their black rulers. One thing to note about the descendants of these civilizations is that many of them are almost white, and want to be white (as they see that white is equated with power). They also brag about nothing more than the war campaigns of these "civilizations", and from the success of those barbarous acts they feel validated. It's fascinating, because Hapi Valley civilization is famed for it's actual civilization, including it's philosophy centered around Ma'at meaning harmony and or understanding. It's the complete opposite of what the later barbarous mixed race states of Asia and Europe came to be known for. Their extremely short lived "glories" of war on the other hand no matter how barbaric tend to be the only thing that these later non African states are known for. These influence of the non black civilizations upon their intrusion into black affairs did not enrich the civilizations in any way shape or form. These partially black and white states of Western Eurasia unlike fully black African states did not last thousands of years, but nothing more than mere centuries. That is the tell tell sign of the futility of their existence. They are proud of being low frequency beings. They adhere to that legacy, and feel that that legacy makes them superior to us. That is a Devil's logic, and it should be rejected by civilized people. The third wave of Africans acted essentially as a 25th Dynasty to regions of the Mediterranean. According to Dr. Ben among other scholars, an army of ancient Kemites lead by pharaoh Thutmoses III conquered and settled in the Levant and Europe, where they reestablished the high cultures of the earlier Saharan African migrants (Pelasgians) after the collapse of the Minoan civilization, and the emergence of the Dravidian lead Mycenaean empire lasting for 500 years until around 1,200 BCE. The Achaeans were the last Africans to wrestle control of the region after defeating the Mycenaeans . It was around this time that nomadic albinoid populations from the Caucus known as the Sea Peoples had overran them and plunged the civilization into their own respective dark ages (Greece for example). The Classical Greek period thus was a fixed mulatto race (not a white civilization), and began after the first millennium BCE. It lasted only around 700 years until succumbing to the Roman empire. So much for any all white "civilizations". Phoenicia & Carthage
(Established Phoenicia 2,700 BC & Carthage 10th Century BC) The Phoenician City of Carthage
Carthage dominated the Mediterranean before Rome was anything. The Romans modeled their entire city-state from Carthage, and as typically with genetically recessive people or those who find themselves heavily influenced behavior, the Romans obsessed over destroying that which it had came/was modeled from)
The Phoenicians civilization were essentially a satellite colony of ancient Kemet. It's boundaries ranged along the Mediterranean coast around Kemet all the way into Western Europe, and the Americas. It was a Phoenician queen who founded what some scholars have consider to be the last stronghold of Africa in ancient times which was Carthage around the 9th century BC. Carthage was the original Rome, before it was raised to ground by Rome. The Phoenicians are the group of Africans who taught the genetically recessive Greek Dorians how to read and write after they had defeated the Achaeans. Below is a coin from Carthage that many scholars have declared to be Hannibal. "As for Stephane Gsell, he concludes the following ‘…anthropological analyses of the skeletons found in Carthage prove that there is no racial or ethnic unity… the Semitic type (White Berber) characterized by a round face, a thin aquiline nose has not been found in Carthage. On the other hand, the dolichocephalic type with a short face, a body more stretched out that the legs is a common feature to the skeletons found in Lebanon and in Tyra (match with the Phoenicians who also were Negroid)… the majority of the Carthaginian population was Negroid…’"
Nations Negres et Culture - Dr. Cheikh Anta Diop
"And Pittard concluded the subject with the description of the members of the Carthaginian elite as follows: Other bones found in the Punic Carthage taken to the Museum of Lavigerie, come from subjects discovered in particular sarcophagus and in all probability belong to the Carthaginian elite. The skulls are almost dolichocephalic and with a rather short face’"
Genetic Evidence (Genetic proof of Carthage being characterized by a Niger-Congo population)
The sub-Saharan African admixture observed in the non-Ogliastra samples could be mediated through an influx of migrants from North Africa before the Arab expansion, for example, during the eras of trade relations and occupations from the Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and Romans (~700 B.C. to ~200 B.C., see Dyson and Rowland10).
link
Phoenician man Ancient Phoenician honoring their Kemetic roots The Pelasgian civilizations brought about the zenith of the entire Greek story. When these early Africoid populations dominated is when all of the Greek myths came to, and was the height of Greek arts, science, mathematics, etc. Over 3,500 years ago, the Phoenicians arrived in what would become Greece bringing with them the Hapi Valley (Nubian) writing system.
Aegean Civilization (Established 3,200-2,700-1,900-800 BC)
Hathor in Greece2019 Archaeological discovery of the ancient Kemetic deity Hathor being depicted on jewelry recently unearthed in an ancient Greek tomb. Thus further confirming the ancient Hapi Valley origins of Aegean civilization. Palesgian art
Ancient Saharan art
As explained earlier the base population for the ancient Greeks were the Natufians. On top of those African migrants from another source, the Sahara desert created the basis for the ancient Minoan civilization in the 3rd millennium BC. These Africans soon spread onto mainland Greece and established the Mycenaean civilization.Bio-Cultural Analysis
DNA analysis prove that the genetic origins of Minoan and the ancient Mycenaean civilizations were genetically linked to the Africoid populations who descended from the original "Negroid" Natufian population who spread from Africa into Canaan and northward into Turkey.
"DNA analysis has revealed that two ancient civilizations in Greece were related and shared common ancestors that travelled from modern day Turkey. Scientists believe that the Minoans and Mycenaens were descended from early Neolithic farmers who migrated from Anatolia to Greece and Crete. "link
A quick rehash on the early "Neolithic" farmers/Natufians of the Levant. "“The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants... It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.”
(Brace et. al. (2006). The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form." and "Other studied populations belong to the old Mediterranean substratum, which has been present in the area since pre-Neolithic times. This study indicates a higher proportion of Iberian than Arab ancestry in Tunisian Berbers, which is of value in evaluating the evolutionary history of present-day Tunisians. Greeks seem to share genetic HLA features (Chr 6) with Sub-Saharans. The relatedness of Greeks to Sub-Saharans has been confirmed by other studies based on chromosome 7 genetic markers. Ann Hum Biol. (2010 Jul 29).HLA class I and class II polymorphisms in Tunisian Berbers. The passage below contextualizes the usurping of these originally Africoid civilizations by the pale nomads when they leave the Caucus mountains and wonder into Europe. The Greeks often called the first inhabitants of Greece Pelasgians. The Greek writers claimed that Pelasgus, the great ancestor of the Pelasgians was the first man. The Pelasgians were a combination of diverse Black tribes which included the Achaeans , Kadmeans, and Leleges. The Garamantes were also often called Pelasgians by some classical writers. Strabo said "that the Pelasgi, as indeed the most ancient nation, were diffused through all Greece, and especially among the Aeolians".
Herodotus referred to the Pelasgians as "venerable ancestors". He said that the first Athenians "they were Pelasgi, the later possessing the country now designed Hellas". The Pelasgian founding of Athens is also noted by Plutarch in Theseus 12, and Ovid in Metamorphosis vii.402ff. According to Herodotus vii.91, the Pelasgians also founded Thebes in Europe. Pausanias, noted that "The Arcadians make mention of Pelasgus as the first person who existed in their country. From this king the whole region took the name Pilasgia". Hopper noted that the Pelasgians founded Attica.
The Black immigrants from Canaan (Saharan-Kushites) were also settled in the Aegean at Argolis. They called themselves the "Sons of Abas". Many of the Melampodes later took part of Argolis away from the Canaanites.
The earliest Greek alphabet was made by the Pelasgians, it was lost and later reintroduced by Kadmus to Boeotia. Another Pelasgian, Evander of Arcadia introduced writing to the Italians. This script was used to make the first fifteen characters of the Latin script according to Pliny and Plutarch."
(migration of Dorians-Ioans/Whites from the Caucus entering Greece)
"By 1300 BC, the Dorian tribes (Indo - Europeans) invaded Greece and defeated the Achaeans. The Dorian conquest of Mycenae led to Crete becoming a major center of Achaean civilization. The Dorians learned the art of writing from the Phoenicians....The Aryan-Greeks adopted the language of the Pelasgians and Egyptians. The linguistic evidence shows that there was a differentiation of Greece into East Greek and West Greek. The Black Greeks spoke East Greek (Achaioi or Achaean). West Greek was spoken by the Dorian or Aryan Greeks. The earliest Aryan tribe called Ionians spoke a dialect of East Greek called Aeolic.
Over 40% of Indo - European words and over 50% of ancient Greek Words were African in Origin
might be asking "well what about the "Caucasian" people", where were they at? Many waves of melaninated people were in Europe long before the nomadic Caucasian tribes were led from the Caucus mountains (hence "Caucasians") during a mere 2,000 B.C. bringing them into those already established areas.
As you've just read Caucasians could not even talk nor had any other form of communication between one another. These recent cave people subsequently plunged the advanced state of early Greece into the Greek Dark Ages. The civilization never fully recovered to return to this high state. This was the fate of all civilizations that they entered into.
on ancient Greece.
The Black Athena "Debates"
The Tamahu/The Whites
After 2,000 BC (around 1,400 - 1,200 BC) is the introduction of Aryans/Indo-European/Tamahu/Pale folks in general into the World (including so called "East Asians"). These nomadic hordes usurped and then destroyed every pre-existing black civilization located in Asia and Europe, and finally around the 6th century BCE they broke into Africa via the invasion of Kemet under the Persian guise eventually sacking Thebes in Southern Kemet. It is their hidden legacy that their own scholars have reluctantly announced publicly (check Fergi cited at the beginning of this section). These savages were the World's original terrorist as noted by ancient Kemetic text (depicted in the "Tamahu" section in the next post). They destroyed an entire phase of high civilization with their unwanted presence, and never replaced it. White scholars (shown below) have noted this about their own legacy, so no need to assume that hate is the motive for presenting this truth.
F. Champollion who deciphered the hieroglyphs wrote this about the what he found written about the humble origins of "whites".
"And we learn at the same time the great geographical or ethnographica divisions established during that early epoch. Men led by Horus, the shepherd of the peoples, belong to four distinct families. The first, the one closest to the god, has a dark red colour, a well-proportioned body, kind face, nose slightly aquiline, long braided hair, and is dressed in white. The legends designate this species as Rt-en-ne-Rme, the race of men par excellence i.e. the Egyptians.
They can be no uncertainty about the racial identity of the man who comes next: he belongs to the Black race, designated under the general term, Nahasi. The third presents a very different aspect; his skin colour borders on yellow or tan, he has a strongly aquiline nose, thick, black pointed beard and wears a short garment of varied colours; these are called, Namou.
Finally, the last one is what we call flesh-coloured, a white skin of the most delicate shade, a nose straight or slightly arched, blue eyes, blond or reddish beard, tall stature and very slender clad in a hairy ox-skin, a veritable savage tattooed [see my article on European Goths] on various parts of his body, he is called, Tamahou.
I hasten to seek the tableau corresponding to this one in the other royal tombs and, as a matter of fact, I found it in several. The variations I observed fully convinced me that they had tried to represent here the inhabitants of the four corners of the earth, according to the Egyptian system, namely;
The inhabitants of Egypt which, by itself formed one part of the world
The inhabitants of Africa proper: Blacks
Asians
Finally [and I am ashamed to say so, since our race is the last and the most savage in the series]. Europeans who, in those remote epochs, frankly did not cut too fine a figure in the world
-- Champollion"
and
"The Mediterranean Race "(1.) The primitive populations of Europe, after Homo Neandertkalensis, originated in Africa; these constituted the entire population of Neolithic times. (2.) The basin of the Mediterranean was the chief centre of movement whence the African migrations reached the centre and the north of Europe. (8.) The two classic civilisations, Greek and Latin; were not Aryan, but Mediterranean. The Aryans were savages when they invaded Europe: they destroyed in part the superior civilisation of the Neolithic populations, and could not have created the Greco-Latin civilization""
G. SERGI.
ROME, Feoruary, 1901."
(Between 16th - 10th century BC Caucasian hoards leaving the caves of the Caucus overran and intermixed and overturned every civilization in Eurasia.
What was Their Strategy?
"First, they settles in a country in small groups and were partly assimilated. Over a period of time their numbers increased. Once they reach a numerical majority they joined forces with other Indo-European speaking groups to militarily overthrow the original inhabitants in a specific area and take political power. Since these communities occupied by the blacks often saw themselves as residents of a city-state, they would ignored the defeat of their neighbors. This typified their second form of invasion of the countries formerly ruled by the Proto-Saharans/Kushites/Blacks.
Blacks have failed even today to recognize that even though whites are highly nationalistic and engaged in numerous fratricidal wars, they tend to unify temporarily to defeat non-European people. As a result in case where the Blacks have been politically organized into states or Empires, rather than isolated city-states, the large political units have lasted for hundreds of years as typified by ancient Egypt, Axum, Mali and ancient Ghana.") - C Winters
Among other things detailed in the full section on the Tamahu in the next post. Their Migrations
The Indo - Aryan Invasions
The Destruction of Mesopotamia and The Indus Valley Civilization
Today the fixed race mulattoes who now inhabit the areas in which these ancient civilizations once flourished like to pretend that their misceginated appearance is something that's "indigenous" to the area rather than being the result of the original melaninated Africoid and recessive people interbreeding. This is so they can deny their Africoid origin (they often obsess over being a proxy of "white"). In reality these Asiatic and European areas in which these civilizations flourished were overran by genetically recessive populations once they left the Caucus mountains. They mixed in with the aboriginal melaninated Africoid people and created fixed race mulattoes throughout those regions. Ivan Van Sertima explains how this happened to Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley civilizations (16-22 min marks).
The Sea Peoples
The Kemites also identified them as the "Sea Peoples" During One Phase of Interaction Dr. Ivan Van Sertima describes what happened to the originally black civilizations in Southwest Asia as the different streams of Indo-Aryans poured out of the Caucus mountains, and invaded hitting Mesopotamia and Indus Valley. Around the same time another wave of genetically recessives had attacked the Mediterranean with full force known as the Sea Peoples.
"In this context it is likely that Bronze Age events may have facilitated the southward diffusion of populations carrying northern and central European biological elements and may have contributed to some degree of admixture between northern and central Europeans and Anatolians, and on a larger scale, between northeastern Mediterraneans and Anatolians. Even if we do not know which populations were involved, historical and archaeological data suggest, for instance, the 2nd millennium B.C. Minoan and later Mycenaean occupation of Anatolian coast, the arrival in Anatolia in the early 1st millennium B.C. of the Phrygians coming from Thrace, and later the arrival of settlers from Macedonia in Pisidia and in the Sagalassos territory (under Seleucid rule). The coming of the Dorians from Northern Greece and central Europe (the Dorians are claimed to be one of the main groups at the origin of the ancient Greeks) may have also brought northern and central European biological elements into southern populations. Indeed, the Dorians may have migrated southward to the Peloponnese, across the southern Aegean and Create, and later reached Asia Minor."
F. X. Ricaut, M. Waelkens. (2008). Cranial Discrete Traits in a Byzantine Population and Eastern Mediterranean Population Movements Human Biology - Volume 80, Number 5, October 2008, pp. 535-564
Everything about these people and their history (which is why it is not publicly taught) indicates that they are mythical creatures known as the "Devil" in the Bible and Koran.These pale nomadic hoards single handedly brought an end to Bronze Age civilizations across the Mediterranean coast overrunning the Anatolian region, Phoenicia, Canaan, Cyprus, and finally halted by the Kemites lead by Ramses III. They not only destroyed these once flourishing civilizations of the region, but as noted in the citation above they brought the "white" element to the Africoid populations formulating "Semitic" populations of the Near East. Western scholars like to pretend to not know that the Sea Peoples were white savages who had recently left the Caucus for obvious reasons. The video below is a classic example of deception in Western history narrative. CA Diop put the true context of the Sea Peoples in African Origins of Civilization (the exert about Ramses III and the Sea peoples is in my next post)
On a side note - It's interesting that genetically recessive supremacist organizations today, like the KKK will attempt to flip the script about race mixing, and pretend that the genetically recessive element was the innovator of civilization, and then a later black element created a mongrelized group that destroyed the progressiveness of the civilization...The pale Devils are very aware of the truth, and are only playing mind games with those who are ignorant of it. More of this is discussed in the next post.
West Africa - Mande Civilizations
Dhar Tichitt (Established 2,000 BC)
Dhar Tichitt is the ultimate proof of the Saharan African source for all ancient civilizations. In every direction that these Saharan migrants went civilization followed, and when they went into Saharan West Africa that is seen in the little mentioned state of Dhar Tichitt. This West African civilization was prior to the 6th century BC, which is when the main migration of Niger-Congo speakers left the Hapi Valley for interior regions of Africa. There is a common retort by white supremacist saying "focus on West African history". This is to imply that our people in the Western hemisphere are only from "West African" lineages, in an attempt to say that Niger-Congo speakers have always lived in West Africa or other interior regions of the continent. This is said out of ignorance, by some and a deliberate attempt to disconnect us from our earlier genesis (prior to the 6th century BC) in Northeast Africa. One of the main facts to make these racist shut up forever is that most of what is "tropical" West Africa was uninhabitable swamp land until the 2nd millennium BC (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981 ,1986). This little known fact is another pivotal reason why Christoper Ehret's 12,000 BP date for the migration into West Africa from Nubia is false. The other argument that they'll have to make is that we are all Mande. The Mande speakers broke away from the main body of Niger-Congo speakers in Nubia early on, and migrated into the Western Saharan regions.
This was an ancient Western Saharan civilization that was created as a result of the Soninke people of the Mande branch of Niger Congo speakers who lived in Western regions of the Sahara intermingling linguistically with Nilotes during it's fertile period, and as a result of desertification this branch of Niger-Congo speakers migrated into Northern-West Africa over 4,000 years ago. To the racist who like to imply that West Africa was underdeveloped they will shut up after being made aware of the fact that This little known advanced literate ancient West African civilization is older than anything in Europe! These Africans were apart of the Ma-Confederation/Kushites and the existence of this thriving civilization with the exact same linguistic and cultural traits seen throughout the Near East and all the way to China proves that Niger-Congo speakers were at the heart of this Kushite faction.
It again needs to be mentioned that this early ancient West African civilization was also literate! The Manding script which is found in the ancient Sahara at least as far back as the 4th millennium BC also shares morphological traits seen as far east as India (among the original inhabitants the Dravidians who also once co inhabited the once fertile Sahara) and China.
Wagadou "Ancient Ghana" (700AD - 1240 AD)
The people who created this civilization were ancestral to that that is known today as "ancient Ghana", but was called "Wagadou" in ancient times. This civilization carried the torch of high civilization after the fall of Meoritic Nubia. These Mande speakers also traveled to America into the Olmec civilization.
The Bio-Cultural Affinities Between Niger-Congo speakers and ancient Kemet
This "modern" Western scholars who are getting credit for "verifying" that the ancient Kemites were "African" are only verifying what African scholars (shown above) have asserted with extreme confidence in the face of those pale Devils who claimed their evidence as "non sufficient" for their claims. Listen to Diop break this down for everyone over a quarter century ago.The following is supporting evidence from
The African Origins of Civilization: by: Cheikh Anta Diop
Evidence from Physical Anthropology The skeletons and skulls of the Ancient Egyptians clearly reflect they were Negroid people with features identical to those of modern Black peoples of Sub Saharan Africa.
Melanin Dosage Test Egyptologist Cheikh Anta Diop invented a method for determining the level of melanin in the skin of human beings. When conducted on Egyptian mummies in the Museum of Man in Paris, this test indicated these remains were of Black people. Diop's technique of determining the melanin content of individuals with "damaged" cells is being built upon in the modern era for burn victims, as the study below does. It also modern validation of the technique created by C.A. Diop finding the ancient Kemites to be "black".
Biotechnic & Histochemistry 2005, 80(1): 7_/13
"Materials and methods
In 1997, the German Institute for Archaeology headed an excavation of the tombs of the nobles in Thebes-West, Upper Egypt. At this time, three types of tissues were sampled from different mummies: meniscus (fibrocartilage), skin, and placenta. Archaeological findings suggest that the mummies dated from the New Kingdom (approximately 1550_/1080 BC). The basal epithelial cells were packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin."
Osteological Evidence "Lepsius canon," which distinguishes the bodily proportions of various racial groups categories the "ideal Egyptian" as "short-armed and of Negroid or Negrito physical type."
Evidence From Blood Types Diop notes that even after hundreds of years of inter-mixture with foreign invaders, the blood type of modern Egyptians is the "same group B as the populations of western Africa on the Atlantic seaboard and not the A2 Group characteristic of the white race prior to any crossbreeding."
The Egyptians as They Saw Themselves "The Egyptians had only one term to designate themselves =kmt= the Negroes (literally). This is the strongest term existing in the Pharaonic tongue to indicate blackness; it is accordingly written with a hieroglyph representing a length of wood charred at the end and not crocodile scales," singular. ‘Kmt’ from the adjective =kmt= black; it therefore means strictly Negroes or at the very least black men. The term is a collective noun which thus described the whole people of Pharaonic Egypt as a black people."
Divine Epithets Diop demonstrates that "black or Negro" is the divine epithet invariably used for the chief beneficent Gods of Egypt, while the evil spirits were depicted as red.
Evidence From the Bible The Bible states"…[t]he sons of Ham [were] Cush and Mizraim [i.e. Egypt], and Phut, and Canaan. And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah and Sabtechah." According to Biblical tradition, Ham, of course, was the father of the Black race. "Generally speaking all Semitic tradition (Jewish and Arab) class ancient Egypt with the countries of the Black."
Cultural unity of Egypt With The Rest of Africa Through a study of circumcision and totemism. Diop gives detailed data showing cultural unity between Egypt and the rest of Africa. HeadrestKing Tut's headrestModern day African incorporating ancient traditional headrest with everyday life (the connection is as obvious as Diop had stated)
NursingKemetian art, like any other, speaks for itself. For instance, Kemetian art had certain features that were similar to that of other ancient African culture. You'll see what I mean... Nursing Woman. From Giza: 5th Dynasty (ca. 2420-2389 B.C.E). Limestone with remains of paint. (courtesy of metmuseum) Akan [Ghana] wood carving of a female breast-feeding a young one; not unlike the theme being communicated in the ancient Egyptian rendition above. Rams's head Necklaces Parallels in color conventions
Noting distinction between the Kemites and the Nubians (who are the same people forming a bio-cultural continuum) in certain ancient depictions is one of the favorite tactics of deceptive pale Devils to imply a racial separation along the Hapi River. They try to impose their own illogical thinking process to interpret the situation.The ignore the true social-political implications behind the depictions.
In the depiction below is another depiction of the Dahomey kingdom in modern day Nigeria depicting themselves in the exact same red skin tone as the ancient Kemites, while depicting their equally melaninated neighbors in jet black skin tone.
"The ancient Egyptians were not the only ones to depict their fellow dark skin African neighbors in dual contrasting tones. the following image shows a conflict between the Fon warriors and their Yoruba counterparts. Both of these groups would generally be seen as dark skin peoples, but from the image below, this might not be immediately apparent to anyone unfamiliar with these peoples. " Rulers Depicted as Giants
Notice how both the Kemetic pharaoh and Dahomey king are depicted as giant rulers, and have one hand sticking out while being served by smaller humans. More proof of this diffusion of people and culture from the Hapi Valley into interior regions of Africa is shown in the appearance of the ancient Kemetic spiritual system being shown in these other African cultures. The Osirian crock and flail were sported by the kings of inner Africa. Notice that the Dahomey king holds the traditional Osirion Crock while the ancient Kemetic figure holds the Flail. It's also note worthy...that the color scheme of the Dahomey (Nigeria) are not depicting "black skinned" people despite us knowing that these people were/are still melaninated "black" Africans. It's also worth noting how these little Damomey citizens are shaped almost identically (even pointy noses) to how the ancient Mesopotamians depicted themselves.
Dahomey Kingdom (Nigeria)
Linguistic Unity With Southern and Western Africa In a detailed study of languages, Diop clearly demonstrates that Ancient Egyptian, modern Coptic of Egypt and Walaf of West Africa are related, with the latter two having their origin in the former.
"Pharaonic Egyptian - Wolof; (Wolof meaning) Aku - Aku : foreigners (Creole descendants of European traders and African wives) anu - K.enou : pillar atef - ate : a crown of Osiris, judge of the soul (to judge) ba - bei : the ram-god (goat) ben ben - ben ben : overflow, flood bon - bon : evil bu - bu : place bu bon - bu bon : evil place bu nafret - bu rafet : good place da - da : child Djoob - Djob : a surname fero - fari : king itef - itef : father kau - kaou : elevated, above (heaven) kem -khem : black (burnt, burnt black) kemat - kematef : end of a period, completion, limit khekh - khekh : to fight, to wage war, war kher - ker : country (house) lebou - Lebou : those at the stream, Lebou/fishermen Senegal maat - mat : justice mer - maar : love (passionate love) mun - won : buttocks nag - nag : bull (cattle) nak - nak : ox, bull (cow) NDam - NDam : throne neb - ndab : float nen - nen : place where nothing is done (nothingness) nit - nit : citizen Ntr - Twr : protecting god, totem nwt - nit : fire of heaven (evening light) o.k. - wah keh : correct, right onef - onef : he (past tense) ones - ones : she (past tense) Diop's highlighted list.
Testimony of Classical Greek and Roman Authors Virtually all of the early Latin eyewitnesses described the Ancient Egyptians as Black skinned with woolly hair.
Genetic Evidence Confirming the Migrations Of Niger-Congo Speakers From Kemet - Kush & Into Interior Africa
The main point of this thread is summed up in this particular section. The deliberate hiding of the fact by the West of mass migrations of Africans from Hapi Valley civilizations into the interior regions of the continent began around the 6th century BC/the Egyptian "Late Period" after the Persian invasion. This is when the original inhabitants of Kemet (most Kemet's population lived in southern/Upper Kemet) began the southward migrations first into home base of Nubia/Kush and broke off into different regions of interior Africa. One of the major routes besides towards the Great Lakes was into West Africa, which involved Niger-Congo speakers, Nilo Saharans, Chadic, and Cushitic Africans. These migrations into interior Africa also coincide with the dating of Kush's redesignation of the capital city from Napata to Meroe further south. One of the main points of this thread is to confirm through contemporary evidence that the Master Teacher's had the story of our people origins and migration perfectly.
African Origins of Civilization C.A. Diop
One of the first genetic studies this decade (2020's) that report on ancient Africans DNA confirms what C.A. Diop stated in "The African Origins of Civilization", and particularly on the page cited above! The first inhabitants of the West, Central regions of Africa were not "Niger-Congo" speaking populations, but instead were the Twa.
Ancient West African foragers in the context of African population history Mark Lipson, Isabelle Ribot, […]David Reich
Nature (2020)
Our knowledge of ancient human population structure in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly prior to the advent of food production, remains limited. Here we report genome-wide DNA data from four children—two of whom were buried approximately 8,000 years ago and two 3,000 years ago—from Shum Laka (Cameroon), one of the earliest known archaeological sites....However, the genome-wide ancestry profiles of all four individuals are most similar to those of present-day hunter-gatherers from western Central Africa, which implies that populations in western Cameroon today—as well as speakers of Bantu languages from across the continent—are not descended substantially from the population represented by these four people.
Kush
Prior to Kemet's "New Kingdom" the Africans further to the south in Kema successfully invaded Kemet during the Middle Kingdom and did not occupy it. This was done to run out the troublesome non black Asiatic foreigners who had been gaining control over the culture of the land. The restoration of that old inner African culture that had been decimated by those "vile Asiatics" who were overrunning northern Kemet (since the Hyksos) was the reason for the famed 25th dynasty of Kush that ruled Kemet and parts of the near East for close to a century. With Kush being fully African (little to no non African immigrants) and united after learning from the examples of Kemet (which was the detriment of parlaying non Africans into the culture further explained in the next post) through it's destruction, the coming Greeks who were lead by Alexander knew not to step to Kushite Nubian queens/Candices even with the knowledge of Nubia's being the treasure trove of the World. The Greeks ran off without a fight. The Romans who later took over the lands of Greece (which included "Egypt) attempted to do the same only with actual battles in which the Africans lead by another Candice defeated the Romans. It was the Semitic takeover of Axum and the war with them that destroyed invisible Kush.
To address the evidence of the dispersal from the Hapi Valley of that original Bantu population from Nubia-Kemet. For comparison purposes I will repost these maps below. The next spot that we migrated into from Kemet was back south into Kush/Nubia.
Original homeland of the Bantu up to 1500 A.D Dark shading: Possible ultimate origin of the Bantu Cross shading: Area of Bantu expansion into Kemet
Bantu Migration Routes from Kush and the Island of Meroe
The evolutionary history of Southern Africa Francesco Montinaro1,2 and Cristian Capelli1
On the map below notice how the Hapi River Valley and particularly around northern & central Sudan along with middle & southern Egypt is the most noticeable abnormality on the map below for their complete absence of Africa's most frequent genetic marker Y-Dna haplogroup E1b1a. Coincidentally this is the exact same region where the Bantu Homeland and expansion is given by African scholar Alfred M M'Imanyara (maps above) decades prior to the heavy reliance on genetic data (compare the map below to the black and white maps of the homeland and expansion above). The migration map with the arrows above explains the genetic marker's current distribution in the map below. It's like plugging the pieces of a puzzle. The exert cited below from S.O.Y. Keita places the M2 lineage in Northeast Africa as well.
Distribution of Y-DNA (male DNA) haplogroup E1b1a/E-M2 lineage (predominant African American lineage)
The Distribution of E-M2 and it clades in Central and Southern Africa has usually been explained by the ‘‘Bantu migrations" (which occurred 3000-2500 B.C), in which agriculture and iron technologies spread from the Bantu's homeland located in the Benue complex i.e. Nigeria/Cameroon’’ But their presence in the Nile Valley and in other Non-Bantu speakers Can Not be explained in this way. E-M2 distribution is probably explained by their presence in the populations of the “Early Holocene Sahara”, Who went on to people the Nile Valley in The mid-Holocene era (12,000 B.P.) according to Hassan (1988). Keita and Boyce; Boyce, A. J. (Anthony J.) (2005). "Genetics, Egypt, and History: Interpreting Geographical Patterns of Y Chromosome Variation".
The East African origins and spread of E-M2 (the most common genetic marker in equatorial Africa) depicted in the map below verifies the oral traditions of the of the Niger-Congo speakers in the West, South and Central regions. The map shows our migration from the area of Sudanese Nubia, but obviously neglects the northward migration of the M2 lineage into Kemet. In essence we're just taking the map for what it's worth. This migration into West, South and Central Africa however did not happen until the 6th century BC.
Niger-Congo Kemetic descendants: Transatlantic slave trade routes (numbers are over exaggerated)
a(Ancient)DNA Results
STR Testing Results Confirming Genetic Affinities between Ancient Kemetic Pharaohs and Niger-Congo speakers (DNA tribes and DNA Consultants Analysis)
DNAconsultant Analysis
"The Akhenaten Gene. Named for the pharaoh who attempted to convert Kemet to monotheism, this autosomal ancestry marker like most of the Amarna family group’s DNA is clearly African in origin. Akhenaten received it from his mother, Queen Tiye.... But it is mostly absent in Asia and the Americas, except where brought there by Africans or people carrying some African ancestry. About 1 in 6 Africans or African Americans has it."
and
The King Tut Gene. Tutankhamun is the most famous of all pharaohs. He was the son and successor of Akhenaten, grandson of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye and great-grandson of the royal matriarch Queen Thuya....Tutankhamun actually carries a “double dose” of the allele named for him. Like most of the other genes in the family, it is Central African in ancient origin, but unlike the other alleles it has a widespread, albeit sparse distribution outside Africa. Still, Africans (and African-influenced populations) are ten times more likely to have it than non-Africans. DNAtribe Analysis
Recent genetic analysis of two separate New Kingdom families. This first one is King Tut's family (Amarna):
Geographical analysis of the Amarna mummies was performed using their autosomal STR profiles based on 8 tested loci.Results are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Maps for individual Amarna mummies are included in Figures 2-8 in the Appendix.
Discussion: Average MLI scores in Table 1 indicate the STR profiles of the Amarna mummies would be most frequent in present day populations of several African regions: including the Southern African (average MLI 326.94), African Great Lakes (average MLI 323.76), and Tropical West African (average MLI 83.74) regions. These regional matches do not necessarily indicate an exclusively African ancestry for the Amarna pharaonic family. However, results indicate these ancient individuals inherited some alleles that today are more frequent in populations of Africa than in other parts of the world (such as D18S51=19 and D21S11=34).
Peer Reviewed DNA analysis of Ramses III and his son
We amplified 16 Y chromosomal, short tandem repeats (AmpF\STR Yfiler PCR amplification kit; Applied Biosystems).........Genetic kinship analyses revealed identical haplotypes in both mummies (table 1⇓); using the Whit Athey’s haplogroup predictor, we determined the Y chromosomal haplogroup E1b1a
DNAtribes follow up.
These results indicate that both Ramesses III and Unknown Man E (possibly his son Pentawer) shared an ancestral component with present day populations of Sub-Saharan Africa..A previous issue of DNA Tribes Digest identified African related ancestry for King Tut and other royal mummies from the Amarna Period. In this issue, results indicate that the later pharaoh Ramesses III also inherited alleles that are most frequent in present day populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. This provides additional, independent evidence of Sub-Saharan African ancestry (possibly among several ancestral components) for pharaonic families of ancient Egypt....In addition, these DNA match results in present day world regions might in part express population changes in Africa after the time of Ramesses III. In particular, DNA matches in present day populations of Southern Africa and the African Great Lakes might to some degree reflect genetic links with ancient populations (formerly living closer to New Kingdom Egypt) that have expanded southwards in the Nilotic and Bantu migrations of the past 3,000 years (see Figure 1)
Recent DNA Testing Confirms that Every Pharoah Genetically Analyzed is a Black African
The mechanisms used by the DNA companies above have been verified, and the conclusions have been found to be accurate by 2018 peer reviewed study: “Results that are likely reliable are from studies that analyzed short tandem repeats (STRs) from Amarna royal mummies5 (1,300 BC), and of Ramesses III (1,200 BC)6; Ramesses III had the Y chromosome haplogroup E1b1a, an old African lineage7. Our analysis of STRs from Amarna and Ramesside royal mummies with popAffiliator18 based on the same published data5,6 indicates a 41.7% to 93.9% probability of SSA affinities (see Table 1); most of the individuals had a greater probability of affiliation with “SSA” which is not the only way to be “African”- a point worth repeating.” FROM: -Gourdine JP, Keita SOY, Gourdine JL, Anselin A, 2018. Ancient Egyptian Genomes from northern Egypt
2018 MTDNA also Confirms a Black African Genetic Affinity for Early Dynastic Kemet
Schuenemann et al. 2017
link
Recent And Highly Publicized White Racist Attempt to Mislead the Public About Genetic Affinities of this Ancient African Civilization. Segments of Western academia are revamping their racist deceptive tactics with genetics as they have done with anthropological studies in the past (i.e. Brace 1993). (That is an example of a Mayonnaise Party) Gourdine JP, Keita SOY, Gourdine JL, Anselin A, 2018
link
Despite their deceitful efforts the leading authority on the matter bio-geneticist SOY Keita has once again halted their white lies dead in it's tracks with a peer reviewed rebuttal to that nonsense released in 2017. This rebuttal was never publicized the way that the initial fallacy was or at all... If it's not already known, mainstream media outlets are nothing more than platforms for a white supremacist agenda, and with CNN making an entire segment dedicated to this feculent study it confirms without a shadow that it is a racist network that should be canceled (even during political season) by our people.
Consistency with Cranial and Archaeological Evidence Confirms the Findings of these recent DNA Studies as well:
"On this basis, many have postulated that the Badarians are relatives to South African populations (Morant, 1935 G. Morant, A study of predynastic Egyptian skulls from Badari based on measurements taken by Miss BN Stoessiger and Professor DE Derry, Biometrika 27 (1935), pp. 293–309.Morant, 1935; Mukherjee et al., 1955; Irish and Konigsberg, 2007). The archaeological evidence points to this relationship as well. (Hassan, 1986) and (Hassan, 1988) noted similarities between Badarian pottery and the Neolithic Khartoum type, indicating an archaeological affinity among Badarians and Africans from more southern regions. Furthermore, like the Badarians, Naqada has also been classified with other African groups, namely the Teita (Crichton, 1996; Keita, 1990). ...
Nutter (1958) noted affinities between the Badarian and Naqada samples, a feature that Strouhal (1971) attributed to their skulls possessing “Negroid” traits. Keita (1992), using craniometrics, discovered that the Badarian series is distinctly different from the later Egyptian series, a conclusion that is mostly confirmed here. In the current analysis, the Badari sample more closely clusters with the Naqada sample and the Kerma sample. However, it also groups with the later pooled sample from Dynasties XVIII–XXV. -- Godde K. (2009) An Examination of Nubian and Egyptian biological distances: Support for biological diffusion or in situ development? Homo. 2009;60(5):389-404."
Recent Osteological Study Supports Diop's Assertion that Early Northern Kemetic Populations Were Black Africoid
Early Northern Kemites while different from the more populous and influential southern Kemet were also Indigenous melaninated Africans .
A plethora of anthropological, archaeological, and genetic studies confirming the Africoid origins of Hapi Valley civilization here and here.
As displayed with the Jebel Sahaba skull (Pleistocene Nubians) earlier when the word "Negroid" is being used it is in reference to the Niger-Congo speaking, E-M2 lineage carrying African populations (except in some cases the vast "Sub Saharan" regions diverse black populations are regarded as one). Our skull shape is the most unique of everyone else (somewhat close to the aboriginal Australian skull however, but everyone can spot the facial distinctions) as a result of our prognathism, wider teeth, and wide nostrils African. (African Origins of Civ -165) Below is a "Negroid" skull from Kerma (Nubia) whom the pre-dynastic Kemites cranio-metrically overlapped with;
|
|
|
Post by asante on Dec 8, 2013 4:36:00 GMT -5
There's a gem in that quote: Here is another shoot down to the "Asiatic" origins for Lower Egyptians silliness.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Nov 28, 2013 13:36:49 GMT -5
Exactly man it has to start with US! Egyptsearch contributors are in my opinion the most important contributors to the conscious movement within the last decade. This is why the forum has a reputation for badass "Afrocentrics" (quit being scared of that word). Internet history forums now fear us and the knowledge that we hold, so they (Historum for one) are unapologetically censoring and heavily blanketing evidence that shows that throughout the vast majority of history Africans have been more "advanced" and knowledgeable then most if not all of our non African counter parts in many categories. Clearly this is a WAR...and blacks have Hella patches missing in our heads. We (the black conscious community and other non black truthcentered individuals) have not struck back since the 90's and I think that utilizing this wildly popular black owned and operated website we can spread the truth about our history to World and assure that this invaluable is not lost forever.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Nov 28, 2013 3:15:35 GMT -5
We (the Egyptsearch and conscious online community) have entirely too much little known yet invaluable knowledge on African and black history in general to simply be educating these silly ignorant white boys on different forums. We need to find a better way to showcase our true history on that heavy traffic black/urban/troll targeted website to combat the racist revision of history that is promoted on mainstream television. I propose that we (the Egyptsearch, the conscious online community, and whoever we can get) collectively start to bombard Q (the owner of Worldstar hip hop) to add a "History lesson of the Day" slot. We have access to a library of documentaries whether officially released or good, factual and entertaining (good music, funny/clever narration) and attractive homemade videos on various topics about black history. Through my experience I have noticed that unconscious black people online are thrilled and very openly appreciative of the revelation of non Eurocentric factual black African history. Almost all of them ask for more sources of this type of information. Promoting our history on Worldstar is a great way to reach the young generations. They will definitely be interested! Hopefully the end result of this would be the resurface the dialogue on these subjects and ultimately have the major media outlets to show racially accurate accounts of history. If not that then at least people will know that those outlets are full 0f . The email address below: worldstar@worldstarhiphop.com Send an email requesting that Q adds this to his daily collage. If someone gets a response then let the everyone know and begin to organize these videos. We can break down the speeches of scholars like cheikh Anta Diop, Ivan Van Sertima, John Henrick Clarke ect and long documentaries (i.e. anything over 45 minutes) into daily segments (positive suggestions very much welcome). If you're going to participate and or added a participant if can please say something in the thread to show that this is garnering good support. Let's make this a movement. If you're open about your beliefs then help start a persistent pledge on these many black conscious facebook pages (i.e. "tribal unity for black liberation", "Educated Black People against the "New" Black Entertainment TV 2", "The Real Afrikan Truth", "Sons of Nat Turner" "Voices of Our Ancestors", African History and Spirituality" ect ect). Basically let's spread the word as best we can about this. #ACTION
|
|
|
Post by asante on Nov 17, 2013 22:07:26 GMT -5
....I see black people..... i do too but its not just black people there are light skinned too Well what do you have to say about the study just posted, which found that Garamante remains clustered primarily with Sub Saharan Africans?
|
|
|
Post by asante on Nov 17, 2013 0:43:58 GMT -5
Yep they too were black.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Oct 1, 2013 12:21:09 GMT -5
In some studies, the Natufian area, such as at Tabun, has lithic technology with clear resemblances to African patterns as noted by scholars of the Natufians like Bar-Yosef. QUOTE: "Since the Levantine Mousterian likewise lacks the chopping tool component characteristic of all Late Acheulean entities.. the complexity typical of this entity and of its African analogues, is nevertheless striking (Bar-Yosef and Goren-Inbar 1993).." (--Thomas Levy 1998. Archaeology of Society in the Holy Land. p 100.) Zaharan does this evidence indicate that the region of Palestine was predominantly black or are those "Negroid" findings along side other types of folks? What do you think that this indicates about Palestine/Israel during Biblical times?
|
|