|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 27, 2016 9:48:04 GMT -5
did they get there by slavery? Is there any DNA proof showing they indigenous to that area?
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 26, 2016 12:25:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 20:16:15 GMT -5
Genetic evidence The genetic proximity observed between Moroccans and Southern Europeans is due to the fact that both these groups shared a common ancestor either in the Upper Paleolithic, and in the Neolithic or alternatively during history with the invasion and the occupation during nearly seven centuries of the Iberian Peninsula by Moorish troops.[31] A genetic study published in January 2012 stated that the indigenous North-west African ancestry appears most closely related to populations outside of Africa but "divergence between Moroccan people and Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya) and The Paleolithic (>40.000BC)."[32] Recent studies make clear no significant genetic differences exist between Arabic and non-Arabic speaking populations, The human leukocyte antigen HLA DNA data suggest that most Moroccans are of a Berber origin and that Arabs who invaded North Africa and Spain in the 7th century did not substantially contribute to the gene pool.[33][34] The Moorish refugees from Spain settled in the coast-towns.[35] According to a 2000 article in European Journal of Human Genetics, Moroccans from North-Western Africa were genetically closer to Iberians than to Sub-Saharan Africans of Bantu Ethnicity and Middle Easterners.[36] The different loci studied revealed close similarity between the Berbers and other north African groups, mainly with Moroccan Arabic-speakers, which is in accord with the hypothesis that the current Moroccan population has a strong Berber background.[37] Various population genetics studies along with historians such as Gabriel Camps and Charles-André Julien lend support to the idea that the bulk of the gene pool of modern Northwest Africans, irrespective of linguistic group, is derived from the Berber populations of the pre-Islamic period.[38] According to the X-Chromosome SNP analyses, the authors reported a high genetic homogeneity between berbers and Arabs in NW Africa, so they suggested that the Arabisation of this area was a cultural phenomenon, which did not imply a replacement of the ancestry population. Our results give support the hypothesis of an early settlement of NW Africa . The original berber population seem to have received a low genetic influx from the surrounding areas. Different hypothesis have been suggested to explain the genetic differentiation of the Moroccan population. An initial genetic drift could have caused differences in allele frequency distribution that have not been re-established due to a certain level of geographic isolation. The Strait of Gibraltar has been described by several authors as an important genetic barrier. Even a certain level of genetic exchange probably occurred between NW Africa and the South of the Iberian Peninsula, sharp frequency changes have been described in this area. Also the Sahara desert has been suggested as responsible of the genetic isolation of NW African populations from Sub-Saharan populations. There is no consensus about the impact of the Neolithic demic diffusion in the Mediterranean area. According to our results, a low impact of the Neolithic expansions and/or later migration events on NW African populations would have occurred. X-Chromosome SNP analyses en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moroccan_genetics
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 20:15:33 GMT -5
Genetic evidence The genetic proximity observed between Moroccans and Southern Europeans is due to the fact that both these groups shared a common ancestor either in the Upper Paleolithic, and in the Neolithic or alternatively during history with the invasion and the occupation during nearly seven centuries of the Iberian Peninsula by Moorish troops.[31] A genetic study published in January 2012 stated that the indigenous North-west African ancestry appears most closely related to populations outside of Africa but "divergence between Moroccan people and Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya) and The Paleolithic (>40.000BC)."[32] Recent studies make clear no significant genetic differences exist between Arabic and non-Arabic speaking populations, The human leukocyte antigen HLA DNA data suggest that most Moroccans are of a Berber origin and that Arabs who invaded North Africa and Spain in the 7th century did not substantially contribute to the gene pool.[33][34] The Moorish refugees from Spain settled in the coast-towns.[35] According to a 2000 article in European Journal of Human Genetics, Moroccans from North-Western Africa were genetically closer to Iberians than to Sub-Saharan Africans of Bantu Ethnicity and Middle Easterners.[36] The different loci studied revealed close similarity between the Berbers and other north African groups, mainly with Moroccan Arabic-speakers, which is in accord with the hypothesis that the current Moroccan population has a strong Berber background.[37] Various population genetics studies along with historians such as Gabriel Camps and Charles-André Julien lend support to the idea that the bulk of the gene pool of modern Northwest Africans, irrespective of linguistic group, is derived from the Berber populations of the pre-Islamic period.[38] According to the X-Chromosome SNP analyses, the authors reported a high genetic homogeneity between berbers and Arabs in NW Africa, so they suggested that the Arabisation of this area was a cultural phenomenon, which did not imply a replacement of the ancestry population. Our results give support the hypothesis of an early settlement of NW Africa . The original berber population seem to have received a low genetic influx from the surrounding areas. Different hypothesis have been suggested to explain the genetic differentiation of the Moroccan population. An initial genetic drift could have caused differences in allele frequency distribution that have not been re-established due to a certain level of geographic isolation. The Strait of Gibraltar has been described by several authors as an important genetic barrier. Even a certain level of genetic exchange probably occurred between NW Africa and the South of the Iberian Peninsula, sharp frequency changes have been described in this area. Also the Sahara desert has been suggested as responsible of the genetic isolation of NW African populations from Sub-Saharan populations. There is no consensus about the impact of the Neolithic demic diffusion in the Mediterranean area. According to our results, a low impact of the Neolithic expansions and/or later migration events on NW African populations would have occurred. X-Chromosome SNP analyses en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moroccan_genetics
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 20:11:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 20:10:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 20:01:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 19:58:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 19:36:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 24, 2016 18:48:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 21, 2016 15:45:18 GMT -5
On page 70 of the book "The African Origins of Modern Judaism from Hebrews to Jews" by Jose V. Malcioln Ph.D...it states: "When Jewish settlers arrived in northeast Africa from Nazi Germany and elsewhere, Gamal Abd-an-Nasir had a premonition that they would be as ruthless as their former oppressors. He told the Zionist, in speeches and on Egyptian television, "You will never be able to live here in peace, because you left here black, and now returned white. We cannot accept you!" Nasir also referred to the Zionist as "the imposter." A Jewish woman read the statements and declared Nasir an anti-Semite."
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 20, 2016 12:11:36 GMT -5
This video proves the DNA tribe study on the ancient Egyptians was wrong. They were not related to black Africans. youtu.be/bP_hqvSMlqw
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 20, 2016 12:09:31 GMT -5
Someone just sent me this: Good old cut and paste will do it. This is topic Limb Proportions of ancient Egyptians DEBU KED in forum Ancient Egypt at EgyptSearch Forums. To visit this topic, use this URL: www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=006366Posted by White Nord (Member # 14093) on 27 February, 2012 06:35 AM: "Ancient Egyptians as a whole generally exhibit intermediate body breadths relative to higher and lower latitude populations, with Lower Egyptians possessing wider body breadths, as well as lower brachial and crural indices, compared to Upper Egyptians and Upper Nubians. This may suggest that Egyptians are closely related to circum-Mediterranean and/or Near Eastern groups, but quickly developed limb length proportions more suited to their present very hot environments. These results may also reflect the greater plasticity of limb length compared to body breadth. ... It can be seen that previous stature estimation methods tend to overestimate Egyptian stature for both sexes.It can be seen that previous stature estimation methods tend to overestimate Egyptian stature for both sexes. The present studys stature estimates (bolded) are about 1-3 cm less than that of other studies for the same time periods, with an average 1.5 cm difference. New Kingdom pharaoh males may have been taller because of their higher status, however Robins and Shute (1983) used Trotter and Glesers (1958) equations for American Blacks to estimate their statures is the mean using regression formulae for the femur). Raxter et al. (2008) showed that although ancient Egyptians proportions are closer to American Blacks than they are to American Whites, they are not identical. Stature regression equations derived from American Black populations may therefore not be appropriate to estimate the statures of ancient Egyptians. ...The fact that limb proportions in ancient Egyptians are somewhat more “tropical” may reflect the greater lability of limb length compared to body breadth. The results may also suggest that Egyptians are closely related to circum-Mediterranean and/or Near Eastern groups and have retained those body breadths acquired earlier in time, but quickly developed limb length proportions more suited to their present very hot environments. The present results for bi-iliac breadth are also consistent with various genetic studies that have found modern Egyptians to have close affinities to Middle and Near Easterners (Manni et al., 2002; Arredi et al., 2004; Shepard and Herrera, 2006; Rowold et al., 2007) and Southern Europeans/Mediterranean groups (Capelli et al., 2006). Some of these authors suggested their results may have been associated with a diffusion from the Near East during the expansion of early food-producing societies (Arredi et al., 2004; Rowold et al., 2007)....MK, NK, and Roman-Byzantine Nubian males exhibit greater stature variation than their Egyptian counterparts from the same periods, with Nubian males possessing more variation compared to Nubian females. The greater variation in Nubian males may be indicative of greater in-migration of and intermarriage with foreign males. (Raxter; 2011) scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4500&context=etd"Super Negroids" DEBUNKED!! Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on 27 February, 2012 12:51 PM: quote: Originally posted by White Nord: EGYPTIAN BODY SIZE A REGIONAL AND WORLDWIDE COMPARISON MIchelle H. Raxter, University of South Florida 318 pages scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4500&context=etd
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 19, 2016 16:01:39 GMT -5
Present location KUNSTHISTORISCHES MUSEUM [09/001] International inventory number 09/001/4906 Designation Head of a Syrian Category ARCHITECTURE: ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION: TILE Dating NEW KINGDOM: 20TH DYNASTY: RAMESSES III/USERMAATRE-MERIAMUN This is a black syrian. He just light skinned like Rhianna. You must be blind.
|
|
|
Post by thamm1 on Mar 19, 2016 15:59:53 GMT -5
This is a black syrian. You must be blind
|
|