Archive:
[/img]
EARLY NATUFIANS were CAUCASIAN and later MEDITERRANEAN CAUCASIANSLOL- hopeless.. debunked again..
==========
FIRST REAL EUROPEAN not the outdated NEGROID recreation of Richard Neave!
That dumbazz recreation was done before it was found, MODERN HUMANS INTERBRED WITH NEANDERTHALS! Your nonsensical "new" dodge is that Neanderthal introgression in EUropeans somehow "cancels" the fact of African
migration to and admixture in EUrope. But it doesn't in any way. Neanderthal introgression would be
of very ancient origin, and in any event is of trivial proportion in Europeans, a mere 1-4%. There could be
Neanderthal mix, but the people doing the mixing, would be- wait for it hapless- MIGRANTS FROM AFRICA TO EUROPE.
Your LOL- your "Neanderthal cancellation" dodge is a complete bust, for the people doing the mixing would be anatomically
modern humans from Africa. You have just shot yourself in the foot- again.
Let's Recap your failures:
1) "Assured" Wikipedia references? - Debunked
2) "Supporting" Wikipedia references? - Debunked.
3) Pure "negro free" white Natufians? - Debunked
4) Pure "negro free" ancient Europeans- Debunked.
5) Cro-magnon as the ancestors of humanity? - Debunked.
6) Wandering white skin Caucasoids 8000 years ago? - Debunked
7) Nazlet Khater man in Egypt was an ancient wandering Caucasoid from EUrope? - Debunked.
8) Use of Neaderthal introgression to "cancel" the fact of ancient African migration to and admixture in EUrope? - Debunked.
But carry on adding nonsensical "new" spin.. It will still Pitifully be...
Jethro says:
I ONLY BELIEVE GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SITES AND WIKI!
WIKI STATES THE NATUFIANS CARRIED E-Z830 and the VERY EURASIAN MTDNA N
E-Z830 ORIGINATED IN NORTH AFRICA AMONGST THE VERY INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS!
EINSTEIN CARRIED E-Z830 as HIS MAIN Y-DNA! Does he resemble a SSA??? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
------------------------------
ANY BLACK AFRICANS CARRYING E-Z830 would have got it from a back migration of NORTH AFRICANS!
FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!
37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN as was 36 000 year old South African HOFMEYR MAN!
ANCIENT 13 000 RACE WAR BETWEEN NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS and black Africans in Northern Sudan:
www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/saharan-remains-may-be-evidence-of-first-race-war-13000-years-ago-9603632.html
Afronazis just cannot accept reality! NORTH AFRICA HAS ALWAYS BEEN CAUCASIAN GOING BACK TO THE VERY FIRST MODERN MAN the very CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON!!!!
LOL SO WIKI IS DOCTORED! SO TYPICAL OF DUMBAZZ AFRONAZIS that cant face reality! Facts are, YOUR LINKS ARE OUT OF DATE and the other LINKS ARE NOT GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESPECTED LINKS!
THERE WERE NEVER EVER ANY BLACK AFRICANS IN EURASIAN EVER!!!
N*GR***DS ARE ONLY 8000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asselar_man
CAUCASIANS are 45 000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurignacian FIRST EUROPEANS WERE HEAVILY MIXED WITH NEANDERTHALS and looked FCK ALL like N*GR***DS that didnt even exist at the time! [/b]
---------------------------
LOL at "Jethro"'s nonsense. Let's debunk it again:
Debunk 4- Wiki- You or your buddies no doubt have gone into Wikipedia and doctored pages, and then you come
back to talk about "information you found on WIki" as if its such a great "treasure trove." How laughable.
But let's take what you say at face value and look at your own "supporting Wiki reference."
Wiki says that Haplogroup E-z830 forms a part of the clade is a subclade of z827, which in turn is
a subclade of M35. Whatever the naming, the major ancestor cluster originated in Africa, and has
the highest frequency within. There goes your "Eurasian" blather up in smoke based on your own
"supporting reference."
Debunk 5- You say the Natufians carry ez380 a "very Eurasian" DNA. But your own Wikipedia set
of articles cites Lizrdis who specificlly notes the Natufian origin in Africa. XYZ has highlighted
THE SAME article above in detail and when you look at the actual scholar's article rather than doctored
Wiki write-ups, your "white Natufian" claim becomes nonsense.
^^Whoops- there you go again, debunked by your own "supporting" reference.
Debunk 6- you say
"FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!" Actually as Brada so succintly points out there were no "Caucasians" around at the time.
And one of the earliest modern humans actually clusters with tropical or "sub-Saharan" Africans.
You fail again, and by the way- we know the name of the early modern from your own place- Wikipedia,
which points us to an actual credible scientist's source. Thanks for the pointer, which by the way,
- has caused you to lose again.
Debunk 7
You said: "37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN" So let's get this straight. Said European migrated into ancient Egypt some tens of thousands of years ago- right?
![]()
memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Hysterical-Laughing-Gif-05.gif[/i]As for the hoped for "negro free Cro-magnons" alack and alas, turns our
they are just not "you" like Brada ponited out.
Debunk 8
WHITE SKIN ORIGINATED IN CENTRAL ASIA about 9000 years ago and was taken into EUROPE BY THE VERY WHITE MIDDLE EASTERN FARMERS
READ SUPER SLOWLY:
www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin LOL do you realize hat yet again you debunk yourself with your own "supporting" reference?
It says:
"Most modern Europeans don’t look much like those of 8000 years ago."
This confirms BRada's point, whereas you are still contradicting yourself with your white Cro-magnons
circa 45,000 years ago.
It also says:
"The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today."
LOL you have destroyed your "ancient Caucasoids" claim with your own reference.
So let's see. Your very own "supporting references" debunk every point you are trying to make.
But don't tell us. You will now go back to Wiki to doctor and "massage" the text to "spin"
additional distortion eh? Then you will report back on what you "found." LOL. GO ahead, and also
hunker down to "guard" your changes. Unfortunately for you, people already have more accurate data
based on the actual scholars. But carry on!
Jethro's consolidated:
I ONLY BELIEVE GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SITES AND WIKI!
WIKI STATES THE NATUFIANS CARRIED E-Z830 and the VERY EURASIAN MTDNA N
E-Z830 ORIGINATED IN NORTH AFRICA AMONGST THE VERY INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS!
EINSTEIN CARRIED E-Z830 as HIS MAIN Y-DNA! Does he resemble a SSA??? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
------------------------------
ANY BLACK AFRICANS CARRYING E-Z830 would have got it from a back migration of NORTH AFRICANS!
FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!
37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN as was 36 000 year old South African HOFMEYR MAN!
ANCIENT 13 000 RACE WAR BETWEEN NORTH AFRICAN CAUCASIANS and black Africans in Northern Sudan:
www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/saharan-remains-may-be-evidence-of-first-race-war-13000-years-ago-9603632.html
Afronazis just cannot accept reality! NORTH AFRICA HAS ALWAYS BEEN CAUCASIAN GOING BACK TO THE VERY FIRST MODERN MAN the very CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON!!!!
LOL SO WIKI IS DOCTORED! SO TYPICAL OF DUMBAZZ AFRONAZIS that cant face reality! Facts are, YOUR LINKS ARE OUT OF DATE and the other LINKS ARE NOT GENUINE SCIENTIFIC RESPECTED LINKS!
THERE WERE NEVER EVER ANY BLACK AFRICANS IN EURASIAN EVER!!!
N*GR***DS ARE ONLY 8000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asselar_man
CAUCASIANS are 45 000 years old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurignacian
FIRST EUROPEANS WERE HEAVILY MIXED WITH NEANDERTHALS and looked FCK ALL like N*GR***DS that didnt even exist at the time! [/b]
---------------------------
LOL at "Jethro"'s nonsense. Let's debunk it again:
Debunk 4- Wiki- You or your buddies no doubt have gone into Wikipedia and doctored pages, and then you come
back to talk about "information you found on WIki" as if its such a great "treasure trove." How laughable.
But let's take what you say at face value and look at your own "supporting Wiki reference."
Wiki says that Haplogroup E-z830 forms a part of the clade is a subclade of z827, which in turn is
a subclade of M35. Whatever the naming, the major ancestor cluster originated in Africa, and has
the highest frequency within. There goes your "Eurasian" blather up in smoke based on your own
"supporting reference."
Debunk 5- You say the Natufians carry ez380 a "very Eurasian" DNA. But your own Wikipedia set
of articles cites Lizrdis who specifically notes the Natufian origin in Africa. XYZ has highlighted
THE SAME article above in detail and when you look at the actual scholar's article rather than doctored
Wiki write-ups, your "white Natufian" claim becomes nonsense.
^^Whoops- there you go again, debunked by your own "supporting" reference.
Debunk 6- you say
"FIRST MODERN MAN ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE WAS THE CAUCASIAN CRO-MAGNON and his skull is found throughout the world including in SOUTH AFRICA AND EGYPT!" Actually as Brada so succintly points out there were no "Caucasians" around at the time.
And one of the earliest modern humans actually clusters with tropical or "sub-Saharan" Africans.
You fail again, and by the way- we know the name of the early modern from your own place- Wikipedia,
which points us to an actual credible scientist's source. Thanks for the pointer, which by the way,
- has caused you to lose again.
Debunk 7
You said: "37 000 year old NAZLET KHATER MAN OF EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN" So let's get this straight. Said European migrated into ancient Egypt some tens of thousands of years ago- right?
![]()
memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Hysterical-Laughing-Gif-05.gif[/i]As for the hoped for "negro free Cro-magnons" alack and alas, turns our
they are just not "you" like Brada pointed out.
Debunk 8
WHITE SKIN ORIGINATED IN CENTRAL ASIA about 9000 years ago and was taken into EUROPE BY THE VERY WHITE MIDDLE EASTERN FARMERS
READ SUPER SLOWLY:
www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin LOL do you realize that yet again you debunk yourself with your own "supporting" reference?
It says:
"Most modern Europeans don’t look much like those of 8000 years ago."
This confirms BRada's point, whereas you are still contradicting yourself with your white Cro-magnons
circa 45,000 years ago.
It also says:
[o]"The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today." LOL you have destroyed your "ancient Caucasoids" claim with your own reference.
So let's see. Your very own "supporting references" debunk every point you are trying to make.
But don't tell us. You will now go back to Wiki to doctor and "massage" the text to "spin"
additional distortion eh? Then you will report back on what you "found." LOL. GO ahead, and also
hunker down to "guard" your changes. Unfortunately for you, people already have more accurate data
based on the actual scholars. All your effort fails- an exercise in irrelevance. But carry on!
pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/3072538649/7bf20e311716c9f6f50cd81baf7a91e6_400x400.jpeg
[/quote]
d"
The Natufians were not identical to ALL West Africans, and were not
on the African continent, though right next door, but do show some
affinities with tropical Africans. Most likely they resembled
Africans, and had a wide range of variation, not only broad. Africans need
not all look like Orpah Winfrey to be considered "truly" African.
A narrow nose among African related people is just as "African" as a broad one.
Most likely in American social terms the Natufians would have been
segregated in the Jim Crow south or profiled up Nawth.
Palestine has had many types of peoples through the centuries-
including Asiatic types, so to use popular terminology a "mixed"
population- meaning features- would be in place over time. The Asiatic
"Middle Eastern looking" types over time may have assumed predominance,
though these labels have all kinds of contradictions and traps.
The Natufian era was circa 12,000 years ago so they would be
long before the Biblical era. By that time the "Arab looking" or "Middle
Eastern looking" types might have been more prevalent, but then again
with Egypt right next door, and Ethiopia right across the Red Sea,
in social terms a lot of varied looks are covered. There is a lot of
ambiguous grey area, requiring caution before making absolute statements.
Those who talk about "Caucasoid" this and that are wrong, but sweeping
statements in the reverse, trying to make everyone out to look like Louis
Armstrong are also shaky. These labels can be tricky.
The archeological artifacts from biblical times show that the population in the Levant/Arabia/Mesopotamia/Canaan - area would have looked like people of African descent today. I've seen reliefs of Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians & Persians, and they don't look like the Turkic population which reside in the so-called "Middle East" today at all. That part of the world obviously fits tropically adapted people more than pale people. It's not like they ran around wearing Thawb's 3000 years ago (which is what the Turks are doing now, to protect themselves from the sun) .
ANCIENT PEOPLE OF THE MIDDLE EAST WERE CAUCASIANS CARRYING EURASIAN DNA AND LOOKING EXACTLY LIKE THEIR MODERN DAY DESCENDANTS:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeogenetics_of_the_Near_East
?? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL