|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 5, 2020 15:59:48 GMT -5
The Lumbee Tribe is the largest tribe in North Carolina, the l argest tribe east of the Mississippi River and the ninth largest in the nation. The Lumbee take their name from the Lumbee River which winds its way through Robeson County. Pembroke, North Carolina is the economic, cultural and political center of the tribe.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 5, 2020 15:17:57 GMT -5
Hot off the press...this blew my mind Never mind the BS introduction just look at the facts....ie data. Tell me what you think? If the RV88 is predominantly in West Africans Holy Sh...!! Holy Sh....!!! This what I have hoping to find R-V88 in the Americas. 1500's Holy Sh------!!!! quote: "Turning to Haplogroups J1 and J2 (n=16), as well as E-L117 (n=4), one finds there is a distinct presence of Middle Eastern and North African DNA among the Lumbee males. In fact, t here are more Middle Eastern male lines among the Lumbee than there are Native American male lines. Moreover, there are twenty-one lines among the Lumbee men which carry the R-m512/R1a1a haplotype. This haplotype is found in approximately 50 percent of male Ashkenazi Levites, a hereditary caste within Judaism.72 In addition, the majority of the male Lumbee sample carries the R-v88 subclade of the Rm269 haplogroup." In addition, the majority of the male Lumbee sample carries the R-v88 subclade of the Rm269 haplogroup." egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/3104/colombus-crew-1500-america-africans
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 5, 2020 15:16:50 GMT -5
Holy Sh...!! Holy Sh....!!!
This what I have hoping to find R-V88 in the Americas. 1500's Holy Sh------!!!!
quote: "Turning to Haplogroups J1 and J2 (n=16), as well as E-L117 (n=4), one finds there is a distinct presence of Middle Eastern and North African DNA among the Lumbee males. In fact, there are more Middle Eastern male lines among the Lumbee than there are Native American male lines. Moreover, there are twenty-one lines among the Lumbee men which carry the R-m512/R1a1a haplotype. This haplotype is found in approximately 50 percent of male Ashkenazi Levites, a hereditary caste within Judaism.72 In addition, the majority of the male Lumbee sample carries the R-v88 subclade of the Rm269 haplogroup."
The R-v88 DNA haplotypes provide additional support for ancestry from the Croatian area, as well as support for the presence of Sephardic Jews among the Roanoke colonists, as hypothesized. Thus, the hypotheses is supported for the male portion of the Lumbee database.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 5, 2020 15:05:09 GMT -5
How long did it take to cross the Atlantic?
== Quote" This article proposes that the reason for their desire to exit England was the threat of Spanish invasion in one or two years’ time and their ethnic status as Sephardic Jews. In other words, if one were a converso merchant/tradesman in London, it was a good time to move west. Already many Portuguese and Bristol (England) fishing vessels were visiting the Atlantic Coast regularly for cod fishing, while English privateers such as Drake, Gilbert, and Grenville were preying on Spanish silver galleons in the south Atlantic.18 Many of the crew members aboard these ships were, in fact, conversos, as the manifests indicate."
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 5, 2020 14:55:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 5, 2020 14:52:04 GMT -5
Never mind the BS introduction just look at the facts....ie data. Tell me what you think? If the RV88 is predominantly in West Africans === QUOTE: DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500sFor the Sephardic Jews of Spain, the year 1492 saw one door close while another door opened half a world away.1 It was the year the Spanish Inquisition reached its apex of brutality, while concurrently Cristobal Colon—remembered in American history as Christopher Columbus and purportedly of Sephardic descent —set sail for the New World.2 The names of his crew suggest that several of them were also Sephards.3 By the mid-1500s, Spain had expelled between 100,000 to 200,000 Jews after first seizing their money and possessions.4 The Spanish Jews fled in all directions: eastward to Italy and the Ottoman Empire,5 westward to Portugal, northward over the Pyrenees to France, and southward across the narrow Strait of Gibraltar to North Africa.6 Another 10,000 to 20,000 remained behind, to later be killed by the Inquisitorial Court,7 while an additional 30,000 converted (often superficially) to Catholicism.8 If their insincerity was suspected, they too were added to the bonfires of the auto-da-fé.9
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Mar 3, 2020 21:12:13 GMT -5
Evaluating the promise of inclusion of African ancestry populations in genomics Amy R. Bentley, Shawneequa L. Callier & Charles N. Rotimi npj Genomic Medicine volume 5, Article number: 5 (2020) Cite this article
505 Accesses
11 Altmetric
Metricsdetails
Abstract The lack of representation of diverse ancestral backgrounds in genomic research is well-known, and the resultant scientific and ethical limitations are becoming increasingly appreciated. The paucity of data on individuals with African ancestry is especially noteworthy as Africa is the birthplace of modern humans and harbors the greatest genetic diversity. It is expected that greater representation of those with African ancestry in genomic research will bring novel insights into human biology, and lead to improvements in clinical care and improved understanding of health disparities. Now that major efforts have been undertaken to address this failing, is there evidence of these anticipated advances? Here, we evaluate the promise of including diverse individuals in genomic research in the context of recent literature on individuals of African ancestry. In addition, we discuss progress and achievements on related technological challenges and diversity among scientists conducting genomic research.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 18, 2020 21:36:27 GMT -5
Of the volume’s three themes—burial, migration, and identity—burial receives the most attention and represents the greatest contribution. Compiling the history of mortuary research, key findings, major challenges, and future directions for over a dozen northern African countries is enough to put this book on any Africanist’s shelf. Many chapters also contain a wealth of previously unpublished data, photos, drawings, and detailed maps prime for comparative research. Although chapters tend to be focused on broad themes, poignant individual stories also come through, such as the young woman with a lip plug in the Fazzan who hints at sub-Saharan connections (Chapter 2) and a child with over 4000 beads and cowrie shells at Daima who signals an important social shift (Chapter 13).
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 18, 2020 21:03:56 GMT -5
In Burials, Migration, and Identity in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond, Gatto, Mattingly, Ray, and Sterry bring together diverse datasets from all corners of the desert using an explicitly trans-Saharan approach. Inspired by developments in Mediterranean archaeology, they reframe the desert as a great interconnected sea that can only be understood in relation to its “shorelands” on its eastern, northern, and southern peripheries. Instead of standing outside the desert looking in, as scholars and historians have done for centuries, this book is set within the Sahara looking out. Through this approach, the editors seek to understand how events and processes within this network shaped human lives across space and time.
The volume focuses on burial, migration, and identity, one of the four interdisciplinary areas explored by the Trans-SAHARA Project (2011–2017). The seventeen chapters are written by archaeologists, biological anthropologists, historians, and linguists who engage with these themes through a wide range of case studies. The aim is to critically discuss and compare evidence from across the desert for the first time. One of the ultimate objectives is to explore whether a trans-Saharan identity emerges that may help contextualize relationships and connections across this broader landscape.
By and large, the book is geographically organized. Following a comprehensive introduction led by D. J. Mattingly on the history of burial, migration, and identity research in the Sahara (which is an immensely valuable literature review), the book begins in the Central Sahara (Part I) with several chapters on Libya’s Fazzan region. Chapter 2, also led by Mattingly, is a data-heavy synthesis of > 11,000 surveyed and > 150 excavated Garamantian tombs studied by the Desert Migrations Project 2007–2011, and includes extensive descriptions of architecture, funerary furniture, grave goods, burial orientations, and human remains. M. C. Gatto and colleagues then compare these data to mortuary patterns and burial typologies in the southwestern Fazzan attributed to Garamantian contemporaries, the Atarantes. The section’s final chapters provide regional perspectives on human mobility and identity through cranial morphometrics and stable isotope analysis led by R. K. Power, and skeletal analysis led by F. Ricci.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 18, 2020 21:03:29 GMT -5
Burials, Migration, and Identity in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond
M. C. Gatto, D. J. Mattingly, N. Ray, and M. M. Sterry (Eds.):
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019, 561 pp., ISBN 978-1-108-47408-5
Elizabeth A. Sawchuk A frican Archaeological Review (2020)Cite this article
18 Accesses
3 Altmetric
Metrics details
The diverse array of tombs, tumuli, and other funerary monuments that dot the Sahara makes it one of the most fascinating mortuary landscapes in the world. Such features also comprise a large part of the archaeological record of the last 5000 years. Yet mortuary archaeology tends to be regionally and chronologically fragmented across multiple countries with distinct academic histories and language traditions. Synthesizing burial traditions across thousands of years and 12,000,000 km2 is also no small task, which is why few sources have taken on the Sahara as a whole.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 18, 2020 20:16:57 GMT -5
But back on topic....
All studies on aDNA and extant Aframs do NOT align with what is being taught in books about most slaves coming from the central West coast of Africa. In fact the same is true for the East coast of Africa. E-M2 was in Arabia and India BEFORE these so called slave importation.
Data emerging seem to support pre-Colombian Africans.
At Zarahan and Sage. I go where the data takes me. I don't get caught up in "what ifs" scenarios. That type of thinking quickly leads to circular arguments. I don't get into that.
FACTS based on DNA - STP and Cape Verde Jews are did NOT originate or are related to Portuguese Jews ....as what the history books tell you
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 18, 2020 20:05:34 GMT -5
OK. let me put it another way. The people who call themselves Jews of Cape Verde or STP are NOT descended or related to the so called Portuguese Jews ostracised to the Islands in the 1400-1600's. The genetic data do NOT align with what is being taught in books!!!!! In other words the books are filled with lies...eh....distortion.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 18, 2020 19:57:57 GMT -5
I have no problem with adding to threads. This is not about me or you. We agree to that. This is about information sharing and placing blacks and Africans in their rightful place in human history. Correcting all the lies that have been told and written in the last 300years.
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 17, 2020 11:00:14 GMT -5
To those who PMed me. I did request that this thread be cleaned up because it was getting off topic combined with lengthy post. From my experience, most newbies or casual readers do NOT read long post because it is too much information at one time. It is better to breakup it into smaller post.
The thread is too important and significant to be buried with off topic discussion and long post. The thread shows an organized effort in the 1700-1800's to make Egypt "white" after Europeans realized the impact AE had on Greece and European civilization.
Although I see no problem with others opening their own thread make make long post etc. But on point questions and critiquing is always welcomed. I am open to criticism.
Why? Because I can backup all that I state with cited references. ALWAYS!
|
|
|
Post by djoser-xyyman on Feb 15, 2020 22:31:03 GMT -5
^"No tradition ? " Ignoring the ethnic name calling. To the readers....her is another one. Man. This is baffling. ==== What really happened in the Trans Atlantic Slave trade. Did it really happen.? The genetic data emerging do NOT support occurrence of a Slave Trade as we were taught. ==== Ancient DNA and bioarchaeological perspectives on European and African diversity and relationships on the colonial Delaware frontier Raquel E. Fleskes1 . quote: "The African haplotypes were compared to the African mtDNA dataset with respect to their frequency and geographic distribution (Tables S3–S5). Haplogroup frequency data for L0a1, L3i, and L3e were generated, as well as corresponding sub-haplotypes, as they are more numerous than the L0a1a, L3i2, and L3e3 haplotypes alone. The absence of haplogroup sharing among the three individuals of African descent indicate that they are not related maternally and possibly originated in geographically dispersed populations in Africa. It is also possible that these persons originated from the same geographic area within a genetically heterogeneous population. The larger haplogroups (L0a1 and L3e) that included the mtDNAs of the two adult males have wide distributions and occur in moderate frequencies in areas associated with 17th century slave trading ports in west and central Africa (Walsh, 2001, 2010) (Figure 5). L0a, the basal haplogroup from which L0a1 derives, was involved in the eastern Bantu expansion into the African continent, which may explain its high frequency around Mozambique (Beleza, Gusmão, Amorim, Carracedo, & Salas, 2005; Rito et al., 2013). It is absent from the central-western coast of Nigeria, Cameroon, and Gabon. Several of the founder types of L0a leading to L0a1 are also found in Angola, suggesting some connection between the eastern and western parts of southern Africa (Beleza et al., 2005; Salas et al., 2004). Haplogroup L3e is distributed across central and southern Africa, and is also present along the western coast (Figure 5). Its derivative, L3e3, is found primarily in West Africa, although it is also present in southern and central regions (Salas et al., 2002; Soares et al., 2012). The distribution of L3e3 in the African continent likely results from persons involved in the southern Bantu agricultural expansions from West Africa carrying these mtDNAs into southwest and southern" "Specifically, L0a1a is identified in Cubans (Mendizabal et al., 2008) and Bermudians (Gaieski et al., 2011), while L3e3 has been reported in the Caribbean (Mendizabal et al., 2008; Salas, Carracedo, Richards, & Macaulay, 2005) and at high frequency in African-descent populations in Brazil (Carvalho, Bortolini, dos Santos, & Ribeiro-dosSantos, 2008; González et al., 2006; Salas et al., 2002; Silva et al., 2006). In North America, both haplogroups Le3e and L0a1 have been identified in multiple studies assaying mtDNA diversity in contemporary African American populations (Diegoli et al., 2009; Ely, Wilson, Jackson, & Jackson, 2006; Johnson et al., 2015; Salas et al., 2004). Th e L3i haplotype of the 5-year-old child (AR11) had not been reported in African-descended populations in the Americas prior to this study. This haplogroup is found almost exclusively in eastern Africa (Cerezo et al., 2016; Soares et al., 2012) (Figure 5), and the" The aDNA do NOT match the account of slavery. It the scenario is more consistent with the presence of Africans prior in the Americas prior to the European arrival.
|
|