|
Post by asante on Apr 16, 2019 12:44:16 GMT -5
CA Diop outlined some things and he was right about some tropical phenotypes- dark skin for example. Ironically his writings also debunk certain dogmas advanced today as "Afrocentric truth." DIop for example never subscribed to any "mulatto" model to explain the peopling of Kemet Yeah, Dr. Chancelor William's described the inhabitants of northern Kemet as whites and "mulattoes", while Diop says that in all likelihood they were Dravidians. I agree with the latter for a host of reasons.
Enrique Cordova what the Hell are you talking about? He directly states that the Africans with exception of the Twa, and perhaps the Khoi were for the most part absent in other regions of the continent. He makes reference to the fact that every African oral traditions validates this migration. The Kalejin who are Nilotic, have an oral tradition specifically mentioning "white Persians " destroying Upper Kemet.
"The migrations into the interior regions of Africa, he puts around the 6th century BC (as some critics have even noted), which is the same time as the Persian invasion. In 2001, I interviewed some oldmen as to why they left Egypt. They told me that they left Egypt after being attacked by a mysterious people called Kipyayamungeen. They said these people were white. (The term, "white", is a relative term, which means lighter skin color.) They say this was during the reign of Pharaoh Kipcheum. According to Dr Sambu, about 250,000 warriors left Egypt for East Africa as a result of this invasion."
Don't sneak diss sir! I have an entire thread on Niger-Congo speakers originating and dispersing from the Hapi Valley that has sat uncontested for half a decade now. The white boys always wither away when this information (based on the works of the master teachers) is presented. If you have something against this truth, then please bring it to the floor, so that we can end all of this nonsense of Niger-Congo speakers not coming from Northeast Africa.
I'm not sure if you think that our EGO'S will prevent us from acknowledging the truth, but you have it twisted if you think that EGO stands in the way of us acknowledging what really happened in antiquity that has lead to this current situation. It was the EGO within the black race imposed on one another that defeated our people, or a precursor to "nigga shat". Perhaps you should read the "Destruction of Black Civilization", if you think that it was something other than internal strife that allowed the white boys to finally succeed after beating their asses for over a millennium . Even the story as told by Herodotus (who has recently had his credibility boosted) behind the successful Persian infiltration into Kemet, wreaked of nigga shat.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 16, 2019 12:27:26 GMT -5
Yesaaah!!! Is there a link to his gofundme?
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 16, 2019 12:24:57 GMT -5
The only reason I joined this site was because it was run by our own. Anansi, Sage, Enrique, Bass, Homely. I am not sure who TheHeavy is? Do we have another "wolf in sheep" owner? He actually announced the location, and gave a tour of the building about two months ago. He says that it will open by August of this year. Where have you been? Are you black or "other"? That's exactly what it sounds like! It's so interesting how white people who like to associate themselves by proxy with hip-hop/black culture feel that they have the power to be so vocal against Dr. Umar Johnson. I had to check a "down" white boy a few weeks back, who felt that he was "in the know" enough to form and spout a negative opinion on Dr. Umar Johnson, and the black liberation struggle that he helps spearhead. Dr. Umar's powerfully truthful stance on the keeping things exclusively black has them triggered, and their little pink testes do not have the fortitude to stand on their negative opinion against a real one.
One of the reasons why I lost alot of respect for Charlamagne, was when he allowed the closet white supremacist who is his cohost of "Brilliant Idiots" Andrew Schultz, and another white boy to criticize Umar Johnson on his own show! Charla sat there letting the white boys talk all that sh*t, and never invited brother Umar Johnson on the show to clear his name. This is the reason why we have to shut out all non black folks from our affairs.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 14, 2019 16:01:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 14, 2019 15:57:38 GMT -5
Interesting to note that members are being banned from various sites for mere criticisms of those researchers. That is interesting, considering just how much of their research is parroted around on those forums as the gospel. It's almost as though their is a conspiracy to create some of those sites in order to steer the narrative in favor of those guys.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 14, 2019 12:16:06 GMT -5
Dr. Gates according to the Great Dr. John Henrick Clarke is, and has always been a "professional white azz kisser". Gates should have been thrown away after that Nile Valley - Nubia episode of his Africa series when he alluded to the racial identity of ancient Kemet as being ambiguous.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 14, 2019 12:09:22 GMT -5
He actually announced the location, and gave a tour of the building about two months ago. He says that it will open by August of this year. Where have you been? Are you black or "other"?
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 9, 2019 12:44:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 9, 2019 12:14:18 GMT -5
Says who? Other DNA data show substantial African affinity: “Results that are likely reliable are from studies that analyzed short tandem repeats (STRs) from Amarna royal mummies5 (1,300 BC), and of Ramesses III (1,200 BC)6; Ramesses III had the Y chromosome haplogroup E1b1a, an old African lineage7. Our analysis of STRs from Amarna and Ramesside royal mummies with popAffiliator18 based on the same published data5,6 indicates a 41.7% to 93.9% probability of SSA affinities (see Table 1); most of the individuals had a greater probability of affiliation with “SSA” which is not the only way to be “African”- a point worth repeating.”
Asante I was reading through a thread on forumbiodiversity and a poster said to the effect of Ramses III e1b1a is irrelevant because "The best that tells us is that he had at least 1 Central or West African ancestor. Doesn't tell us anything about his overall ancestral affiliation." My apologies for the late reply. The importance that I get from this study, is that now we have "official" proof genetically that the so-called "West African" or "Niger-Congo" speaking group as a whole were apart of the biological make up of ancient Hapi Valley civilization, and particularly Kemet. With that genetic evidence no one can no longer say that our people were not apart of that civilization. The whole notion of "you people don't have anything to do with ancient North African civilizations" that is a favorite trope on those sites has officially been silenced with that finding. Prior to this finding we still have overwhelming anthropological evidence coupled with other forms of genetic evidence (i.e. sickle cell), which proves our existence there. The issue that had arisen however was the demand for modern genetic back up, because some silly people wanted to say that the unique head shape of Niger-Congo speakers (deemed "true Negroid" by some anthropologist) was a superficial relationship. Those people tend to be quiet when I bring up sickle cell however. With the finding of E1b1a in the region now there has to be research done to account for it's presence in dynastic times, as well as an explanation as to how it ended up there. This will present a complete overhaul of Christopher Ehret's narrative of the peopling of ancient Egypt, in which he admits to the Northeast African/Sudanese Nubian origins of Niger-Congo speakers along side Cushitic speakers, but he inexplicably says that rather than migrating "north" into Kemet like the Cushitic speakers that the Niger-Congo speakers (not just the Mande) immediately headed into West Africa 12,000 years ago. This essentially debunks the "Hamitic Hypothesis" that modern proponents of "Afro-Asiatic" support on the low. PS. Question and press ANYBODY who props up Christopher Ehret or Afro-Asiatic languages, because they are likely agents trying to promote that false white supremacist narrative. That's just baseless speculation on their behalf. They have no evidence to suggest that he had any additional non African ancestry. To that I'd just tell to that they have to take what actually came from the study. No other studies on pharonic Kemites has produced anything other than African individuals. Everything else is wishful thinking on their behalf.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 8, 2019 17:49:39 GMT -5
No one can forget that the internet is the ultimate way to infiltrate into our conversation to narrate the discussion. There is no verification process to see who is who. All some people need is knowledge some corny dated "black" lingo and a profile pic with a black person on it. White folks (only them) have a history of this type of "strange" behavior throughout their recorded history. As I've stated here before (prior to seeing that Mike also has opinion) that some things in the Egyptsearch community simply do not make sense. The strict adherence of Western academia ("Afro-Asiatic" language nonsense) is clearly an attempt to undermine the works of the master teachers who have picked those lies apart decades ago. The master teachers have never really been discussed in an appropriate manner in these discussions, and when they do some people attempt to criticize there work in the condescending ways that only people from outside of the culture would. The fact that what I argue in regards to our people coming from the Hapi Valley (a fact that has been stated and proven the World over for decades now) is considered "radical" and pushed off....Why is the truth being brushed off as "radical"...BECAUSE white people are pretending to be black in these conversation in order to narrate the direction of it. It's really not that hard to see at all...and it's quite humorous actually. The fact that someone else (and other people not mentioned) has stated this is all the confirmation needed. Some folks really do not understand what "white people" are (devils), and their purpose. The internet is being used by whites as a form of mind warfare, from the constant negativity being fed to some through social media, to the fake black profiles who infiltrate into every black conversation in everything from culture to politics. Whites are SHAMELESS about this behavior, because they think that no one will catch on. Look!!! at the risk of capism I can honestly say that Zarahan has put in work at least a decade old, he is very concise , organized and to the point, personally, I couldn't ask for a better Allie in braking down the raw truth, making sense of it all, I have seen others used his talking and power points to devastating effects on other sites , including YouTube , he do us proud and He have my outmost respect.. We should be so lucky to have his contribution ....nuff respect Zarahan keep doing what u do. I didn't mention anybody by name, nor am I limiting what I say to one individual. The fact of the matter is there is an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the master teachers. Some of their contributions to the academic aspects of ancient Kemetic research It makes no sense as to why the narrative of some of Afrocentrism's most pivotal books has not been outlined, and thoroughly examined by many (if any) in the last two decades. What reason would there be to make no mention of the book that Dr. Rishidi said changed his entire life (The Destruction of Black civilization)? There are such raw points of truth in that book that resonate to this very day, but it has been muted on an "Afrocentric" crowd. The stuff in that book is hard line truth, that would make anybody non black squirm! There is a "Shea Butter" type of Afrocentrism that has narrated alot of Egyptsearch's conversations over the last year, and that is just apparent as many have noted. As far as non blacks in our conversations....If they don't have the RESPECT enough for OUR people to identify themselves as an "other", then they need to be aired out point blank period. Then for them to use that false identity to interject into their tasteless stale white washed opinions into our social-politics....Oh that is such a violation.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 7, 2019 20:49:08 GMT -5
In those types of discussions those are strictly trolls. I've GIVEN IT to some of those trolls in the comment section of Worldstar on black history, and I've gotten a ton of "likes" on my "discuss" profile from the rebuttals that I give. Those white boys trolls on those types of comments sections will NEVER respond in any adequate way to a true intellectual ass whooping given to them. Hell I've even gotten a "I can't believe that you actually wrote all of that no one's going to read it" quite a few times. That being said that they are trolls, and it is simply not worth going all the way in on them like that. egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/thread/2691/ancient-egyptian-mummy-genomes-debunked
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 7, 2019 20:26:55 GMT -5
Glad that I'm not the only one who peeped game!!! The games I've peeped is disrupters like to disrupt especially when their POV is challenged, whilst others throws shade on their behalf. No one can forget that the internet is the ultimate way to infiltrate into our conversation to narrate the discussion. There is no verification process to see who is who. All some people need is knowledge of some corny dated "black" lingo and a profile pic with a black person on it. White folks (only them) have a history of this type of "strange" behavior throughout their recorded history. As I've stated here before (prior to seeing that Mike also has that opinion) that some things in the Egyptsearch community simply do not make sense. The strict adherence of Western academia ("Afro-Asiatic" language nonsense) is clearly an attempt to undermine the works of the master teachers who have picked those lies apart decades ago. The master teachers have never really been discussed in an appropriate manner in these discussions, and when they do some people attempt to criticize their work in the condescending ways that only people from outside of the culture would. The fact that what I argue in regards to our people coming from the Hapi Valley (a fact that has been stated and proven the World over for decades now) is considered "radical" and pushed off....Why is the truth being brushed off as "radical"...BECAUSE white people are pretending to be black in these conversation in order to narrate the direction of it. It's really not that hard to see at all...and it's quite humorous actually. The fact that someone else (and other people not mentioned) has stated this is all the confirmation needed. Some folks really do not understand what "white people" are (devils), and their purpose. The internet is being used by whites as a form of mind warfare, from the constant negativity being fed to some through social media, to the fake black profiles who infiltrate into every black conversation in everything from culture to politics. Whites are SHAMELESS about this behavior, because they think that no one will catch on.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Apr 7, 2019 1:36:59 GMT -5
^Clyde: Problem is, you can't tell who is just an ignorant negro needing education, and who is a White person "Faking" Black, (Black picture, icon, and all), so as to surreptitiously control the direction and scope of intercourse. The Woody Strode character seems unduly irritated. Glad that I'm not the only one who peeped game!!!
|
|
|
Post by asante on Mar 31, 2019 13:12:10 GMT -5
I don't think there has been a single study that has spread more disinformation than the Krause study that purports that the Ancient Egyptians were somehow more related to the peoples of the Near East than any other african cultures, despite the fact that the pretty clearly migrated from the south and share more in common lingustically and culturally with Africa than with any Near Eastern cultures. Why is this clearly slanted study making so many waves when it doesn't even make sense? It's been debunked for the crap that it is, but people (I'm talking on instagram, on Reddit, and in real life) keep bringing it up like it's fact. I made an account just to vent my frustration. It's surreal. Who exactly is still promoting it? Also they didn't read the full study if they think that that 2017 study helped their case.
|
|
|
Post by asante on Mar 23, 2019 1:41:34 GMT -5
To be honest Zaharan if you're one of those "white are the same as us" types, then I'm really not interested in even entertaining these types of conversations with you..
|
|